Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives November 01 2014

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Knock_Out_IMG_3830.jpg

[edit]

File:London MMB «C2 West India Quay.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Canary Wharf. Mattbuck 06:58, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose too dark --Taxiarchos228 08:15, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
    • That would be because it was taken at night. --Mattbuck 23:26, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Too bright, streetlamps are blown :-) No, no,  Support for me. --Kreuzschnabel 06:35, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
  •  Support4metoo --Christian Ferrer 17:54, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Ship_procession_fresco,_part_4,_Akrotiri,_Greece.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Ship procession fresco, part 4, Akrotiri, Greece. --Yann 19:59, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline Lacks sharpness, sorry --Poco a poco 20:50, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
    New version. Please check. --Yann 13:47, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
    Better, but not at QI level IMHO, sorry, Poco a poco 19:40, 21 October 2014 (UTC)

File:2014.06.21.-25-Mannheim Rheinau--Kleiner Sonnenroeschen-Blaeuling.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Kleiner Sonnenröschen-Bläuling - Aricia agestis --Hockei 20:43, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Insufficient quality. Sorry. IMO not sharp enough for this kind of image. --XRay 15:58, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
 Comment You forget that these butterflies were in hectic motions. Please another opinions. --Hockei 18:43, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
 Comment You're right. So it is difficult to take the photo of the butterflies. IMO 1/60 s is too long for this kind of photo.--XRay 06:56, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
The compromise was to select F13 in order to get enough DOF. And that's borderline. Therefore the relatively long shutter time with flash. More opinions? --Hockei 08:00, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I can see why you chose those settings, but in the end it's just not sharp enough for me. Great composition and beautiful colors, though! --El Grafo 09:30, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Olustvere mõisa peahoone, 1900-1915.a.a*.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Olustvere manor main house (by A.palu) Kruusamägi 20:18, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline  Comment Good, but a bit tilted CCW--Lmbuga 20:50, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
    Good quality, I cannot see tilted parts --Hubertl 12:26, 19 October 2014 (UTC)It need description --Christian Ferrer 16:47, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
  • ok for description but 1 dustspot (see note) and both sides are leaning in a bit --Christian Ferrer 05:06, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Ok, but it needs a little perspective correction. See notes. Vertical lines are not stright. Improvable--Lmbuga 20:07, 21 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Roundabout_September_2014_12.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Roundabout Vällingbyvägen/Råckstavägen. --ArildV 07:40, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --XRay 10:09, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
    could the exposure be optimized? Additional Opinions? --Ehsc 10:48, 20 October 2014 (UTC) Did you have a opinion? If so, please explain.--ArildV 19:29, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose This image is underexposed. A correction is possible, so I'd like to change to support. --Alchemist-hp 19:47, 22 October 2014 (UTC) .  Support I stike my oppose. --Alchemist-hp 17:24, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
  •  Info Thank you. New version uploaded.--ArildV 11:10, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
  •  Support QI.--P e z i 22:23, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
  •  Support --Dirtsc 11:43, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Hotel_The_Rubens,_Londres,_Inglaterra,_2014-08-07,_DD_001.JPG

[edit]

  • Nomination The Rubens hotel, London, England --Poco a poco 10:37, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline Top too unsharp. --Mattbuck 22:36, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
    ✓ New version Poco a poco 08:54, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
    I think it's acceptable now, please let's discuss, please --Poco a poco 20:55, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Perspective issue.--Jebulon 20:26, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Brixner_Dom_Orgel_4.JPG

[edit]

  • Nomination: Organ of Brixen Cathedral --Uoaei1 06:55, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Review slightly tilted and quite dark. --MB-one 10:41, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
    ✓ fixed --Uoaei1 20:11, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
    Now, it has weird effects at the window part. Maybe you want to ask for discussion. --MB-one 22:28, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
    ✓ Done CAs removed at the window. More opinions please! --Uoaei1 07:28, 18 October 2014 (UTC)

 Support--Hubertl 10:55, 23 October 2014 (UTC)