Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives June 10 2019

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Porsche,_Techno-Classica_2018,_Essen_(IMG_9731).jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Porsche 911 Carrera at Techno-Classica 2018, Essen --MB-one 09:41, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Comment Try to reduce noise under the car and on the wheels. --Moahim 10:16, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support Good composition and technical O. K. for me. Please discuss. -- Spurzem 16:16, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support --Moroder 06:03, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:22, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support - Perfectly OK, IMO. -- Ikan Kekek 10:46, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Seven Pandas 13:37, 9 June 2019 (UTC)

File:Kleinweikersdorf_Kellergasse_Schintagrube_27.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Objekt in der Kellergasse „Schintagrube“ in Kleinweikersdorf (Niederösterreich). --Manfred Kuzel 05:12, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Comment Would crop out the building on the left --MB-one 08:58, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
  •  Comment: NEIN, denn das gerade soll zeigen, ob und wie große Abstände es zwischen den einzelnen Gebäuden in einer Kellergasse gibt. Traufständige Gebäude sind oft direkt aneinandergebaut, zwischen giebelständigen ist meist ein Abstand. -- Manfred Kuzel 10:18, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support - There's nothing exceptional-looking about this photo, but it's thoroughly OK, in my opinion. -- Ikan Kekek 03:59, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support --Moroder 06:02, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support I would not want to miss the wall on the left, although it doesn't look 100% vertical, maybe it really isn´t. But I think it's ok for QI.--Milseburg (talk) 11:47, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Seven Pandas 13:37, 9 June 2019 (UTC)

File:PolarizingFilterKenko2017.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Circular polarizing filters, Kenko --Cvmontuy 22:26, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 08:07, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I disagree Focus stack, 24 MPix-Camera, static motif, but below 8 MPixels? --Smial 13:20, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
  •  CommentI was using a 50 mm lens so I can't get much closser to the filter, regards --Cvmontuy 15:08, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
 Comment That confuses me. But okay, if the rule that allows cropping of motifs that are difficult to photograph now also applies to objects that cannot run away, that's fine with me. But I don't want it to come along with sayings about "double standards" any more... --Smial 08:55, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
I am not sure if I am completely understand your comment, but my previous comment was about the rule "Images should not be downsampled (sized down) in order to appear of better quality", I am just saying that this is not the case, best regards --Cvmontuy 13:07, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support Good enough for QI..--Ermell 06:21, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support per others. -- Ikan Kekek 04:01, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Seven Pandas 13:38, 9 June 2019 (UTC)

File:Immendorf_Figur_heiliger_Florian.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Statue heiliger Florian in Immendorf (Niederösterreich). --Manfred Kuzel 05:00, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:02, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I disagree. --CptViraj 06:33, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support - Good quality. CptViraj, "I disagree" is not a reason. Why do you disagree? -- Ikan Kekek 09:43, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Regarding the rather low resolution (only 6.5 out of possible 24 MPix) the image is still not very sharp. ISO200 is ok, f/10 is ok, 1/400s is ok, no camera shake visible. Perhaps a very weak or defective lens? --Smial 09:04, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support Sharp enough for QI. --Palauenc05 21:18, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support Look ok for me. Tournasol7 07:20, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support Quality high enough for QI --Michielverbeek 07:25, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Sharpness just below the threshold IMHO and the image is tilted (based on the houses in the background). The WB looks also off to me (too yellowish) Poco a poco 14:01, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Promoted   --Seven Pandas 13:40, 9 June 2019 (UTC)