Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives July 20 2019
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
-
- Nomination Musk mallow (Malva moschata) with raindrops --Uoaei1 04:47, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:50, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Oostermoer De Groeve pumping station. Nameplate of the pumping station. (MONUMENTNUMMER PM2-0269)
--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:47, 18 July 2019 (UTC) - Promotion Supportbr/>Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 04:57, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
- Nomination Oostermoer De Groeve pumping station. Nameplate of the pumping station. (MONUMENTNUMMER PM2-0269)
-
- Nomination De Wachter (Zuidlaren) Statue of Berend Botje in the exhibition space.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:47, 18 July 2019 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality --Llez 04:59, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
- Nomination De Wachter (Zuidlaren) Statue of Berend Botje in the exhibition space.
-
- Nomination Museummolen De Wachter (Zuidlaren) Upper part of De Wachter oil mill.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:47, 18 July 2019 (UTC) - Promotion Supportbr/>Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 04:55, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
- Nomination Museummolen De Wachter (Zuidlaren) Upper part of De Wachter oil mill.
-
- Nomination Lier-Belgium, street view to the Werf from the bridge (the Sint-Jansbrug) --Michielverbeek 04:35, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Supportbr/>Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 04:52, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Lier-Belgium, street view: the Vismarkt --Michielverbeek 04:34, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:43, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Lier-Belgium, view to the Grote Markt --Michielverbeek 04:32, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:45, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Objekt in der Kellergasse „Bogengasse/Mühlberggasse“ in Altlichtenwarth (Niederösterreich). --Manfred Kuzel 04:30, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:39, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Objekt in der Kellergasse „Bogengasse/Mühlberggasse“ in Altlichtenwarth (Niederösterreich). --Manfred Kuzel 04:30, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Isiwal 04:54, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Kellergasse „Bogengasse/Mühlberggasse“ in Altlichtenwarth (Niederösterreich). --Manfred Kuzel 04:30, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:41, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Statue of Kronos, botanic garden Linz/Donau --Isiwal 04:04, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Sehr schöne Serie. Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:27, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bronze sculpture "Liegende", work of Peter Dimmel, botanic garden Linz/Donau --Isiwal 04:04, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:27, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --XRay 04:28, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Catholic parish church Saint Michael and other protected objects on river Steyr --Isiwal 04:04, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:25, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Baroque column, Wieserfeldplatz, Steyr / Upper Austria --Isiwal 04:04, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:25, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Berggasse and parish church in Steyr (Upper Austria) --Isiwal 04:04, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:25, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Swiss Chard (Beta vulgaris subsp. cicla) in the Botanical Garden in Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:01, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:23, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Jewish Cemetery, Prague, Czech Republic --XRay 03:01, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:23, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mute swan and cygnets in Prospect Park --Rhododendrites 02:05, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 03:02, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Juvenile black-crowned night heron --Rhododendrites 02:05, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Vengolis 03:29, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Caitlin Zaloom at BookExpo --Rhododendrites 02:05, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. A little bit noisy, but acceptable. --XRay 04:27, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Aloe flower --Rhododendrites 02:05, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Vengolis 03:22, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Anna's hummingbird --Rhododendrites 02:05, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Vengolis 03:24, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Melastomataceae sp --Vengolis 01:33, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:10, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Asparagus racemosus --Vengolis 01:33, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:10, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Indothemis carnatica --Vengolis 01:33, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:10, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Hydrocleys nymphoides --Vengolis 01:33, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:10, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Los Horcones near Túnel del Cristo Redentor, Argentina --Bgag 01:00, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:08, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Aconcagua Provincial Park, Argentina --Bgag 01:00, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:08, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Man gate #6 at castle Hochosterwitz, Sankt Georgen am Längsee, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 00:45, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Vengolis 01:38, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Khevenhüller gate #07 at castle Hochosterwitz, Sankt Georgen am Längsee, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 00:45, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Bgag 01:03, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Landscape gate #8 at castle Hochosterwitz, Sankt Georgen am Längsee, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 00:45, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Vengolis 01:38, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Weapon gate #10 at castle Hochosterwitz, Sankt Georgen am Längsee, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 00:45, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Bgag 01:03, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Access balcony with arcades at castle Hochosterwitz, Sankt Georgen am Längsee, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 00:45, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Bgag 01:03, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Main building, Botanic Garden, Munich, Germany --Poco a poco 12:55, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 15:07, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Botanic Garden, Munich, Germany --Poco a poco 12:55, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality -- Spurzem 15:25, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Botanic Garden, Munich, Germany --Poco a poco 12:55, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 15:10, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Botanic Garden, Munich, Germany --Poco a poco 12:55, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 15:10, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Main building, Botanic Garden, Munich, Germany --Poco a poco 12:55, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 15:10, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Hospital in Tübingen --Dktue 09:12, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 09:24, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Hospital in Tübingen --Dktue 09:12, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 09:24, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Porphyr rocks on the alpine pasture Resciesa in Gherdëina, South Tyrol . --Moroder 08:53, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 09:20, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Audi A3 SportBack 2.0 TFSI S-line 2017 front/side view.--Peulle 07:57, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Berthold Werner 11:30, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Greece, Athen, Acropolis, Erechtheion --Berthold Werner 07:42, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Moroder 08:59, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Chamber of the lock Bamberg, view direction Danube --Ermell 06:56, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 07:27, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Hess/ABB TOSA bus at Geneva Airport bus and quick charging station --MB-one 05:34, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 05:38, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Skyscrapers seen from the rail yard of Baku in 2019 --MB-one 05:34, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 05:38, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Diesel locomotive in Baku rail yard --MB-one 05:34, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 05:40, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Spider with wrapped prey --MB-one 05:34, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 05:41, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Objekt in der Kellergasse „Bogengasse/Mühlberggasse“ in Altlichtenwarth (Niederösterreich). --Manfred Kuzel 05:12, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. Shadows are a little bit too dark. --XRay 05:22, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Objekt in der Kellergasse „Bogengasse/Mühlberggasse“ in Altlichtenwarth (Niederösterreich). --Manfred Kuzel 05:12, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 05:22, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Objekt in der Kellergasse „Bogengasse/Mühlberggasse“ in Altlichtenwarth (Niederösterreich). --Manfred Kuzel 05:12, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --MB-one 05:36, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Objekt in der Kellergasse „Bogengasse/Mühlberggasse“ in Altlichtenwarth (Niederösterreich). --Manfred Kuzel 05:12, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Berthold Werner 06:51, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Objekt in der Kellergasse „Bogengasse/Mühlberggasse“ in Altlichtenwarth (Niederösterreich). --Manfred Kuzel 05:12, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality -- Spurzem 05:24, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Oostermoer De Groeve pumping station. Dirt collection grid.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:48, 17 July 2019 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality -- Spurzem 05:20, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
- Nomination Oostermoer De Groeve pumping station. Dirt collection grid.
-
- Nomination Museummolen De Wachter (Zuidlaren) Petroleum sets and storm lanterns.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:48, 17 July 2019 (UTC) - Promotion Beautiful collection and good quality -- Spurzem 05:18, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
- Nomination Museummolen De Wachter (Zuidlaren) Petroleum sets and storm lanterns.
-
- Nomination Museummolen De Wachter (Zuidlaren) Miniature steam engine.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:48, 17 July 2019 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality -- Spurzem 05:22, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --XRay 05:22, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
- Nomination Museummolen De Wachter (Zuidlaren) Miniature steam engine.
-
- Nomination Mechelen-Belgium, river the Dijle crossinbg the railway line --Michielverbeek 04:44, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 05:23, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mechelen-Belgium, church: de Onze-Lieve-Vrouw-over-de-Dijlekerk --Michielverbeek 04:42, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 05:23, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mechelen-Belgium, gate: de Brusselpoort --Michielverbeek 04:40, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion You may need a vertical correction. But good enough for me.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:43, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
Comment Thanks for your comment. The left side is hanging a bit to the left and the right side is hanging a bit to the right, but it is not too much for me for making a new version. I would not nominate this photo for FP --Michielverbeek 18:58, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
It's ok for me.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:53, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mechelen-Belgium, street view to the former townhall (het Schepenhuis) --Michielverbeek 04:36, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:14, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The gate tower "Schnallentor" in Steyr / Upper Austria --Isiwal 04:16, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 05:59, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The chinese pavillon on Schloßberg in Graz --Isiwal 04:16, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 06:00, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Deer fillet with blackcurrants served in restaurant in Saint-Cyprien-sur-Dourdou, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 23:51, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
- Decline Insufficient quality. Lighting / reflections. --Smial 11:16, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Store Rauddalseggje seen from Olavsbu in Jotunheimen. --Frankemann 19:50, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --KaiBorgeest 22:07, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A plane cut at x 0, y 0 that illustrates the iterations that create smaller and smaller cubes. --PantheraLeo1359531 14:48, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --MB-one 14:06, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
I have a concern about the file size of this image. Please email me at my User Page to discuss. --GRDN711 00:39, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
Support Major issue of file size has been corrected. This fractal image could be stronger if there was more purple pink background area created evenly on all sides of the fractal. --GRDN711 17:34, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Image of a Mandelbox. --PantheraLeo1359531 14:45, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
I have a concern about the file size and cropping of this image. Please email me at my User Page to discuss. --GRDN711 00:39, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
Support Major issue of file size has been corrected and I support promotion. would be a stronger image if there was more blue space created evenly around the Mandelbox so that the Mandelbox can project out of the blue background. Right now, it is a little cramped. --GRDN711 17:45, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Image of a Sierpinski octahedron. --PantheraLeo1359531 14:44, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support File size has been corrected without any loss of resolution. I support promotion but would suggest that this image could be stronger if there was blue space on all sides of the Sierpinski octahedron similar to the top. With the points at the bottom and right of the fractal almost touching the edge for the frame, this balanced geometric shape seems unsettled. --GRDN711 17:58, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Olavbunuten seen from Olavsbu in Jotunheimen --Frankemann 22:13, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Should be a bit brighter IMO --Ermell 07:06, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
Have made the picture brighter. --Frankemann 16:54, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:43, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Fahrzeug vor einem Objekt in der Kellergasse „Am Kirchenweg“ in Stetten (Niederösterreich). --Manfred Kuzel 03:07, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Casa de la Marquesa, an ancient building in Queretaro, Mexico. --Mizaelc 19:52, 11 July 2019 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Little river floating down the mountain. --PantheraLeo1359531 20:48, 11 July 2019 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: ☺ Chain of mountains at clouds. --PantheraLeo1359531 20:42, 11 July 2019 (UTC)
- Review Good. There is a visible dustspot in the sky (top right), I have marked it with an image note. Could you please remove that spot?
-
- Nomination: Construction site in Tomineborgveien, Drammen.--Peulle 11:41, 11 July 2019 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Grand Prismatic Spring, view from boardwalk --Dirtsc 07:36, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --KaiBorgeest 22:12, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Hong Kong Airport --Poco a poco 07:09, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Would easily promote a different crop with just the aircraft at the ramp. However, this composition with the blurred and distorted bus in the foreground is a bit unfortunate. --MB-one 13:28, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
I've cropped it without being really convinced --Poco a poco 09:34, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
Support I am convinced --MB-one 05:37, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
Consensual review
[edit]File:20190623_Wodna_Masa_Krytyczna_na_Wiśle_w_Krakowie_1431_9634_DxO.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Water Critical Mass event on Vistula River in Kraków --Jakubhal 20:42, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Oppose The boat on the right is disturbing, sorry. --Peulle 22:42, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
- Comment I disagree. For sure the boat on the right is a problem. But it is not a FPC and I belive it is enough for QIC. I would like to see other opinions. --Jakubhal 18:40, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
- No problem, let's see what others say. :) Just so you don't think I took this from nowhere, I was referring to the "Composition" section of the QI Guidelines, which say that: "the elements within the image should support depiction of the subject, not distract from it.". I felt that this part of the boat on the right side distracts from the subject, which is otherwise well captured.--Peulle 10:05, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
- Support Sharp, uncluttered, and well-exposed. --Smial 10:24, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
- Support Funny and good quality -- Spurzem 15:28, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted --Seven Pandas 00:56, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
File:Catedral_de_Puebla,_México,_2013-10-11,_DD_08.JPG
[edit]- Nomination Puebla Cathedral, Mexico --Poco a poco 07:09, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
- Comment Why landscape orientation? Portrait would have allowed less perspective distortion. --Smial 07:18, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
- Well, what can I add, it is as it is... --Poco a poco 09:34, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
- Support Good quality. --Cvmontuy 01:02, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose I disagree. Wrong image orientation, so unecessary extreme perspective. --Smial 09:44, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose The positive first rating above is amazing. I can not gain the photograph anything. The perspective gives hardly any impression of the building, the strong shadows in the foreground are unattractive and the picture loses sharply upwards. -- Spurzem 09:09, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
- You are really pushing hard Spurzem to aggravate this issue instead of mitigating it. I'm being polite enough to you not reviewing your images which often are hardly above the bar, don't wikihound me! --Poco a poco 19:51, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
- Support IMHO the image is good as it is. It was the artistic choice of the photographer to try landscape orientation here; as we can learn from probably any textbook about photography, sometimes it is appropriate to break the rules to get a fresh expression; and this image actually has quite some effect. All (other) technical things are done well. So, maybe not the most usual kind of building photos here at QI, but an interesting image and good quality. --Aristeas 07:14, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
- Support I agree with Aristeas.--Ermell 20:52, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
- Support QI for me. --Rbrechko 00:00, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted --Seven Pandas 00:56, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion {{{2}}}
File:Verena_Stauffer_at_Lyrikmarkt_Berlin_2019_03.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Verena Stauffer reading at the Lyrikmarkt Berlin 2019 --Kritzolina 21:11, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
- OpposeCropped hair is not nice. --Dktue 21:50, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
- Decline
- Oppose The crop is fine to me, but it has lack of detail, sorry --Cvmontuy 03:58, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
- Support I disagree. Not a studio shot but in a live situation and therefore by far good enough, --Smial 10:33, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
- Support Good image. Perhaps it could be cropped more at the right. -- Spurzem 21:56, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose per Cvmontuy.--Peulle 22:44, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose Resolution is pretty high but the lack of detail is obvious also at smaller sizes Poco a poco 19:44, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
- Comment I consider a rejection of this image with the mentioned "too little detail" argument unobjective and for a case of double standards. In the conditions for QIC we have a few exceptions for the evaluation of images if they were taken under particularly difficult conditions. These include taking pictures in difficult lighting conditions, in which both an increase in image noise is permitted, provided that it remains within reasonable limits, and a certain degree of downscaling or lower resolution is permitted compared with easy-to-take pictures. We clearly have a shot here that was taken under difficult circumstances (ISO800, 1/125s at 400mm 35mm equivalent focal length) and is also available at full resolution. If the image had been scaled down appropriately, the low blur would not be noticeable at all and the image would be accepted as QI without much objection. At least if it had been presented by the "right" photographer. --Smial 09:41, 17 July 2019 (UTC) Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator
- Support nice crop. --Ralf Roletschek 13:16, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Decline? --Seven Pandas 00:57, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
File:Newhall_Pass_Interchange_from_bypass_2016-11-28.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Newhall Pass interchange. (by Junkyardsparkle)- Fluffy89502 04:36, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
- Decline Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 04:44, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
Again: Good quality, but not your photo. Please fix the nomination per the instructions above on how to nominate other people's photos, or I'll move this to CR until you do. -- Ikan Kekek 18:13, 4 July 2019 (UTC)Nitpicky procedural Oppose until the photographer is duly credited in this nomination.-- Ikan Kekek 04:45, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
- Done @Ikan Kekek: my apologies :/
- Support --Ralf Roletschek 14:35, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
- Question - Ralf, why are you supporting when the photographer is not duly credited in the nomination? You should really remove your supporting vote until that is taken care of. I, too, will support, but only then! -- Ikan Kekek 15:43, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
- Because it's a quality Image. --Ralf Roletschek 09:26, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
- Yes, it's a quality image, but the attribution is of no importance whatsoever to you? -- Ikan Kekek 08:11, 11 July 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose Too blurry IMO.--Ermell 06:46, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose -- Seven Pandas 20:55, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
- Support -- Ikan Kekek 05:25, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose per Ermell --Tsungam 08:10, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose per Ermell --Cvmontuy 18:29, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose There is no detail here, it looks like camera shake, not a QI to me, sorry --Poco a poco 19:45, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose Motion blur. -- Smial 10:50, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 6 oppose → Declined --Seven Pandas 00:58, 20 July 2019 (UTC)