Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives June 18 2016

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:16-03-30-Ben_Gurion_International_Airport-RalfR-DSCF7546.jpg

[edit]

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Hubertl 07:22, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Isosceles-triangle-more.svg

[edit]

  • Nomination Isosceles triangle --MartinThoma 06:13, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  • {{s}} Good quality. --Hubertl 08:54, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
    •  Comment neutral until check... --Hubertl 06:06, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
  • {{o}} I disagree, I already made an annotation. Probably, it slipped through your attention. --Cccefalon 16:32, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
    •  Comment Ich hatte das Bild offen, aber offenbar wirklich die Notiz übersehen. --Hubertl 06:07, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
      •  Comment I didn't see it either. I fixed it. --MartinThoma 10:52, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality now --Cccefalon 11:00, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support for me too. --Hubertl 12:27, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Cccefalon 11:00, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

File:Montaña del Selado - Caldera del Corazoncillo - Lanzarote.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Montaña del Selado and Caldera del Corazoncillo, Lanzarote --Llez 13:24, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --Hubertl 13:41, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose A stitching error have to be removed- see note --Milseburg 12:43, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
    • ✓ Done and thanks for the hint --Llez 21:11, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
      • Okay! There's a minor stitching problem further to the right at a mountain top. I've currently no time to pursure this further more. So I give up opposing. --Milseburg 22:47, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
        • ✓ Done --Llez 14:48, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
          • Absolutely  Support now. --Milseburg 18:36, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   ----Milseburg 18:36, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

File:Rio_Marin_verso_il_Canal_Grande_Venezia.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination The Rio Marin and the Canal Grande in Venice. --Moroder 07:50, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose not sharp enough imho --Berthold Werner 09:08, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
    •  Comment Thanks for the review but I'd like some other opinion. --Moroder 10:07, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Motion blur in vertical direction - probably camera shake. -- Smial 09:02, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Blurred --A.Savin 00:18, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
    •  Comment I understand that this is not a good photo --Moroder 21:14, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
      •  Comment Please no misunderstanding. I like the composition and lighting as with most of your photos. -- Smial 13:36, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
      •  Comment Ja, ausnahmsweise nicht so gut, dass es QI wird. --Berthold Werner 15:30, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
        •  Comment Thanks for the appreciations. I was with a tripod on a bridge which probably vibrated. --Moroder 15:44, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Hubertl 09:36, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

File:Plassy shipwreck 2016.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination MV Plassy shipwreck in Inisheer island. --Triton 23:28, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support OK. --A.Savin 02:30, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Fixable magenta CA. Also vanishing sharpness in the left and right third of the photo (seems to be a problem of wide angle lens) --Cccefalon 06:36, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Pixelpeeping there is some CA, but it is not really disturbing in 100% view. But the sharpness is not sufficient. A wide angle converter used? -- Smial 08:49, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
Hello! No, no converter used...nothing more than showed in the metadata. :/ (What means CA?) Triton (talk) 11:16, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
CA means "chromatic aberrations". Easy to fix, thats why I usually ask to remove it thoroughly. --Cccefalon 11:26, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
Indeed, under the boat, got it! Triton 12:41, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
Also the antenna/rods --Cccefalon 13:23, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
Does this one look better for you? At least for the sharpness? Triton (talk) 21:24, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Hubertl 09:36, 17 June 2016 (UTC)