Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives July 25 2023

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Crepuscolo_sul_mare_-_Vada_Livorno.jpg

[edit]

 I withdraw my nominationI solve the problem and withdraw the application. I had nominated because the colors seemed so wonderful to me in such a delicate moment as twilight, even at the expense of the details as there was little light and they were penalized.Anna.Massini 14:25, 24 July 2023 (UTC)Anna.MassiniAnna.Massini 14:25, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes?   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 10:35, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wings_of_DragonFly.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Beautiful wings of dragonfly.uploaded by User:Mildeep --Nirmal Dulal 04:12, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 13:39, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
     Oppose should be identified --Charlesjsharp 18:17, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
  •  CommentI would rate Libellula quadrimaculataAnna.Massini 13:22, 21 July 2023 (UTC)Anna.MassiniAnna.Massini 13:22, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
     Oppose Insufficient ID. Libellula quadrimaculata is highly unlikely, because this is a holarctic species, see e.g. [1]. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 13:57, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
  •  CommentI'm sorry, I just wanted to help. Could you help to categorize rightly?Anna.Massini 07:47, 24 July 2023 (UTC)Anna.Massini 07:47, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 07:17, 24 July 2023 (UTC)