Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives July 17 2021
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
-
- Nomination Stavoren. Lady of Stavoren.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:21, 15 July 2021 (UTC) - Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:48, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination Stavoren. Lady of Stavoren.
-
- Nomination Poppy field in Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:54, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:02, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Catnip on the roadside in Hausdülmen, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:54, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:02, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Toyota GR Supra (in the showroom of Auto Bertels) in Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:54, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:02, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Chessboard from above --XRay 03:54, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:05, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sign “Königsplatz 3” at Königsplatz in Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:54, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:05, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sacristy at the parish church Saint Martin on Ponfeldstrasse #92 in Ponfeld, 14th district «Wölfnitz», Klagenfurt, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:45, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 03:57, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Clock at the bell tower of the parish church Saint Martin on Ponfeldstrasse #92 in Ponfeld, 14th district «Wölfnitz», Klagenfurt, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:45, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 03:57, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Spire of the bell tower of the parish church Saint Martin on Ponfeldstrasse #92 in Ponfeld, 14th district «Wölfnitz», Klagenfurt, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:45, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 03:57, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Year of reconstruction at the parish church Saint Martin on Ponfeldstrasse #92 in Ponfeld, 14th district «Wölfnitz», Klagenfurt, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:45, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 03:59, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Stone roof of the parish church Saint Martin on Ponfeldstrasse #92 in Ponfeld, 14th district «Wölfnitz», Klagenfurt, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:45, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 03:59, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Kuan An Keng Shrine , Bangkok. --Supanut Arunoprayote 19:04, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 19:24, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Easter breakfast (Serbian cuisine) --PetarM 17:08, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 18:49, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Building at Markt 12 in Alsfeld, Hesse, Germany. --Tournasol7 17:06, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 19:26, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Old city hall of Leipzig, Saxony, Germany. --Tournasol7 17:06, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Well done! --Mosbatho 19:52, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Toasted coconut donut. (by Evan-Amos) --GuavaTrain 16:54, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Mmm. --Nefronus 20:42, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Blood orange donut. (by Evan-Amos) --GuavaTrain 16:54, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:27, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Raisin Bran cereal. (by Evan-Amos) --GuavaTrain 16:54, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 20:00, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Count Chocula cereal. (by Evan-Amos) --GuavaTrain 16:54, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Nefronus 20:42, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Board trailer at Pozov (Postupice), Czech Republic. --Palauenc05 15:44, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Almost excellent --MB-one 17:08, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Lost pacifiers on the pacifier tree in the Lüneburg Heath Wildlife Park
--F. Riedelio 15:16, 14 July 2021 (UTC) - Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:38, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination Lost pacifiers on the pacifier tree in the Lüneburg Heath Wildlife Park
-
- Nomination Baby plays with Scout's Learning Lights Remote
--F. Riedelio 15:16, 14 July 2021 (UTC) - Promotion
Support Good quality. --Nefronus 20:23, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination Baby plays with Scout's Learning Lights Remote
-
- Nomination A chocolate chip cookie. This is from a Duane Reade brand of cookies.. By User:Evan-Amos --Andrew J.Kurbiko 14:12, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Pudelek 14:24, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination An iced oatmeal cookie. Bought from a Duane Reede in America.. By User:Evan-Amos --Andrew J.Kurbiko 14:12, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Pudelek 14:24, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A mug of Lipton tea. By User:Evan-Amos --Andrew J.Kurbiko 14:12, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Nefronus 20:37, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A six pack of organic chicken eggs, from a New York CSA. Included is a mix of white and brown eggs in a standard egg crate.. By User:Evan-Amos --Andrew J.Kurbiko 14:12, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --MB-one 17:08, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A building built in 1912 in Hof, Germany. --PantheraLeo1359531 13:46, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:46, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Opole (Oppeln), Upper Silesia, Poland - Młynówka chanel --Pudelek 10:28, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 10:30, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Opole (Oppeln) - Młynówka chanel in winter --Pudelek 10:28, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 10:30, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Tower clock at the Catholic parish church of St. John the Baptist in Hochstahl --Ermell 07:29, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 08:02, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Aerial view of Wohlmuthshüll --Ermell 07:29, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. But: IMO touch too warm. Please try to adjust the WB. --XRay 08:59, 14 July 2021 (UTC) Comment But the clouds are white. The colour of the field at the left side is barley on the change from green to yellow. Thanks for the review.--Ermell 19:23, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Spire of the Parish Church of St. Erhard in Wichsenstein --Ermell 07:29, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 08:03, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Dům kramáře Kříže, west house of historical town hall in Prague. --Palauenc05 06:51, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:56, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Boîte à livres installée dans l'ancienne gare de Villette-d'Anthon. --Benoît Prieur 06:28, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 06:30, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination David Alaba, footballplayer of Austria. --Steindy 00:00, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
- Withdrawn
Oppose Motion-blurred, sorry. --Nefronus 07:50, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Withdrawn --Steindy 09:30, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination David Alaba, footballplayer of Austria. --Steindy 00:00, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
- Withdrawn
Oppose Tight crop on the top, sorry. --Nefronus 07:50, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Withdrawn. I don't like to argue about such comments anymore. --Steindy 09:38, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination An F-16 from the Demonstration Team performing at the NAS Ft Worth Air Show in April 2016. --Balon Greyjoy 10:14, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Nefronus 10:18, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Castle of Ressouches in commune of Chanac, Lozere, France. (By Krzysztof Golik) --Sebring12Hrs 08:58, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Nefronus 20:39, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Church Saint Martin in Postupice, Czech Republic. --Palauenc05 08:25, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Good quality and composition. @Palauenc05: EXIF is missing, will be useful to add it for info purposes. --Tagooty 15:51, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
Comment @Tagooty: I've explained several times that for some reason my system does not provide exif-data. --Palauenc05 15:58, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
Support Okay! I'm curious what system you use? --Tagooty 00:30, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
@Tagooty: Never mind, exif-data aren't mandatory anyway. --Palauenc05 06:56, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Saint Thomas church in Leipzig, Saxony, Germany. --Tournasol7 04:36, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Nefronus 20:40, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mönchberg, "Aubachtal bei Wildensee" --KaiBorgeest 21:12, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Nefronus 20:36, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination St Martin collegiate church in La Canourgue, Lozere, France. (By Krzysztof Golik) --Sebring12Hrs 15:51, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Nefronus 20:36, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Entrance to the courtyard, framed by gateway
--F. Riedelio 12:00, 12 July 2021 (UTC) - Promotion
Support Good quality. --Nefronus 20:36, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination Entrance to the courtyard, framed by gateway
-
- Nomination View of the stone cross Creu d'Es Picot on the beside mountain Puig des Milá, framed by the drinking fountain at the Sanctuary of Sant Salvador
--F. Riedelio 12:00, 12 July 2021 (UTC) - Promotion
Support Good quality. --Nefronus 05:52, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination View of the stone cross Creu d'Es Picot on the beside mountain Puig des Milá, framed by the drinking fountain at the Sanctuary of Sant Salvador
-
- Nomination Plane on Colmar - Houssen airport in Colmar (Haut-Rhin, France). --Gzen92 16:52, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 19:59, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
Categorization as “unidentified aircraft” is not useful for future utility of this image in Commons. The registration number and visible observation of the plane’s features suggest this is a “Fisher Celebrity” kit plane and there is a Commons category for it. Please correct the category. --GRDN711 02:12, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Done Categorization ok. Gzen92 12:11, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Plane on Colmar - Houssen airport in Colmar (Haut-Rhin, France). --Gzen92 16:52, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Type of air plane would be very useful --Ermell 19:40, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 19:59, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
Please correct category. --GRDN711 02:12, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Done Categorization ok. Gzen92 12:11, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Nefronus 20:29, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --GRDN711 02:05, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Plane on Colmar - Houssen airport in Colmar (Haut-Rhin, France). --Gzen92 16:52, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Quality is good, but it needs a rotation ccw and please think about the perspective --Michielverbeek 16:56, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
Done Rotation. Gzen92 03:52, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 20:01, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
Categorization as “unidentified aircraft” is not useful for future utility of this image in Commons. The tail reference and visible observation of the plans’s features suggest this is a “Skyleader200” kit plane and there is a Commons category for it. Please correct the category. --GRDN711 02:10, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Done Categorization ok. Gzen92 12:11, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Nefronus 20:29, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --GRDN711 02:05, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Aerial image of the Hallig Süderoog (island in the German Wadden Sea) at low tide --Carsten Steger 17:00, 10 July 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 15:04, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mercedes-Benz E-Class Convertible in Stuttgart. --Alexander-93 10:57, 10 July 2021 (UTC)--
- Promotion
Support Probably acceptable considering the camera/kit lens. --Nefronus 20:36, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination BMW 3 Series Touring in Stuttgart. --Alexander-93 10:57, 10 July 2021 (UTC)--
- Promotion
OpposeBlurred, sorry. --Nefronus 05:53, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Support But since a kit lens for the camera in exif was probably used, the quality is acceptable. --Nefronus 20:30, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination BMW 1 Series in Stuttgart. --Alexander-93 10:57, 10 July 2021 (UTC)--
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 15:02, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mi Kasa (Miribel) - glacess fraise et coco. --Benoît Prieur 10:14, 10 July 2021 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Poor detail around the strawberry one, sorry. --Nefronus 05:53, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Domain of Grandlac in commune of Laval-du-Tarn, Lozère, France. (By Krzysztof Golik) --Sebring12Hrs 08:09, 10 July 2021 (UTC)
- Decline
IMO not sharp enough (blurred). --F. Riedelio 14:58, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Oppose Per F. Riedelio, motion blurred, sorry. --Nefronus 20:32, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Adult male Phidippus putnami jumping spider --Nosferattus 05:46, 10 July 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Oppose Too little detail/sharpness for me, sorry. --Nefronus 20:07, 10 July 2021 (UTC)Comment I take my vote back and shall let others decide. Nefronus 06:29, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
Support Sharpness good enough. --Palauenc05 10:17, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Lukas Hinterseer, footballplayer of Austria. --Steindy 15:15, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
- Review
Comment Facial expression is better in the other one. --GuavaTrain 17:50, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Leerbroek-NL, the Dorpskerk from Geer --Michielverbeek 05:09, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
I'm not sure about the perspective & the loss of detail at the sides. --Nefronus 11:22, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
DoneFocus is to the church and the foreground is not sharp. I checked verticals and add two notes. I did some crops to remove unsharp parts --Michielverbeek 19:56, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
OK for me. --Palauenc05 10:12, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Consensual review
[edit]File:Lille_hellemmes_32_rue_jacquard.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Résidence Jacquard building, former Résidence les Célibataires at the Fives Cail factory, Rue Jacquard 32, Hellemmes-Lille, France --Velvet 05:21, 5 July 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Oppose Good quality of the building detail, but the trees are too much obtrusive imo. Perhaps it could be taken from between the trees with a wider lens? --Nefronus 19:59, 10 July 2021 (UTC)
Support Good quality picture, the trees are just part of the street and let the building visible enough. --Selbymay 13:42, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
Support The trees don't disturb me, btw focal lens is 19 mm!. --Moroder 02:49, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
Comment Selbymay, I added the count and counted your vote as support. --Nefronus 07:22, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
Support It's not disturbing for me. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 16:41, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted --Robert Flogaus-Faust 23:01, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
File:Katzenminze_--_2021_--_9612.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Catnip on the roadside in Hausdülmen, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 05:07, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 05:08, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
Oppose In my opinion not very sharp, some of the inflorescences are motion-blurred, the composition looks chaotic to me, there are some white patches, sorry. --Nefronus 07:35, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
IMO: With respect to the resolution is the sharpness (as top view) good enough. --XRay 12:02, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
Support enough for me--Commonists 19:34, 12 July 2021 (UTC) - Support Good quality. --Steindy 22:04, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
File:NSG-00562.01_Auenwald_bei_Erlenfurt.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Rothenbuch, "Auenwald bei Erlenfurt" --KaiBorgeest 21:38, 5 July 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion *
OpposePoor detail, violet/pale green haze, sorry. --Nefronus 05:00, 10 July 2021 (UTC)
* Support I disagree Imo irrelevant. Nice composition and lights --Moroder 07:40, 11 July 2021 (UTC) - Support per Moroder. The colors look very natural to me. It's normal for shadow areas to look a bit bluish if the sunlit parts of the photo have correct white balance. I find it rather pleasing that no attempt has been made to "gimmick" colors or forcibly apply different white balance to different areas of the photo. The sharpness of the photo is quite adequate and sufficient for printing larger than A4. --Smial 11:09, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
- Support per others. Pretty and rather natural-looking. -- Ikan Kekek 22:20, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
- Weak support Well, I change my vote per others. --Nefronus 07:20, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
- Support Good quality. --Steindy 22:07, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
File:AUT_vs._TUR_2016-03-29_(077).jpg
[edit]- Nomination Kevin Wimmer, footballplayer of Austria. --Steindy 13:51, 4 July 2021 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Sorry, but the hand got in the way. --Nefronus 19:55, 10 July 2021 (UTC)
And therefore the sharp photo is wrong? --Steindy 00:07, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
Therefore I assume it might not be up to QI criteria. Let’s see what others think. --Nefronus 05:56, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
Support enough for me --Commonists 19:37, 12 July 2021 (UTC) - Oppose per Nefronus. Too distracting, IMO. -- Ikan Kekek 22:23, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
- Support The guy moves his hands while he is jogging. There is nothing distracting in it in my view. --Imehling 10:06, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose Disturbing object. --Peulle 14:30, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
File:Red_Delicious_Apple_2021.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Red Delicious Apple --Commonists 19:14, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 21:41, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Bottom crop is very tight, could be better with a little more space, if possible. --Selbymay 14:11, 10 July 2021 (UTC) - Support Good, very detailed photo. The crops are not dealbreakers to me. Why is this in CR, though? Do you oppose, Selbymay? -- Ikan Kekek 18:44, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
My comment was just a improvement suggestion. The picture isn't bad considering QI criterias but could be better. I don't oppose nor promote. --Selbymay 08:28, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
- Comment When I make a suggestion, I just leave it as a "review" and don't change the status of the nomination. -- Ikan Kekek 22:12, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Detailed, yet some planes of the image are unsharp from the focus stacking (the information about stacking should be mentioned in the description). The colors and the lighting are rather dull in my opinion (most of the apple is in shadow) + there’s the tight crop. --Nefronus 19:04, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
- stacking is in the exif data --Commonists 19:38, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Nefronus. The missing sharpness planes are irritating at full resolution but only a minor issue with this subject. Yet it is easy to adjust the white balance and contrast. As long as this is not done, I am afraid I have to oppose. --Johannes Robalotoff 19:29, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
- Support Fine for me. --Palauenc05 07:30, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted --JRff (talk) 19:31, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
File:Jaguar_(Panthera_onca_palustris)_female_Piquiri_River_3.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Jaguar (Panthera onca palustris) female --Charlesjsharp 08:34, 5 July 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quakity--Lmbuga 11:54, 5 July 2021 (UTC)
Oppose Sorry, not sharp enough. Only the nose is good. --Steindy 22:58, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
Support Since it’s a photo from the wild, I am all for support. --Nefronus 08:45, 7 July 2021 (UTC) - Support Per Nefronus --Moroder 11:16, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
- Support Good quality to me. The nose is sharpest, but there's enough to see here. -- Ikan Kekek 01:02, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
- Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 06:12, 10 July 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose Agree Steindy. Just applying Charles' own standards to his own photos. Seven Pandas 22:21, 10 July 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose Agree Steindy.--Commonists 18:07, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
- Comment I took the liberty to change the category from Pteronura brasiliensis to Panthera onca palustris. --Nefronus 18:34, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Promoted --Robert Flogaus-Faust 08:22, 16 July 2021 (UTC)