Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives May 07 2014
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
-
- Nomination Centennial Hall in Wrocław, Poland --Taxiarchos228 04:36, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Cccefalon 04:42, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Green Haistreak butterfly -- Alvesgaspar 23:48, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion QI IMO --Cccefalon 04:45, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The Ever Safety in Hamburg 2013 --Alchemist-hp 22:37, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 04:37, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Power Plant West (Mainova AG), Frankfurt, Hesse, Germany. --NorbertNagel 19:45, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Lewis Hulbert 20:19, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Restaurant at the former waterworks building (Druckwasserwerk), Frankfurt, Germany. --NorbertNagel 19:45, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion QI imo --Lewis Hulbert 20:19, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sigma Building, Frankfurt Niederrad, Hesse, Germany. --NorbertNagel 19:45, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good --Lewis Hulbert 20:19, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Panoramic view from Rechberg’s eastern slope towards Waldstetten and surrounding scenery --Kreuzschnabel 18:24, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --NorbertNagel 19:53, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Assumption of Mary chapel, Kressbronn-Schleinsee, district Bodenseekreis Baden-Württemberg, Germany --DKrieger 18:10, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Comment I suggest denoise the sky, image would be better. --Halavar 18:44, 4 May 2014 (UTC) Done --DKrieger 19:13, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
Support Good now. --Halavar 19:19, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Lower trunk of Kapok trees on the island of La Mère in French Guiana. --Cayambe 17:40, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --NorbertNagel 19:55, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Outside corbels of the apse, recently renewed ; church of Romagne, Vienne, France. --JLPC 17:35, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --NorbertNagel 20:00, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View of the Medina of Tunis --Dyolf77 17:18, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
- Decline Strong green CA, a lot of blurry spots in the sky. The photo is lacking sharpness in full resolution. --Cccefalon 17:54, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
Comment New version uploaded, anyway thanks for reviewing! Dyolf77 18:27, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View of Lake Baikal. Listvyanka, Siberia, Russia. --Halavar 14:23, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Nice photo, however have a look to my annotations; there is a general issue that needs your attention. --Cccefalon 15:33, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
Done You were right, thanks for the help. I uploaded new, fixed version. Hope it's better now (personally it's my favourite image from Lake Baikal) --Halavar 18:13, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
Well done! It's really a great photo and QI. --Cccefalon 19:28, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Kuah, Langkawi, Malaysia: Masjid Al Hana (Al Hana Mosque) --Cccefalon 11:58, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality (though heavy colour saturation). --NorbertNagel 20:13, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sedov (ship, 1921), Sète, France --Christian Ferrer 11:31, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Cccefalon 12:21, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ferry "Nordfriesland" in port of Wittdün --Dirtsc 10:38, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:37, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Rami alle Cascine --Assianir 10:08, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
- Decline Too much chromatic aberrations. Also, substantial parts of the trunks are not sharp. --Cccefalon 10:19, 4 May 2014 (UTC) Tried to fix aberrations changing in black & white --Assianir 11:48, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
Not done I never decline thoughtless but only when I think, it is not resolvable. Your latest release didn't resolced the blurred trunks and added solarized areas. I made an annotation to show you the problem. --Cccefalon 12:08, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Tata truck in the streets of Georgetown, Malaysia --Cccefalon 09:39, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:37, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sedov (ship, 1921), Sète, France --Christian Ferrer 09:35, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:37, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Brühl, Germany: Schloss Falkenlust --Cccefalon 08:35, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:33, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Le Mont-Saint-Michel, France: Police car of the Police municipale --Cccefalon 08:35, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:33, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Wayside cross at the Kappenberger Damm in Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 08:04, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion I proposed a crop that gives more importance to the cross and gets rid of the blurry branches in the foreground --Cccefalon 08:30, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
Fixed Thanks! I've just uploaded the image with your proposed crop.--XRay 08:40, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
Good now. --Cccefalon 08:43, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Shell of a Canarian land snail, Hemicycla melchori --Llez 06:49, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:38, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Eielson Air Force Base, Alaska — The Aurora Borealis, or Northern Lights, shines above Bear Lake. By User:AngMoKio --Arctic Kangaroo 06:43, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
- Decline Not the work of a Commoner --Poco a poco 09:33, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View of Zagreb, Croatia --Poco a poco 06:26, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality --Halavar 14:14, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Kiosk in the Nikola Šubić Zrinski park, Zagreb, Croatia --Poco a poco 06:26, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --JLPC 17:30, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Art Pavillon, Zagreb, Croatia --Poco a poco 06:26, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Support QI --Rjcastillo 15:59, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Statue of Frane Bulic in front of the State Archives, Zagreb, Croatia --Poco a poco 06:26, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Cccefalon 06:52, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Monument to Marko Marulić, Zagreb, Croatia --Poco a poco 06:26, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Support QI --Rjcastillo 15:59, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Croatian National Theater, Zagreb, Croatia --Poco a poco 06:26, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --NorbertNagel 20:13, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Godorf, Köln, Germany: Cooling towers of Rhineland Refinery Godorf --Cccefalon 06:08, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
There are some spots on the right Poco a poco 09:34, 4 May 2014 (UTC) removed, thank you. --Cccefalon 09:48, 4 May 2014 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:37, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
- Nomination Godorf, Köln, Germany: Cooling towers of Rhineland Refinery Godorf --Cccefalon 06:08, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sungai Padas Barrage near Tenom at the entry of the gorge, also know as Pangi Hydroelectric Plant --Cccefalon 06:08, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:38, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Nationaal Park De Alde Feanen in the Netherlands.--
Famberhorst 04:46, 4 May 2014 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality. --Cccefalon 06:18, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
- Nomination Nationaal Park De Alde Feanen in the Netherlands.--
-
- Nomination The domed church in the Soğanlı Valley in Cappadocia Turkey --Moroder 22:01, 3 May 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. Although I feel it can and should be slightly sharper. --Arctic Kangaroo 06:49, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Airbus A380 of British Airways at Paris Air Show (by Julian Herzog) --Gyrostat 16:42, 3 May 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Cccefalon 06:11, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cologne, Germany: Haus Neuerburg, Stair tower. Architect: Emil Felix, Built: 1923-29 --Cccefalon 18:28, 3 May 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Comment Tilted. Easy to fix. --Halavar 23:01, 3 May 2014 (UTC)
Done I rotated 0.1° as requested ... --Cccefalon 06:42, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
Support OK. --Halavar 09:08, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Naadam festival at the national stadium. Ulan Bator, Mongolia. --Halavar 17:45, 3 May 2014 (UTC)
Needs some perspective correction Poco a poco 17:57, 3 May 2014 (UTC)
Done New version uploaded, hope it's better now. --Halavar 18:50, 3 May 2014 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:46, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
- Nomination Naadam festival at the national stadium. Ulan Bator, Mongolia. --Halavar 17:45, 3 May 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Town hall in Ziębice --Jacek Halicki 13:42, 3 May 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Comment Tilted a little bit. (Potrzeba lekkiej rotacji przeciwnie do ruchów wskazówek zegara, czyli CCW). --Halavar 13:58, 3 May 2014 (UTC) Done Jacek Halicki 21:41, 3 May 2014 (UTC)
Support Good now. QI. --Halavar 21:36, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Town hall in Ziębice --Jacek Halicki 13:42, 3 May 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Comment Tilted a little bit. (Potrzeba lekkiej rotacji przeciwnie do ruchów wskazówek zegara, czyli CCW). --Halavar 13:58, 3 May 2014 (UTC) Done Jacek Halicki 21:41, 3 May 2014 (UTC)
Support Good now. QI. --Halavar 21:36, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Papilio cresphontes --ComputerHotline 14:34, 2 May 2014 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose Blur. --Arctic Kangaroo 07:03, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Papilio cresphontes --ComputerHotline 14:34, 2 May 2014 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose Blur wing-tip, overexposed. --Arctic Kangaroo 07:03, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Heliconius hecale --ComputerHotline 14:34, 2 May 2014 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose Blur wingtip --Arctic Kangaroo 07:03, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Parthenos sylvia --ComputerHotline 14:34, 2 May 2014 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose Blur wing-tip. --Arctic Kangaroo 07:03, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Hot air balloon ride at sunrise in Uçhisar in Cappadocia Turkey --Moroder 11:27, 2 May 2014 (UTC)
Tricky one, lighting not really good, lacks detail, balloons in both sides leaning in, Poco a poco 12:28, 2 May 2014 (UTC) - Decline Oppose Per Poco. --Arctic Kangaroo 07:07, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
- Nomination Hot air balloon ride at sunrise in Uçhisar in Cappadocia Turkey --Moroder 11:27, 2 May 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Danaus plexippus --ComputerHotline 10:38, 2 May 2014 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose Wing-tips blur. --Arctic Kangaroo 07:15, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Danaus plexippus --ComputerHotline 10:38, 2 May 2014 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose Overexposed. --Arctic Kangaroo 07:15, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: ÖBB 5047 078-0 leaving Grünau im Almtal heading for Wels. The building on the right side is the former engine shed. By User:Herbert Ortner --Linie29 20:26, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
Tilt and perspective correction needed Poco a poco 21:14, 28 April 2014 (UTC) - Review needed
- Nomination: ÖBB 5047 078-0 leaving Grünau im Almtal heading for Wels. The building on the right side is the former engine shed. By User:Herbert Ortner --Linie29 20:26, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Rom, Basilika San Giovanni in Laterano, Innenansicht --Dn@lor_01 16:25, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Rom, Petersdom, Pietà von Michelangelo --Dn@lor_01 16:08, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
Chromatic noise in too brightened darker areas Poco a poco 18:52, 28 April 2014 (UTC) - Review needed
- Nomination: Rom, Petersdom, Pietà von Michelangelo --Dn@lor_01 16:08, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Jesus Christ Statue in Catedral of La Asuncion --Beria 14:58, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
Needs perspective correction Poco a poco 18:56, 28 April 2014 (UTC) - Review needed
- Nomination: Jesus Christ Statue in Catedral of La Asuncion --Beria 14:58, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Passeio del Lago, Maracaibo --Beria 14:58, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Rösrath, Germany: Administratve Building of OSMAB Holding AG, Leibnitzpark 4 --Cccefalon 13:09, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Elisenturm (Wuppertal) --Atamari 12:31, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: USO-AB - 20131221 - Placement sur pénalité --Pleclown 11:26, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Memorial, Giromagny-France --Michielverbeek 19:51, 27 April 2014 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose Insufficient quality. Sorry. It's not sharp enough (f/3.5). --XRay 08:18, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Church in the street, Chaux-France --Michielverbeek 19:49, 27 April 2014 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose Insufficient quality. Sorry. It's not sharp enough (f/4). --XRay 08:18, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Church in the street, Willer sur Thur-France --Michielverbeek 19:45, 27 April 2014 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose Insufficient quality. Sorry. It's not sharp enough (f/4). --XRay 08:18, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bunker of the Largin, Bonfol, Switzerland --ComputerHotline 11:25, 27 April 2014 (UTC)
- Decline WB not properly applied. Reddish line at the left windows (CA). Green glooming at the windows at the right side (plus burnt out). Can you fix all that? --Cccefalon 11:43, 27 April 2014 (UTC). This is some wood. The WB is already ajusted. --ComputerHotline 18:32, 27 April 2014 (UTC)
Not done --Cccefalon 04:55, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 170637 at Nuneaton. Mattbuck 06:50, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Can you btight a bit the shadows please? --Christian Ferrer 04:32, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
Done Mattbuck 09:00, 3 May 2014 (UTC) Support left a bit blurred however ok IMO --Christian Ferrer 08:15, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Church Saint Ouen and Hotel de Ville --Cccefalon 19:16, 23 April 2014 (UTC) Comment Blurred f/20? --Moroder 11:39, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Sharpening may help, and maybe a slight de-blueing of low levels. Mattbuck 19:56, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
Done I raised sharpening level and did some colour corrections. --Cccefalon 15:13, 1 May 2014 (UTC) - Promotion Support highlights are a bit overdone on the big tower of the chuch however it's ok IMO --Christian Ferrer 08:11, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
- Nomination Church Saint Ouen and Hotel de Ville --Cccefalon 19:16, 23 April 2014 (UTC) Comment Blurred f/20? --Moroder 11:39, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination USO-Sale Sharks - 20131205 - USO-Sale Sharks - 20131205 - Tony Buckley --Pleclown 11:31, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
- Decline Try fixing the noise --RalfHuels 08:17, 30 April 2014 (UTC) Oppose nothing done --Christian Ferrer 08:06, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination USO-AB - 20131221 - Anthony Etrillard --Pleclown 11:31, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
- Decline Good but it need a little denoising of the background --Christian Ferrer 04:41, 30 April 2014 (UTC) Oppose nothing done --Christian Ferrer 08:05, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Himmelsrasta is a mountain cabin built between Ljungdalen and Mount Helags. --ArildV 07:43, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Info new version uploaded --ArildV 10:52, 22 April 2014 (UTC) Like your other image in CR, white is not enough white --Christian Ferrer 17:10, 28 April 2014 (UTC) Done new version by me --Christian Ferrer 17:29, 28 April 2014 (UTC) Thank you, the new version is fine imo. --ArildV 20:54, 29 April 2014 (UTC) over opinion please? --Christian Ferrer 08:16, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
* Support I can't judge the light, but photographer likes the new WB and in general the photo meet QI for me, so I support --J. Lunau 12:56, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
Consensual review
[edit]File:Kenilworth Castle MMB 06 Phasianus colchicus.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Pheasant at Kenilworth Castle. Mattbuck 07:05, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Support QI IMO, though I had preferred a tighter crop, e.g. 1:1 --Cccefalon 10:50, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
Oppose beak not in focus. Background door hinge detracts --Charlesjsharp 12:28, 28 April 2014 (UTC) - Support QI IMO --Christian Ferrer 11:24, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
- Support Excellent image, QI --Balon Greyjoy 03:04, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
- Support Good! --High Contrast 23:24, 2 May 2014 (UTC)
File:Kapelle Quotshausen (1).jpg
[edit]- Nomination Chapel in Quotshausen --Hydro 17:38, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
Oppose Needs perspective correction Poco a poco 08:37, 21 April 2014 (UTC) - Decline Not done --Mattbuck 13:26, 27 April 2014 (UTC)
- I don't see any perspective distortion. --Hydro 17:46, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose Come on, I can see the incline from thumbnail. I don't think you need annotations, do you? --Cccefalon 14:24, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
- I would say that the image should only be tilted 0.1° to the right, but if I make a automatic perspective correction (with Lightroom), the picture is even turned to the left. --Hydro 17:47, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
- Awwww, automated pc with LR is ending often in chaos. Just use the manuell correction and iterate vertical correction and rotate. --Cccefalon 05:41, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
- I really see only a very minor distortion. One day I will concern myself again with it, but currently I have to edit too many new pictures. --Hydro 16:55, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
- Excuse me, it is not a minor distortion. I made an annotation to give you a hint. No offense, but you should grasp the problem and try to accomodate with manual untilting process in LR now because a lot of your new photos will go the way of decline, if the problem is not handled properly. --Cccefalon 06:16, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
- I really see only a very minor distortion. One day I will concern myself again with it, but currently I have to edit too many new pictures. --Hydro 16:55, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
- Awwww, automated pc with LR is ending often in chaos. Just use the manuell correction and iterate vertical correction and rotate. --Cccefalon 05:41, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
- I would say that the image should only be tilted 0.1° to the right, but if I make a automatic perspective correction (with Lightroom), the picture is even turned to the left. --Hydro 17:47, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
File:Syrian Marbled White - Melanargia syriaca.jpg
[edit]- Nomination A couple of Syrian Marbled White. Adana, Turkey.--Zeynel Cebeci 14:52, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support Good quality. --Cccefalon 07:54, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
Oppose Sorry. I find the blurred flowers rather distracting. Other than that, a good picture. --Arctic Kangaroo 00:16, 27 April 2014 (UTC)
Comment I believe the problem lies with your DoF. f/6.3 is too large an aperture in this instance. I also notice that your shutter speed is 1/60 and ISO 160. A smaller aperture would have made those flowers sharper. Something like f/8.0 would probably have been better. The faster shutter speed as a result would undoubtedly have led to a higher ISO of either 250, 320 or 400. But based on my experience in the field of butterfly photography and observation of others' butterfly photos, an ISO of 400 is perfectly normal and common and won't have any significant impact on the photo. After 400, then it probably depends on a case-by-case basis. cheers, --Arctic Kangaroo 00:27, 27 April 2014 (UTC) - Support Main objects are sharp enough, very nice lighting and bokeh. @Arctic Kangaroo: In principle, I agree with your thoughts. But assumed a en:Circle of confusion of 0.25mm and a distance of 1 m you get a DOF of about 2.5cm with f/6.3. With f/8 it will be 3.2cm, not significantly more. You will need f/22 to get 6.9cm DOF which would provide the demanded DOF. Without flash this would result in 3 2/3 stops higher ISO to get 1/60s again, e.g. ISO 1600 would be necessary. If the distance to the object was smaller than 1m then the situation would be still worse. -- Smial 08:36, 27 April 2014 (UTC)
Support nice composition and good background --Charlesjsharp 12:06, 27 April 2014 (UTC) - Neutral I don’t agree at all with Arctic Kangaroo about the flowers. The unsharp foreground flowers aren’t a drawback at all since they add depth to the image. However, the picture, though well ex- and composed, looks heavily overprocessed (oversharpened) to me, visible as artifacts in the aforementioned unsharp flowers. I will support as soon as there’s a softer blur. … --Kreuzschnabel 18:30, 27 April 2014 (UTC)
- Comment It's normal in butterfly photography to have a photo this sharp, although I agree that in this case, it probably has to be *slightly* less sharp for the sake of the flowers. --Arctic Kangaroo 11:41, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
- Support --Uoaei1 05:45, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
- Support definitely --Kulac 06:57, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
- Support --JDP90 12:49, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
File:Pissenlit_(1).JPG
[edit]- Nomination Abeille butinant sur un pissenlit --Orikrin1998 12:04, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
- Decline Support OK --A.Savin 14:19, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
- Needs species identification --Poco a poco 17:57, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose Impossible to recognize the species. --Archaeodontosaurus 17:36, 2 May 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose per Archaeo.--Jebulon 20:47, 2 May 2014 (UTC)
File:Derby railway station MMB C6 170397.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Early morning at Derby station. Mattbuck 07:10, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose Poor composition. The light on the lamp post right in the middle of the image has been missed. Too much foreground. --Charlesjsharp 08:44, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion
- This is not FP. I am aware that the lamppost was missed, this is because leaving it in would have made most of the image empty sky. Too much foreground? It's the station and showing snow. --Mattbuck 12:27, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
- Support good (even would have been very good with the fist lamp not cut) --Christian Ferrer 16:50, 27 April 2014 (UTC)
- Support --Cayambe 10:30, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
- Support --JDP90 07:23, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
File:Girl_of_Venezuela.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Girl of Venezuela, Margarita Island --The Photographer 16:09, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:12, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose I don't like the composition here - 1/3 of the photo is empty water, which leaves the eye to be drawn to the hair rather than the face. Once cropped I think this would fall below 2MP. --Mattbuck 12:46, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
- Weak Support. Somewhat hard lighting and possibly minimal tilted CW. Composition is not standard, but reasonable. -- Smial 08:52, 27 April 2014 (UTC)
- Question Haven’t we had this image already some time ago? --Kreuzschnabel 18:40, 27 April 2014 (UTC)
- Not the same version, I usually made several shots. Generally upload to commons at the same time, however, sometimes I do the digital revealed later. You are very observant. --The Photographer 01:13, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
- I think I've had the same view promoted about 10 times, so it's hardly an issue, so long as this particular one wasn't promoted before! Unless you're doing some weird "rereview" thing. Mattbuck 12:29, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
- Not the same version, I usually made several shots. Generally upload to commons at the same time, however, sometimes I do the digital revealed later. You are very observant. --The Photographer 01:13, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
- The others are here, not is the same image --The Photographer 12:02, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
File:Scarborough MMB 41 Castle.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Scarborough bay. Mattbuck 06:50, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Oppose poorly composed. Cropped woman in foreground detracts. --Charlesjsharp 15:09, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
Given you have pretty much openly admitted you are declining all my nominations as some form of revenge, I think a second review would be helpful. --Mattbuck 19:12, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
- Seriously, ANYONE else care to comment? Mattbuck 09:16, 3 May 2014 (UTC)
- The composition is good; nothing to complain about. Also the photo is technically ok. However, it is always a problem if a single person is cropped below the knees. I proposed a new crop that overcomes this flaw. After that, it can have my support. --Cccefalon 08:16, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
- I agree with Cccefalon for the crop suggestion --Christian Ferrer 16:47, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
- Done Mattbuck 18:12, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
- I agree with Cccefalon for the crop suggestion --Christian Ferrer 16:47, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
- Support ok --Christian Ferrer 04:53, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
- Support good now. --Cccefalon 07:03, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
File:Backlit_Margarita_Island_Sunset_in_Las_Guevaras,_Venezuela_CaptureNX2.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Backlit Margarita Island --The Photographer 15:08, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
OpposeI have supported the image in FP but the quality of the lower part is poor, not a QI to me like this and I have my doubts now about my vote in FPC, sorry, Poco a poco 18:44, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
Si cambias tu voto, te asesinaré. Es broma :) , los votos en contra con buenos argumentos son bienvenidos, Un abrazo --The Photographer 22:43, 15 April 2014 (UTC) - Decline
- Support Promoted as FP 8/0/2 == QI -- KTC 22:59, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry but that's not a valid argument IMHO --Poco a poco 18:53, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
Of course it is. The criteria for (non-historical photograph) FP is stricter and decided by more people than QI, but each to their own. -- KTC 23:00, 22 April 2014 (UTC)- Maybe on the paper. Fact is that some pictures are not at QI level but become FP because the wow effect "compensates" the lack of quality. Poco a poco 18:33, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose Foreground was underexposed when the photo was taken. Partial raising of exposure in the lower third of the image resulted in a raising noise level. It looks atmospheric but it lacks photographic quality for me. --Cccefalon 05:15, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
- Support Ok for me. I supported this version for FP. --Arctic Kangaroo 00:52, 27 April 2014 (UTC)
- That is definitely FP, but QI criteria can be more strict due to us not allowing extenuating circumstances. I think I'd probably let this scrape past myself. Weak Support Mattbuck 09:55, 27 April 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Poco.--Jebulon 21:04, 3 May 2014 (UTC)