Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives July 06 2023

• 
  • Nomination Stream valley landscape of the Lende valley. Swamp vegetation and biotope.
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 04:21, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:34, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination It was restored in 2017 Helomasluisje.
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 04:21, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:42, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Hauptstraße 61 in Ladenburg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany. --Tournasol7 04:09, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:16, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Hauptstraße 53 in Ladenburg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany. --Tournasol7 04:09, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:17, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Marktplatz 7 in Ladenburg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany. --Tournasol7 04:09, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 04:19, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Kirchenstraße in Ladenburg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany. --Tournasol7 04:09, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:19, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --XRay 04:19, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Kirchenstraße 3 in Ladenburg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany. --Tournasol7 04:09, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 04:19, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Süderholmstraße 36, Schleswig, Schleswig-Holstein, Germany --XRay 03:19, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:12, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Round silo, Eckernförde, Schleswig-Holstein, Germany --XRay 03:19, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:12, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Beach chairs on the beach, Eckernförde, Schleswig-Holstein, Germany --XRay 03:19, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:12, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Fire truck in harbour, Eckernförde, Schleswig-Holstein, Germany --XRay 03:19, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:12, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Old lighthouse, Eckernförde, Schleswig-Holstein, Germany --XRay 03:19, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:10, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bikeway along the Drava in Rottenstein, Ebenthal, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 01:50, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 03:20, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bridge across the Drava reservoir in Rottenstein, Ebenthal, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 01:50, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 03:20, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Crucifix at the cemetery in Rottenstein, Ebenthal, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 01:50, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 03:20, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Former mortuary at the cemetery in Rottenstein, Ebenthal, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 01:50, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 03:23, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Door of the former mortuary at the cemetery in Rottenstein, Ebenthal, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 01:50, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 03:23, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The Serpentine, London --Mike Peel 17:40, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality -- Spurzem 18:54, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Swan at Hyde Park, London --Mike Peel 17:40, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion Nice image, beautiful colors and good quality -- Spurzem 18:56, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Europe by Patrick MacDowell, part of the Albert Memorial --Mike Peel 17:40, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good lighting and good quality -- Spurzem 18:38, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Looking to Hartenfels Castle in Hartenfels, Westerwald, Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany --Milseburg 13:41, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 15:41, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ring-tailed lemur (Lemur catta) mother with young looking up to the sky. --Аныл Озташ 12:55, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion Lovely :) --ReneeWrites 00:15, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Drinking fountains in the Tallinn ferry terminal --MB-one 10:46, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 15:41, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Aerospatiale AS350 Ecureuil at EBACE 2023 at Palexpo, Le Grand-Saconnex --MB-one 10:46, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 17:45, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Zucchini and pepper at the Barilla Professional booth at WTCE 2023 in Hamburg --MB-one 10:46, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Very little in focus, cluttered background, sorry. --Mike Peel 17:45, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Entrance to the ethnographic museum in Split, Croatia --MB-one 10:46, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 17:45, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Creu de Sant Miquel, Montserrat, near Barcelona. --DimiTalen 10:45, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:54, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ryskulov and Seifullin avenues crossing photographed from above. Almaty, Kazakhstan. --Красный 10:39, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --MB-one 10:49, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Baum grove photographed from above. Almaty, Kazakhstan. --Красный 10:39, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 14:35, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Municipal monument at haven 10, Raamsdonksveer --ReneeWrites 10:42, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:54, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Entrance of the church in Wernhout --ReneeWrites 10:42, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:54, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mural in Breda depicting two women from Indonesia --ReneeWrites 10:42, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:52, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Val d’Orcia --Anna.Massini 09:03, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
  • Withdrawn Noisy and not sharp, blue highlights behind tree of colouring. --Светлана И. Ленина 10:27, 3 July 2023 (UTC) Not eligible to vote due to fewer edits. --Milseburg 12:10, 3 July 2023 (UTC) I withdraw my nominationAnna.Massini 15:10, 3 July 2023 (UTC)Anna.MassiniAnna.Massini 15:10, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Protected area in Ukraine By User:Володимир Тертишник --Luda.slominska 07:32, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
  • Decline Sharpness + noisy --Светлана И. Ленина 10:40, 3 July 2023 (UTC) Not eligible to vote due to fewer edits. --Milseburg 12:14, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
     Oppose Oversaturated, posterized and very little detail. --BigDom 21:09, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Stumbling block dedicated to Dr. Helene Hirschler
    --F. Riedelio 07:27, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 14:36, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Compilation of five stumbling blocks dedicated to Durlacher
    --F. Riedelio 07:27, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:52, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Close wing basking position of Bassarona durga (Moore, 1858) - Blue Duke. By User:Thamblyok --Sandipoutsider 07:09, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Светлана И. Ленина 10:29, 3 July 2023 (UTC) Not eligible to vote due to fewer edits. --Milseburg 12:16, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
    I'll promote it instead then :) --ReneeWrites 00:15, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Close wing basking position of Dodona adonira Hewitson, 1866 - Striped Punch. By User:Thamblyok --Sandipoutsider 07:09, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --ReneeWrites 10:50, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Close wing pudding position of Abisara neophron (Hewitson, 1861) - Tailed Judy. By User:Thamblyok --Sandipoutsider 07:09, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --ReneeWrites 10:44, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Open wing basking position of Euthalia nara (Moore, 1859) - Bronze Duke. By User:Thamblyok --Sandipoutsider 07:09, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --ReneeWrites 10:50, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Val d’Orcia view from Pienza--Anna.Massini 06:50, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
  • Withdrawn Not sharp and artifacts in the sky --Светлана И. Ленина 10:27, 3 July 2023 (UTC) Not eligible to vote due to fewer edits. --Milseburg 12:26, 3 July 2023 (UTC) I withdraw my nominationAnna.Massini 15:10, 3 July 2023 (UTC)Anna.MassiniAnna.Massini 15:10, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Val d’Orcia view from Pienza--Anna.Massini 06:50, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
  • Withdrawn Not sharp and artifacts in the sky --Светлана И. Ленина 10:27, 3 July 2023 (UTC) Not eligible to vote due to fewer edits. --Milseburg 12:26, 3 July 2023 (UTC) I withdraw my nominationAnna.Massini 15:10, 3 July 2023 (UTC)Anna.MassiniAnna.Massini 15:10, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Val d’Orcia view from Pienza--Anna.Massini 06:50, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
  • Withdrawn Not sharp and artifacts in the sky --Светлана И. Ленина 10:27, 3 July 2023 (UTC) Not eligible to vote due to fewer edits. --Milseburg 12:26, 3 July 2023 (UTC) I withdraw my nominationAnna.Massini 15:10, 3 July 2023 (UTC)Anna.MassiniAnna.Massini 15:10, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Wire coral (Cirrhipathes spiralis), Red Sea, Egypt --Poco a poco 06:21, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:25, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Coral (Siderastrea savignyana), Red Sea, Egypt --Poco a poco 06:21, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:25, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Coral (Pocillopora verrucosa), Red Sea, Egypt --Poco a poco 06:21, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:25, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Coral (Galaxea fascicularis), Red Sea, Egypt --Poco a poco 06:21, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:25, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Aerial photograph of the Catholic Parish Church of St. Bartholomew in Buttenheim --Ermell 06:09, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --ReneeWrites 10:52, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Buttenheim in Upper Franconia, aerial view --Ermell 06:09, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --ReneeWrites 10:52, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Marabou stork (Leptoptilos crumenifer) --Аныл Озташ 02:57, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Wing is in focus not the eye. Sorry. --Ermell 05:47, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Chingay performers walk past at the annual parade. By User:Fortresseconomist --Satdeep Gill 00:49, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --ReneeWrites 00:15, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mille Miglia 2023 - Car number 158 - OSFA Faccioli FIAT 750 S (1948) --Gio Terra 00:40, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 17:50, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mille Miglia 2023 - Car number 237 - SIATA DAINA GRAN SPORT Stabilimenti Farina (1952) --Gio Terra 22:55, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --CherryX 18:30, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lime Point Light Station underneath the Golden Gate Bridge. --Frank Schulenburg 22:15, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 17:50, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination BMW G42 in Stuttgart.--Alexander-93 18:50, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 17:50, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mercedes-Benz C-Class All-Terrain in Stuttgart.--Alexander-93 18:50, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 17:50, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Kamianska Sich national park By User:Артем Жеребцов --Luda.slominska 12:11, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
  • Decline Composition. --CherryX 18:33, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Limnytsia river reserve By User:TumkivA --Luda.slominska 12:11, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
  • Decline Too grainy, esp. for ISO 400. --CherryX 18:32, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Coral (Pachyseris speciosa), Red Sea, Egypt --Poco a poco 10:31, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 17:50, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Reefer With Frohavet. --Vasmar1 15:22, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    Like this one best as having the best focus on the ship and best separation from the background. Would lighten slightly, particularly the mid-tones. --GRDN711 16:39, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
    Thanks, this made me discover some new functions in DPP4. Is this version better? :) --Vasmar1 19:35, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. The best and easiest post-processing is to avoid or minimize it by implementing best practices in making the original image (good exposure, focus, shutter speed, dof, good separation of ship from background, if possible). A good option is to make a test image of the location first before the ship gets there, and check it on play back in the view finder, particularly noting dof and histogram. It's much less work than post-processing. A day with lots of light also helps mightily. --GRDN711 12:02, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination DS 3 Crossback E-Tense at Esslinger Frühling 2023.--Alexander-93 13:02, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 17:56, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Close wing posture Basking of Spalgis epius (Westwood, 1851) - Apefly --Sandipoutsider 08:00, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --CherryX 18:40, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Close wing posture Basking of Spalgis epius (Westwood, 1851) - Apefly --Sandipoutsider 07:53, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
  • Decline Head not sharp. --CherryX 18:40, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination AUOptronics Timing Controller (t-con) board t370hw02 V402, size is 78 x 160 mm --Alex P. Kok 15:27, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 17:56, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Outbound RORO cargo ship (containers, reefers), MISANA - IMO 9348936, coming down fjord near Skudeneshavn, Norway. --GRDN711 19:14, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion Below minimum size requirement. --Milseburg 13:42, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
    Sorry - originally uploaded lower res extracted video still by accident. Have now uploaded correct still image with higher resolution. --GRDN711 20:16, 29 June 2023 (UTC) I marked some spots. --Milseburg 08:04, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
    Spots addressed. --GRDN711 12:04, 3 July 2023 (UTC) Good quality now. --Milseburg 12:43, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Outbound RORO cargo ship (containers, reefers), MISANA - IMO 9348936, coming down fjord near Skudeneshavn, Norway. --GRDN711 19:14, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion Insufficient quality. Below minimum size requirement. --Milseburg 13:43, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
    Sorry – my mistake. Have fixed by uploading correct still image with higher resolution to replace original extracted video still. --GRDN711 20:18, 29 June 2023 (UTC) Better now. But in all tree images nominated on 28 June there are (still) spots in the sky. --Milseburg 19:40, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
    Great job on the full resolution version. --ReneeWrites 00:59, 1 July 2023 (UTC) I marked some spots. --Milseburg 07:58, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
    Spots addressed. --GRDN711 12:05, 3 July 2023 (UTC) Good quality now. --Milseburg 12:41, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Kristall taken on the 28/06/2023, detached from original plant. --多多123 13:52, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Sorry: Truncated object, bad white balance, no metadata. --F. Riedelio 07:26, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The wooden facade decoration at the DHR Sukna Station --Sumitsurai 07:14, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose underexposed --Grunpfnul 13:39, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Stoney Littleton Long Barrow --Mike Peel 05:15, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Grunpfnul 13:37, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Cow at the Stanton Drew stone circles --Mike Peel 05:15, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Grunpfnul 13:37, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Naturdenkmal im Kreis Pinneberg, Stieleiche, Westerhorn, Flur 5, Flurstück 34/1 --Nightflyer 16:54, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 07:07, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Gola del Nera --Stifone 15:39, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 07:09, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sun shining throw art on the campus in Hof, Germany. --PantheraLeo1359531 15:14, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Considering the lens flares to be part of the composition, I'd say QI. --MB-one 12:18, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Arco a Stifone --Stifone 15:02, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --MB-one 12:18, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Kindergruppe im Zoologischen Museum Hamburg by user:Hanse hiwi --Nightflyer 12:03, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Unfortunately the skeletons are burned, while the educator (?) is even a bit underexposed. Still a very nice image, but IMO not a QI. --MB-one 12:14, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Pavilions at Afra Hotel, Oghuz, Azerbaijan --MB-one 10:43, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination View of Tasik Bukit Besi in Johor Botanical Garden, Malaysia --Wiki Farazi 07:27, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
     Oppose Sorry: blurred, too low sharpness for QI, level of detail is too low  Level of detail too low. --F. Riedelio 07:02, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
  • Decline {{{2}}}
• 
  • Nomination Piggy-back railway wagons passing through Buttenheim station, direction of travel Bamberg --Ermell 06:29, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
  • Withdrawn
    can your sharpen it? --Grunpfnul 06:37, 2 July 2023 (UTC) Done
    Thanks for the review.--Ermell 21:45, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Nuremberg-Bamberg railroad line with the construction site of the Nuremberg-Erfurt high-speed line in Eggolsheim, aerial view --Ermell 06:29, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 06:56, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Cousiño Palace Facade. --Rjcastillo 05:09, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Tribute to General José de San Martin. --Rjcastillo 05:09, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --MB-one 12:05, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 8 Strada Zossima Demarat, Bucharest --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 18:22, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --MB-one 12:02, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 8 Strada Zossima Demarat, Bucharest --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 18:22, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
  • Decline Composition (tree, power pole, car). --CherryX 18:35, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Magnificent sea anemone (Heteractis magnifica), Red Sea, Egypt --Poco a poco 06:43, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    Noisy background, fixable? --F. Riedelio 12:45, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
     New version --Poco a poco 10:52, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
     Support Good quality now. --F. Riedelio 06:40, 3 July 2023 (UTC)

Consensual review

File:Lamborghini_Urus_S_1X7A7435.jpg

• Nomination Lamborghini Urus S in Böblingen.--Alexander-93 09:16, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Oppose. Unfavorable lighting, windshield and bonnet far too bright. Color of the adjacent vehicle is very disturbing. For me the photo is not a quality image. But let's hear what others have to say about it. -- Spurzem 10:46, 1 July 2023 (UTC)

Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Declined   --BigDom 15:16, 5 July 2023 (UTC)

File:Cherry_Heering_-_Peter_Heering_Liqueur_70cl_35cl_50cl_bottles.jpg

• Nomination Cherry Heering - Peter Heering Liqueur flessen 70cl 35cl 50cl --Alex P. Kok 15:27, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Oppose Too much noise, sorry, not a QI to me --Poco a poco 07:17, 30 June 2023 (UTC)

•  QuestionCould you please state where you see distracting noise? Alex P. Kok 09:50, 1 July 2023 (UTC)

•  Comment To be honest, everywhere, but specially in darker areas, there are also artifacts. This is an easy shot and I expect much better quality. I could give you further feedback if I could see the EXIF data, but it's hidden. Poco a poco 10:51, 2 July 2023 (UTC)

•  Support. Good image though I would like it a little bit darker. I can not say that there would be distracting noise. -- Spurzem 13:02, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
•  Oppose Strong noise on the sides of the bottles. --Jakubhal 16:41, 2 July 2023 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --BigDom 15:15, 5 July 2023 (UTC)

File:Raadhuis_Zundert_1.png

• Nomination Town Hall of Zundert --ReneeWrites 19:56, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 07:09, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
•  Oppose Nice shot, but too low detail level --Poco a poco 07:15, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
•  Support. Good image and good quality -- Spurzem 11:33, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
•  Oppose I agree with Poco. This isn't a QI in 2023.--Peulle 19:35, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
•  Oppose Images with this resolution should have almost perfect quality at pixel-size. Sorry --PantheraLeo1359531 14:57, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
•  Oppose Too low detail level --Jakubhal 15:02, 2 July 2023 (UTC)

Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined   --BigDom 15:12, 5 July 2023 (UTC)

File:Harley_Davidson_-_Fat_Boy_114_(3).jpg

• Nomination Different view of a Harley Davidson Fat Boy 114 (2021 - 2023) parked in Cesena, Piazzetta dei Cesenati (1377). --Gio Terra 16:16, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 07:10, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
•  Oppose Lacks sharpness, sorry --Poco a poco 07:17, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality. In my opinion, the picture is sharp enough, even if I look at the details almost in their original size. -- Spurzem 11:35, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Poco a poco, level of detail is too low  Level of detail too low. --F. Riedelio 12:58, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
•  Oppose per others.--Peulle 19:34, 1 July 2023 (UTC)

Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --BigDom 15:11, 5 July 2023 (UTC)

File:Cattle,_Volo_(P1090958).jpg

• Nomination A herd of cattle in rural North Tongu, Ghana --MB-one 07:49, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support Good quality. --Terragio67 16:43, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
•  Oppose Off focus. --Светлана И. Ленина 13:23, 30 June 2023 (UTC) Not eligible to vote due to fewer edits. --Milseburg 12:29, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
•  Support No good composition, but sharp, correct colors und good lighting. -- Spurzem 11:37, 1 July 2023 (UTC)

Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --BigDom 15:11, 5 July 2023 (UTC)

File:Panorama_depuis_le_château_de_Saxon.jpg

• Nomination La vue depuis le sommet de la tour du château de Saxon en juin 2023. --Espandero 20:20, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Oppose Insufficient quality.Unfavorable crop. Neither the mountains nor the town are sufficiently in the image. --Milseburg 13:39, 29 June 2023 (UTC)

•  InfoMilseburg: The town or the mountains are not the subject of this picture. The point of this image is to show the view from the top of the tower from one hillside to another, so the subject is the Rhône valley. "Insufficient quality" is harsh considering it's a 20 pictures panorama where you can zoom in and see the neighboring villages quite well. Adding a lower portion would not have made much sense since part of the castle blocks the view on the village in the center of the panorama. The wall at the top of the tower is also a factor because there's no way of having this angle while shooting down without having to move physically, which would impact the panorama's shape (I already had to crop the right part a bit because I shot the wall by accident). I can understand the higher portion a bit more but that would have added more sky than mountain. So it would have been harder to make technically for not a lot of benefit. Those mountains are also, IMO, not that remarkable. Best regards, Espandero 17:21, 29 June 2023 (UTC)

• I'm sorry, but the composition seems indecisive about the subject of the image. As a documentation of the view from the tower, it seems incomplete and the chosen excerpt is to narrow. If stitched there should be no problem for enlarging the shown view. --Milseburg 18:36, 29 June 2023 (UTC)

•  Oppose Poor crop. --SHB2000 00:32, 30 June 2023 (UTC)

* Oppose Unlucky crop. --Светлана И. Ленина 17:32, 30 June 2023 (UTC) Not eligible to vote due to fewer edits. --Milseburg 12:05, 3 July 2023 (UTC)

•  Oppose per others --Sandro Halank 12:53, 2 July 2023 (UTC)

Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --BigDom 15:09, 5 July 2023 (UTC)

File:Baardsund_in_Krossfjorden_06.jpg

• Nomination Bårdsund in Krossfjorden, Austevoll. --Vasmar1 14:19, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support Good quality. --Milseburg 13:52, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
• Tilted CCW. Otherwise good. --MB-one 09:42, 30 June 2023 (UTC)

• Tilted, thanks! --Vasmar1 13:29, 30 June 2023 (UTC)

•  Support Thank you! --MB-one 15:13, 30 June 2023 (UTC)

•  Support --Ezarate 21:51, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
•  Support --Sandro Halank 12:51, 2 July 2023 (UTC)

Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --BigDom 15:42, 5 July 2023 (UTC)

File:MDR700_West_Masinagudi_Nilgiris_Jun23_A7C_05207.jpg

• Nomination Main road MDR 700 from Ooty towards Theppakadu, Masinagudi --Tagooty 03:13, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:25, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
•  Oppose I disagree, it need the perspective correction - it's leaning in. --Tournasol7 15:13, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
•  Oppose And grey line at the bottom. --Sebring12Hrs 05:19, 29 June 2023 (UTC)

 Done @Tournasol7 and Sebring12Hrs: Improved perspective. I do not see a grey line, could you please indicate where? --Tagooty 10:06, 29 June 2023 (UTC)

* Requesting reviews of the new version, please --Tagooty 10:08, 1 July 2023 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 17:00, 5 July 2023 (UTC)

File:South_Australia_regions_map.png

• Nomination: Regions map of South Australia. --SHB2000 13:36, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
• Review
   Support Looks good to me. --痛 02:13, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
   Oppose Inaccurate - cannot read all regions' proper names and Clare Valley missing --Charlesjsharp 14:44, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
  This map was specifically designed for voy:en:South Australia where there is no article for the Clare Valley. --SHB2000 04:24, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
  That's no reason to produce a map with so many errors e.g. Yorke is too big. Why would you produce maps like this when better ones exist? e.g. on the government website. Charlesjsharp 09:05, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
  

"Why would you produce maps like this when better ones exist?" – I literally explained it to you in my previous comment (if you somehow missed "This map was specifically designed for voy:en:South Australia"). --SHB2000 11:50, 27 June 2023 (UTC)

Or if that wasn't clear enough, Charles, let me put it this way: it is accurate; just not the way you want it to be. The purpose of this map is not to provide a visual illustration of South Australia's regions on *Wikivoyage*, which it does (unless you can point out one mismatch between voy:en:South Australia and this map). Your statement "Why would you produce maps like this when better ones exist?" demonstrates your lack of understanding for why many maps on Wikimedia Commons exist in the first place. Your oppose vote is out-of-line at best. --SHB2000 12:01, 27 June 2023 (UTC)

•  Comment Charles, maps leaving things out does not make them inaccurate. This map is inaccurate only if the information shown on it is in any way wrong. However, I don't think it's a QI yet, because there are letters of names that overlap with coastlines and boundaries or just barely miss doing so. For example, I'd suggest using a smaller pitch for Murray & Mallee Riverland to avoid such overlaps. -- Ikan Kekek 04:53, 28 June 2023 (UTC)

Thank you for your feedback, Ikan! Before I make the changes, regarding your points:

• Should I trunkate "Murray and Mallee Riverland" to "Riverland" (and add Riverland to the key) which should then get rid of the overlap?
• Now that I look at it, I can see the flaws with Ceduna and Pt Lincoln, I'll move them after your reply to my first bullet point (easier to make all changes at once)
• If the Yorke Peninsula overlapping with the two highways (A1 and A32) prevents this from becoming a QI, how should I convey the text in question?

Thanks again for the informative feedback :-). --SHB2000 08:08, 28 June 2023 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 17:03, 5 July 2023 (UTC)

File:Karlu_Karlu_Rocks_in_Devils_Marbles_Conservation_Reserve,_NT.jpg

• Nomination Karlu Karlu Rocks in Devils Marbles Conservation Reserve, Northern Territory, Australia (by Warren Poole) --SHB2000 00:43, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 00:50, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sharpness on the subject is questionable, in my opinion. Let's have a discussion. -- Ikan Kekek 06:16, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sorry: Insufficient DoF and level of detail is too low for QI. --F. Riedelio 09:07, 27 June 2023 (UTC)}
•  Support Somewhat soft viewed in full resolution, but by far good enough for a decent A4-size print. Nice colours, lighting, and composition. --Smial 15:40, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Ikan and F. Riedelio --Jakubhal 15:44, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
•  Support. Beautiful and interesting image -- Spurzem 19:42, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
•  Oppose In full resolution not sharp enough for QI --Milseburg 12:16, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
  •  Comment So you want to encourage uploaders to more or less downscale their photos to fake greater sharpness at "full resolution"? It is well known that images with around 6 MPixels at normal viewing distance are suitable for any magnification. This meets my criterion that a handheld print at about A4 size should appear sharp when viewed without a magnifying glass. Anything above that is bonus, slight weaknesses at higher image resolutions should not be the sole rejection criterion for QIC. Besides, it is completely illusory to demand pixel-sharp images for every photo from cameras with more than 16 MPixels (APS) or 36 MPixels (FF). Purely physical reasons speak against this, see "diffraction". --Smial 17:48, 28 June 2023 (UTC) (Of course, the 6-pixel rule of thumb does not apply to special cases such as extreme wide-angle or panoramic photos or stitched images that were obviously created with the intention of providing extremely high detail and resolution and to be viewed from very low distance.) Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator (free version)
    •  Comment Sharpness is an important criterion. I am opposed to disregarding full resolution and judge only about a reduction as "review size", especially when the attractiveness of the subject is dazzling. This only means that photographers no longer pay attention to getting the best sharpness out of their camera. There could be more here. If it leads to downscaling that is well below the possible resolution of the camera, I would decline too. --Milseburg 20:14, 28 June 2023 (UTC)

@Milseburg: It's been a long time since I've posted any pictures for QI evaluation. But I get annoyed regularly when I see the criteria used to evaluate here. If an image is sharp and if the lines of buildings are vertical, then the photo is excellent, everything else doesn't matter. Then the picture can be over- or underexposed, with extreme shadows or completely distorted and with a distracting background. Then it is okay. Best regards -- Spurzem 09:47, 29 June 2023 (UTC)

•  Support Per Smial, nice image. --Kallerna 12:00, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
•  Support Not the sharpest, but still ok for QI . --Palauenc05 14:44, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Ikan --Ermell 20:26, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Ikan --Sandro Halank 12:48, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
•  Oppose Insufficient sharpness and level of detail --LexKurochkin 18:38, 2 July 2023 (UTC)

Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 7 oppose → Declined   --BigDom 15:24, 5 July 2023 (UTC)

File:At_the_Intrepid_Museum_2023_221.jpg

• Nomination The stern of the Intrepid Sea-Air-Space Museum --Mike Peel 20:27, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:49, 25 June 2023 (UTC)

•  Oppose I think that Charles got a point, I revert my vote Poco a poco 20:08, 28 June 2023 (UTC)

•  Oppose right crop --Charlesjsharp 14:50, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
•  Support per Poco. --SHB2000 06:07, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sorry: truncated object, perspective distortion perspective distortion and white color fringes . --F. Riedelio 09:00, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
•  Support. Good quality -- Spurzem 19:43, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Charles. -- Ikan Kekek 04:55, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
•  Support ok --Sandro Halank 12:49, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
•  Oppose Unfortunately cropped :( --PantheraLeo1359531 13:50, 2 July 2023 (UTC)

   Comment Please do not close the discussion less than 48 hours after the last entry! I reopened it because it was not rightfully closed. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 18:32, 2 July 2023 (UTC)

Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 5 oppose → Declined   --BigDom 15:25, 5 July 2023 (UTC))

File:At_the_Intrepid_Museum_2023_223.jpg

• Nomination Vought F-8 Crusader at Intrepid Sea-Air-Space Museum --Mike Peel 20:27, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
• Promotion
   Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:49, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
   Oppose something stuck on the nose. Foreground shadows --Charlesjsharp 14:52, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
•  Support. Good quality -- Spurzem 19:44, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
•  Question I'm willing to accept the shadows and the lack of separation between the nose and whatever that is, but could you decrease the noise palpably? -- Ikan Kekek 04:57, 28 June 2023 (UTC)

  @Ikan Kekek: I've uploaded a new version with noise reduced, does that look better? The "whatever it is" is the enclosure for Category:Space Shuttle Enterprise at the Intrepid Sea-Air-Space Museum. Thanks. Mike Peel 22:15, 28 June 2023 (UTC)

  @Mike Peel: the new version is too small, could you re-upload? BigDom 05:49, 30 June 2023 (UTC)

  @BigDom: Oops, wrong export setting, full resolution version now uploaded. Thanks. Mike Peel 08:32, 30 June 2023 (UTC)

•  Comment I agree though that the image would benefit from a tighter crop at the bottom. It's uninteresting and the shadows don't help, either. Poco a poco 10:47, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
•  Support The image might be better with different crop, but even as it is good enough for QI. --LexKurochkin 18:35, 2 July 2023 (UTC)

Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --BigDom 15:23, 5 July 2023 (UTC)

File:EBACE_2023,_Le_Grand-Saconnex_(EB237514).jpg

• Nomination Gulfstream G800 prototype with extended pitot probe on static display at EBACE 2023 --MB-one 15:25, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
• Decline
   Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 20:30, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
   Oppose Sorry - making clean images of static planes at an air show is difficult. Unfortunately, this one has too many obstructions in front and on the left, to clearly show the plane. --GRDN711 23:31, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per GRDN711. --Kallerna 12:01, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
•  Regretfully oppose due to obstructions on the left. A pity because I'd have supported this image if it weren't for that. --SHB2000 07:30, 2 July 2023 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --BigDom 15:23, 5 July 2023 (UTC)

File:Crane in flight, Altenpleen (P1090063).jpg

• Nomination: Common crane (grus grus) in flight --MB-one 15:25, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
• Review
•  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:29, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
•  Oppose flying away from photographer --Charlesjsharp 14:53, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
•  Comment License migration redundant --F. Riedelio 08:46, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
•  Support per Poco. --SHB2000 12:02, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
•  Oppose Small & unsharp. --Kallerna 12:01, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
  • @Kallerna: it's well above the 2MP requirement. Also, where do you see sharpness issues? --MB-one 14:17, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
•  Comment The image looks sharp, but the level of detail is rather low. On the other hand, this is a bird in flight. The description is bad because this is a bird photo from Kranorama, not a photo of the bird surveillance station. There is no species name in the file name either. Sorry. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 21:28, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
  • @Robert Flogaus-Faust: Thank you for the review. Changed the file name. --MB-one 11:49, 1 July 2023 (UTC)

Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 17:04, 5 July 2023 (UTC)

File:Ulrich_Silberbach_2019_Landtagswiese_Düsseldorf.jpg

• Nomination: Chief of the union DBB, Ulrich Silberbach --Grunpfnul 15:35, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
• Review
•  Oppose Hand and elbow cropped at the lower edge while the upper part of the image has a lot of space. --Sandro Halank 18:40, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
  • Thank you for your feedback. This seems to be a matter of personal preference, which I personally don't share. The face is in the golden ratio, and I would cut off an elbow for it anytime (one of your pictures on your profile also has this characteristic, which is why I can't fully understand the argument). --Grunpfnul 19:06, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
    • This is Quality Images Of Out Of Focus Ellbows! scnr --Smial 15:52, 26 June 2023 (UTC)

•  Oppose I, too, find the crop of the elbow overly distracting. -- Ikan Kekek 06:09, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
•  Support Some unimportant areas in the background a little bit too bright, otherwise near perfect event portrait. --Smial 11:07, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
•  Support Fine for me. BigDom 09:04, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
•  Support Subject is in focus, there's a good separation of fore- and background, face is sharp even when zoomed-in, composition is great. I don't find the elbow crop distracting, and it's not the point of the picture anyway. ReneeWrites 12:30, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
•  Weak oppose per Sandro Halank and Ikan Kekek --LexKurochkin 18:31, 2 July 2023 (UTC)

Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 17:07, 5 July 2023 (UTC)

File:Emblem_of_the_Association_of_the_Athenians.svg

• Nomination: SVG emblem of the Association of the Athenians --痛 21:45, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
• Review
  
•  Oppose original author is unknown. is it wikimedia user? --Modern primat 11:01, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
  
  •  Info Original designer is someone who lived in the year of 1821. I drew the vector graphic. --痛 13:40, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
•  Support the image is of good quality and was made by a wikimedian user. --LexKurochkin 09:18, 25 June 2023 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 17:08, 5 July 2023 (UTC)