Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives October 12 2020

• 
  • Nomination View of Picton Harbour, Marlborough Region, New Zealand. --Tournasol7 03:48, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:53, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Pareloup Lake near Salles-Curan, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 03:48, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:15, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Window of the Saint John Baptist of Capdenac, Lot, France. --Tournasol7 03:48, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:53, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lake of Villefranche-de-Panat, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 03:48, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:15, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Gargoyles at the St. Lamberti Church in Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:44, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:46, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ammunition depot in the Dernekamp hamlet, Kirchspiel, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:44, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:46, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Building “An den Speichern 13” in the Speicherstadt in the Coerde district in Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:44, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:46, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Gable figures at Prinzipalmarkt 5, Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:44, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:48, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination St Lambert's Church, Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:44, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:48, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Dufferin Terrace, Quebec city --Wilfredor 03:02, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Sorry, resolution should be better and the image is not sharp enough. --XRay 03:48, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination D'Youville, QuebecI --Wilfredor 03:02, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 03:49, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Maison Mère-MalletI --Wilfredor 03:02, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 03:54, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Celtic Cross at the Artillery ParkI --Wilfredor 03:02, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:31, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Hospital church Holy Spirit and former hospital, nowadays school, on Hauptstrasse, Straßburg, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:54, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 03:50, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 03:59, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Curtain wall at the former bishop`s castle on Schlossweg #6, Straßburg, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:54, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 03:50, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Rectory, parish church Saint Margaret, cemetery with lantern of the dead and ossuary in Lieding, Straßburg, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:54, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 03:50, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 03:57, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bishop’s portal in the curtain wall (1685) of the former bishop`s castle on Schlossweg #6, Straßburg, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:54, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 03:53, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 03:55, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Northwestern view of the city parish church Saint Nicholas on Hauptplatz #1a and the municipal hall on Hauptplatz #1, Straßburg, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:54, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. But: Please have a look to the verticals. And may be you can reduce the midtone lights (for the front of the church). --XRay 03:53, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
     Done @XRay: Thanks for your review. I made two minor corrections. —- Johann Jaritz 04:14, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Path around Lake Lavarone in winter. --Lion-hearted85 23:34, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --King of Hearts 02:05, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Acqua alta floods a fondamenta of Venice.--Lion-hearted85 23:34, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --King of Hearts 02:05, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Landmark Center, Boston. --King of Hearts 23:00, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:33, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Boston Common. --King of Hearts 23:00, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lion-hearted85 23:39, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Boston Public Garden. --King of Hearts 23:00, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lion-hearted85 23:39, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Boston Public Garden. --King of Hearts 23:00, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lion-hearted85 23:39, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Damwoude-NL, the Akkerwoude church --Michielverbeek 22:01, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --King of Hearts 02:05, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Leeuwarden-NL, sculpture Us Mem designed by Gerhardus Jan Adema --Michielverbeek 22:01, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:36, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lamborghini Huracán Perfomante at IAA 2017 --MB-one 21:36, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --King of Hearts 02:05, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Wood burning using a fresnel lens and solar energy at Maker Faire Berlin 2018, FEZ Wuhlheide --MB-one 21:36, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Sorry, but the peace of wood is not in focus. --Augustgeyler 21:46, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sailing ship Freedom in Eckernförde --MB-one 21:36, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 21:46, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Dial-side of an ETA-ESA 255.461 watch movement. -- Kaffe42 20:42, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Unfortunately low DoF and overall too soft. --MB-one 21:38, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Spaso-Preobrazhensky Cathedral, Pereslavl-Zalessky, Yaroslavl region --AlixSaz 17:37, 9 October 2020(UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Very good quality. Rich of detail. --Augustgeyler 21:46, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Alexander Nevsky Church, Pereslavl-Zalessky, Yaroslavl region --AlixSaz 17:05, 9 October 2020(UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:08, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:30, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Art deco building by Marcel Depelsenaire (1935) in Charleroi. --Jmh2o 16:26, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:08, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Flower of Rosa cultivar 'Brother Cadfael'. --Salicyna 15:17, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:08, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Flower of Rosa cultivar 'Geoff Hamilton'. --Salicyna 15:17, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose DOF/Focus problem --Poco a poco 19:29, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Flower of Rosa cultivar 'Grace'. --Salicyna 15:17, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:08, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
• * Nomination Monument to V. I. Lenin. Prospekt Mira, at the Northern entrance to the VVC, Ostankinsky, North-Eastern district, Moscow.--AlixSaz 15:05, 9 October 2020(UTC) * Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 20:38, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Nomination Monument to V. I. Lenin. Prospekt Mira, at the Northern entrance to the VVC, Ostankinsky, North-Eastern district, Moscow.--AlixSaz 15:05, 9 October 2020(UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 20:38, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The river Neckar in Tübingen, Germany, in autumn 2015. --Aristeas 13:45, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Beautiful and good quality --Jakubhal 13:47, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Fortification walls of Nahargarh Fort in Jaipur --Jakubhal 13:44, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Very good. -- Ikan Kekek 00:19, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Belgium Amber-beer in the evening sun. --Gordito1869 10:59, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Description is pretty vague (doesn't mention the type of beer), the perspective is vertically straight but otherwise pretty random (edge of the table in the foreground), so is the background (person's cut off head around the glass), and there is mention of a sun but the sky is dark gray; it looks like it's overexposed and was post-processed to a gray gradient instead of white. --Trougnouf 11:51, 9 October 2020 (UTC) - Info : Sorry, the missed "type of beer" is Amberbier / Amber-beer : https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amberbier
• 
  • Nomination Zebra mother and child, Nairobi National Park, Kenya. --Tagooty 10:21, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline  Oppose Not sharp. -- Ikan Kekek 11:21, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Obecni Dum Restaurant, Prague. By User:Jorgeroyan --Andrew J.Kurbiko 10:05, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline  Oppose I really like the composition, but I regret that this photo is in my opinion not sharp enough for QI. Also, the file description is insufficient, and the same file description shouldn't be used for all the files in this series. -- Ikan Kekek 11:19, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Hanging 50's bar neon sign. Havana (La Habana), Cuba. By User:Jorgeroyan --Andrew J.Kurbiko 10:05, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality to my mind. -- Ikan Kekek 11:23, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Hartebeest, Nairobi National Park, Kenya. --Tagooty 09:54, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Strong noise --Jakubhal 13:45, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Night shot of the Bjertnes lake in Nannestad, Norway--TommyG 09:37, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Very good quality. --Augustgeyler 13:42, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Chahkooh Canyon By User:Lionne210885 --Hanooz 08:58, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. Some of the foreground is slightly (not even very) unsharp, clearly by choice. -- Ikan Kekek 11:26, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Blue Mosque By User:Hameddaeipic --Hanooz 08:58, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tagooty 09:13, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Maison Weymer (tabac-presse) Cours de la Liberté (Lyon). --Benoît Prieur 08:21, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:48, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The new Altar inside the New Cathedral in Linz. --Mosbatho 08:08, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Hanooz 09:25, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Saint John the Baptist church in Mościsko 2 --Jacek Halicki 07:43, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Mosbatho 08:11, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination House No. 38 in Opoczka --Jacek Halicki 07:43, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:48, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Park in Piława Dolna --Jacek Halicki 07:43, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:49, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Town hall, Praia do Vitória, Terceira Island, Azores, Portugal --Poco a poco 07:27, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 07:39, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Exemplar of pohutukawa (Metrosideros excelsa), Ponta Delgada, São Miguel Island, Azores, Portugal --Poco a poco 07:27, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:46, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Innergschlöss --Tesla 06:48, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    Good composition. But: Green CA along the entire edge of the mountain. --Tagooty 10:24, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
     Info Thank you for the feedback, i'll fix theese issues soon. --Tesla 11:51, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
     Done removed aberrations. --Tesla 17:14, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Tagooty 01:28, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View over the Calanque de Sugiton. --Tesla 06:48, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Hanooz 06:57, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Fanal in Camaret-sur-Mer (Finistère, France). --Gzen92 06:30, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Sky is a little grainy but OK. Good quality. Just so you know, this isn't a lantern. A lantern is a portable light, such as one with an oil lamp inside. This is a lighthouse. -- Ikan Kekek 11:40, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
    Google translate... It's fanal Gzen92 11:59, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
    Which is given as an archaic word in English. As I said, the word is "lighthouse". -- Ikan Kekek 00:25, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lantern in Camaret-sur-Mer (Finistère, France). --Gzen92 06:30, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 11:40, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination eggs of black-naped tern - Oeufs de Sterne diamant --Ercé 06:30, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Hanooz 06:32, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Shell of an Angas's Volva, Pellasimnia angasi --Llez 06:17, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:28, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lissabon, Parque Eduardo VII, Pavilhão Carlos Lopes --Berthold Werner 06:14, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 06:18, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Facade of Art Nouveau Building in Historic Quarter of Riga (4a Strelnieku street) --Scotch Mist 06:12, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:35, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
     Comment Sharpness is a little questionable again, but I won't oppose and just wanted to compliment you on your very good sense of composition. If you could take a photo like this and make it very sharp (and in more even light), it could possibly be a good FP nominee. -- Ikan Kekek 11:43, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
    @Ikan Kekek: Thank you for your kind comment - have attempted to sharpen and improve image white balance --Scotch Mist 19:01, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sphinx 'guarding' Isaiah Berlin Memorial Plaque at 2a Alberta street in 'Art Nouveau' Historic Quarter of Riga --Scotch Mist 06:12, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:33, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Kaspar Röckelein KG plant in Altendorf in the Bamberg district --Ermell 06:12, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:31, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Door of the catholic chapel in Kirchahorn --Ermell 06:12, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 06:14, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Kaspar Röckelein KG plant in Altendorf in the Bamberg district --Ermell 06:12, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 06:15, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Train station in Bamberg --Ermell 06:12, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 06:16, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Fendt 412 Vario with Horsch Terrano 3 FX cultivator on a field near Bamberg --Ermell 06:12, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Llez 06:18, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Tree stump with heart and arrow, Vienna. --Tsui 22:35, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Trougnouf 07:47, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Breitenseer Lichtspiele, Vienna. --Tsui 22:35, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Too much noise, shadows are very dark and these settings don't allow getting details back. Shutter speed is unnecessarily fast (1/250s for a static scene). Static scene at night -> use a tripod and base ISO for a QI, ideally even HDR to capture the huge dynamic range --Trougnouf 07:21, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Breitenseer Lichtspiele, Vienna. --Tsui 22:35, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Too much noise. Static scene at night -> use a tripod and base ISO --Trougnouf 07:21, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
     Comment I still like the atmosphere. But you're right, the images could be better using a tripod and the according settings. --Tsui 19:06, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sigrid Horn (Trio) live. --Tsui 22:35, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Withdrawn * Comment Guess it is, even considering the rather horrible light conditions there, not really sharp enough. There will be other live pics to nominate. --Tsui 19:02, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Another early 20th century façade with mascaron in Vienna. --Tsui 22:35, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Berthold Werner 06:14, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Chapell in Bamberg Wildensorg --Ermell 08:45, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Aristeas 13:51, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Statue of Giuseppe Tartini, Piran, Slovenia --Isiwal 07:37, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 06:22, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Walking route along sand sculptures in the Kuinderbos-Flevoland. (A bridge too far).
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 04:40, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. May be a little bit too warm. --XRay 04:43, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
    Question: do you want me to change the photos?--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:15, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
    Answer If you like, change the WB. If not, it's OK too. --XRay 11:27, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Overgrown fairly wet habitat. Location, Stuttebosch in the lime valley. Friesland province.
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 04:40, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. WB a little bit too warm. --XRay 04:43, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
    Question: do you want me to change the photos?--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:15, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
    Answer If you like, change the WB. If not, it's OK too. --XRay 11:27, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ducks on reflecting water in the evening --Tesla 21:57, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    Excellent lighting and composition. The second duck is a bit fuzzy. Both ducks are grainy (overprocessing? or try noise reduction). Add species category (my guess is Mallard?). --Tagooty 01:35, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
     Done Done, sharpness added, and reduced noise, category added --Tesla 12:57, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
     Support Good quality --Tagooty 06:05, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Church of the Assumption of the Blessed Virgin Mary. Studzionka, Silesian Voivodeship, Poland. --Halavar 16:10, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    Possible to add some sharpness? --Ermell 18:18, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
     Done Yes, of course. Sharpness added. Hope it's better now:) --Halavar 21:41, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
     Support better --Ermell 13:39, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination St. Roch church. Zamarski, Silesian Voivodeship, Poland. --Halavar 16:10, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 13:41, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View of the Kach-Keshene crypt against the background of the village of Bulungu --Александр Байдуков 18:13, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 21:46, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Upper shopping malls (GUM). Moscow --AlixSaz 12:49, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Comment A very impressive image. But can you reduce the chromatic aberations at the roof? --Augustgeyler 21:26, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
     Done Oк, the chromatic aberration removed..--AlixSaz 10:02, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
     Support Improved. QI now. --Augustgeyler 21:46, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Palace in Krzyżowa 2 --Jacek Halicki 07:31, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    A COA category would be good! --Scotch Mist 06:12, 6 October 2020 (UTC)@Scotch Mist:  Done--Jacek Halicki 16:27, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 10:06, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 2016 Brussels bombings memorial in the Sonian forest, with a human sitting during golden hour --Trougnouf 07:41, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    CA should be removed. --Ermell 07:57, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
     Done thank you --Trougnouf 09:06, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 13:59, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Saver 830 Cabin at Interboot 2020, Friedrichshafen --MB-one 11:26, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Small motorboat "Boby" on Saaler Bodden --MB-one 11:26, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: iFi Pro audio equipment at Internationale Funkausstellung 2018, Berlin --MB-one 11:26, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Petroglyphs of the kalbak-Tash tract. Ongudaysky district of the Altai Republic --Александр Байдуков 10:18, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Kronshtadt. Grave of Colonel N. A. Alexandrov and captain A. A. Vrochinsky, who died on July 19, 1906. --Александр Байдуков 10:18, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Review
    The halo around the grave is visible in thumb size --Poco a poco 21:05, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: This image was uploaded as part of Wiki Loves Monuments 2020. --RajashreeTalukdar 10:24, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Review
    Please straighten the horizon and provide more categories --Podzemnik 06:14, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Reflection of Cathedral of Saint Domnius - SplitI, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:This image was uploaded as part of Wiki Loves Monuments 2020. --Sumitsurai 10:16, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Review
    Provide more categories, dust spot to remove. GEO tag would be useful --Podzemnik 06:14, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: View of the old city from the city wallI, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:This image was uploaded as part of Wiki Loves Monuments 2020. --Sumitsurai 10:16, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Review
    Very good. However, the building on the right seem to be leaning right. Please provide some categories, GEO tag would be useful --Podzemnik 06:14, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A tram in Havnegade, Aarhus. --Liberaler Humanist 04:41, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    Quality is good, but you need to add the description. --Tournasol7 06:35, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
     Support Well exposed - very detailed - no disturbing elements --Virtual-Pano 11:30, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: A group of gravestones in Altube --Александр Байдуков 02:10, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Review
    Please provide geotag or more information about what we see on the picture --Podzemnik 06:44, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: The castle of Colombières in Normandy (France), 14th century, Towers and moat ; This image was uploaded as part of #WLM2020. --Xfigpower 12:33, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Review
    starke Ca´s. --Fischer.H 13:30, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
    In addition, the verticals are leaning in, so a perspective correction would be welcome. --Aristeas 09:12, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Mazeh water tower by User:Degser --Andrew J.Kurbiko 07:56, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Review
    The file needs to have a meaningful name --Podzemnik 06:36, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
    Requested! --Andrew J.Kurbiko 17:19, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Hejdeby Church. --ArildV 08:50, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
     Comment Needs a light perspective fix for the bottom edge of the roof, to make it more horizontal. Good image otherwise. --ReneeWrites 11:55, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    Thanks for review. New version uploaded, is it better? --ArildV 08:33, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
    Sorry for not commenting sooner. But I'm not seeing the new image in this image's history, did you upload a new image altogether? --ReneeWrites 23:52, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
    Sorry, my mistake. New version uploaded now. --ArildV 15:49, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Tagooty 09:25, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Blue Moon over Zeche Gneisenau in Dortmund Scharnhorst --Rainer Halama 10:43, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline well balanced exposure but washed out. Lack of details is not as bad as in the first one of this series--Virtual-Pano 22:17, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
     Oppose Moon is fuzzy. --Tagooty 09:21, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Blue Moon over Zeche Gneisenau in Dortmund Scharnhorst --Rainer Halama 10:43, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline this frame is suffering from noise, quite visible on the sttel parts of the pithead frame on the left. Would it possible to reduce the noise?--Virtual-Pano 23:00, 2 October 2020 (UTC) * Done modifiedPROPOLI87 12:58, 6 October 2020 (UTC)PROPOLI87PROPOLI87 12:58, 6 October 2020 (UTC): CommentI'm sorry, I wrote on a photo not mine. I made a big mess, and I don't know how to changePROPOLI87 10:27, 8 October 2020 (UTC)PROPOLI87PROPOLI87 10:27, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
     Oppose Strong noise, especially on the steel parts of the tower on the right, no attempt to fix this within a weeek --Virtual-Pano 11:14, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

Consensual review

File:Área_de_Proteção_Ambiental_da_Baleia_Franca_Claudio_Seelig_(08).jpg

• Nomination Área de Proteção Ambiental da Baleia Franca By User:Ctseelig --Rodrigo.Argenton 13:14, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Support Good quality, but an english description would be helpful.--Tesla 13:20, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose There are strange artefacts of editing in the surf of the water. First I thought its algae. But the contours are too sharp independent from the blur of the surrounding areas. Otherwise it's a beautiful picture with great light and composition. --Tsui 22:04, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Yes, the waves are strange. Obviously some filter etc. has been applied and damaged the photo. @Ctseelig: : Could you have a look and re-process your (beautiful!) photo? IMHO it is worth the additional effort. --Aristeas 08:59, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

•  Comment Oh yes! Could you please re-process this image to solve the mask / filter issue at the waves? --Augustgeyler 13:20, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 13:23, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

File:Раменье.jpg

• Nomination Троицкая церковь: Раменье, Кумёнский район, Кировская областьЭто фотография памятника культурного наследия России c номеромЯ, владелец авторских прав на это произведение, добровольно публикую его на условиях следующей лицензии:Это изображение было загружено в рамках соревнования Вики любит памятники — 2020. --Ele-chudinovsk 09:21, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Support Good quality. --Stimoroll 09:33, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sorry, but I disagree: there are chromatic aberrations, church is slightly tilted to the right. Both fixable. --A.Savin 13:33, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose per A.Savin. CA is very evident in the doorways of the outbuilding on the left. -- Ikan Kekek 08:45, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose per others. --Augustgeyler 13:22, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 13:23, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

File:Спасский_собор3.jpg

• Nomination Спасский собор с двумя палатками на паперти: улица Казанская, 50, Киров, Кировская областьЭто фотография памятника культурного наследия России c номеромЯ, владелец авторских прав на это произведение, добровольно публикую его на условиях следующей лицензии:Это изображение было загружено в рамках соревнования Вики любит памятники — 2020. --Ele-chudinovsk 09:20, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Support Good quality. --Stimoroll 09:32, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sorry: perspective and chromatic aberrations need to be taken care of. --A.Savin 13:34, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per A.Savin. Also somewhat overexposed. --Smial 12:29, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 13:22, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

File:Архангельская_церковь,_Вятские_Поляны2.jpg

• Nomination Архангельская церковь: у городского кладбища, Вятские Поляны, Кировская областьЭто фотография памятника культурного наследия России c номеромЯ, владелец авторских прав на это произведение, добровольно публикую его на условиях следующей лицензии:Это изображение было загружено в рамках соревнования Вики любит памятники — 2020. --Ele-chudinovsk 09:17, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
• Decline
• Good quality, but an english description would be helpful.--Tesla 13:11, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Not a QI for me. The picture is very noisy and unfocused. --A.Savin 13:37, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose per A.Savin. -- Ikan Kekek 08:47, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose I would accept the noise level, but there is CA everywhere, the image is oversaturated, and sharpness is below standard. I think f/3.2 was not a really good choice. --Smial 12:27, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Good composition but I am with Smial. --Augustgeyler 13:25, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Comment with noise reduction, sharpening and removing CAs, it could be a QI, but not now. Also an english description would be helpful.--Tesla 10:34, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 13:35, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

File:Wind_Mill_Skansen.jpg

• Nomination Wind Mill (Skansen Open Air Museum, Stockholm, Sweden) --Chme82 20:10, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Comment Could use perspective adjustment --Rhododendrites 21:29, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

•  Done New version with corrected perspective uploaded. Thank you for your notice. Chme82 19:46, 26 September 2020 (UTC)

•  Comment The trees on the right are blur unfortunately @Chme82: --Vincent60030 09:00, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

•  Done I've just tried some sharpening. What is your opinion now? Chme82 19:10, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

•  Neutral Thank you for the edit. However, I'm rather on the fence on this (neutral). I would love to take this into discussion. --Vincent60030 17:54, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Support well composed, nice perspective, good focus throughoit- looks like a QI to me. --Virtual-Pano 21:52, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Weak oppose For me it is very well done photo. Only the super tight crop at the bottom leading me to a weak oppose. --Augustgeyler (talk) 07:23, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality - very good except on the right. -- Ikan Kekek 08:51, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 13:21, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

File:Roma_kloster_(station)_September_2020_06.jpg

• Nomination Roma kungsgårds station. --ArildV 09:48, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 10:08, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Comment Pink CAs on the trees (see the note). --Halavar 10:14, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

•  Comment For me, it's not too visible. So let's discuss this. --Augustgeyler 14:03, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

•  Done new version uploaded.--ArildV 14:42, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

•  Support Much better:) Good quality now. --Halavar 16:37, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Nice picture! No signs of CA now, thank you for fixing it. --Lion-hearted85 21:09, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Lovely picture. Crep171166 15:48, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Augustgeyler 16:23, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

File:Märzstraße_90_Wien_2020-04-05_e_Maskaron.jpg

• Nomination Early 20th century façade in Vienna. --Tsui 21:58, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 08:37, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose As this image is showing both reliefs, I have to oppose becaus the upper one is cropped. --Augustgeyler 10:08, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose +1. --Peulle 06:48, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Augustgeyler Sebring12Hrs (talk) 14:33, 8 October 2020 (UTC).
• @Tsui: Could you have a look? I still think your photo is OK for QI, but the crop at the top is indeed unfortunate. Cropping the complete upper ornament would remove that problem and would give the photo a clearer composition. Maybe you want to try that? Best, --Aristeas 09:07, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
  • @Aristeas: Thank you for the invitiation! But I'd rather leave it as it is. The foremost reason for pictures here is to be documentary. Even if some pixels/centimeters at the top may be missing, it still gives an impression of the decoration of the windows. QI would be nice, but it's not why I put pictures on Commons. --Tsui (talk) 23:05, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
    • @Tsui: Thank you for your answer! I have the highest respect for your reasons. --Aristeas 12:27, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 13:21, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

File:Iglesia_de_San_Carlos_Borromeo,_Viena,_Austria,_2020-01-31,_DD_46.jpg

• Nomination St. Charles Church, Vienna, Austria --Poco a poco 09:54, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Oppose Sorry, but the upper middle part is unsharp. --Augustgeyler 11:45, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
• Please, let's talk, with a few improvements I believe this is QI --Poco a poco 19:25, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
•  weak support I like the lighting around the painting and how the shot is composed. It's true that the upper part is less sharp, but the painting is almost entirely good. Regarding the vertical lines, they seem correct on the right, but the horizontal ones (the bottom of the painting and the pulpit) are not perfectly straight. Maybe you are able to find a better compromise with a guided perspective correction? If you have some room on the left, a wider crop would also be very nice (so that the vase is not cut out). Thank you--User:Lion-hearted85 00:03, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose The angels in the upper part are blurred. In addition, the subject could be better centered. The altar steps are also slightly crooked, higher on the left than on the right. -- Spurzem 12:06, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

• Spurzem Stop targetting my pictures, otherwise I'll do the same. Poco a poco 19:22, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

•  Comment Dear Poco a poco, this is unfair. Nobody is targetting others pictures, at least nobody should do that. On the other hand everybody should be free to review others images without being afraid of getting "targeted" by the nominator. --Augustgeyler 08:12, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

@Poco a poco: Factual evaluations have nothing to do with "targetting". Besides, you don't need to threaten me. I will no longer present any pictures here that you can "attack". -- Spurzem 14:51, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

Facts? No problem, here you are: from the last 65 images I've proposed to QIC 54 have been promoted, 3 are still open, 1 is on the way to CR (just declined by August) and 5 have been declined and are under discussion in CR. The 5 images declined and in CR right now come from 1 reviewer, guess who. Mr. Spurzem.

No problem, I can change the perspective. Mr Spurzem has promoted 15 images in October and declined 6 (ok, declined formally 5 and one with a comment). Any guess who is the author of those 6 images declined? Me.

Mr. Spurzem, if you don't have to courage to admit what you do, your problem, but please, don't insult me, and never forget that big brother documents everything in the page history.

Yes, I already read last week that you are not proposing anymore images to QC as a result of the fight you had 1 week ago with other users, this week it was me, let's see with whom you fight then next week. As said, your behavour is toxic and I just proved it. And I'd rather not spend a word in the quality of your reviews. Your criteria is just one: friend author or not? Poco a poco 18:49, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

Dear Poco, it is possible this is just a co-incidence, isn't it? I hope Spurzem and all the others are here to review images to improve the wikimedia project an nothing else. For example this case here: If Spurzem would act just to make something "toxic", how could others follow his arguments? Different other reviewers supported his point of view or made, like Scotch Mist did, suggestions how to improve this image. --Augustgeyler 22:07, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

That's innoncent and sweet from somebody who hasn't been around for too long. After you see the behaviour of some people for years you'll see things differently. And you know as I do that there is always room for improvement for all pictures in QIC, for all. So, if you want to move to CR, you will always find a reason. Even if you find none some people believe that they have the liberty to decline because the sky wasn't blue... Specially a user like this with the lowest bar for QI as reviewer you can think of. Poco a poco 08:19, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

•  Comment @Poco a poco: Cropping to the immediate frame of the painting and the bases of the bottom sculptures should overcome most opposing comments expressed above --Scotch Mist 11:07, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

• Thank you for your hint, Scotch Mist, I believe though that this image as it's (at least in the current version) a QI and I wouldn't make such a radical change. Poco a poco 08:10, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Augustgeyler 08:55, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

File:Monumento_a_María_Teresa,_Viena,_Austria,_2020-01-31,_DD_28.jpg

• Nomination Empress Maria Theresia monument, Vienna, Austria --Poco a poco 10:47, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Oppose very sharp and technically ok, lighting not good and cropping to hard at the lower part of monument. --Augustgeyler 20:30, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Comment Looks like a QI to me, please, take a veridict, promote or decline --Poco a poco 18:29, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Support I agree; sharpness is good and perspective acceptable given the distance and angle of the photographer's point of view. Assuming oppose and sending to CR. --Peulle 11:17, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Support per others. -- Ikan Kekek 07:50, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Support per others. The sun is not always shining … --Aristeas 09:08, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
• Weak  Oppose. Indeed, the sun doesn't always shine and you can't get a quality picture all the time. In addition, the image is cropped too tight on the left and right. Finally I have to ask: Can the nominator now also vote here himself? -- Spurzem 12:14, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

•  Comment I think the vote of the nominator was accidentally added while transferring this to Consensual Review. I corrected it. --Augustgeyler 13:34, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

•  Oppose Per Spurzem. --Kallerna 20:05, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Certainly the cropping is tight at the bottom corners but the primary sculptures are in full view and appear in good detail (if somewhat dark overall due to apparent cloudy weather) - if the partial relatively small sculptures in the bottom corners had been 'blurred' I think this would still be a QI --Scotch Mist 10:42, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Weak oppose The horizontal lines are slightly inclined CW. The vertical lines are leaning backwards. As this is a crop of 50 MP image, perspective should be correctable. Otherwise, quality is good. --Tagooty 01:46, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

  I improved it Tagooty, you are being demanding Poco a poco 08:23, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

•  Support QI for me.--Ermell 21:07, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Support QI, very sharp. Sky is not so important here --Tesla 10:13, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

Total: 6 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 13:20, 11 October 2020 (UTC)