Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives July 11 2014

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Bath Spa railway station MMB 20.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination The River Avon in Bath Mattbuck 08:45, 21 June 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline Right part is blurred.--ArildV 11:58, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
    I don't see anything significant. --Mattbuck 19:58, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose As for ArildV. Also CA. -- Smial 08:06, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose blurred + CA. --Alchemist-hp 07:06, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --George Chernilevsky 18:37, 10 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Equus asinus asinus Kopf.JPG

[edit]

  • Nomination Equus asinus asinus Mariofan13 10:58, 22 June 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline Insufficient quality. not sharpen --Ezarate 14:38, 22 June 2014 (UTC)
    I don't agree., the donkey's head is sharp Mariofan13 14:42, 22 June 2014 (UTC)
     Oppose Sorry, I downloaded a small version of the picture but in the true versions I think that the ears aren't too sharp for QIC Ezarate 14:49, 22 June 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose DoF too shallow. Every now and then some small parts appear sharp, surrounded by vaste unsharp areas. Not a QI for me, sorry. --Cccefalon 12:37, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Agreeing with the others. Too small portion of the head is sharp, and even in those the sharpness isn't very crisp. It's an attractive and usable photo but not QI for me. --Pitke 09:49, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Nice image, and sharp enough in the eye area, but for me the issue is the animal in the background - even though it is out of focus, its size, contrast with the rest of the background, and its position with respect to the foreground causes the main subject to look somewhat like a unicorn.Generic1139 (talk) 01:22, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Decline?   --George Chernilevsky 18:36, 10 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Palacio_de_la_Reunificación,_Ciudad_Ho_Chi_Minh,_Vietnam,_2013-08-14,_DD_19.JPG

[edit]

  • Nomination Movie projector, Reunification Palace, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam --Poco a poco 12:11, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Insufficient quality. Noisy sorry--Moroder 12:38, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
✓ New version uploaded, good enough IMHO for QI. Please, let's discuss --Poco a poco 20:49, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
    •  Oppose Loss of detail, sharpening artifacts. Not a QI for me, sorry --Kreuzschnabel 19:26, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --George Chernilevsky 18:34, 10 July 2014 (UTC)