Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives January 09 2025

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Salamandra_salamandra_–_mlok_skvrnitý_–_Tiché_údolí.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Fire salamander (Salamandra salamandra). --Skot 18:49, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Comment This is a good picture but the foreground is distracting can you fix it?--Tzim78 21:37, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
  •  Comment Thank you, I can retouch a bit of the leaf near the foot if it's too distracting (is that the problem?), if it's the distraction of out of focus parts of the foreground then I can't think of many ways to fix it (I don't think there's much room for further cropping). --Skot 11:32, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
  •  Oppose This should not have landed here since there's no vote, but anyway -  Oppose due lack of DoF (only part of the head is sharp), plus the disturbing foreground. --Plozessor 11:27, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
    •  Comment Can it be repaired?--Tzim78 12:42, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
    •  Comment I easily cropped this image to 2427 x 1407 and removed most of the foreground blur there is a slight distraction to our right on the rock but it is acceptable in the foreground. While evaluating the image closer I noticed the tail would be out of focus or lacks sharpness.--Tzim78 (talk) 12:55, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
  •  Oppose After cropping the image the tail is out of focus.--Tzim78 (talk) 12:55, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
  •  Comment The tail was already out of focus in the original image, that has not changed. --Plozessor 05:13, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 08:17, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

File:Blick-auf-Los-Cristianos-2024.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination View from a hill on the TF-51 into the bay of Los Cristianos --Tuxyso 08:05, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose I'm afraid that the power mast spoils it --Poco a poco 12:17, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
  •  Comment Imho a power mast[er] (which is there) is no reason to oppose an overall good photo. --Tuxyso 13:12, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
As you decleared Los Cristianos to be the main subject of the image, the composition -with that mast in the middle of the cityscape- is poor to me. --Poco a poco 16:16, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support Picture is good. The power mast is there in reality, if you're standing on that hill you will see it, so it's natural that it's visible in a photo from exactly that view. --Plozessor 11:31, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support The picture is good quality. The power mast is composed so that it does not cover any of the dominant buildings.--Skot 11:40, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Sorry, per Poco here. A QI of Los Cristianos requires a composition without this disturbing mast right before and in the middle. I think a more suitable shooting location in the near is possible and should be reachable. --Milseburg 13:10, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support Ok to me. --Sebring12Hrs 00:01, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
  •  Comment For the record: after I see this image being promoted, I feel like either I don't know anymore what a good photographic composition is or the QI standard is at floor level. Poco a poco 09:18, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 08:17, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

File:Taj_Mahal_striaght_view_1.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination World Heritage Site under the reference 252. This image was uploaded as part of Wiki Loves Monuments 2024. --Rangan Datta Wiki 03:50, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:52, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
  •  Oppose CA, at least on the left edge of the right tower. --Plozessor 04:20, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
  •  Oppose CAs everywhere. --Sebring12Hrs 23:59, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Sebring12Hrs -- Екатерина Борисова 02:17, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 08:15, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

File:Tilburg,_standbeeld_Koning_Willem_ll_RM521169_IMG_5971_2024-11-03_11.26.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Tilburg Noord Brabant-NL, statue King William ll of the Netherlands --Michielverbeek 06:15, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 06:26, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
  •  Oppose too dark (see sculptures at the bottom) --Grunpfnul 15:11, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
  •  Oppose  Underexposed per Grunpfnul, probably fixable. --Plozessor 04:54, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
  •  Comment Please realize the disappointing weather conditions that day (serious unexpected local mist). This was also for me the reason to leave this town after a while and go to The Hague. I have already made this photo brighter and gave it more light and imo more brightness and light will make the sky ugly white. Maybe you have better suggestions to deal with those circumstances. Thank you for your reviews and I hope to visit Tilburg on a sunny Sunday coming summer. --Michielverbeek 08:35, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
Unfortunately, sometimes there are situations and conditions that do not allow a good or appealing photo. That is annoying, but we have to accept it. Best regards -- Spurzem 13:22, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 08:14, 8 January 2025 (UTC)