Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives October 18 2020

• 
  • Nomination Drents-Friese Wold. Location Fochteloërveen. Biotope in the upland moor area
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 04:34, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:39, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Digging part of the frames of the Queen Anne in the Schoterveld nature reserve near Bant in Flevoland.
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 04:34, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:39, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Walking route along sand sculptures in the Kuinderbos-Flevoland. (Radio Oranje).
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 04:34, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:39, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bunker 24 in the ammunition depot in the Dernekamp hamlet, Kirchspiel, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:13, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:22, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ammunition depot in the Dernekamp hamlet, Kirchspiel, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:13, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:22, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Gable figures at Prinzipalmarkt 5, Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:13, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:21, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Plaque at St Lambert's Church, Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:13, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:21, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Door at Lange Straße, Billerbeck, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:13, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:21, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Western view of the cathedral on Domplatz #1, Gurk, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:03, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 04:14, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Clock at the northern bell tower of the cathedral on Domplatz #1, Gurk, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:03, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 04:14, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Spire of the mortuary (Agony of Jesus Christ chapel) at the cemetery on Domplatz #1, Gurk, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:03, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 04:14, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Fresco at the mortuary (Agony of Jesus Christ chapel) at the cemetery on Domplatz #1, Gurk, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:03, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 04:16, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Relief of a lion with a basilisk at the main apse of the cathedral on Domplatz #1, Gurk, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:03, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 04:16, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Spring morning. The chapel at the source of the Volga: Volgoverkhovye, Ostashkovsky district, Tver oblast --Александр Байдуков 02:23, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 04:16, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Cuningham House, Christchurch Botanic Garden --Podzemnik 01:26, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:28, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Chamaerops humilis male flowers, Christchurch Botanic Gardens --Podzemnik 01:26, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:29, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Chamaerops humilis male flowers, Christchurch Botanic Gardens --Podzemnik 01:26, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:18, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Chamaerops humilis, Christchurch Botanic Gardens --Podzemnik 01:26, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 04:17, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Euphorbia polymorpha, Christchurch Botanic Gardens --Podzemnik 01:26, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 04:17, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Picked parasol mushrooms caps in basket -- George Chernilevsky 00:08, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:07, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Parasol mushroom (Macrolepiota procera) -- George Chernilevsky 00:08, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Stepro 00:12, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Slippery Jack mushrooms in bucket -- George Chernilevsky 00:08, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Stepro 00:12, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Scots pine branch with a cone -- George Chernilevsky 00:08, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:07, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Domestic goat -- George Chernilevsky 00:08, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Great pic! --Stepro 00:12, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Station "Landgericht" of the Wuppertal Suspension Railway --Augustgeyler 23:20, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Stepro 00:12, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 25 Pfennig Notgeld banknote (1921) of Quedlinburg. --Palauenc05 20:40, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Stepro 22:22, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Battery 223, Cape May. --King of Hearts 19:51, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Stepro 22:22, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Battery 223, Cape May. --King of Hearts 19:51, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 20:45, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Cape May Lighthouse. --King of Hearts 19:51, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:31, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ural-4320 camping truck at Pfingsttreffen Pütnitz 2018 --MB-one 19:44, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 20:47, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Historical photographic studio from Kirchheim unter Teck, Germany, in the Freilichtmuseum Beuren, NNE view. --Aristeas 18:39, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 18:53, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Evening view over the old town to the castle hill with the Götzenturm in Möckmühl, Germany. --Aristeas 18:39, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 18:53, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ushkaloyskie Towers in Chechnya, Russia --SoloveiYegor 19:35, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Poor processing. Posterization as a result of very strong noise reduction --George Chernilevsky 18:43, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Black wood spider (Nephila kuhlii) --Charlesjsharp 17:51, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ercé 18:22, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Portugal, Rio Alcobaça in Alcobaça at the Rua Doutor José Nascimento e Sousa --Berthold Werner 17:36, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 17:49, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Portas da Cidade, Ponta Delgada, São Miguel Island, Azores, Portugal --Poco a poco 17:34, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Berthold Werner 17:36, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Gonçalo Velho Square, Ponta Delgada, São Miguel Island, Azores, Portugal --Poco a poco 17:34, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 18:39, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View of Horta from Monte da Guia, Faial Island, Azores, Portugal --Poco a poco 17:34, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ercé 18:24, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View of Horta from Monte da Guia, Faial Island, Azores, Portugal --Poco a poco 17:34, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 18:46, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A wine glass in a vineyard --Itu 16:12, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support QI although there may be a slight ccw tilt --Poco a poco 17:38, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sacro Cuore di Gesù church in Brescia. --Moroder 15:01, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:38, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination San Giuseppe church in Brescia. --Moroder 15:01, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:41, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Hamburg-Rahlstedt, residential buildings Remstedtstraße 4 to 10 --Dirtsc 14:54, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Aristeas 18:40, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Hamburg-Rahlstedt, villa Wehlbrook 12 --Dirtsc 14:54, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Stepro 22:22, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Hamburg-Rahlstedt, church in Hohenhorst --Dirtsc 14:54, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:41, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ivy growing over the walls of the University of Cambridge, UK. By User:Jorgeroyan --Andrew J.Kurbiko 11:36, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 12:24, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ivy growing over the walls of the University of Cambridge, UK. By User:Jorgeroyan --Andrew J.Kurbiko 11:36, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:41, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The granite sculptures of Sesostris III. British Museum, London, UK. By User:Jorgeroyan --Andrew J.Kurbiko 11:36, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 18:48, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Children in a school visit sorrounding the Lely's Venus. British Museum, London, UK. By User:Jorgeroyan --Andrew J.Kurbiko 11:36, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 20:43, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Kilpisjärvi seen from Saana fell. --Kallerna 11:17, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 11:44, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Vestbreen glacier. --Kallerna 11:10, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 11:44, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ruohtogorži waterfall, Lyngsdalselva river, Lyngen, Norway. --Kallerna 11:10, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:41, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Théâtre de l'Odéon, Paris 6e (by DXR) --Sebring12Hrs 10:49, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:41, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Prachatice coat of arms at the facade of the Lower Gate in Prachatice, Czech Republic. --MIGORMCZ 10:28, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:43, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Eglise de Saint-Lambert, Paris 15e, East View (by DXR) --Sebring12Hrs 10:29, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Trougnouf 10:58, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Central building of Parc Georges-Brassens, Paris 15e (by DXR) Sebring12Hrs 10:11, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:43, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bumblebee (Bombus) on a flower (Asteraceae) in Porspoder (Finistère, France). --Gzen92 09:40, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:41, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Domestic goat (1) -- George Chernilevsky 09:40, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:43, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Domestic goat (2) -- George Chernilevsky 09:40, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --MB-one 16:20, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mercedes-Benz W211 E (Avantgarde). --Gordito1869 08:32, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Withdrawn
    Good exept for the improper blurring of the license plate --MB-one 16:18, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
     I withdraw my nomination --Gordito1869 18:38, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination War memorial in Harsdorf --Ermell 07:30, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 09:43, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Inn to the fir tree in Harsdorf --Ermell 07:30, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 09:43, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Level crossing at Harsdorf health train station, Bayreuth. --Ermell 07:30, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 09:46, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Trumpet tree (Catalpa bignonioides) in the Hain (Sadtpark) in Bamberg --Ermell 07:30, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 09:40, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 7 Market Square in Świdnica 2 --Jacek Halicki 07:04, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 10:25, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 8 Market Square in Świdnica 1 --Jacek Halicki 07:04, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 10:27, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 8 Market Square in Świdnica 2 --Jacek Halicki 07:04, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 10:27, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Oudlajan Bazaar By User:Yare zaman2000 --Hanooz 06:55, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Very good composition. --Augustgeyler 23:14, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ancien hôtel des Postes and surrounding buildings during golden hour (Place Verte, Charleroi, Belgium) --Trougnouf 05:39, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:11, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Shell of a Grove snail, Cepaea nemoralis --Llez 05:35, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Peulle 06:33, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Madonna and child, Overdoor of the main portal of the pilgrimage church Maria zu den Ketten, Zell am Harmersbach, Germany --Llez 05:35, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:11, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Laetiporus sulphureus. Location, Stuttebosch in the lime valley. Friesland province.
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 04:31, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:17, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Tower of the Nicolaaskerk (Hemelum) is a hall church built in 1668.
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 04:31, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:17, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Drents-Friese Wold. Location Fochteloërveen. Biotope in the upland moor area.
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 04:31, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:17, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Дмитриевская церковь: улица Сельская, 23а, Пантыл, Белохолуницкий район, Кировская областьЭто фотография памятника культурного наследия России c номеромЯ, владелец авторских прав на это произведение, добровольно публикую его на условиях следующей лицензии:Это изображение было загружено в рамках соревнования Вики любит памятники — 2020. --Ele-chudinovsk 07:13, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose strong chromatic aberration against the sky and noisy at the bottom --George Chernilevsky 16:52, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bonifacio--Tesla 23:16, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline Not sharp enough --Michielverbeek 05:22, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Federal Constitutional Court of Germany. Renonination. Ich habe das die Helligkeit erhöht. --Asmodea Oaktree 21:56, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
    Please make the building on the right vertical, it's leaning left --Podzemnik 01:06, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
     Oppose It was nominated again above... --Podzemnik 01:21, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
    Comment I have corrected the perspctive . This is the second nomination I have withdrawn the first. --Asmodea Oaktree 08:30, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Houses, 6 & 8 rue Esquermoise in Lille, France --Velvet 10:41, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Aristeas 18:44, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sculpture of a rooster in De Haan (Belgium), Roger Meert. --Gordito1869 09:30, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Withdrawn
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:52, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
     I withdraw my nomination --Gordito1869 18:52, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Installation ship "Innovation", Antwerpen, Belgium --Gordito1869 13:23, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Withdrawn
    CA, noisy sky, perspective correction needed --Poco a poco 17:48, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
     I withdraw my nomination --Gordito1869 15:38, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sculpture Lucy Loes, Josiane Vanhoutte, Ostend, Belgium. --Gordito1869 13:06, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Withdrawn
    I'd crop a portion on the left to reduced disturbing elements from the background and balance it better --Poco a poco 17:49, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
     I withdraw my nomination --Gordito1869 18:40, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Crab (Cancridae) in Telgruc-sur-Mer (Finistère, France). --Gzen92 10:03, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 00:51, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
    is this alive please? --Charlesjsharp 10:34, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
    Yes, 10 minutes after leaving the fishpond.
     Support Good quality. --MIGORMCZ 15:37, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Brewery d'Achouffe, Belgium. --Gordito1869 08:31, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Withdrawn
     Oppose Sorry, tilted CCW, unsharp, looks like JPEG artifacts. F/3.5 isn't a good choice for sharpness, at least f/8 would be better. --XRay 08:37, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
     I withdraw my nomination --Gordito1869 15:22, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Transept of the Aulne Abbey during golden hour --Trougnouf 06:47, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Dirtsc 06:10, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Columns and front door of the Emir of Bukhara's house: 44-b Kamennoostrovsky Avenue, Petrogradsky district, Saint Petersburg --Александр Байдуков 02:25, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Well and precisely composed, good level of detail. The perspective distortion at the columns is not disturbing the compostion. --Augustgeyler 20:43, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Stockton Manor, Cape May. --King of Hearts 01:32, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    I'm not sure, but it looks like tilted CW. --XRay 06:05, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
    I don't think so. This is an old house, so a lot of the lines do not line up, and some will be crooked one way or another. Most of the verticals are perfectly straight. The horizontal line at the top is slightly tilted, but if you tried to correct it, other horizontal lines would get bent. Anyways horizontal perspective correction has never been a requirement at QIC. --King of Hearts 21:51, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
     Support So it should be OK. --XRay 16:54, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bush canopy (Dracophyllum latifolium on the right) during sunset --Podzemnik 00:41, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support very good quality and well composed. --Augustgeyler 10:45, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Gun embrasure of the Menshikov Bastion Peter and Paul fortress, the Eastern part of Petrogradsky district, Saint Petersburg --Александр Байдуков 02:15, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Well composed, good level of detail and well balanced lighting. --Augustgeyler 20:43, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A "feeding prohibited"-sign in Trogen. --PantheraLeo1359531 20:26, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 10:45, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sculpture of Denis Diderot, Frédéric-Auguste Bartholdi 1884, Langres (France). --Gordito1869 06:58, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Withdrawn Good focus to the main object, but it needs a perspective correction. Please look to the verticals in the background --Michielverbeek 08:54, 11 October 2020 (UTC). New uploaded - with perspetive correction.--Gordito1869 15:45, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
    It is still not straight enough (see note), please look to the left --Michielverbeek 07:20, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
     Not done--Gordito1869 07:33, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
     I withdraw my nomination --Gordito1869 15:18, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Crab fishing on horseback in Brendene (Belgium). --Gordito1869 17:16, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose It is a very good scene. But there is sharpness missing. The horse and the person at the right are completely out of focus. --Augustgeyler 09:27, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
     I withdraw my nomination --Gordito1869 15:17, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Leeuwarden-NL, the Mercurius fountain designed by Gustav Adolf Bredow --Michielverbeek 22:01, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Place du Trocadéro-et-du-11-Novembre, Paris --Paris 16 17:48, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: A bench in Trogen. --PantheraLeo1359531 15:44, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Flower of Rosa cultivar 'Gartentraume'. --Salicyna 15:17, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Flower of Rosa cultivar 'Jubilee Celebration'. --Salicyna 15:17, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Obecni Dum Restaurant, Prague. By User:Jorgeroyan --Andrew J.Kurbiko 10:05, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Review + sharp and clean, but could you extend the crop at the left a bit so the glass is not cropped? --Tesla 18:47, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Obecni Dum Restaurant, Prague. By User:Jorgeroyan --Andrew J.Kurbiko 10:05, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Review
    Purple chromatic aberration on the edge of the window. Also minor perspective distortion --Jakubhal 13:49, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Masouleh village By User:Javadrezaeisalanghouch --Hanooz 08:58, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Review That's quite interesting, but: (1) Since this camera is capable of 6000 x 4000 pixels, this photo could have been downsampled by as much as 1/2. (2) It's unsharp at this size. So I'd like User:Javadrezaeisalanghouch to upload the full-size version if there is one and then see whether they can increase the picture's sharpness without damaging anything else about it. If not, this might be a useful valued image if nominated at COM:VIC in the right scope, but I'm not sure it would be a quality image. -- Ikan Kekek 11:35, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
    I left a message on their talk page. Hanooz 15:37, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Crab fishing on horseback in Brendene (Belgium) --Gordito1869 08:40, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Withdrawn
     Oppose Too small, not particularly sharp --Trougnouf 10:51, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
     I withdraw my nomination --Gordito1869 15:16, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Art Nouveau Building Facade with Sculptured Balcony in Historic Quarter of Latvia's Riga (5 Vilandes street) --Scotch Mist 06:12, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 20:43, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Courtyard of the Emir of Bukhara. 44-b Kamennoostrovsky Prospekt. Saint-Petersburg --Александр Байдуков 02:30, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Review
    Please check your image, the horizontal line (top and bottom) is not horizontal. --XRay 05:13, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Norderport, Visby city wall. --ArildV 07:30, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Review
    Nice, there is just a dust spot in the top-right corner (see image note). --Aristeas 13:52, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Chapel of Notre-Dame-de-Rocamadour and Vauban tower in Camaret-sur-Mer (Finistère, France). --Gzen92 06:39, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Review Foreground is not sharp and IMO it is better to crop it. IMO it is a quality image if you would emphasize the two main objects and the clouds, please don't crop the ships --Michielverbeek 05:11, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Kitchen in Telgruc-sur-Mer (Finistère, France). --Gzen92 07:50, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --MB-one 16:26, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Chapel in Lutomia Dolna 2 --Jacek Halicki 07:34, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose cluttered composition --MB-one 16:24, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Tram Cables behind Latvian Freedom Monument symbolizing Latvia breaking away from the restraints of the past --Scotch Mist 05:47, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Withdrawn
     Oppose Composition is spoiled by the overhead lines --MB-one 09:48, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
    Thank you for your review - the overhead lines were deliberately photographed against the 'backdrop'of the 'Freedom Monument' because of the 'symbolism' in portrying Latvia's recent history which I felt was re-inforced with the Liberty Statue seemingly emerging from the clouds of despair (under foreign rule) - accept this 'composition' will not work for everyone but thought I would pass this for the opinions of others --~~~~ --Scotch Mist 05:18, 15 October 2020 (UTC)  Oppose I don't mind overhead cables in a composition, but the monument in the background is much too dark and does not seem to be as well in focus. I understand that it may have been your intention to focus on the cables more than the monument, but in that case I would expect to see exceptionally good details on the cable (for QI) and that's far from being the case as they are mostly shadows like typical overhead cables. --Trougnouf 10:48, 15 October 2020 (UTC))
     I withdraw my nomination @Trougnouf: Essentially I do not disagree with your view!:) --Scotch Mist 14:32, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Leijepolder pumping station. Wetterskip Fryslân in Súdwest-Fryslân.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:46, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:05, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

Consensual review

File:Ambiorix_statue_on_the_Grote_Markt_of_Tongeren_(DSCF4344).jpg

• Nomination Ambiorix statue on the Grote Markt of Tongeren (Belgium) --Trougnouf 14:00, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Oppose Some of the main parts are underexposed (too dark shadows). --Gordito1869 11:26, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

•  Comment I disagree, detail is visible throughout the whole statue. --Trougnouf 11:48, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

•  Done new version uploaded with less harsh contrasts --Trougnouf 12:06, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

•  Support Better now. --Gordito1869 15:08, 15 October 2020 (UTC)

•  Support The new version looks good. Greetings --Dirtsc 06:30, 15 October 2020 (UTC)

Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Augustgeyler 18:57, 17 October 2020 (UTC)

==

• Nomination Latvian Freedom Monument – Independence Memorial in Riga (rear angle) --Scotch Mist 05:47, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support Good quality. --MB-one 09:48, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose hardly tilted, and fundament of the monument is partially cropped --Augustgeyler 18:48, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

•  Comment @Augustgeyler: As indicated this photograph was taken at a different "angle" from the conventional so issues of tilt and perspective are a calculated compromise, as is the cropping (because to show all of the substantial base of the monument would have significantly altered the photograph from what I had first conceived). Of course as this is not a 'straightforward' photograph others will have different but perfectly valid opinions on this but it seems disrespectful, and I believe generally outside of accepted practice here, to regularly 'oppose' the reviews of others who take the time to provide initial reviews. Almost every image nominated for QI could be questioned on one level or another, some simply on the basis of a lack of contrast making images appear dull and uninteresting, but if we all spent time questioning every one else's reviews the end result would likely be that many fewer images would be nominated for QI because not everyone has the time to engage in sometimes protracted discussions. As you appear to have plenty of time on your hands, I would respectfully suggest that you use this to review previously un-reviewed images which I think would be a more constructive use of your talents, especially if you come to appreciate a broader range of perspectives!:) --Scotch Mist 05:38, 15 October 2020 (UTC)

•  Comment Dear @Scotch Mist: I am very sorry if you thought I am not respectful for others reviews or your nominations in general. I do respect them. I try to review more unreviewed images than those which are reviewed by others. In that special case, I took the time to carefully check your nomination. Than I found, that it might not meet the guidelines. This has nothing to do whether I would like your image in an exhibition or on instagram. I personally like it. But here I came to the conclusion, that your nomination at least should be discussed. Perhaps I am wrong. Let's see what other find. --Augustgeyler 09:35, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Comment @Augustgeyler: Thank you for your further comment - appreciate the time taken to review the images of others but perhaps overall you could better balance the number of images you 'oppose' with the number of your reviews that provide constructive feedback or which you 'support' - please see my response to Trougnouf below --Scotch Mist 14:02, 15 October 2020 (UTC)

•  Oppose I don't understand the issue. The image is tilted, and the contrast is too harsh imo. Those issues seem to be easily fixable (-2.1degrees, lighter shadows). If you prefer to leave it at that then you are welcome to, but understand that it doesn't meet the QI image guidelines so there is no point in arguing for a label that simply shows that it meets these guidelines. Not all angles, subjects, and conditions can meet those guidelines, and it's fine to have images that are not QI (They can even be "Valued images"). If you believe that you have exceptional images then Commons:Featured picture candidates is the place to post, where artistic vision is valued and the image guidelines are not as strictly followed. --Trougnouf 06:42, 15 October 2020 (UTC)

•  Comment @Trougnouf:  Done Thank you for your feedback - essentially differences of opinion on the technical aspects of this image are not so much the issue here (have already uploaded a new version with a 'tilt adjustment' based on the central vertical of the column, rather than a base sculpture vertical that I thought made the image better 'balanced' aesthetically, and have lightened the shadows) but the repeated opposing of the expressed support of others, even when opposition seems more subjective than technical. Of course if it is spotted that a reviewer has missed the fact that the resolution of an image is below the stipulated cut-off, then this is not a subjective opinion, but often levels of brightness/darkness and contrast, as well as cropping are more subjective and IMHO some discretion should be left with the photographer who created the image. Over recent weeks Augustgeyler has 'opposed' many images, not just mine, often after those images have already been promoted by third parties, yet Augustgeyler has rarely provided a 'non-opposing constructive review' advising possible improvements (in my case never) which overall either results in many more images requiring consensual discussion, or regrettably, in generally discouraging the nomination of more images for QI. This does not mean that the promotion of images should not be opposed, especially on clear technical grounds, but where others have taken the time to review images IMO their views should generally be respected except when obvious errors have occurred such as 'dust spots' missed or important features cropped or omitted. --Scotch Mist 14:02, 15 October 2020 (UTC)

•  Support Thank you! I think the sky could use some denoising but it's definitely in the realm of QI now.
  I very much appreciate oppose votes, whether they are the initial vote or a discussion.They are much more difficult to give out than a simple "Good quality." which never demands argumentation. I think many people will leave pictures unreviewed because they see a flaw that they would like corrected but they don't voice it for various reasons (don't think the fix would be enough for QI, simply unsure, don't know how to argument it, there is unwanted required followup if it's not a direct oppose, not wanting to hurt one's feelings, ...) and so the submitter never gets constructive criticism or any feedback. Likewise there are many flaws that go unnoticed so pointing them out and moving pictures to discussion helps ensure that the quality standards remain, otherwise this whole thing is rather pointless. (There is no taking back the QI label after 48h, it's timeless.) This also puts less pressure on reviewers and so someone new and less experimented won't necessarily be as intimidated to review knowing that it may be checked over. Some reviewers may be distracted (there are a lot of pixels to look at in an image, approximately 6 millions at a reasonable zoom level imo) and some reviewers care more about some aspects than others while ultimately all of the guidelines should be followed. Finally some reviewers accidentally cross the fine line between subjective and objective, and the discussion is the perfect place to collectively draw these lines and attempt reaching a consensus. I haven't followed most of this but I often agree with the discussions that are currently in place due to User:Augustgeyler's reviews. Also I see an instance where an image was opposed and User:Augustgeyler moved it to discussion (File:Amalfi_Cathedral_-_Duomo_di_Amalfi_(4908).jpg), or an image was promoted by User:Augustgeyler but it was opposed (File:Zingzing_Bar_Suraj_Tal_Himachal_Jul19_D72_10907.jpg). Of course this is anecdotal evidence of this moment rather than a few weeks, so in the absence of contradictory evidence my best course of action is to Commons:Assume good faith. --Trougnouf 16:41, 15 October 2020 (UTC)

•  Neutral Thank you Trougnouf! I supported images in the first place which where opposed by others later, as well as I opposed nominations after others had supported them. I do not see any problem with both situations because both can help finding the best conclusion. In this case I saw MB-one supporting the nomination with "Good quality". So I tried to carefully argument my oppose. The edit improved the image in my eyes, so I changed to neutral. --Augustgeyler (talk) 20:12, 15 October 2020 (UTC)

•  Comment In general, I agree with Trougnouf. I would not oppose the image for the contrast, but I think, the tilt should be corrected and you should clarify the description to show that it is a view from the "back side". Greetings --Dirtsc 06:47, 15 October 2020 (UTC)

 Comment @Dirtsc:  Done Thank you for your comment - see above response to Trougnouf (corrected image uploaded) --Scotch Mist 14:02, 15 October 2020 (UTC)

 Support now. It looks better than before and the crop of the base isn't disturbing. Thanks for your explanation. I can understand quite a lot of your feelings, it's always discouraging, if there comes only the rejection of the nomination and not a constructive review. Greetings --Dirtsc 16:21, 15 October 2020 (UTC)

Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Augustgeyler 18:59, 17 October 2020 (UTC)

File:Wartehäusle_in_Trogen_An_der_Zech_20201002_DSC4168.jpg

• Nomination A bus stop in Trogen. --PantheraLeo1359531 19:25, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support Good quality. --Tesla 18:10, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Inadequate lighting situation. Main object is in shadow with very low contrast. --Augustgeyler 12:58, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Alright in my opinion. -- Ikan Kekek 05:31, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Not the best lighting conditions, but there's nothing really technically wrong with the image.--Peulle 08:54, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Support per Peulle. (unsigned votes are not countable --Augustgeyler 09:38, 14 October 2020 (UTC))
•  Neutral IMO the image is improvable. Contrast in the shadows should be better to see more details, sky should be improved too. --XRay 17:10, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Augustgeyler 09:36, 17 October 2020 (UTC)

File:Old_Town,_Zadar_(P1080837).jpg

• Nomination Entrance to the Rector's Palace in the Old town of Zadar, Croatia --MB-one 13:53, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Comment Please fix the vertical lines --Moroder 10:43, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Insufficient quality. Not done in 7 days --Moroder 15:24, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

•  Done Uploaded new version --MB-one 09:24, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Support--Moroder 09:44, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

•  Oppose This is definitely not the "Old town of Zadar", just a house badly cropped on the right. --Palauenc05 21:46, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

• Oppose vote withdrawn after correction. --Palauenc05 14:12, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

•  Support Acceptable to me. -- Ikan Kekek 05:33, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
• "Quality images shall have a meaningful file name ... and have an accurate description". This is the part of a house, not the "Old town of Zadar". --Palauenc05 08:11, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose with Palauenc05. --Augustgeyler (talk) 08:56, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

• @Palauenc05 and Augustgeyler: Thank you for the reviews. Adjusted the file description accordingly. --MB-one 09:58, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

•  Neutral thank you! --Augustgeyler 18:34, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Augustgeyler 09:37, 17 October 2020 (UTC)