Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives June 16 2024

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Неоконченное_здание,_ЖК_Эко_Бунино.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Unfinished building, Eco Bunino residential complex, Moscow --Юрий Д.К. 22:49, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Comment Please geolocate. --Grendelkhan 16:54, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done @Grendelkhan: Hi, coords has beed added Юрий Д.К. 20:38, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support Thank you; good quality. Grendelkhan 18:23, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support Not mandatory to me. --Sebring12Hrs 20:39, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support Picture is ok. IMO description should show where the picture was taken (not just "building in Moscow"), but whether it is coordinates or an address or a well-known name does not matter. --Plozessor 08:07, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Augustgeyler 07:24, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

File:Mercedes-Benz_Vision_EQXX,_IAA_Open_Space_2023,_Munich_(P1120195).jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Mercedes-Benz Vision EQXX at IAA Open Space 2023, Munich --MB-one 09:18, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 11:43, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Is this photo with the shadows and reflections, the low contrast between the roof of the vehicle and the wall, and the photographer's shadow a quality image? The bicycle on the left also disrupts the composition of the image. Please discuss. -- Spurzem 20:34, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Distorted, disturbing background, photographer's (?) shadow. --Plozessor 06:58, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I agree with the two previous posts. Bahnfrend 08:14, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 13:53, 15 June 2024 (UTC)

File:Parque_Alberto_Manuel_Brenes.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Alberto Manuel Brenes Park, San Ramón, Costa Rica --Bgag 02:26, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:29, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I disagree. There's purple fringing and also wires across the photo are very disturbing --Екатерина Борисова 02:51, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I also wonder whether this image has any particular subject, as opposed to various objects almost randomly scattered around it. Bahnfrend 08:14, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 13:52, 15 June 2024 (UTC)

File:Anne_Kaun_at_Republica_2024_04.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Anne Kaun at Re:publica 2024 in Berlin --Kritzolina 11:24, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Peulle 13:14, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Sorry, I think the woman is not sharp enough and ther is some lack of detail. No QI for me. --Alexander-93 16:26, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support If I take into account that this is not a studio shot, but was photographed in available light and that the image is significantly larger than six mpixels, then the quality is quite acceptable. --Smial 13:21, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support -- Spurzem 08:43, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
  •  Weak oppose Not even sharp when downscaled to 3 MP. --Plozessor 03:49, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Lacks sharpness. Sorry.--Ermell 20:53, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
  •  Weak oppose Good image. But like the other statet, it just not sharp enough. --Augustgeyler 22:44, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I agree - not sharp enough. Bahnfrend (talk) 08:30, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 5 oppose → Declined   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 13:49, 15 June 2024 (UTC)