Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives May 2008
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
-
-
- Nomination Ophrys apifera. Lycaon 14:02, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion nice --Mbdortmund 19:02, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bellardia trixago. Lycaon 21:03, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion clear composition and nice Bukeh --Mbdortmund 17:53, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Gal Viharaya Buddha --Bgag 16:47, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion would be a bit better if the crop on the top would be a bit wider --Mbdortmund 19:06, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A flower of Liatris spicata --Chrumps 17:02, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion Good. Maedin 11:31, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Coats of arms of Sant Sadurní d'Anoia --Xavigivax 12:02, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion looks good to me, but I'm no svg-expert... --Mbdortmund 19:08, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Coats of arms of Vallbona de les Monges --Xavigivax 12:02, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion looks good to me, but I'm no svg-expert... --Mbdortmund 19:08, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A dead fox --Ianare 09:57, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion nothing wrong --Mbdortmund 19:11, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination Giraffa camelopardalis tippelskirchi, Masai Giraffe at Cincinnnati Zoo --Ltshears 15:43, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion Nice. --High Contrast 16:46, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Severijn organ in Cuijk, The Netherlands --Tfioreze 12:57, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
- Decline
Comment It's tilted (to the left). -- Cecil 15:17, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
Oppose and perspective ist bad --Berthold Werner 16:56, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination City of Tel-Aviv on it's 100th birthday, as seen from the city's highest tower rooftop. --Rastaman3000 18:34, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
- Decline Blurry and noisy. Lycaon 21:53, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Opportune shot of jazz fusion musician Nashmaximus 16:31, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
- Decline Unsharp and noisy. -- Cecil 22:38, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Lightnings over Belfort, France. --ComputerHotline 06:40, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
- Decline C'est super mais les toits sont un peu penchés. Je donne mon support quand c'est corrigé. (support when tilt fixed) --Ianare 21:42, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
Unfortunate crop: too much or too little of the roofs is visible. Lycaon 22:02, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Roofs of Antananarivo --Bgag 23:40, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion Beautiful picture. Rastaman3000 17:32, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination City pigeon (Columba livea) -- Alvesgaspar 23:04, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion OK for me. Lycaon 22:11, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination Opava (Troppau), Czech Silesia. Church of St. Adalbert --Pudelek 11:56, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- Decline Not convinced. The statue in the foreground is completely dark, a different position might have avoided the black pole and camera on the right, the crop seems a little tight on top, and the light on the building should be more even. But I'm not certain, so please do move to discussion if you disagree. Maedin 06:52, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination PCI NIC. --Afrank99 19:15, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion Good Richard Bartz 19:51, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Audi DTM racing car --AngMoKio 08:39, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion Obvious QI Richard Bartz 19:23, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mercedes DTM racing car --AngMoKio 08:39, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion Obvious QI Richard Bartz 19:23, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cruise ship MS Albatros (by User:Merops) --High Contrast 19:10, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion good details --Ianare 13:07, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination Rope games in the show Les Fils qui nous lient, Paris --Romanceor 20:08, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion good, sorry for the license problems with the other pictures --Mbdortmund 20:15, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Latin letters --Tiago Fioreze 11:46, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
- Review Comment I would have chosen a slightly higher f number (to get more than one letter in focus, while keeping the effect). Also, everything not in focus is a bit noisy. --Eusebius 11:58, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination Gulmohar tree flowers closeup. -- Kprateek88 13:33, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- Decline Distracting background—it's hard to focus on the subject. Also, colours seem slightly washed out? Maedin 08:11, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Old city in Opole (Oppeln), Upper Silesia. Buldings over Młynówka canal --Pudelek 20:22, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion OK. --Berthold Werner 07:45, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Leeds Castle in Kent (by User:Diliff) --High Contrast 20:12, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion More than QI. --Berthold Werner 07:45, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Gatehouse of the disused coal mine Zeche Königsborn --Smial 15:39, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion good --Mbdortmund 18:38, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Snipe fly Rhagio scolopaceus with dew Richard Bartz 12:25, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion Correct exposure and details. --ComputerHotline 15:50, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Lightnings over Belfort, France. --ComputerHotline 06:40, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
- Decline L'image est penchée et la prise de vue n'est pas la meilleure. (tilted, poor crop/composition) --Ianare 21:51, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sharing a meal with an equal --Tony Wills 02:43, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion good composition and details --Mbdortmund 18:40, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Idea leuconoe -- Pro2 18:13, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion good --Mbdortmund 18:41, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Main entry of Basses Perches fortifications --ComputerHotline 11:47, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
- Decline
Question Belle image (lumière, composition, couleurs) d'un sujet intéressant. Quelques petits problèmes toutefois: avant-plan trop dominant et tendance de l'image à pencher vers la gauche (CCW tilt). Ainsi qu'une question: d'où vient l'image-fantôme en haut à droite, à hauteur de la cheminée et du bord de l'herbe? -- MJJR 20:12, 25 May 2009 (UTC) Oppose and reply to MJJR: I think the ghost is due to an imperfect HDR merge (oppose also motivated by the tilt). --Eusebius 21:28, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination SGI Octane workstation. --Afrank99 14:51, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion Please use the standard information template. --Eusebius 21:25, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
Done --Afrank99 08:05, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
*
Support I would've loved one of these back in the day ... and the quality is good ;-) --Ianare 21:33, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Romanesque church in Hepberg --Blackfalcon 13:31, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion Comment The dust spots and black specks in the sky need to be clone stamped first. Maedin 21:23, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
Sky has been cleaned. Ok now. Maedin 06:48, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Autostadt in Wolfsburg, Germany. --High Contrast 18:04, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- Decline Noisy, not too sharp--Ianare 21:28, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination Portrait of a Wall Lizard (Podarcis muralis). Just to mimic Lycaon, below... Alvesgaspar 17:03, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion Comment Would probably benefit from a cloning out of the shadow in the upper left corner. --Eusebius 10:22, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
* Support fine as-is imo --Ianare 21:26, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 100x magnification of an head of a spider Cheiracanthium mildei, male Richard Bartz 07:59, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion Very good. --Afrank99 08:20, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Lightning over Weigmannsdorf, Germany (by User:Eclipse.sx) --High Contrast 21:29, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion Correct exposure. --ComputerHotline 06:37, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Panorpa communis with prey Diogma glabrata glabrata Richard Bartz 20:57, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion Correct exposure and details. --ComputerHotline 06:37, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ptycholoma lecheana Richard Bartz 20:57, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion Correct exposure and details. --ComputerHotline 06:37, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Wandering Glider --Muhammad Mahdi Karim 17:42, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion Correct exposure and details. --ComputerHotline 06:37, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Tiger Beetle --Muhammad Mahdi Karim 09:44, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion Good shot. --kallerna 14:06, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination An access in Bois d'Oye fortifications --ComputerHotline 07:45, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Decline Too much tilted CCW IMHO. --Afrank99 07:42, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Turret 155R in the in the Bois d'Oye fortifications --ComputerHotline 07:45, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Decline Too much tilted CCW IMHO. --Afrank99 07:42, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Acre, Caravanserai --Berthold Werner 09:24, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
- Decline Noisy, unsharp and massive CA (left side mostly). --Afrank99 08:26, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Panorama of the Kozłówka Palace and near buildings (b< User:Von.grzanka). --High Contrast 19:10, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion Sky is dull, sharpness could be better, but IMHO good enough. --Afrank99 08:24, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Nomination Sawfly. Tenthredopsis sordida, female --Richard Bartz 16:42, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion Very well done. --AngMoKio 18:25, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination to the EAST part of Basses Perches fortifications --ComputerHotline 11:47, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion Perhaps a bit oversaturated but still ok imho --Berthold Werner 12:51, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Papilio machaon (yet another one). --Wilder Kaiser 18:25, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion Good -- Pro2 11:12, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
-
-
-
- Nomination Boat shed Gnangarra 11:20, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
- Withdrawn
-
-
-
-
-
- Nomination A tank to remind people of World War 2 P.J.L Laurens 19:29, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
- Decline Full of jpg artifacts -- Pro2 11:08, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
-
-
-
- Nomination Banias spring with Pan's cave. --Berthold Werner 17:06, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion Nothing exceptional, but quality is O.K. -- MJJR 21:08, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Landscape from Reposaari, Pori, Finland. --kallerna 14:09, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Decline Noise,
chromatic aberration --Ianare 17:47, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination Main gate in the Bois d'Oye fortifications --ComputerHotline 07:45, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion Some CCW tilt (l'image penche un peu à gauche...), but otherwise good quality. -- MJJR 21:14, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The back of the Farnsley-Moorman house on a foggy Kentucky morning.--JMSchneid 11:41, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- Decline Nice mood, but visible JPG artifacts. Surprising, given the file size. Maybe due to oversharpening? --Dschwen 12:16, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
I went back 5 years to my original RAW file. The new version has no sharpening in post processing and a different, more accurate look--JMSchneid 17:01, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
* Oppose Noise, distortion --Ianare 17:42, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Statue of a woman. --Eusebius 20:44, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion Comment Can you rotate CCW by 0.1 degree? Maedin 07:13, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
If I do, the top horizontal line in the wall appears tilted, and it is quite visible. It attracts the eye because it is prominent and close to the border, that's why I have chosen it as a reference. --Eusebius 07:42, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
I was using the base as a reference—that's what was drawing my eye. But no matter. Maedin 07:48, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
I have uploaded a tilted version. No big difference for me, after all. --Eusebius 07:54, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Scott McCloud lecturing at the University of Louisville.--JMSchneid 11:43, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
Isn't the background image copyrighted? --Eusebius 11:50, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
I never thought about that! This should make me think about it in the future. Can the image be changed to low resolution as are other like images on Wikimedia?--JMSchneid 14:37, 17 May 2009 (UTC) - Decline Declining on account of the copyright. See your talk page for more info. Maedin 07:20, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
- Nomination Scott McCloud lecturing at the University of Louisville.--JMSchneid 11:43, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Apartment block at Bigbury-on-Sea. --Jolly Janner 16:06, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion Composition could be better but OK --Ianare 17:52, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Forficula auricularia, Bastavales, Brión, Galicia, Spain. --Lmbuga 20:06, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
- Decline Comment A bit noisy, distribution of focused zones is strange. --Eusebius 07:50, 21 May 2009 (UTC) Oppose as per Eusebius. The requirements for arthropods are quite high --Ianare 17:49, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Children at the Western Wall --Berthold Werner 17:26, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
- Decline Comment
Looks tilted to me.ok now. --Afrank99 06:52, 22 May 2009 (UTC) Oppose difficult to tell if tilted, but noisy and not too sharp --Ianare 17:51, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
-
- Nomination Cetonia aurata (rose chafer) taking off --Wilder Kaiser 16:29, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion great work, would support for FP --Ianare 10:15, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
-
-
-
- Nomination Haifa, Shrine of the Báb --Berthold Werner 11:26, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion A little soft, but otherwise good. Maedin 21:29, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Palais Großer Garten Dresden Germany. Kolossos 20:11, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion Very nice -- Pro2 19:53, 19 May 2009 (UTC) CommentVery good indeed. I'd love to see the EXIF-like info. If it is a pano, maybe it should be stated. --Eusebius 10:30, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
It's a Gigapan-Panorama --Kolossos 23:51, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A stone to remind people of World War 1 P.J.L Laurens 19:29, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
- Decline Poor lighting. --Afrank99 06:47, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Shows tow IC-Technologies with dirct comparison of the size --Sundance Raphael 17:04, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
- Decline Too hard light and mostly out of focus. --Afrank99 06:47, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Nomination Train station of Shushkovo (by User:S1) --High Contrast 21:09, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- Decline No description, source/author info only implicit. --Eusebius 10:32, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination The silhouette of a orthodox church--Moise Nicu 12:08, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- Decline CA on the cross, silhouette not so sharp. --Eusebius 10:20, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination Stained glass window in Saint-Pierre cathedral, Geneva. Yann 21:46, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion Good glass detail. I'd crop on the right to centre the window. Can you please upload a crop? Maedin 06:49, 22 May 2009 (UTC) Comment Done. Yann 07:52, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
Good, thank you. Maedin 07:56, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
-
-
-
- Nomination White-crowned Sparrow Zonotrichia leucophrys Cap Tourmente National Wildlife Area, Quebec, Canada. --Cephas 09:15, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion Comment Bird looks ok, background is quite noisy. --Eusebius 07:44, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
Good enough. --Afrank99 09:52, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
Background can easily (and should be) de-noised. Lycaon 12:56, 21 May 2009 (UTC) Comment Done -- Pro2 14:10, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
De-noise done: good to go. Maedin 20:05, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination Hôtel Pincé, Angers. --Coyau 11:36, 14 May 2009 (UTC) Comment Could use a little sharpening. --Afrank99 06:46, 15 May 2009 (UTC) Done Better ? --Coyau 17:58, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
Actually, no. I did an attempt myself. --Afrank99 09:50, 21 May 2009 (UTC) - Promotion Sharp enough now. --Afrank99 09:50, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
Afrank99's edit is good. Maedin 20:30, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
Good, thanks. --Coyau 01:40, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
- Nomination Hôtel Pincé, Angers. --Coyau 11:36, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination St. Giles-Church in Inowłódz, Poland --Chrumps 08:44, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion already QI, but if you can go there again it would be slightly better to make the picture with a longer time and a smaller aperture, the wall in the foreground would look better --Mbdortmund 09:10, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination Windmill in Belgium (by User:Paul Hermans) --High Contrast 17:48, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion good --Mbdortmund 22:02, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination yellow German locomotive --Flominator 16:02, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion good --Mbdortmund 22:02, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Oman Air tail -- Kprateek88 06:16, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- Decline Noise, chromatic aberration --Ianare 09:16, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Kingfisher Airlines tail -- Kprateek88 06:16, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- Decline Noise, chromatic aberration --Ianare 09:16, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The rare burnt orchid (Neotinea ustulata) in the Calestienne, Belgium. Lycaon 18:03, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion nice, better than the first two --Ianare 21:00, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
-
-
-
- Nomination Grey Catbird (Dumetella carolinensis) --Cephas 23:18, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion good --Mbdortmund 09:18, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination Indian Peafowl portrait -- Von.grzanka 13:24, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
- Decline Unfortunate crop and unspectacular details. Lycaon 07:10, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Challaborough --Jolly Janner 14:32, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
- Decline Vignetting, disturbing foreground not contributing to the picture IMO. --Eusebius 10:38, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Challaborough beach --Jolly Janner 14:32, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
- Decline Vignetting should be corrected, pole in the foreground is disturbing, slight CA (not serious). --Eusebius 10:36, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
-
![* Nomination Coats of arms of Berne. Yann 19:31, 15 May 2009 (UTC) * Decline Question Did you apply masking? The roof looks 'nibbled'. Lycaon 12:02, 18 May 2009 (UTC) Comment Yes, I masked the roof which is not interesting and distracting for the subject. See the other version [1]. Yann 19:49, 18 May 2009 (UTC) I prefer the unaltered version, distraction is minimal. Current image has too poor masking. Lycaon 07:12, 21 May 2009 (UTC)](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/60/Coats_of_arms_of_Berne.jpg/120px-Coats_of_arms_of_Berne.jpg)
- Nomination Coats of arms of Berne. Yann 19:31, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
- Decline Question Did you apply masking? The roof looks 'nibbled'. Lycaon 12:02, 18 May 2009 (UTC) Comment Yes, I masked the roof which is not interesting and distracting for the subject. See the other version [1]. Yann 19:49, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
I prefer the unaltered version, distraction is minimal. Current image has too poor masking. Lycaon 07:12, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
-
-
-
- Nomination Olive harvest in Getsemani --Berthold Werner 16:20, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
- Decline The post-processed version may be brighter, but I think it makes the relationship between the tones artificial. The details on the trunk of the olive trees are lost, and CA is strongly accentuated. Additionally, there might be a typo in the filename (not sure about the German and English orthographs). --Eusebius 07:36, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The New York, New York Hotel and Casino in Las Vegas. --High Contrast 20:36, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
- Decline Comment Perspective should be corrected and the cables removed. --Berthold Werner 06:46, 14 May 2009 (UTC) Oppose Not sharp enough. About Berthold's comment: I'm afraid perspective correction wouldn't do any good here, with this deliberate low-angle pov. I'd leave it as it is. --Eusebius 07:29, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Citadel, Jerusalem --Berthold Werner 07:47, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
- Decline Sky is a bit too noisy for me. --Eusebius 07:25, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination Editorial office building of a newspaper in Germany --High Contrast 14:25, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
- Decline I see nothing but trees. --Afrank99 09:43, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Gentiana verna --Böhringer 20:53, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion Good! Lycaon 21:10, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination Clover Leaf Weevil (Hypera zoilus) --Kaldari 16:41, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion Very good. Lycaon 18:08, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The Amazon Kindle 2 --ShakataGaNai 15:23, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Decline Not sharp enough for a studio pic. Also the resolution could be higher. --Berthold Werner 17:17, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A photograph of mountains and clouds at sunset; taken near the village of Masca (This was Commons' file #4000000.) --kallerna 14:09, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Decline Unsharp, artifacted at full res. --Spock lone wolf 18:10, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Stained glass window at Notre-Dame, Geneva, Switzerland. Yann 13:51, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion Ok. If someone want to say it is not really sharp, remember this is a photograph of a painting and paintings are mostly not sharp. --Berthold Werner 17:14, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Parasola sp Mushroom --Muhammad Mahdi Karim 09:42, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion Ok. --kallerna 20:57, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Inside the Bois d'Oye fortifications --ComputerHotline 07:45, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion good --Ianare 21:56, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination Bayside label Miami Florida Kolossos 20:11, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion Nice exposure. Sharpness is OK. --High Contrast 12:48, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Eng, municipal Vomp, Tirol, Austria. View from Northeast. Richard Bartz 22:45, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion Correct exposure and details. --High Contrast 12:48, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Schmalensee, Mittenwald, Bavaria, Germany. View from South. Richard Bartz 01:19, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion Correct exposure and details. --High Contrast 12:48, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Some stalactite in an old NATO station --ComputerHotline 08:24, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion cool --Ianare 21:54, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination Stairway in Lisbon -- Alvesgaspar 23:27, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion A little noisy (sky especially) but OK--Ianare 21:51, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination Schoolhouse in Oronoco, Minnesota. --Jonathunder 19:59, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
- Decline Noise, chromatic aberration --Ianare 21:48, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ruins of an old farm, Lisboa, Portugal -- Alvesgaspar 15:27, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion nice atmosphere --Ianare 21:44, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Röder Gate, Rothenburg ob der Tauber, Germany --Berthold Werner 09:14, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion Again a little soft at the top of the structure but otherwise good --Ianare 21:47, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
-
-
-
- Nomination Mallard (Anas platyrhynchos) --Cephas 23:18, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion Correct exposure and details. --ComputerHotline 09:28, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ajuga reptans. Lycaon 19:30, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion Correct exposure and details. --ComputerHotline 09:28, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Scarce Blue-tailed Damselfly (Ischnura pumilio) --Chrumps 19:15, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion nice --Mbdortmund 21:48, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Flower of Yellow Azalea (Rhododendron luteum) --Chrumps 18:42, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion Correct exposure and details. --ComputerHotline 09:28, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination Kelheim is a municipality in Bavaria, capital of the district Kelheim. The image is 13000px so there is slight noise because of the jpg compression - to get the file size not over 10MB and make it more easy to handle in the project. Richard Bartz 01:00, 18 May 2009 (UTC)~
- Promotion Erstaunliche Details, mir ist aufgefallen, dass wenige Elemente ein wenig nach rechts gedreht zu sein scheinen, etwa der gelbe Kirchturm. Vielleicht sähen einige Gebäude ein winziges bisschen dunkler und mit einem Bruchteil mehr Kontrast noch etwas besser aus, aber sicher hast Du schon damit experimentiert. --Mbdortmund 13:50, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination New SVG of map/diagram of Falaise Pocket --Jarry1250 19:19, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion Clear map but it should first be cropped to the limits of the data shown at the left, top and right. Also I would like a scale in the international system. Sting 14:08, 18 May 2009 (UTC) Done. Jarry1250 20:02, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
Thanks. Sting 22:19, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Tree Swallow, Tachycineta bicolor --Cephas 17:30, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion Background is little noisy, but the bird's quality hits the spot. --Jolly Janner 19:55, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Church of Šėta --Matasg 17:03, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
- Decline Noisy sky, poor crop (it has a white frame!), poor perspective. --Jolly Janner 19:40, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Romanesque church in Hepberg --Blackfalcon 18:23, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
-
-
-
-
- Nomination Hot springs Bathing Waterpark in Germany --High Contrast 21:34, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
- Decline High noise and CA--Ianare 21:15, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination Befreiungshalle ("Hall of Liberation") upon Mount Michelsberg above the city of Kelheim in Bavaria, Germany Richard Bartz 22:26, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion Einfach gute Bilder, chapeau --Mbdortmund 22:30, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Two catamarans, leaving Saint-Vaast-la-Hougue harbour (by User:Benh) --High Contrast 17:24, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion good details and colours --Mbdortmund 22:33, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Arch of Antoninus Pius, Sbeitla --Bgag 14:53, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion Correct details. --ComputerHotline 09:08, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Pyrrhocorax graculus on a picture of the Aiguille du Midi by Jean-Pol GRANDMONT --Mbdortmund 12:43, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
- Review Comment Nice, but the EXIF data is lost. Yann 21:09, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Bruges (Belgium): the Ramparts. -- MJJR 20:27, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Cairina moschata male --Ianare 09:59, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion good portrait --Mbdortmund 10:28, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Common daisy --Von.grzanka 21:34, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
- Decline overexposure causes loss of detail --Ianare 10:02, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Guard in "The Hall of the Warrior Glory", Mamayev Kurgan, Volgograd. --High Contrast 19:36, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion OK --Mbdortmund 00:09, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination Jerusalem, Bar Mitzvah at the Western Wall --Berthold Werner 14:10, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion good quality, interesting --Ianare 10:02, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
-
-
-
- Nomination Arcade in the old city of Geneva. Yann 20:15, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion Ok. --Berthold Werner 14:15, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bruntál (Freudenthal), Czech Silesia. House on the market square --Pudelek 14:52, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion good details on the houses but, therefore IMHO QI inspite of the camera-problems with the statue. --Mbdortmund 12:20, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Male Ruby-Throated hummingbird guarding his territory from the top of a tomato stake.--JMSchneid 22:46, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion Comment Dust spots need to be removed. Lycaon 06:22, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
Done.--JMSchneid 12:12, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
DOF a little shallow but IMHO QI because of the good details --Mbdortmund 12:14, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination European Hare in Tampere, Finland --Miraceti 07:52, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion Image quality is good. I added the proper description, the genus and species name, to the image page. Normally this can be reason for rejection, but you provided wiki links in several languages. --Ianare 01:44, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Lace curtain. Yann 22:20, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion clear structures and focus on the main object --Mbdortmund 12:18, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The Predjama Castle. --Romanm 20:41, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
- Decline As much as I like the subject and composition, there is too much noise, sorry. --Ianare 01:38, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Copy of a 3th century stele in the Camp celtique de la Bure. --Coyau 16:27, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Marienkirche in Halle Saale, seen from West. -- Pro2 11:58, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion very good, shouldn't the person be removed? --Mbdortmund 23:08, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
Das Entfernen von Personen ist verboten ;-) --Berthold Werner 06:56, 12 May 2009 (UTC) Comment This is already a FP, what's the point of nominating it here? Yann 21:18, 13 May 2009 (UTC) Comment AFAIK there is no rule, that FPs cannot be nominated as QIs --Berthold Werner 06:12, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
And it's featured on German Wiki, not on Commons. Btw: There is a version without the person here -- Pro2 12:43, 14 May 2009 (UTC) Support OK then good. Yann 10:56, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
FP and QI are not mutually exclusive, this is not a hierarchical system and the same goes for VI: An image can be any or each of them. Lycaon 22:38, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
-
-
-
- Nomination Unknown pink rose in my garden. --Jolly Janner 12:53, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
- Decline Overexposure and unappealing composition --Ianare 11:48, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
-
-
-
- Nomination Head of pyrrhosoma nymphula. --ComputerHotline 20:13, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion Crop could be tighter, but otherwise nice. --kallerna 11:51, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination Pyrrhosoma nymphula copulation --ComputerHotline 18:46, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
- Decline There's a dust spot --Ianare 16:00, 14 May 2009 (UTC) Oppose dust spot is still there, lighting could be better --Ianare 11:46, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
-
-
-
- Nomination Forficula auricularia, Bastavales, Brión, Galicia, Spain. --Lmbuga 20:31, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
- Decline crop --Mbdortmund 21:38, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sava Centar in cylindrical perspective. --Lošmi 02:42, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion Good. --High Contrast 12:46, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination European Hare Lepus europaeus
- WARNING: third template parameter added – please remove.
-
-
-
- Nomination: Ghorfas of Medenine, Tunisia --Bgag 03:43, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Stairway to heaven -- Alvesgaspar 00:22, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Minimalist composition: a beach in Porto Covo, Portugal - Alvesgaspar 00:00, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion ok --Ianare 06:43, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Griffon vulture (Gyps fulvus) --LC-de 23:06, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination A forest in Germany in autumn --Adiel lo 04:40, 15 May 2009 (UTC) - Beautiful in thumbsize but too soft when enlarged -- Alvesgaspar 07:53, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
- Decline
-
- Nomination Christmas Lights in London (by User:Diliff) --High Contrast 20:57, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
- Decline Below size limit (Look ma, I've opposed a Diliff picture!) --Eusebius 20:59, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Light meter Sixtomat --Berthold Werner 17:52, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion Although I don't like the gray background and the DOF & focus point is not optimal, obviously QI. --Afrank99 19:51, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination Bernkastel-Kues, Germany --Berthold Werner 17:43, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
- Decline shadows too dark --Mbdortmund 21:52, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
-
-
-
- Nomination Cigacice, Poland.--Wisniowy 08:52, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
- Decline Nice panoramic image. Not QI in my opinion because sky is too thin and trees at the right are chopped at the top. -- Klaus with K 15:09, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sculpture in Góra Świętej Anny (St. Annaberg, Anaberg), Upper Silesia --Pudelek 08:25, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion Here I like this light (Is it called 'harsh' in english?) --Berthold Werner 16:29, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Obserwation tower near Góra Świętej Anny (Anaberg, St. Annaberg) Pudelek 08:25, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
-
- Nomination: Shinto shrine of registration cultural asset --Jnn 05:04, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
-
-
-
- Nomination Jerusalem Model, Temple of Herode --Berthold Werner 13:40, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion Composition is so-so but quality is OK --Ianare 15:58, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Tree Swallow, Tachycineta bicolor, Saint-Joachim (Cap-Tourmente), Quebec, Canada --Cephas 22:25, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion nice composition --Mbdortmund 06:52, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Millbrook Towers in Southampton (by User:Suitcivil) --High Contrast 15:15, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
- Decline Composition: too much gras, too few sky --Berthold Werner 11:08, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination Polistes bischoffi near Nismes, Belgium. Lycaon 21:35, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion nice --Mbdortmund 07:03, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Coenagrion puella --ComputerHotline 16:11, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion Quality image. --kallerna 13:09, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Coenagrion puella copulation. --ComputerHotline 16:11, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion Well done --kallerna 13:09, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
-
![]] 18:41, 9 May 2009 (UTC) * Promotion Comment Rotate, so the edge of the building (seen on the right on the picture) is directly vertical and then crop it out, because it is very white. --Jolly Janner 19:31, 9 May 2009 (UTC) Comment Thanks for the improvement advices ;-) check it out again ;) --Stefan-Xp 15:58, 13 May 2009 (UTC) Support Good now! --Jolly Janner 16:43, 13 May 2009 (UTC)](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/0e/Menschenrettung_mit_der_Steckleiter.jpg/80px-Menschenrettung_mit_der_Steckleiter.jpg)
]] 18:41, 9 May 2009 (UTC)- Promotion Comment Rotate, so the edge of the building (seen on the right on the picture) is directly vertical and then crop it out, because it is very white. --Jolly Janner 19:31, 9 May 2009 (UTC) Comment Thanks for the improvement advices ;-) check it out again ;) --Stefan-Xp 15:58, 13 May 2009 (UTC) Support Good now! --Jolly Janner 16:43, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion
-
- Nomination Anemone coronaria flower. --Adiel lo 18:26, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
- Decline Shallow depth of field means out-of-focus petal in bottom right. --Jolly Janner 22:29, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Same drawing as the other picture, but different szene and lighting --Niabot 21:47, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Portal of former St. Maximin's Abbey in Trier, Germany --Berthold Werner 12:48, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion Looks OK. --Coyau 09:55, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sisal plantation and Uluguru Mountains --Muhammad Mahdi Karim 21:20, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion nice composition --Mbdortmund 10:53, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Lotus Elise 1.8TS --Spock lone wolf 08:22, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality, well done. --kallerna 13:25, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A Transceiver. --Afrank99 19:22, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion sharp --Mbdortmund 10:54, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Nomination Polish sailing training ship, Dar Młodzieży in Szczecin, Poland Kpalion 22:16, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
- Decline Nice, but too dark. --Berthold Werner 06:49, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination A view of the Moon through the 12" refractor at my University --Colds7ream 16:10, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
- Decline Bad post-processing all around the Moon at the borders. The original is even better in these areas. I think also a better quality can come out from this kind of astronomical instrument. Sting 12:25, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
Well, the telescope is 130 years old! :-) Colds7ream 12:48, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Sandpiper flock in flight --Ianare 06:36, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
-
- Nomination: Schloss Nordkirche, Germany --Mbdortmund 23:24, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
-
- Nomination Hosta -- MJJR 19:58, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion Question Can somebody help with the exact species name? Thanks. -- MJJR 20:12, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
Possibly Hosta undulata 'Albomarginata'. Lycaon 17:10, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
* Support I updated the description page. The photo is good. --Ianare 22:26, 11 May 2009 (UTC) -- Thanks a lot to you and to Lycaon (and to Jolly Janner for his suggestion). -- MJJR 09:50, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Germany, Dinkelsbühl, Martin-Luther-Street and Rothenburg Gate --Berthold Werner 08:41, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion Is that for the civil rights or reformist guy ? --Ianare 22:35, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
It is for the reformist en:Martin Luther --Berthold Werner 06:02, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination rhododendron --Thesupermat 20:09, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
- Decline Overexposed/harsh lighting --Ianare 22:25, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Siberian Crane --Ltshears 19:19, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
- Decline overexposured --Mbdortmund 23:13, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Flowers of a Yellow Lupin - Alvesgaspar 14:46, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion Good work. -- Pro2 18:15, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Apple flowers. --Jolly Janner 16:55, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion A simple clean, clear image. Looking at other Malus images this is very good --Herbythyme 16:24, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cruise ship on the Danube --High Contrast 06:38, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion good --Mbdortmund 23:16, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cherub at Duke Gardens --Specious 06:34, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
- Decline composition (flowers right out the head) --Mbdortmund 23:15, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination Now for a little more difficult ... --Ianare 05:52, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
- Decline not suited for reuse because of overlapping birds and the rightmost, unbalanced piper --G.Hagedorn 16:50, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination last running piper --Ianare 05:52, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Quality image --G.Hagedorn 16:50, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Schloss Nordkirche, Germany --Mbdortmund 23:24, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
- Decline Disturbing trapezoidal distortion. Good luck with that. --Eusebius 11:04, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Trier, Prince-electors Palace, South wing. --Berthold Werner 11:35, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion Good. --Eusebius 11:02, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Germany, Dinkelsbühl, Turmgasse, Towerlane --Berthold Werner 08:52, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination en:Barossa Reservoir --Peripitus 13:13, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion Slight posterization in the sky, but I think it's ok. --Eusebius 10:58, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination Garden strawberry (Fragaria x ananassa). -- MJJR 20:40, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion sharp, natural colours --Mbdortmund 23:18, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
-
-
-
- Nomination 2TE10U Russian diesel locomotive - Charlie fong 02:22, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
- Decline Looks fantastic, but overprocessed. You should upload the original and put it in the "other versions" section. PS the data on the metadata says 2008, but the date you put is 2007. --Jolly Janner 11:20, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Schloss Neuhaus near Paderborn (Germany) --Nawi112 21:14, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion Stunning! --Jolly Janner 21:20, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
-
-
-
- Nomination Jagiellonian University in Krakow --OlEnglish 11:55, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
- Decline Sorry, but Oppose Strange perspective, strange colours at lot of ghosts --Berthold Werner 12:45, 7 May 2009 (UTC) *HDR image obviously. I like the colors and even the ghosts (yes!), but resolution is too low. --Afrank99 16:20, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
- Nomination Pyrrhosoma nymphula --ComputerHotline 18:46, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion Looks good! kallerna 19:17, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ischnura elegans --ComputerHotline 18:46, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion Nice shot. kallerna 19:17, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Contaflex III with Tessar 1:2,8 50mm and Pro-Tessar 1:4 115mm --Berthold Werner 18:05, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion Great quality (great DOF, sharp etc.) kallerna 19:19, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Leptodirus hochenwartii, a blind cave beetle from Slovenia --Yerpo 19:59, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion Nice picture. DOF is unfortunately not sufficient for FPC imo but well interesting photograph which shows clearly the whole animal... and rare as it's the only one here on Wikimedia! It changes us from the common flies, dragonflies, wasps and so on... Thanks for sharing it! Sting 20:18, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination Ceriagrion glabrum female --Muhammad Mahdi Karim 20:24, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion Good job. --kallerna 19:21, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Pelopidas sp. --Muhammad Mahdi Karim 20:09, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion Good job. --kallerna 19:21, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Conical orchid (Orchis conica) from Mallorca. -- Lycaon 19:00, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion nice --Mbdortmund 21:18, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Schloss Nordkirche, Germany --Mbdortmund 23:24, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
- Decline Too few light. Due to bad weather conditions, your images need a little bit more exposure or gamma correction. Moderate sharpening won't hurt either. --Afrank99 11:26, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination: Schloss Nordkirchen, Vase --Mbdortmund 20:58, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
-
-
- Nomination A panoramic view of the Vercors mountains (France)--Jean-Alexis AUFAUVRE 12:56, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
- Decline there is something wrong in the right part of the image (near the poles) --Ianare 14:08, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
- Nomination --Muhammad Mahdi Karim 04:41, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion Question is that a mango tree? --Ianare 14:26, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
Acacia tree --Muhammad Mahdi Karim 16:20, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
Quality is good, can you add tree species info --Ianare 06:19, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
Done --Muhammad Mahdi Karim 18:42, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
OK --Ianare 22:35, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A Street full of fog -- Pro2 20:08, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
- Decline Over exposed. --Jolly Janner 20:22, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
Not really but ok..--Pro2 13:36, 5 May 2009 (UTC) Comment try cropping out the completely white upper part of the image --Ianare 06:19, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
Better now? But I'm sure, in reality it didn't look different! -- Pro2 13:26, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Chinatown Gate, Chicago. --Dschwen 18:09, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
- Decline Noisy sky. --Jolly Janner 15:40, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Window cleaner at MS Amorella. kallerna 14:53, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
- Decline Blurred window frame if you look at the bottom and overexposed where light gets through the window. --Jolly Janner 15:40, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Rhône river in Geneva. Yann 12:54, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
- Decline Comment too yellowish. _Fukutaro 15:49, 6 May 2009 (UTC) Question Yellowish? I don't see any yellow. I see a blue sky and a blue-green river. Yann 00:05, 7 May 2009 (UTC) Comment there is a problem with the yellow color balance --Ianare 06:24, 7 May 2009 (UTC) Question Is this one better? Yann 07:05, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
yes, it is --Ianare 14:41, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sterna maxima portrait --Ianare 06:15, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion I certainly would not want to see several svg, labelled with as much detail as this photographer has displayed a knowledge of plant parts in CR) made from this very complete collection of birds on sand collection of Ianare's. -- carol 10:23, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Facade of Viborg Katedralskole, Denmark. Stitch of three photos in Hugin, rectlinear projection. --Slaunger 22:01, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Ianare 06:16, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ceriagrion glabrum male--Muhammad Mahdi Karim 20:09, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. But a wee bit too much denoising for my taste (eyes look odd). --Dschwen 20:16, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ceriagrion glabrum male--Muhammad Mahdi Karim 20:09, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. But a wee bit too much denoising for my taste (eyes look odd). --Dschwen 20:16, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ceriagrion glabrum male--Muhammad Mahdi Karim 20:09, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. But a wee bit too much denoising for my taste (eyes look odd). --Dschwen 20:16, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The Mittellandkanal in Wolfsburg, Germany with the headquater building of Volkswagen. --High Contrast 11:34, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
- Decline Low contrast, unsharp, noisy. --Afrank99 19:04, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination Schloss Nordkirche, Germany --Mbdortmund 23:24, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
- Decline underexposed --Pudelek 19:31, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Schloss Nordkirche, Germany --Mbdortmund 23:24, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion good details --Ianare 21:12, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Veronica prostrata subsp. scheereri from the Calestienne, Belgium. Lycaon 14:59, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion nice --Mathias Bigge 19:36, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination World Health Organisation building from west. Yann 20:10, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
- Decline I like this composition, however I think the vertical perspective could be corrected, and there is a dustspot just above the top cloud. --Karora 10:18, 7 May 2009 (UTC) Comment In fact, looking again (rather than actually measuring verticals) the perspective is close enough - just the dustspot that needs cleaning. --Karora 10:20, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Nomination Buildings at the Wine market, Dinkelsbühl, Germany --Berthold Werner 09:12, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion Comment I would prefer sun from behind - not from the right. --Villy Fink Isaksen 19:56, 3 May 2009 (UTC) Support OK for me. Yann 07:42, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination INS Lahav - a Saar 5 class missile ship. --MathKnight 14:32, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
- Decline jpeg artefacts/noise --Ianare 21:18, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Frozen waterfall on the Wappinger Creek, Dutchess County, New York. Juliancolton 04:43, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion Good composition & details. Some areas could be a tad darker. --Ianare 21:16, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination Tractor on a meadow. --High Contrast 21:12, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
- Decline a slight strong C/A, not good sharpness. _Fukutaro 15:49, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination Vicugna pacos --null 11:28, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
- Decline Careful when using this shallow DOF, the focus has to be on the eyes of the animal, otherwise it usually doesn't look good. --Spock lone wolf 13:05, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Viborg Katedralskole, present building: 1922-1926. Architect: Hack Kampmann. Stitched of three photos in Hugin. -- Slaunger 21:51, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion looks OK --Mbdortmund 22:54, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Coastal steamer MS Kong Harald approaching harbour of Nesna. Background left the mountains of Tomma. Finnrind 18:05, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion QI --Mbdortmund 22:55, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Chicago River and Michigan Avenue bridge by night. --Dschwen 14:19, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion cool --Mbdortmund 00:04, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Post World War II Lionel Trains and accessories. --JMSchneid 11:54, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
- Decline Bad composition. --Spock lone wolf 13:38, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Camouflaged European Hare --Spock lone wolf 11:20, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion QI fo me. Lycaon 15:00, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The Hazbani river in northern Israel --Adiel lo 10:56, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion Nice. Meets the requirements. --High Contrast 08:33, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cividale del Friuli, Cathedral Santa Maria Assunta and Ponto del Diavolo --Aconcagua 09:11, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion Ok. --Berthold Werner 11:34, 5 May 2009 (UTC) Support Very nice composition, but also a bit blurry. Minor chromatic aberration visible on left. A QI nevertheless. --Siipikarja 20:59, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Calidris alba running --Ianare 11:05, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion Very nicly done, but the dust induced spot (upper left of centre) needs fixing - Peripitus 12:34, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
Question I don't see it - can you say where it is relative to the bird? Thank you --Ianare 13:58, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
all fixed now - Peripitus 22:18, 5 May 2009 (UTC) Comment Thank you. It was easier to crop out the seaweed ;-). --Ianare 05:14, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Potato bag cultivation in my garden. --Jolly Janner 20:15, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
- Decline perspective not optimal, plant is not alone (neutral background) or in it's natural Environment -- MichaelFrey 16:45, 5 May 2009 (UTC) Comment By the way, the photo is to show the plants in potato bag cultivation, not in their "natural environment". --Jolly Janner 18:12, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A European Honey Bee carries pollen in the pollen basket by Muhammad Mahdi Karim. --High Contrast 18:05, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion nice shot ! --Ianare 14:26, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination Germany, Dinkelsbühl, Rothenburg Gate --Berthold Werner 08:08, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion Comment: Seems a bit tilted to the left. --Coyau 18:11, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
I checked it again but in my opinion the tower ist upright. --Berthold Werner 08:09, 4 May 2009 (UTC) It might be an effect of perspective, then. --Coyau 12:56, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Diskette --Afrank99 11:54, 3 May 2009 (UTC) 11:40, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion Quality is ok -- Pro2 12:26, 3 May 2009 (UTC) Support
LOAD "QI",8,1--Siipikarja 21:04, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Roosevelt Dam, Arizona --Bgag 16:38, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
- Decline Jpeg artefacts, in parts unsharp and noisy. --High Contrast 08:52, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Přemysl Otakar II Square in České Budějovice --Spock lone wolf 19:49, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion I like the water effects. Sharp. --Ianare 05:25, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
-
-
-
- Nomination: Picea abies. Adamantios 11:35, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
- Review Comment How about rotating the image 90 degrees CCW? --Siipikarja 08:04, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination World Health Organisation building from south, Geneva. --High Contrast 19:01, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
- Decline Pointless edit per my comments below in CR. --Dschwen 19:16, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Poel Island (Germany), Baltic Sea, in winter --Aconcagua 16:43, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion Nice image --High Contrast 18:06, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
- Nomination Bergues bridge and "Seagull" ship, Geneva. Yann 13:36, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion meets QI-requirements --Mbdortmund 23:02, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ponta da Piedade near Lagos, Portugal Felix Koenig 14:44, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
- Decline Washed out colors, not too sharp, noise --Ianare 18:48, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
-
-
-
- Nomination Illinois State Capitol dome.--Dschwen 03:36, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion Boah eh. --Berthold Werner 08:43, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Exterior shot of Resurrection Catholic Secondary School in Kitchener, ON. Tabercil 01:15, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
- Decline Sorry, no. Distracting tree in the foreground, overexposed sky and bad perspective --Berthold Werner 08:46, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination Denmark, Stepping Kirke --Villy Fink Isaksen 09:18, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion Good. --Coyau 18:11, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination Denmark, Det Røde Vandtårn i Haderslev --Villy Fink Isaksen 12:02, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion Ok. --Berthold Werner 12:06, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination House in Angers --Coyau 21:56, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion OK. --Berthold Werner 17:13, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination Wells Street Bridge in Chicago. Exposure blended from 3 shots and manually deghosted. --Dschwen 04:08, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion Very good. --Berthold Werner 09:12, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bridges over the Chicago River. --Dschwen 16:17, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion great details --Mbdortmund 22:56, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Calidris alba running.--Ianare 14:41, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion Ok --Spock lone wolf 10:16, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Nomination Bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) with visible Nictitating membrane --LC-de 13:36, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion Correct exposure and details. --ComputerHotline 17:54, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Church tower in Menden, Germany --Mbdortmund 14:22, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion quality image --Ianare 04:22, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
och neee, seit wann laedst Du denn unter GFDL-1.2-only hoch :-( --Dschwen 16:08, 1 May 2009 (UTC) Aus Bockigkeit wegen der absolut nervigen Lizenzdebatten --Mbdortmund 22:59, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Gemany, Dinkelsbühl, Wörnitz Gate --Berthold Werner 10:55, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion OK --Karora 10:52, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Common dandelion --Von.grzanka 19:09, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion Good light and details --Ianare 17:22, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Quiscalus major eating shrimp --Ianare 04:16, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
- Withdrawn
I withdraw my nomination --Ianare 07:17, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
- Nomination 1 Primula auricula, 2 Primula elatior, 3 Primula veris --Böhringer 20:05, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
- Decline Comment Mittleres Bild passt nicht recht zu den anderen, vor allem Kontrast, IMHO --Mbdortmund 21:04, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
Very nice idea and undoubtedly useful, but quality is not good enough (sharpness, noise). Lycaon 11:16, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Speyer Cathedral (South-View) by Gentry --Ianare 17:47, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion provides a good overview --Mbdortmund 21:06, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination Calidris alba running.--Ianare 14:41, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
- Withdrawn I withdraw my nomination Ianare 21:55, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Calidris alba running.--Ianare 14:41, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
- Withdrawn I withdraw my nomination Ianare 21:55, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Jerusalem, Dome of the rock --Berthold Werner 09:11, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion Comment The fact that the base of the dome is not horizontal is distracting, complicated further by the similarly sloped wall in the nearer foreground. Is that the way it is, or is it reasonable to correct it? --Karora 12:35, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
Info This problem comes up often by photographs of buildings. I tried to correct it. --Berthold Werner 15:31, 1 May 2009 (UTC) Comment Don't I know it :-) OK now. --Karora 21:39, 1 May 2009 (UTC) Oppose while there is a dust spot in the sky, just above the las building on the left. --Coyau 16:12, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
Info Removed --Berthold Werner 18:17, 2 May 2009 (UTC) Good. --Coyau 21:42, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination An abandoned building with pool. --High Contrast 08:57, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
- Decline Washed out sky, colours probably overprocessed (noisy, maybe too much saturation), and the building in the centre of the frame should be horizontal. Additionally, I'm not a big fan of the fisheye effect, but it does not motivate my vote. --Eusebius 17:26, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bergiselschanze --Böhringer 11:04, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion All photographic requirements fulfilled and it is additionally an interesting composition -- there is something very elating about a snowless ski lift in the Northern hemisphere in April also.... -- carol 11:31, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Detail of a fountain in Grenoble. --Eusebius 15:50, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion portrait itself crisp and good details --Mbdortmund 13:11, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Staircase in the Château de Chambord. --Coyau 01:34, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion Comment There is a visible stitching artifact near the top of the downpipe to the right of the stairs. --Karora 11:41, 30 April 2009 (UTC) I can't find it... Where is it ? --Coyau 12:13, 30 April 2009 (UTC) Comment 1660px across & 2125px down. --Karora 12:57, 1 May 2009 (UTC) I checked with original picture and I can't see a difference. For me the column is badly weathered, it makes kind of an angle at the 1/3 and lichen patterns seem repetitive on original picture too. Do you want me to upload it so you can check ? --Coyau 13:20, 1 May 2009 (UTC) Comment Thanks for checking. Since stitching errors are repairable I think it's good to be pedantic about them. --Karora 10:35, 2 May 2009 (UTC) No problem. --Coyau 15:26, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Roman baths, Sbeitla --Bgag 15:05, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Maria in a church tower in Menden, Germany --Mbdortmund 14:22, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Illinois House of Representatives. blowing the windows is hardly avoidable, so I hope you take the resolution and details into account. --Dschwen 21:22, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion good, die anderen sehen für meinen Geschmack etwas rotstichig aus. --Mbdortmund 12:18, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
-
-
-
- Nomination another Chicago sunrise shot - and yes, it was worth getting up that early, unfortunately my camera ran out of space and battery, but the light was getting amazing, at sunset the light comes from behind the skyline. --Dschwen 22:56, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion There's a not-quite-removed dustspot about every 1800 pixels all the way across which you may want to tweak. Otherwise perfect. --Karora 06:03, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Lake Geneva with Jet d'Eau --MRB 10:10, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion Ok. --Berthold Werner 17:05, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Germany, Dinkelsbühl, Segring Gate --Berthold Werner 09:56, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion Good work. --Karora 09:09, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Palazzo Cavalli-Franchetti in Venice. --High Contrast 08:57, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion Ok. --Berthold Werner 17:05, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination St. Georg church, Dinkelsbühl, Germany --Berthold Werner 06:56, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion There's a dust spot in the top right quadrant, otherwise this is good. --Karora 02:03, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
Info Removed --Berthold Werner 09:50, 30 April 2009 (UTC) Support Promoted! --Karora 20:54, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
-
-
-
- Nomination The Hazards, Freycinet Peninsula, Tasmania, Australia. --High Contrast 08:57, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion That is a big rock. --Coyau 09:57, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Fallow deer in the forest --Spock lone wolf 07:50, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion QI-material --Mbdortmund 08:31, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Russell Falls in Mt Field National Park. --High Contrast 06:59, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion very nice --Böhringer 07:48, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
-
-
-
- Nomination The Skatalites during a Concert --Er Komandante 20:26, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion Crisp, with excellent crop & lighting and very little noise for such an environment. Could you geocode it too, please. --Karora 01:58, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Animation of a rotary Atkinson-cycle engine. --Till Niermann 20:08, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion A great illustration,
however the text on the discussion page at Atkinson cycle suggests that there might be errors in it. I don't think we could make this QI until that discussion is resolved in some way. Please resubmit when that happens.--Karora 11:50, 30 April 2009 (UTC) Comment Sorry - that discussion referred to the other diagram. My mistake. --Karora 12:03, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Marienkirche in Halle Saale, seen from East. -- Pro2 19:35, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion Ok. --Berthold Werner 09:42, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination Contest fireworks performance, Brno dam, Ignis Brunensis 2007 --Spock lone wolf 09:56, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion Good -- Pro2 13:10, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination St. Georg church and Segring Street, Dinkelsbühl, Germany --Berthold Werner 08:09, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion technisch OK, leider Haus links etwas zersenst, wahrscheinlich schwer besser zu kriegen --Mbdortmund 00:04, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
Info Da gibt's noch eine Nominierung vom 28. ganz ohne störende Häuser --Berthold Werner 09:53, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Melbourne Royal Exhibition Building --Karora 05:50, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
- Decline sorry, but overexposured sky ruins the good composition --Mbdortmund 00:05, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The Bluewater Shopping Centre in England --High Contrast 16:36, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion Great -- Pro2 19:34, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
-
-
-
- Nomination Vault and main staircase of the Château de Chambord. --Coyau 01:10, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
- Decline This can't quite decide if it's a photo of the roof or the stairs, and unfortunately ends up not doing either very well. --Karora 11:41, 30 April 2009 (UTC) Info How about a photo of how they meet, about what's between them. --Coyau 11:46, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination South tower of the Château de Chambord. --Coyau 19:32, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion Comment There is a slight lean to the left that could be corrected, otherwise good. --Karora 09:30, 27 April 2009 (UTC) Done Better? --Coyau 16:20, 27 April 2009 (UTC) Support good! --Karora 03:45, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Anzac Day dawn service -- silhouette Gnangarra 14:46, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
- Withdrawn
-
- Nomination Anzac Day dawn service -- foreground crowd Gnangarra 14:46, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
- Withdrawn
-
- Nomination Coreus marginatus --ComputerHotline 09:37, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
- Decline DOF too tight. --Karora 11:27, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Syrphidae sp. --ComputerHotline 09:37, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
- Decline DOF way too tight. --Karora 11:27, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Tipula sp. --ComputerHotline 09:37, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
- Decline DOF too tight. --Karora 11:27, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Hamburg-Moorburg power plant (gas turbine), Germany Felix Koenig 19:01, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion Looks fine. --Karora 06:18, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Belltower of the Viviers cathedral. --Coyau 16:52, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
- Decline The picture is very tilted and distorted, as could be expected from this angle without using tilt/shift lens. --Spock lone wolf 10:00, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Closed church of St. Anna in Szubin -- Albertus teolog 14:27, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion ok. --Berthold Werner 15:48, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ruby-throated hummingbird (Archilochus colubris) --JMSchneid 13:28, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion Nice picture, althought the use of flash is apparent, it's good. --Spock lone wolf 13:32, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Rooster crowing --Muhammad Mahdi Karim 08:33, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
- Decline No mitigating reason for downsampling to just barely above the minimum resolution. --Dschwen 21:43, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination Door knocker --Bgag 22:07, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion Comment Where does the strange mauve come from? Was that really the colour? --Karora 00:35, 27 April 2009 (UTC) Comment I don't know but it is the real color. --Bgag 03:59, 27 April 2009 (UTC) Support Good composition. --Karora 22:17, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination River Gąsawka InfoSecond attempt -- Albertus teolog 13:42, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
- Decline Comment Nothing really sharp..? -- Pro2 16:30, 24 April 2009 (UTC) Oppose Not sharp and photo where you'd wait for better lighting would be nice. --Spock lone wolf 12:58, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
- Nomination River Gąsawka
.jpg)
.jpg)
_de_Vallbona_de_les_Monges.svg)
.jpg)
_-_kostel_svat%C3%A9ho_Vojt%C4%9Bcha.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg){kind=small}
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
_-_houses_on_market_square.jpg)
.jpg)
![* Nomination Coats of arms of Berne. Yann 19:31, 15 May 2009 (UTC) * Decline Question Did you apply masking? The roof looks 'nibbled'. Lycaon 12:02, 18 May 2009 (UTC) Comment Yes, I masked the roof which is not interesting and distracting for the subject. See the other version [1]. Yann 19:49, 18 May 2009 (UTC) I prefer the unaltered version, distraction is minimal. Current image has too poor masking. Lycaon 07:12, 21 May 2009 (UTC)](/wiki/File:Coats_of_arms_of_Berne.jpg)
.jpg)
.JPG)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg){kind=small}
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg){kind=small}
.jpg)
![]] 18:41, 9 May 2009 (UTC) * Promotion Comment Rotate, so the edge of the building (seen on the right on the picture) is directly vertical and then crop it out, because it is very white. --Jolly Janner 19:31, 9 May 2009 (UTC) Comment Thanks for the improvement advices ;-) check it out again ;) --Stefan-Xp 15:58, 13 May 2009 (UTC) Support Good now! --Jolly Janner 16:43, 13 May 2009 (UTC)](/wiki/File:Menschenrettung_mit_der_Steckleiter.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
_-_market_square.jpg){kind=small}
.jpg)
.JPG)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg){kind=link}
![[1]](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/archive/2/25/20090515191538!Armes_de_Berne.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![1.39 File:Clematis montana "rubens" flower.JPG](#File:Clematis_montana_"rubens"_flower.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Consensual review
[edit]File:BergiselInnsbruck1.JPG
[edit]
- Nomination View of Bergisel ski jumping hill in Innsbruck (Austria) from the South --Böhringer 20:26, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
- Decline
- Support nice composition, would be nice to have a picture of the changing colours during the night, too --Mbdortmund 20:33, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose Dull colors, main subject too small. Yann 10:16, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
Neutral Colors are a bit blunt. Size of the subject is OK, puts the subject nicely into scale. --Siipikarja 20:18, 21 April 2009 (UTC)- Support not bad --Pudelek 10:54, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose Subject is not clearly visible --Pymouss44 21:35, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose Don't like colors, composition nor the technical quality. --Spock lone wolf 10:07, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Decline? Eusebius 11:47, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
File:Thermocouple Multiplexer Agilent.jpg
[edit]
- Nomination Thermocouple Multiplexer Card --Harke 20:33, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support QI. --Karora 05:57, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose Background needs cleaning up. Lycaon 07:52, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
- Support Background is neutral enough to be acceptable. --Eusebius 09:39, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote? Eusebius 12:04, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
File:MilfordSoundStirlingFalls_gobeirne_EDIT.jpg
[edit]
- Nomination Stirling Falls, Milford Sound, New Zealand (new proposition after colour balance) --Sting 00:53, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
- Decline
- Support interesting enough, IMHO --Mbdortmund 22:56, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose Interesting but too noisy. Lycaon 08:00, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose This is taken from the front of a launch nosing into a 189 metre waterfall, so it's a very difficult shot. I've been there and there's a heck of a lot of water flying around in this place. My own photo is an unworthy comparison. On the other hand it does appear to have gained some noticeable noise, particularly on the right underneath the mossy patch, when compared against the original image, and a white balance adjustment should be able to do better than that. --Karora 12:42, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline? Eusebius 12:03, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
File:Seiffen_Kirche_01_(MK).jpg
[edit].jpg)
- Nomination the church of Seiffen in the Ore Mountains in Saxony, Germany. (Panorama of two upright Pictures) --Leviathan1983 06:44, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
- Decline
- Oppose Agree this is an unfortunate crop. --Karora 13:01, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose Unfortunate crop (especially considering it being a composite image). Lycaon 09:39, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
- Your right! I thought that this argument will come. Sadly even the originals have no more space to the ground. The church stands in a kind of ditch so you can´t see more of the church --Leviathan1983 09:52, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose However if you did left more space down there, it would be obvious in what position the church is and it wouldn't seem to be cut off by photographer. --Spock lone wolf 12:20, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Decline? Eusebius 12:02, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
File:Zwinger gardens.jpg
[edit]
- Nomination the gardens behind the Zwinger palace, Dresden -- Adiel lo 16:46, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Neutral Good framing and a nice shot, but perhaps it could benefit from some careful sharpening, and please geocode the image. --Karora 07:05, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
- Info I've added the location and sharpened it a little bit (I hope it's ok, I'm no photoshop expert). Adiel lo 17:10, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
- Support Just right --Karora 00:26, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose Looks overexposed. --Eusebius 12:50, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
- Support looks fine to me --Ianare 23:24, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote? Eusebius 12:02, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
File:Thomas_Bresson_-_Cour-int_(by).jpg
[edit].jpg)
- Nomination Courtyard of Roppe fortifications. --ComputerHotline 16:56, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
- Decline
- Oppose I'm afraid the motion of the trees ruined the merge. --Eusebius 12:55, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
- Support Nice light and colours : it's all right for me. Pymouss44 21:25, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose per eusebius, you can see false shadows on the tall trees on left --Ianare 23:21, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
- Comment I like the composition but the false trees are not good. Can you fix it? -- Pro2 20:03, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline? Eusebius 09:52, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
File:Maremma panorama from buratta.jpg
[edit]
- Nomination 3-pics panorama of Maremma (Italy) --Alejo2083 12:30, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
- Decline
- Comment Fix the black areas! -- Pro2 16:31, 24 April 2009 (UTC); did you mean the small dark area on top?
- I cropped it away! and I added geotags --Alejo2083 13:57, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose edges severely Out Of Focus, image is not sharp --Ianare 07:37, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose Also, I think there is something like a water drop on the lens. --Eusebius 08:17, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline? Eusebius 09:27, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
File:San Francesco, Pisa, interno.jpg
[edit]
- Nomination Church San Francesco, Pisa, Italy --Lucarelli 23:12, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
- Decline
- NeutralNice image, but I think the effects of the light from the windows seems to give too much glare to the rest of the image a bit much for my taste. --Karora 07:32, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose blown windows, noisy --ianaré (talk) 03:34, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Decline? Eusebius 09:26, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
File:Bamberger Dom BW 6.JPG
[edit]
- Nomination Bamberg Cathedral --Berthold Werner 12:21, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
- Decline
- Comment perspektive should be corrected --Mbdortmund 19:42, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
- Question Better? --Berthold Werner 11:05, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
- Comment Perspective seems good. A slight trim of the pink area at the top on the right-hand side is now needed, but I wonder if you could also go back to the original and apply the cumulative changes to that, as there seems to be a small loss of definition in the corners that may be avoidable --Karora 00:19, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose perspective is distorted, and the top of the tower is blurry --Ianare 07:31, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Decline? Eusebius 09:25, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
File:Assisi San Francesco BW 10.JPG
[edit]
- Nomination Assisi,Basilica di San Francesco, Portal of the lower church --Berthold Werner 10:49, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
- Decline
- I think that such things shoud be photographed in a way to show it's symmetry. Was it impossible here? --Sfu 09:08, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
- QuestionHm? What exactly do you mean? --Berthold Werner 11:07, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
Framing is asymmetrical. I can see a part of the column on the right but not on the left. The same with sculpture. If croped I think it sould be to tight. --Sfu 05:59, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
- Now I see it --Berthold Werner 08:45, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose Agree with sfu about symmetry --Ianare 07:24, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Decline? Eusebius 09:25, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
File:Monoski.JPG
[edit]
- Nomination A monoski. --Eusebius 12:25, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Neutral Can you re-take in better lighting? --Karora 07:32, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
- Question Because of the reflection, or because you'd like it more exposed? --Eusebius 16:21, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
- Comment The reflection isn't great, but mainly because the lighting is uneven, making the lower half very dim. --Karora 23:02, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
- Info I've tried to make the lighting more even through postprocessing. The result is lighter (closer to the true aspect of the object), but the reflection is unchanged and the postprocessing induced some slight luma noise in the lower part. --Eusebius 20:52, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
- Support good enough --Ianare 07:35, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote? Eusebius 09:24, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
File:Apis mellifera Portrait.jpg
[edit]
- Nomination Common Honeybee. --High Contrast 08:57, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
- Decline
- Oppose It's got good drama, but when you get down to it only the eye is in focus, and not even all of that, and it still only barely makes the 2mp limit. --Karora 12:00, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
- Support I think it is good enough to be QI. 2,5MP are enough, too -- Pro2 12:40, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose DOF too shallow, sorry --Ianare 07:47, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline? Eusebius 09:24, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
File:Johan_Ludvig_Runeberg_statue.jpg
[edit]
- Nomination Statue of J.L. Runeberg. --P7r7 18:57, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion Wow. Guess I don't need to visit in person now :-) --Karora 06:05, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
- Comment Light and crop are much better, but there remains the stitching errors on the lower legs/feet of the statue. Lycaon 18:25, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
- Support Fine now. Lycaon 21:21, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
- Support Well done! --Siipikarja 10:11, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote? Eusebius 09:23, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
File:Musiksaal von 1896 Villa Grünau .jpg
[edit]
- Nomination music hall in 1896 in neo-renaissance --Böhringer 20:00, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
- Decline
- Comment Tolles Bild, brauchte man da keine Fotoerlaubnis? --Mbdortmund 23:25, 26 April 2009 (UTC) * nein, heute ist das Gemeindehaus in der Villa untergebracht. Der Bürgermeister hat mich pesönlich eingelassen und freut sich über den Artikel, der in nächster Zeit noch geschrieben und bebildert wird. l.g. --Böhringer 10:43, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
- Support Dann klar QI --Mbdortmund 19:42, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose Most of it is unsharp, significant overexposure. --Eusebius 11:46, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
- Neutral From an encyclopedic point of view, this is ein tolles Bild indeed. The overexposed parts are almost unavoidable IMO, due to the (too big) contrasts between dark & light in the room. For a pano of 16 images, the sharpness is insufficient. -- MJJR 20:35, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose should be sharper, blown highlights --Ianare 07:53, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline? Eusebius 09:22, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
File:Haliaeetus albicilla LC0194.jpg
[edit]
- Nomination White-tailed eagle (Haliaeetus albicilla) --LC-de 22:56, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
- Decline
- SupportCorrect exposure and details. --ComputerHotline 10:52, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose The feet are cut off. Good otherwise, sorry. --Ianare 14:10, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Ianare. --Eusebius 09:51, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline? Eusebius 09:21, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
File:Thomas Bresson - Ibis rouge (by).jpg
[edit].jpg)
- Nomination Eudocimus ruber --ComputerHotline 07:39, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
- Decline
- Oppose Needs a thorough crop IMO. Lycaon 08:01, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
- Comment
I'd also support a cropped version.--Eusebius 11:48, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
- Support not bad, but would be better cropped. --ianaré (talk) 07:49, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose red channel on the main subject severely blown. Main subject takes up little space in the frame. --Dschwen 14:14, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Dschwen, loss of information on the red channel, which is significant here. --Eusebius 14:17, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Decline? Eusebius 11:23, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
File:Chartres - cathédrale - arcs-boutants de la nef.JPG
[edit]
- Nomination Chartres cathedral: flying buttresses of the nave. --Eusebius 07:32, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
- Withdrawn
- Neutral I think the perspective needs fixing, but there's good detail in there. Maybe a little sharpening would also help. --Karora 07:32, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
- This picture has been taken with a deliberate angle, I really don't think perspective correction would be a good thing here. Feel free to propose a DW, though, if you have an idea about it. --Eusebius 13:07, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
- Maybe you're right and work on the perspective wouldn't help (I admit I tried and couldn't make it work :-), but it just doesn't look like much of anything as-is. Perhaps you can persuade someone else to endorse it. --Karora 23:02, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
- Support good details, and i think the perspective adds to the interest of the picture in this case --Ianare 07:55, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose Sad pictures, common composition : everything but a quality image. Pymouss44 21:27, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose Washed out details in the sky ruin the picture for me. --Siipikarja 21:14, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
- OMG... I was sure I had checked that... I'm sorry to have wasted your time. --Eusebius 21:34, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination
File:A black pearl and a shell.jpg
[edit]
File:Adelaide Zoo Silver Gull - pelican enclosure.jpg
[edit]
- Nomination Chroicocephalus novaehollandiae (Silver Gull) - Peripitus 13:13, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support Very nice image -- Pro2 15:07, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
- Question Isn't the head overexposed? --Eusebius 11:31, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
- Support Lighting is definitely not optimal but I think the photo makes a good enough compromise between light and dark areas. --Ianare 17:35, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
- Comment here I was trying to get the subject to pop out from the background while keeping as much feather detail as possible. It looks much better printed than on my LCD screen - Peripitus 04:28, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote? Eusebius 09:25, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
File:Ophrys bombyliflora (flower).jpg
[edit].jpg)
- Nomination Ophrys bombyliflora in Mallorca --Lycaon 22:55, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Comment The sharp part could be cropped tighter imo --Berthold Werner 06:17, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
- OpposeI don't mind the crop; I do think that all of the sepals should all be in focus. -- carol 18:21, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
- Comment Request second opinion. The flower is about 5 mm across. Lycaon 10:50, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
- Support I don't see anything wrong with the focus, the sepals are behind/lower than the labellum --Ianare 17:30, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
- Support Focus OK. Yann 08:17, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote? Eusebius 09:23, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
File:Hôtel des Bergues.jpg
[edit]
- Nomination Hôtel des Bergues, Geneva. Yann 12:01, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion
- OpposePoor composition : the flag is in the way --Ianare 18:53, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
- Support IMHO technically OK, composition following acceptable idea --Mbdortmund 23:04, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose I like the composition with the flag but I think it is not so good for Wikipedia. (And two are too much.) --Berthold Werner (talk) 13:28, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
- Support nice photo, for me composition is OK --Pudelek 09:47, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
- Support This is QI, not FP. Technical quality is OK. Lycaon 10:47, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
- Support Good Quality, flag is ok. -- Pro2 19:15, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
Running total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promote? Eusebius 09:22, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
File:Menden-20070426 103-DSC 6794-Fachwerk.jpg
[edit]
- Nomination Timber framing in Menden, Germany --Mbdortmund 00:25, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support The whole building is tilted ;-) --Berthold Werner 16:37, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
- Yes, that's why I used the doorway as a reference point. It would be a very easy fix --Ianare 18:45, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
- Would you be so nice to post a proposal, Ianare, even the road was not straight but leaded down to the right...
--Mbdortmund 23:07, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
- Done I really like this image BTW. My initial vote was only to encourage it to be even better ;-) --Ianare 08:53, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
- But now is the left part of the door tilted ;-) --Berthold Werner 06:13, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
- If my modification is undone I will change my vote to support --Ianare 14:12, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
- Until now there is no vote from you. --Berthold Werner 07:59, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
- I can't vote on my own edit --Ianare 17:57, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
- Support OK. Yann 08:23, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote? Lycaon 09:59, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
File:Krnov castle - entrance.jp
[edit]
- Nomination Castle in Krnov, Czech Silesia - entrance --Pudelek 07:36, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Neutral it's a little noisy, but otherwise good. Let's see what others have to say --Ianare 18:38, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
- Comment Noise level is ok for me, but I think I see some kind of "aliasing" on the border of the window/doors arches. I'm not sure about it, though. --Eusebius 07:33, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
- Support OK for me. Yann 08:40, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote? Eusebius 09:21, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
File:Thomas Bresson - Pyrrhosoma nymphula-1 (by).jpg
[edit].jpg)
- Nomination Pyrrhosoma nymphula --ComputerHotline 16:59, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support ok imo -- Pro2 11:08, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose Flat light and insufficient sharpness Compare with current VI. Lycaon 22:00, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
- Support Would not support for VI or FP but I think it's good enough for QI. --Ianare 18:40, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
- Neutral not bad, but DOF a bit shallow and there is gras or something else between camera and object. --Mbdortmund 23:10, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose Distracting straw in the foreground. --Slaunger 18:13, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
- Support OK for QI. Yann 08:42, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promote? Eusebius 09:21, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
File:Allium triquetrum (inflorescense).jpg
[edit]File:Allium triquetrum (inflorescense).jpg
.jpg)
The original has subsequently been over-written with a copy of the cropped version
.jpg){kind=link}
- Nomination Allium triquetrum in Mallorca. Lycaon 19:45, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Original version
- I really am unsure if the crop improved the image or not. -- carol (talk) 13:39, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
- It may have. I didn't consider that crop. Thanks. Lycaon 14:15, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
- Edited version
- I have stricken my vote. If I remember correctly, much of the integrity of the reviews here was achieved by not voting for your own image, nomination or edited version and relying (confidently) on the opinions of others. Such behavior is a given for some of those with a certain kind of upbreeding in our species, perhaps (obviously) not a guarrentee of the whole group though. 'Tis easy and it also feels good, please feel free to experiment with this type of good conduct on yourself. -- carol (talk) 16:53, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
- Yep, fully agree. Lycaon 20:59, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
- I have stricken my vote. If I remember correctly, much of the integrity of the reviews here was achieved by not voting for your own image, nomination or edited version and relying (confidently) on the opinions of others. Such behavior is a given for some of those with a certain kind of upbreeding in our species, perhaps (obviously) not a guarrentee of the whole group though. 'Tis easy and it also feels good, please feel free to experiment with this type of good conduct on yourself. -- carol (talk) 16:53, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
- Support (the new crop). The crop at the fade point really makes it stronger. --Karora 09:31, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
- Support cropped version --Ianare 14:02, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
- weak Support cropped version. Very dreamy, still, the right side is too tight. _Fukutaro 15:49, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
- Very articulate review and you are correct. I had some serious problems with the "professional looking" software I use while making this crop. Perhaps maintaining the aspect ratio was not so important. (I have heard that learning English is easy, you make it appear that this is true.) -- carol (talk) 21:01, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote? Lycaon 09:56, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
File:Canadian geese and goslings in GGP.jpg
[edit]
- Nomination Canadian geese. --Mbz1 23:53, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
- Decline Way too overprocessed, oversharpening creating artifacts (see grass) --Spock lone wolf 07:47, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
New version was uploaded. Please notice the small white particles in the chicks feather and at the ground is bread that somebody was feeding the birds. --Mbz1 18:07, 30 April 2009 (UTC) - Oppose it's still too oversharpened (although improved). Can you fix ? --Ianare 18:41, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
- Oversharpened where? Thank you.--Mbz1 20:26, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
- Over the entire image it seems, but it's most noticeable on the chicks and the grass --Ianare 22:55, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
- Well, the grass was not sharpened at all. I cannot remember about chicks, maybe I sharpened them a little bit. I did make the image darker. Anyway thank you for taking your time to review the image.--Mbz1 04:16, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
- maybe contrast adjustment ? --Ianare 05:37, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Decline? Eusebius 09:20, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
File:Sinaia steam engine 230039 cropped.jpg
[edit]
- Nomination A steam engine exhibited in Sinaia railway station, Romania. Andrei Stroe 17:03, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Question What is the greyish gradient on the barrier in the bottom right of the picture? --Coyau 21:35, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
- I'm not sure. It could be the edge of the train window, through which I took the picture.Andrei S. 17:14, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
- Info I made a crop, so it's not visible. --Andrei Stroe 23:22, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
- Neutral I like it better without the gradiant, even if it makes the crop tight. --Coyau (talk) 16:06, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
- Support Good, but just. Could be sharper --Ianare 07:21, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
- Support
Image is tilted to the right.Now it's ok for me. --Afrank99 14:27, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
- Info I fixed the tilt.--Andrei Stroe 10:39, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
- Comment I think you corrected it too much: see File:Sinaia steam engine 230039 cropped untilted.jpg Yann 09:00, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote? Eusebius 09:19, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
File:Mamila area by night.JPG
[edit]
- Nomination Nightshot of Mamilla area in Jerusalem. --Adiel lo 06:28, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Neutral looks like the exposure time was maybe too long, but hard to tell --ianaré (talk) 05:40, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
- Support good enough for QI. --Afrank99 08:05, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote? Eusebius 10:46, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
File:Dougga 05.jpg
[edit]
- Nomination Temple of Saturn, Dougga --Bgag 12:15, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Comment What is the green line on the crowd of the upper left? _Fukutaro 15:49, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
- Comment I don't know, probably trees. --Bgag 16:33, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
- Comment I have imported a new version. --Bgag 21:40, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
- Support better now --Ianare 05:22, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote? Eusebius 10:45, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
File:Contaflex BW 1.JPG
[edit]
- Nomination Contaflex III with Pro-Tessar 1:4 115mm --Berthold Werner 19:47, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support Nice setup (pleasant background and lighting), good image quality. --Dschwen 20:12, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose Does the tilt of the image serve any purpose? Except the tilt very good. --Afrank99 08:53, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
- It makes the composition look more dynamic and visually balances off the big lens barrel
- Support obvious QI --Ianare 19:37, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote? Eusebius 10:44, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
File:Illinois_State_Senate.jpg
[edit]
- Nomination Illinois State Senate. same here. --Dschwen 21:22, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Oppose Difficult shooting situation but it's too blurry, sorry --Ianare 05:33, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
- Given the 12MP resolution I do not think it is too blurry at all, you can even read the little "Minority" brass plaque. --Dschwen 12:52, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
- Support It doesn't get much better than that. QI for me (easily).--Afrank99 20:50, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
- Support Looks amply sharp enough - Peripitus 04:57, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote? Eusebius 10:44, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
File:Cividale 0904 View from Ponte del Diavolo.jpg
[edit]
- Nomination Cividale del Friuli, view from Ponte del Diavolo --Aconcagua 09:11, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support Ok. --Berthold Werner 11:34, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
- Comment Brilliant composition and nice colors. However, appears to be a bit blurry in full size. --Siipikarja 20:54, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
- Support Nice. Yann 08:14, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
- Support Beautifully done. --Karora 10:45, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
- Support Nice. --High Contrast 19:58, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
Running total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote? Eusebius 10:43, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
File:Volvox.svg
[edit]
- Nomination Volvox --MichaelFrey 22:28, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support Well done -- Pro2 17:34, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose Doesn't show depth properly. Lycaon 08:19, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
- Support Nice! --Gummitierchen 17:01, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote? Eusebius 10:43, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
File:Supertalent USB-Stick.jpg
[edit]
- Nomination USB flash drive --Afrank99 15:20, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion
- I cannot agree on that, please discuss. --Afrank99 06:03, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
- Well, in my opinion you need everything in the picture, because it is all important. There's no point in taking a photo of a building if you can only see half of its face. I hope that you understand my opinion more now. --Jolly Janner 22:36, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
- Sorry, I don't understand why the chain of a USB stick could be important. Actually, the attention of the viewer should be directed to the stick, and not to the chain, so the stick must be the prominent part of the picture. I like it that way - I don't necessarily need a QI tag. --Afrank99 08:48, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
- That is exactly the point. The chain is not important, but the way it is cropped it distracts the eye, which wonders where it ends thus taking focus away from the actual subject. With a tighter crop, where the chain only intersects the image edge once it would be less prominent and the actual subject would get more focus for the viewer as it deserves. --Slaunger 09:44, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
- Take another picture without the chain. The chain is attached to it, so it is all one object. --Jolly Janner 15:47, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
- That is exactly the point. The chain is not important, but the way it is cropped it distracts the eye, which wonders where it ends thus taking focus away from the actual subject. With a tighter crop, where the chain only intersects the image edge once it would be less prominent and the actual subject would get more focus for the viewer as it deserves. --Slaunger 09:44, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose I also find that the cropped chain is too distracting to pass my QI bar. --Slaunger 21:43, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
- Comment I think simply editing out the loop of chain in the top-right corner will improve things: with the chain leading cleanly out of the picture, it should look acceptable. --Carnildo 23:17, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
- Comment I agree. --Slaunger 18:11, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
- better now? --Afrank99 17:57, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
- Support yes, it's better --Ianare 17:59, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
- Neutral Good quality photograph. Chain is no longer distracting, but it's a shame it's not all visible. --Jolly Janner 18:32, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
- Support Looks good now for me. --Slaunger 21:29, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote? Eusebius 10:42, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
File:Vergleich_zwischen_Manga_und_Foto.jpg
[edit]
- Nomination Comparison between photo and drawing in anime/manga style --Niabot 21:47, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support Clean drawing, good photo (like the lighting of the face). --Dschwen 21:51, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
- Comment the drawing looks a little bit distorted to me. I would like to discuss it. --LC-de 09:48, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
- Comment Can you define, what exactly looks wrong? Your explanation let's me in the dark. --Niabot 17:50, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
- As I wrote you in the german WP: Keeping the original proportions and symmetrie of the face, just lowering the eyes gives me the impression of a somewhat deformed face. --LC-de 22:17, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote? Eusebius 11:06, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
File:Petrified tree in Curio Bay.jpg
[edit]
- Nomination Petrified tree log at low tide --Karora 10:57, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
- Decline
- Support Ok. --Berthold Werner 12:42, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
- Ok, I think we can afford to take some time on this one and talk about the low depth of field. --Dschwen 15:00, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose I'm even less happy with the weird waviness of the horizon. Lycaon 17:01, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose per above --Ianare 22:59, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
- Comment I can probably fix the horizon, which is distortion from my lens, but DoF fix will have to wait another 20 years for my next visit... :-)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline? Eusebius 11:05, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
File:Passerculus sandwichensis CT2.jpg
[edit]
- Nomination Savannah Sparrow (Passerculus sandwichensis), Cap Tourmente National Wildlife Area, Quebec, Canada --Cephas 16:35, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Question Can you upload the original image ? --Ianare 05:32, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
- Support What a difference ! Very nice now. --Ianare 01:27, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote? Eusebius 11:04, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
File:Cygnus olor LC0201.jpg
[edit]
- Nomination Mute swan (Cygnus olor), head details --LC-de 15:08, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support Perfect exposure and background. --Afrank99 19:09, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
- Leaving playing card icons after the support of this image...? -- carol 19:16, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
- Support --Mbdortmund 23:29, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote? Eusebius 11:04, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
File:Clematis montana "rubens" flower.JPG
[edit]
- Nomination Clematis montana flower. --Jolly Janner 21:43, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
- Decline
- Oppose Nice colors, but main flower out of focus. Yann 07:55, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
- Comment Is this any better? --Jolly Janner 15:33, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
- Maybe, but overexposed. Yann 20:46, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
- Support Looks good & crisp to me --Herbythyme 16:52, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose like Yann --Mbdortmund 23:11, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline? Eusebius 11:01, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
File:Asparagus stipularis (detail).jpg
[edit].jpg)
- Nomination Grey asparagus (Asparagus stipularis) in Mallorca, Spain. Lycaon 16:41, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
- Decline
- Oppose Good DOF but because of the angle many of the flowers/buds are OOF --Ianare 15:12, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
- Comment That was on purpose. Lycaon 15:28, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Decline? Eusebius 10:42, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
File:Coccoloba uvifera flower.jpg
[edit]
- Nomination Seagrape flowers --Ianare 10:04, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion
Request please review --Ianare 15:17, 12 May 2009 (UTC)- Support QI for me. Lycaon 15:26, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote? Eusebius 10:41, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
File:Bombycilla garrulus CT2.jpg
[edit]
- Nomination Bohemian Waxwing (Bombycilla garrulus) Cap Tourmente National Wildlife Area, Quebec, Canada. --Cephas 01:49, 9 May 2009 (CEST)
- Promotion
- Better, but still overprocessed. Can you upload the original image ? --Ianare 05:27, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
- Support Good now --Ianare 20:10, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
- Support Original is very good already --G.Hagedorn 16:38, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose Good shot indeed, but the shadows are too disturbing for me. The image as a whole is too dark. --Eusebius 11:10, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote? Eusebius 10:41, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
File:HomePlace.jpg
[edit]
- Nomination "The Homeplace", a recreation of an 1850-style farm, at the Land between the Lakes National Recreation Area. --JMSchneid 14:48, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support good composition, sharp --Ianare 05:36, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote? Eusebius 10:40, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
File:PairOfMules.jpg
[edit]
- Nomination A pair of mules. --JMSchneid 12:04, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support interesting black and white composition, good details and atmosphere --Mbdortmund 12:50, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose No reason for desaturation. Also blown sky and highlights. Lycaon 09:37, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
- Support Really nice atmosphere and composition. Pymouss44 21:24, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose OK, now I've seen the actual colour version (via private e-mail - thanks) I would far prefer that. I think the B&W presentation is cute, but that kind of post-processing is possible for anyone, and what we should have here is the colour version, with the B&W as an 'other versions available'. --Karora 08:50, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
- Comment I should have done this earlier. I looked up the original and found that I had a RAW file as well as the JPG. I processed a new image from RAW and replaced the blown version. JMSchneid 15:07, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
- Support much better --Ianare 07:51, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
- Comment now to dark for my taste, the main objects were much better in the first exposure, you could repare the blown out sky without making the whole picture darker.--Mbdortmund 12:25, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose Under-saturated. --Jolly Janner 13:03, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
- Comment A comment on the procedure here. This is a pain for determining supports and opposes. Support was given to a different version. Does that support apply to the new version? It is easier to determine the outcome of the consensual review if an altered version is uploaded and displayed with the original nomination. It is even easier to allow the first version to fail (if that is what is going to happen) and nominate the second version, but this might be too challenging to suggest.... -- carol (talk) 11:56, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
- Same applies for the World Health Org building, higher on the same page. --Eusebius 12:09, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
- Support come on guys - this is not about wether you like b/w images or not, it is about the (technical) quality of the image, and this is an image of extraordinary quality in terms of sharpness, detail, composition. --Afrank99 16:25, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
- This is an encyclopedia and we should encourage colour photographs, because they are more educational. Jolly Janner 16:54, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
- I really do hope you're kidding. Color photographs are not very good in educating on black/white photography. By the way, this is not an encyclopedia, this is Wikimedia Commons, a media library. --Afrank99 20:01, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
- Black and white photographs are useful for educating about black and white photography, of course. This photograph was taken with a colour camera and there is absolutely no need to desaturate it. In doing so, you can't see the colours on the horse etc. Jolly Janner 20:18, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
- I think you may mean say "mule", rather than "horse". Wsiegmund 20:34, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
- Black and white photographs are useful for educating about black and white photography, of course. This photograph was taken with a colour camera and there is absolutely no need to desaturate it. In doing so, you can't see the colours on the horse etc. Jolly Janner 20:18, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
- I really do hope you're kidding. Color photographs are not very good in educating on black/white photography. By the way, this is not an encyclopedia, this is Wikimedia Commons, a media library. --Afrank99 20:01, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
- Comment I wonder if you might be willing to upload a color version, as well as this one? Interest has been expressed in that image. The "other_versions" field of the Information template may be used to link versions. Wsiegmund 20:34, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
- Done! Now everyone will know the color of his hat, shirt and pants! :) --JMSchneid 00:54, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
- Support Yann 08:41, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
- Support B/W version is superior, in my opinion. The color version draws too much attention to the man's clothing. Wsiegmund 04:57, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
Running total: 6 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Promote? Walter Siegmund (talk) 05:00, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
File:GIPE25 - Ardea cinerea (by-sa).jpg
[edit].jpg)
- Nomination: Ardea cinerea --ComputerHotline 19:47, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
- Review
- Support quality image --Ianare 17:53, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose weak composition. -- carol 19:21, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose -> draw Eusebius 09:47, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
File:Illinois_House_of_Representatives_detail.jpg
[edit]
- Nomination: Illinois House of Representatives. --Dschwen 21:32, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
- Review
- Support OK --Ianare 05:33, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose Not sharp enough for me (pose a bit too long, no tripod?). --Eusebius 11:26, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
- Focus is on the bottom row of desks which is pretty much perfectly sharp. The image has 12MP so there would be plenty room to downsample if you enjoy looking at 1:1.--Dschwen 14:49, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose -> draw Eusebius 09:47, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
File:RubyThroatedHummingbird(Crop).jpg
[edit].jpg)
- Nomination Archilochus colubris female--JMSchneid 00:17, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion
- My first reaction was wow. But the pic is pretty heavily denoised. Did your camera do that, or do you have a less processed version? --Dschwen 01:08, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
- Comment The original is a jpg and the EXIF indicates that in camera noise reduction was off. A levels adjustment was made on the right of the histogram and possible a slight unsharp mask. This file is cropped from the file File:RubyThroated Hummingbird.jpg. The adjustments were made to that file. Except for brightness this image looks like the original when examined up to 100%.--JMSchneid 03:12, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
- Comment is that denoising, or an artifact of the flash? Looks technically QI to me, and an impressive shot, for sure. --Karora 11:08, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
- Comment Flash was used. --JMSchneid 20:54, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
- Support despite some apparent weirdness in the post processing. It's an impressive shot ! --Ianare 16:05, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote? Eusebius 10:43, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
File:Wildpferde Tripsdrill.jpg
[edit]
- Nomination nice picture --null 11:36, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
- Decline
- Comment This is already a FP, what's the point of nominating it here? Yann 21:16, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
- Support Ok IMHO --Berthold Werner 06:45, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose FP is not QI. Quality fails. Sharpness is insufficient and light is only so-so. Lycaon 06:57, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose I agree with Lycaon -- Pro2 12:50, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
- Support Because of composition and atmosphere --Mbdortmund 21:54, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose per Lycaon --Ianare 22:00, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Decline? Eusebius 10:43, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
File:Thermohygrometer rotronic A1.jpg
[edit]
- Nomination Hygrometer --Harke 18:17, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support Looks ok. --Eusebius 18:55, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose I don't like the blotchy background. Lycaon 19:40, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
- I have no problem with the background. It could be removed quite easily I guess, but honestly I don't think it is worth the effort. It is rather clean, neutral, and shows a soft, natural shadow. --Eusebius 13:06, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
- Support background doesn't bother me --Ianare 16:07, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote? Eusebius 10:42, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
File:Melospiza melodia CT.jpg
[edit]
- Nomination Song Sparrow, Melospiza melodia Cap Tourmente National Wildlife Area, Quebec, Canada --Cephas 22:25, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
- Decline
- Support cute --Mbdortmund 21:51, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose unfortunate crop --Ianare 11:41, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose Crop, bit overprosessed (noisy). --kallerna 11:49, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline? Eusebius 10:10, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
File:Camp celtique de la Bure - baraque 1.jpg
[edit]
- Nomination Archaeologists barrack in Camp celtique de la Bure. --Coyau 20:10, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support good --Ianare 01:34, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose Lots of CA in the sky and noise in the shady parts are too disturbing for QI IMO. Lycaon 22:32, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
Neutral still not 100% but not bad enough to oppose ;-). Lycaon 08:16, 18 May 2009 (UTC) - Info Denoised from RAW file. I don't know how to fix CA. --Coyau 19:06, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote? Eusebius 10:10, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
File:Temple de Mînâkshî01.jpg
[edit]
- Nomination Meenakshi Amman temple, Madurai --Bgag 23:28, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
- Decline a little tilted --Pudelek 14:25, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose 'Dirty' (posterized?) sky. Also some CA. Lycaon 22:48, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Decline? Eusebius 10:09, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
File:Libellula quadrimaculata 04 (MK).JPG
[edit].JPG)
- Nomination a Four-spotted Chaser (Libellula quadrimaculata) --Leviathan1983 12:22, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
- Decline
- Support Correct exposure and details. --ComputerHotline 16:37, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose - Chaotic composition, very little on focus -- Alvesgaspar 19:09, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose - As Alvesgaspar. Lycaon 08:13, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline? Eusebius 10:09, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
File:Dijon - Palais des ducs - Minerve crop 1.jpg
[edit]
- Nomination Ducal palace in Dijon. --Eusebius 10:35, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
- Withdrawn
- Oppose Crop is too tight at the top. --Jolly Janner 19:36, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- Why, you want one more story in frame?? --Eusebius 19:41, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- It is distracting that you can't see the whole of the gargoyl at the top.--Jolly Janner 21:35, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- I understand your POV. I'll nominate other crops, if it becomes clear that one gets more support, I'll withdraw the others. --Eusebius 21:46, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- It is distracting that you can't see the whole of the gargoyl at the top.--Jolly Janner 21:35, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- Why, you want one more story in frame?? --Eusebius 19:41, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
I withdraw my nominationEusebius 07:20, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
File:Thomas Bresson - Stalactite (by).JPG
[edit].JPG)
- Nomination Stalactite in an old NATO station --ComputerHotline 08:24, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
- Decline
- Oppose I find the composition distrating, the stalactite is hanging out of nowhere. --Spock lone wolf 10:42, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- Neutral I am not sure about the quality (noise?), but I like the composition. Yann 19:47, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Decline? Eusebius 07:19, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
File:Trier Sankt Maximin BW 1.jpg
[edit]
- Nomination Church of former St. Maximin's Abbey in Trier, Germany --Berthold Werner 13:07, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Better? --Berthold Werner 08:59, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- Support still a little soft at the top of the building (maybe due to the lens?) but noticeably better now. --Ianare 19:13, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote? Eusebius 07:16, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
File:Sayornis phoebe CT3.jpg
[edit]
- Nomination Eastern Phoebe (Sayornis phoebe), Cap Tourmente National Wildlife Area, Quebec, Canada --Cephas 10:21, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Comment I removed the noise, should be okay now. -- Pro2 20:15, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
- Support Nice shot. --kallerna 13:25, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
- Support --Ianare 21:10, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote? Eusebius 07:16, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
File:Dendrocopos major on ripped pig kallerna.jpg
[edit]
- Nomination: Great Spotted Woodpecker (Dendrocopos major) on ripped pig. kallerna 19:14, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
- Review
- Support strange enough --Mbdortmund 12:46, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose Strange and special, yes, but quality (e.g. sharpness, light) is insufficient for a QI label. Lycaon 11:41, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose -> draw --Eusebius 07:15, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
File:Fronton Cathédrale Saint-Pierre Genève.jpg
[edit]
- Nomination Lateral gate, Geneva cathedral. Yann 21:24, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
- Withdrawn
- OpposeQuite dark, a bit noisy, not so sharp. --Eusebius 07:51, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
- Comment And now? Yann 15:58, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
- I'm afraid you cannot make sharp a picture that was originally unsharp (or not so sharp). When denoising you have also removed fine details, and sharpening after denoising just make it more obvious. I don't think there's a way to make this picture pass my (own, maybe too high and not-so-straight) threshold. The strong shadow, primarily, is a problem that you cannot deal with in a simple manner. I think you should revert to the original version, which is better. --Eusebius 16:32, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
- Comment Ok, fine. I will try with another photo later. Yann 17:39, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose Decline as Eusebius. Maedin 21:02, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination
File:2008-07-11 Chapel Hill bus passing South Building.jpg
[edit]
- Nomination Chapel Hill Transit --Specious 21:10, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
- Decline
- OpposeNice picture (though unsharp), but where's the rest of the bus? --Afrank99 06:44, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
- Support - Not the best crop, but good quality. This art of taking pictures is not easy but this is quite a good work -- Pro2 12:47, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
- Support As Pro2 already said: crop my not be optimal, nevertheless image quality is convincing. --High Contrast 13:10, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose Poor crop, the bush is in the way, and not very sharp. For such a common subject I would expect a better image. --Ianare 01:31, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Ianare. --Eusebius 07:22, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Decline? Eusebius 10:22, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
File:Wrist and hand deeper palmar dissection-numbers.svg
[edit]
- Nomination: SVG of a hand made by User:The Photographer. --Jolly Janner 18:29, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
- Review
- You can click on the English or Spanish version for the text depending on your language and it will show it. I nominated this, because it is the "master" version and doesn't show a preference between English or Spanish language. --Jolly Janner 16:38, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
- To be useful it should include a key. It can be imported from the localized files, and possibly put inside a {{Hidden}} in order to preserve a decent appearance of the image page. --Eusebius 16:47, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
- Done. --Jolly Janner 22:12, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
- To be useful it should include a key. It can be imported from the localized files, and possibly put inside a {{Hidden}} in order to preserve a decent appearance of the image page. --Eusebius 16:47, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
- Support like Eusebius --Mbdortmund 21:55, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose Not referenced and some very confusing labeling (e.g. combining veins/arteries and nerves (sic!). Lycaon 06:32, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
- Very true. I retract my support. --Eusebius 10:44, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
- Commons:Featured picture candidates#Featured picture delisting candidates? Jolly Janner 16:03, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
- Very true. I retract my support. --Eusebius 10:44, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose -> draw --Eusebius 10:21, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
File:World Health Organisation building south face.jpg
[edit]
- Nomination World Health Organisation headquarters from south, Geneva. Yann 21:56, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
- Withdrawn
- Original version (left)
- Support Good work. --Karora 01:08, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
- Comment I tried to improve that. Yann 21:22, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
- Comment I'll simply retract my vote, I don't feel able to judge that kind of postprocessing, nor the quality of the result. --Eusebius 22:10, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
- Support Nice. It's ok --High Contrast 13:41, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
- Nevermind. --Dschwen 19:43, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose Highlights are still blown
(per Dschwen)and image looks generally over-processed (also over-sharpened yielding halos). Lycaon 21:25, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
- To make these kinds of edits really work with the review system here, please revert to the original nomination and upload the edited version into a different namespace and display the edited version here. Not everyone is as mentally agile as Dschwen surely must be and can remember what the original looked like. Opinions of support or oppose can then be made for specific versions and the person who is doing the work of tallying the votes (not easy, btw, and this kind of reviewing does not help) will know for certain what has been supported or not. -- carol (talk) 16:45, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
- I don't think you can oppose because I have proposed an alternate version. You can vote for each of the version or none. Yann 22:47, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
- Comment You think or know? If you think, you cannot revoke my vote as you have done. Please point where in QI rules it is said that I may not oppose based on duplicate nomination. See QI guidelines and QI rules. In guidelines it says: "Adding more than a couple of images at once can be considered flooding, which is frowned upon." I'm not saying that it is forbidden to have multiple versions under one consensual review item (as nothing is said about this in the rules), but if you have the same image both in review section and consensual review section (as user Dschwen pointed out below), then either of them should be withdrawn in my opinion. Just for the sake of keeping the voting process simple. Perhaps I used the word "version" a little inconsiderably in my previous comment, I should have used word "entry". Sorry for the confusion. Anyhow, perhaps the QI rules should specify in more detail what is the policy with duplicate versions / entries. Especially, to which version does the
QICtotaltemplate apply when there are multiple versions of a single entry under on consensual review item? To avoid any further hassle, I revoke my vote. --Siipikarja 08:38, 9 May 2009 (UTC)- The edited version was declined. I didn't revoke your vote. And yes, your comment was not clear: I understood that you oppose that I proposed an alternate version below. Yann 21:16, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
- Comment OK, no problem then. My vote had disappeared from the QItotal template somewhere in the process of voting. --Siipikarja 08:36, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
- The edited version was declined. I didn't revoke your vote. And yes, your comment was not clear: I understood that you oppose that I proposed an alternate version below. Yann 21:16, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose Clouds are indeed not correct: or too white or too grey. --Estrilda 22:31, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination
- Edited version (right)
- Oppose. This is nominated above as well. --Dschwen 21:55, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination
File:Thomas Bresson - Pres-de-entree (by).jpg
[edit].jpg)
- Nomination Near the main gate in the Bois d'Oye fortifications --ComputerHotline 07:45, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Decline
- Support very good --Pudelek 20:09, 20 May 2009 (UTC)<
- Oppose Barrel distortion is disturbing. Lycaon 07:05, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose White balance. --Eusebius 10:32, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline? Eusebius 10:46, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
File:Dijon - Palais des ducs - Minerve crop 2.jpg
[edit]
- Nomination One out of three crops. If one gets more support, I'll withdraw the others. --Eusebius 21:47, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support celle-ci me plait le plus, mais à mon avis la meilleure prise de vue serait comme l'originale mais légèrement décalée : en haut montrant l'horloge en entier, en bas coupée entre la devise et les fenêtres. --Ianare 20:50, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- Would be my choice as well, I think. I had even forgotten it was a clock... Now I remember that I had to crop it because of a bad reflection. I deliberately wanted to keep the "Liberté, Egalité, Fraternité". --Eusebius 21:18, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- Comment It still has the purple/green chromatic aberrations that it had when you nominated it in January (mainly apparent on sides of downpipes, and flag poles). Maybe you could do a little bit of a clean-up before getting a QI medal :-) --Tony Wills 11:39, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
- OK, now I remember why I have three versions of this picture... I had forgotten about the first nomination. I suggest you simply oppose, because I'm unable to remove the CA (mainly because I barely see it, and also because I just don't know how to do it). --Eusebius 11:50, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote? Eusebius 10:45, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
File:Dijon - Palais des ducs - Minerve crop 3.jpg
[edit]
- Nomination One out of three crops. If one gets more support, I'll withdraw the others. --Eusebius 21:47, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- Withdrawn
I withdraw my nomination--Eusebius 10:45, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
File:Darkling beetle.jpg
[edit]
- Nomination Darkling beetle --Muhammad Mahdi Karim 16:23, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
- Decline
- Support sharp. --Afrank99 09:44, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose Don't agree. Sharpness, DOF and lighting insufficient for QI. Lycaon 12:48, 21 May 2009 (UTC) Oppose Poor lighting, sharpness could be better. Kaldari 18:27, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
- Comment At 4mm, sharpness can't be better without a better macro lens --Muhammad Mahdi Karim 06:33, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline? Eusebius (talk) 10:09, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
Musei capitolini - Colosso di Costantino.jpg
[edit]
- Nomination Parts of the Statue of Constantine in Rome --Alejo2083 09:37, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
- Decline
- Oppose Too soft focus --Ianare 02:07, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
- Info I improved it by a sharpening filter, is it better now? --Alejo2083 08:18, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
- Sharpening is mainly for bringing out details on a well focused image, it won't help as much if the focus has problems. --Ianare 10:12, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
- well, out-of-focus images look blurred and sharpening can make them sharper. It can't add details that the original blurring effect removed, but in this case there are none (considering the high resolution of the pic, too). Just to know for the future: can you please explain me where you see there are focusing problems? I can't see any! Thanks a lot!! --Alejo2083 11:10, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Decline? Eusebius 10:06, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
File:Gentiana dinarica.jpg
[edit]
- Nomination Blooming Gentiana dinarica --Chrumps 18:35, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- Decline
- Support Correct exposure and details. --ComputerHotline 09:28, 19 May 2009 (UTC).
- Oppose Part of the left side is missing. --Estrilda 22:42, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Estrilda. --Bgag 15:38, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline? Eusebius 10:06, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
File:Donna York.jpg
[edit]
- Nomination Towboat Donna York pushing barges of coal.--JMSchneid 12:45, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support Great quality, exhaust looks cool. Crop is a bit tight and separation from the background would have been nice. But this is still above the cut for me. --Dschwen 12:19, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose - It's too tilt for me --Pudelek 14:00, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
- now is OK --Pudelek 15:25, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
- CommentI uploaded a level version.--JMSchneid 18:14, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
- CommentI hope this version is level. I could not see the tilt at first.--JMSchneid 13:49, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
- This version looks level ;-). Lycaon 15:56, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote? Maedin 08:42, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
File:Wind turbine - C-Power (Thornton Bank).jpg
[edit].jpg)
- Nomination 5 MW wind turbine on the Thornton bank, Belgium. Lycaon 13:39, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
- Decline
- Oppose Bad crop: the lower blade is cut. Yann 15:11, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
- Comment It didn't fit. Seriously, the picture is about the largest turbine in the world, not the blades, I have other pictures for those. Lycaon 15:50, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
- Comment If it's about the turbine only, maybe you should crop it even further to emphasize the subject. --Afrank99 09:14, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose I must agree with Afrank99, composition (and designation of the subject) is unclear. --Eusebius 10:35, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose As per Afrank99. - Till.niermann 05:24, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Decline? Maedin 08:44, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
File:Papaver_dubium_a.jpg
[edit]
- Nomination Long-headed Poppy --Spock lone wolf 19:21, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Question Can you point out the noise to me? Seems to me we're both looking on different picture. --Spock lone wolf 20:15, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
- Support I agree with Spock lone wolf, I don't see unacceptable noise. I think it can be promoted. Maedin 06:44, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
- Comment I retract my opposition, obviously it was a bad review, sorry. Perhapas I was looking at some other picture, but my best guess is that at 7.40 in the morning, everything looked noisy to me. I want to point out, however, that there is significant CA on the edge of the topmost petal. --Eusebius 10:28, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose Noise is prominent in the BG though. Lycaon 10:49, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
- Question Happy now? --Spock lone wolf 19:57, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
- Support OK for me. Yann 10:02, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote? Maedin 08:19, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
File:Haight Street, SF.jpg
[edit]
- Nomination Haight Street, San Francisco --Bgag 15:03, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
- Decline
- Oppose Not seeing a lot of Value in this picture. Kaldari 18:57, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
- It's Haight street in san fran. In any case, this is Quality image, not Valuable image. --Ianare 02:14, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
- Support quality is OK --Ianare 02:14, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose too much compressed -> Compression artifacts -- Pro2 11:19, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose But the framing is terrible. Way too much cut off, including the interesting detail on the fascia board. Think this could have been done much better in portrait, maybe a few steps back, or maybe stitched. Maedin\talk 09:20, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Decline? Maedin 08:18, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
File:Andean Condor 065.jpg
[edit]
- Nomination Andean Condor --Ltshears 19:19, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support good enough for QI --Ianare 21:15, 18 May 2009 (UTC).
- Oppose Maybe there is not enough space over his/her head? --Estrilda 22:37, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- SupportI don't think we need more (useless) background on this one. Maybe for FP, but good enough for QI. --Afrank99 07:28, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote? Maedin 08:15, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
File:Thomas Bresson - Libellula depressa (by).jpg
[edit].jpg)
- Nomination Libellula depressa --ComputerHotline 16:09, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
- Decline
- Support - good details --Mbdortmund 21:41, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose -- Overall unsharpness, disturbing yellow background -- Alvesgaspar 16:06, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
- Support --kallerna 15:21, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose I would have liked or the head, or the tail to be sharp, but both aren't. --Estrilda 22:34, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose Several areas of the insect are out of focus, wings are dirty (looks like he just escaped from a spider web). Kaldari 18:52, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose Sharpness is lacking, and the yellow plant is overexposed in parts. Maedin 08:39, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Decline? Maedin 08:13, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
File:Zampieri - Adam et Ève (détail).jpg
[edit].jpg)
- Nomination It's her fault, it's always been. --Eusebius 07:00, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
- Withdrawn
- Oppose According to QI guidelines, copyright holder must be a Wikipedian. --Afrank99 09:11, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
- No. It says "Pictures must have been created by a Wikimedian". This is a self-made picture of a PD work of art, like many QIs we already have. --Eusebius 09:18, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
- Support Very good quality. Yann 10:36, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
- Comment Read again: Copyright status. Quality image candidates have to be uploaded to Commons by the copyright holder under a suitable license.. It's probably time to rethink this guideline (which tells different things at different positions/translations in the text) and exclude PD (expired) artwork from this restriction. --Afrank99 11:21, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
- Yes, I think it is worth clarifying the state of PD-art pictures, specifically. I start that in the talk page. --Eusebius 11:52, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination until the situtation is clarified. --Eusebius 13:01, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
File:Sea Turtle Nest Boca Raton FL.jpg
[edit]
- Nomination Sea turtle nest --Ianare 12:53, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
- Decline
- would like a second opinion. I agree parts of the clouds are very white (sun was directly behind me), but there is still detail imho --Ianare 09:07, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
- If the image is about the Turtle Nest, the warning is not readable, if it is about the whole place, the hut is out of focus. Yann 09:22, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
- Weak Oppose Interesting picture, very good composition, and the sky is not overexposed! But I agree with Yann about the sharpness and DOF. -- MJJR 20:38, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
- Comment The intention was to show both together as well as possible. The sign was identical to this one, and there are plenty pictures of lifeguard tower images on commons. The sign does have enough resolution to show the date the eggs were laid, which is more important than the fine print. --Ianare 02:05, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Decline? Eusebius 11:32, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
File:Dendroica caerulescens CT.jpg
[edit]
- Nomination Black-throated Blue Warbler, Dendroica caerulescens Cap Tourmente National Wildlife Area, Quebec, Canada. --Cephas 09:15, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
- Decline
- Oppose Too much noise, both on the background and the bird. --Eusebius 07:45, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
- Info Edit uploaded. Hopefully it's ok now. Maedin 06:47, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
- Comment I'm sorry, but it is now obvious that the bird has been digitally processed, so I won't remove my opposition. I'm not sure which version of the pic is the best. --Eusebius 10:33, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose both versions are overprocessed. Given your camera, lens, and abilities, you shouldn't need to do much correction if at all. --Ianare 21:54, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
- also, if you must, look into photoshop's 'unsharp mask' rather than normal sharpening. --Ianare 22:04, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline? Eusebius 11:32, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
File:Gulmohar leaves closeup.JPG
[edit]
- Nomination: Gulmohar tree leaves closeup. --Kprateek88 13:31, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- Review
- Support Correct exposure and details. --ComputerHotline 09:28, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose Very nice idea but the result is a bit too soft for QI. Lycaon 07:08, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose -> draw --Eusebius 11:31, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
File:Campus TU München, Garching.jpg
[edit]
- Nomination Campus of the Technical University of Munich. --High Contrast 12:41, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
- Decline
- Comment Black spots in the sky. Please clean. Maedin 20:56, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose Stitching error in the crane. --Berthold Werner 05:48, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose like Berthold. --Mbdortmund 13:00, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline? Lycaon (talk) 07:08, 30 May 2009 (UTC)