Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives February 28 2017
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
-
- Nomination House number 112 in Stary Waliszów --Jacek Halicki 00:02, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:17, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Wayside chapel in Stary Waliszów 2 --Jacek Halicki 00:02, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:17, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Saint George church in Wilkanów 2 --Jacek Halicki 00:02, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:17, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A Waymo self-driving car on the road in Mountain View. (Front view.) --Grendelkhan 23:14, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 23:58, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A Waymo self-driving car on the road in Mountain View, making a left turn. (Rear view.) --Grendelkhan 23:14, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- Decline Blurred --Jacek Halicki 23:58, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination La phare et une petite partie du port à Sète, Hérault, France. --Christian Ferrer 19:34, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 20:04, 25 February 2017 (UTC) SupportVery good quality.--663highland 01:09, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Jean Yanne (ship) --Christian Ferrer 19:34, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Very good quality. --Peulle 20:59, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination E match used in pyrotechnics --Lucasbosch 18:44, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Support good quality --Christian Ferrer 19:48, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Has anyone seen a tougher engineer than this hydropower planner? --Frankemann 18:40, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- Decline Comment If this picture was taken in 1918, you probably aren't the author. Please list the proper date and source. Also, I think QI is only for images created by users here. --Grendelkhan 19:49, 25 February 2017 (UTC) Oppose Grendelkhan is correct; this image was taken by the Norwegian state power company (still in operation) and as such it is not the work of a Commoner and cannot be a QI. Therefore declining it outright.--Peulle 22:13, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination House in Karlsruhe-Grötzingen --Llez 17:02, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Just enough exposure --Daniel Case 17:16, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Gibraltar, Main Street, balconies at Govenor's Street --Berthold Werner 15:59, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- Decline Too much clipping --Daniel Case 17:16, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Larnaca: St.George Church --A.Savin 14:42, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 15:02, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Larnaca: Bekir Pasha Aqueduct --A.Savin 14:42, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Berthold Werner 16:01, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Larnaca: airport duty-free shop --A.Savin 14:42, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Again you make this space look interesting --Daniel Case 17:16, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Larnaca district: Neolithic site of Khirokitia --A.Savin 14:42, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Not perfect, but almost looks like another planet --Daniel Case 17:16, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The tourist pathway under snow at the Waterfalls of Gullfoss in Iceland --PierreSelim 14:15, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Might've been able to go with more DoF, but well-done given that --Daniel Case 17:16, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ostrich (Struthio camelus). Jurong Bird Park. Jurong, West Region, Singapore. --Halavar 14:09, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- Decline Background noise --Daniel Case 17:16, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Pelicans (Pelecanidae). Jurong Bird Park. Jurong, West Region, Singapore. --Halavar 14:09, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- Decline Not enough sharpness --Daniel Case 17:16, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Pelican (Pelecanidae). Jurong Bird Park. Jurong, West Region, Singapore. --Halavar 14:09, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Olivier LPB 14:54, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Adhemarius donysa - Dorsal side - Female. By User:Archaeodontosaurus --Olivier LPB 12:09, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Llez 21:24, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Adhemarius donysa - Ventral side - Female. By User:Archaeodontosaurus --Olivier LPB 12:09, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:15, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Adhemarius globifer - Dorsal - Male. By User:Archaeodontosaurus --Olivier LPB 12:09, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:15, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Adhemarius globifer - Ventral side - Male. By User:Archaeodontosaurus --Olivier LPB 12:09, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:00, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ambulyx bakeri - Dorsal side - Male. By User:Archaeodontosaurus --Olivier LPB 12:09, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Cvmontuy 16:00, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Catholic parish church of St.Nikolaus in Sand am Main --Ermell 12:03, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 12:15, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Catholic parish church of St.Nikolaus in Sand am Main --Ermell 12:03, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 12:15, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Pipe organ in the Catholic parish church of St.Nikolaus in Sand am Main --Ermell 12:03, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 12:15, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Pipe organ in the Catholic parish church of St.Nikolaus in Sand am Main --Ermell 12:03, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 12:15, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Pulpit in the Catholic parish church of St.Nikolaus in Sand am Main --Ermell 12:03, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 12:15, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Patrouille Suisse formation Northrop F-5E Tiger II at ILA Berlin 2016. --Julian Herzog 09:15, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jakubhal 09:18, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Patrouille Suisse formation Northrop F-5E Tiger II at ILA Berlin 2016. --Julian Herzog 09:15, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jakubhal 09:21, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Patrouille Suisse formation Northrop F-5E Tiger II at ILA Berlin 2016. --Julian Herzog 09:15, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jakubhal 09:20, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sundial on the church wall in Chotel Czerwony --Jakubhal 09:02, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:39, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cracow Dance Theatre in the show "Estra & Andro" at 29. ULICA – The International Festival of Street Theatres in Kraków --Jakubhal 09:02, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:39, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Lassacher Winkelscharte in the High Tauern National Park from Seebach Valley near Mallnitz, Carinthia, Austria --Uoaei1 07:31, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Beautiful panorama, quality high enough for Q1, only a bit noisy --Michielverbeek 07:38, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Nasirolmolk mosque, Shiraz, Iran --Poco a poco 07:23, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Uoaei1 07:36, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Masjed-e Jomeh mosque, Yazd, Iran --Poco a poco 07:23, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --XRay 07:28, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Honda CG125 with cover, Tehran, Iran --Poco a poco 07:23, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --XRay 07:28, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Wall in Yazd, Iran --Poco a poco 07:23, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Ermell 07:26, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Akan Gold Weight, Geometric weight with pattern --Ercé 07:02, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Just ok (same as usual that noise could be avoided) --Poco a poco 07:28, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mountain hiking of parking in power station Malga Mare to Lago Lungo (2553m).
--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:00, 25 February 2017 (UTC) - Promotion Support Good quality. --XRay 07:12, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- Nomination Mountain hiking of parking in power station Malga Mare to Lago Lungo (2553m).
-
- Nomination Mountain Walking Tour from Pejo to Lago Covel (1,839 m) in the Stelvio National Park (Italy).
--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:00, 25 February 2017 (UTC) - Promotion Support Good quality. --XRay 07:12, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- Nomination Mountain Walking Tour from Pejo to Lago Covel (1,839 m) in the Stelvio National Park (Italy).
-
- Nomination Hike from parking in central Malga Mare (1983m) to Lago del Careser (2603m) in the Parco nazionale dello Stelvio (Italy).
--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:00, 25 February 2017 (UTC) - Promotion Support Good quality. --XRay 07:12, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- Nomination Hike from parking in central Malga Mare (1983m) to Lago del Careser (2603m) in the Parco nazionale dello Stelvio (Italy).
-
- Nomination Pierre du Terrail (Chevalier de Bayard) “Bayard” (Aristide-Onésime Croisy, 1895), Charleville-Mézières, France --XRay 05:47, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:35, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Place Ducale, Charleville, Charleville-Mézières, France --XRay 05:47, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:28, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Fountain in Charleville, Charleville-Mézières, France --XRay 05:47, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:31, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Door scrapers in Mézières, Charleville-Mézières, France --XRay 05:47, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:51, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Fortification of Mézières, Charleville-Mézières, France --XRay 05:47, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:28, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sculpture by the group Verde DF, it is designed to support a vertical garden. --Cvmontuy 05:30, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:48, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Chapultepec aqueduct --Cvmontuy 04:39, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good focus on the aqueduct. -- Ikan Kekek 05:30, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Memorial plaque for Dr. Wilhelm Münch at the park on Hans-Pruscha-Weg, Poertschach am Woerther See, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 03:12, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:44, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Reed bed (phragmites australis) on Hans-Pruscha-Weg, Poertschach am Woerther See, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 03:12, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --XRay 07:25, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View of the Wörthersee`s waterline and Maria Woerth on Hans-Pruscha-Weg, Poertschach am Woerther See, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 03:12, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Very good quality and nice composition. -- Ikan Kekek 05:28, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Salix x sepulcralis on the peninsula promenade, Poertschach am Woerther See, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 03:12, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Some parts of the photo are a bit soft at full size, but still a QI, and besides, full size is very large. -- Ikan Kekek 05:31, 25 February 2017 (UTC) Comment @Ikan Kekek: The soonest possible I`m gonna try to improve this with LR. --Johann Jaritz 05:51, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Werzer`s lake hotel, boathouse, Hotel Astoria and Hotel Prueller on the lakeside promenade, Poertschach am Woerther See, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 03:12, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --XRay 07:25, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination House number 67 in Stary Waliszów 1 --Jacek Halicki 00:05, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:45, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination House number 112 in Stary WaliszówHouse number 112 in Stary Waliszów 1 --Jacek Halicki 00:05, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --XRay 07:21, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Church of San Miguel, Belmonte de Gracián, Zaragoza, Spain --Poco a poco 16:59, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Ermell 07:31, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Common cranes (Grus grus), Bello, Teruel, Spain --Poco a poco 16:59, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Ermell 07:40, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The elder part of Hotel Panhans in Semmering. --Liberaler Humanist 16:45, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Uoaei1 07:34, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Escalator at Cantón de San Francisco Javier Street in the Old Town. Vitoria-Gasteiz, Basque Country, Spain --Basotxerri 16:38, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Ermell 07:34, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Los Arquillos. Vitoria-Gasteiz, Basque Country, Spain --Basotxerri 16:38, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Ermell 07:32, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mountain hiking of parking in power station Malga Mare to Lago Lungo (2553m).
--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:55, 24 February 2017 (UTC) - Promotion An excellent composition. Sharp enough for Q1, but it is not extremely sharp. Ik heb eerlijk gezegd geen idee hoe je een dergelijke compositie nog wat scherper kan maken. --Michielverbeek 06:54, 24 February 2017
Ik heb scherpgesteld op het einde van het immense dal, dan is de foto in zijn geheel redelijk scherp. Misschien F11? Agnes 07:19, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
Probeer gewoon verschillende instellingen f5 t/m f11, eventueel wat meer lichtonderdrukking. Haal de mooiste er tussen uit met misschien wat meer ruisonderdrukking. De compositie is schitterend! --Michielverbeek 08:07, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- Nomination Mountain hiking of parking in power station Malga Mare to Lago Lungo (2553m).
-
- Nomination Mézières, Charleville-Mézières, France --XRay 05:09, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Support good quality --Christian Ferrer 19:40, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The Si-o-seh pol, officially known as Allāhverdi Khan Bridge is a bridge located in Isfahan, Iran --Poco a poco 22:41, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Can you change this to rectilinear (perspective) projection to get the curved horizontal lines straight? --Uoaei1 05:03, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
I'd really like to keep it this way for two reasons, personal preference and due to the fact that it's an FP that way. We shouldn't apply major changes to FPs Poco a poco 16:57, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
Ok, good quality anyway. --Uoaei1 07:28, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Hamburg, one of the rectories of the main church St. Michaelis --Dirtsc 16:05, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Tilted cw, please correct! --Uoaei1 19:53, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
Comment Please take a look at the new version. Greetings, --Dirtsc 19:44, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
Support Fine now, good quality. --Uoaei1 17:07, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Seyyed mosque, Isfahan, Iran --Poco a poco 21:38, 22 February 2017 (UTC) Comment See note --A.Savin 01:54, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
Fixed Poco a poco 17:20, 24 February 2017 (UTC) - Promotion OK. --A.Savin 14:22, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- Nomination Seyyed mosque, Isfahan, Iran --Poco a poco 21:38, 22 February 2017 (UTC) Comment See note --A.Savin 01:54, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Pepe Lopez Peugeot 208 T16 Rali Serras de Fafe 2017 --Harpagornis 11:20, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Comment Needs some CW rotation; the standing stone and people are clearly tilted.--Peulle 12:22, 22 February 2017 (UTC) Comment Why so small now? After the rotation, the image is halved in size.--Peulle 10:54, 23 February 2017 (UTC) Comment Why he used other software, exactly Darktable--Harpagornis 13:01, 23 February 2017 (UTC) I edited it, keeping the bigger size. Yann 17:34, 24 February 2017 (UTC) Support Well it's a good capture, well focused. I approve. :)--Peulle 21:01, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license: --Freddy2001 20:47, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
- Decline Comment Could you please use an adequate caption when nominating pictures. --A.Savin 14:12, 18 February 2017 (UTC) Not done Obviously no interest to respect reviews by other people. --A.Savin 16:49, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mathematical object for illustrating Angle of repose on display at Matemateca IME-USP, by Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton --Leandroxavier 15:54, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
- Decline Comment Some image stacking errors have created unsharp zones. Fixable? --C messier 11:18, 18 February 2017 (UTC) Not done in a week.--Peulle 22:16, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
Consensual review
[edit]File:Credit_River_at_Forks_of_the_Credit_Provincial_Park.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Credit River at Forks of the Credit Provincial Park, Ontario --СССР 01:32, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
- Decline
- Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:56, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose Lacking sharpness, especially in the left part it is blurred, and some chromatic aberrations are there too --A.Savin 15:42, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose - I tend to agree with A.Savin on this. -- Ikan Kekek 05:37, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined --Peulle 15:37, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
File:Broken_ice_on_Holma_Millpond_5.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Broken ice on Holma Millpond, Lysekil, Sweden. --W.carter 21:04, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Oppose Composition isn't quite there for me, unfortunately. No clear subject as most of the frame is simply a uniform sheet of ice. Dark intrusion of near bank pulls the eye in one direction and blown reflection of the sun pulls it in the other. Sorry. Juliancolton 03:30, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
- Comment Pic is now cropped to show just the subject which is the light on the ice in a minimalistic way. Is this better? It is polite to give the nominator a chance to correct such a simple thing as a crop. ;) --W.carter 10:47, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
- Please know that I didn't mean to be impolite. I considered that a crop might have addressed my concerns, and it was indeed a nice improvement, but I still feel find the composition to not be very compelling. I'm happy to be proven wrong, as it's still very pretty and tranquil as others have noted. Juliancolton 15:11, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
- There are loads of QIs without compelling compositions. If we had to decline every one of them, QI would be a much smaller category - and this one is way more interesting than quite a lot of other pictures, anyway. If you find this very pretty and tranquil and it's up to QI technical standards, do you really think it's appropriate for you to oppose a promotion? -- Ikan Kekek 05:20, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
- The image guidelines define compositional as well as technical standards to be met for QI status. If there are many QIs with poor compositions then perhaps at least some of them shouldn't be QIs at all. It's fine to disagree with my judgement. That's why we have consensual review. Just don't insist that I've been impolite or inappropriate etc etc... Juliancolton 15:11, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
- I didn't insist; I asked you a question - perhaps sharply, but with room for a reply such as you gave. In practice, I find that compositional standards aren't very high at QIC, merely what's sufficient to focus on the subject of the photo with decent clarity and without tremendous distraction. Maybe that's worth discussing on the talk page. -- Ikan Kekek 06:16, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
- Comment Guys, let's not blow this out of proportions. I should have used a better way of expressing myself at the beginning, perhaps "more polite" or "better" or whatever might have been more appropriate. I don't consider Julian impolite at all and he surely has full rights to his opinion. I read the initial oppose as being fixable by a crop, I didn't realize Julians objection went deeper than I though. My bad. --W.carter 11:56, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
- Support - Good, interesting photo. -- Ikan Kekek 05:39, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- Support for me pretty picture.--Famberhorst 16:43, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- Support Subtle shades of a golden winter afternoon. Daniel Case 17:04, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted --A.Savin 16:13, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
File:Charleville-Mézières_--_2017_--_4803.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Mézières, Charleville-Mézières, France --XRay 07:59, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
- Withdrawn
- Support Good quality. --Basotxerri 19:45, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
- Sorry Oppose. Sky washed out. --A.Savin 15:33, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
- Sorry, but bad weather conditions. It isn't washed out, but you're right, it isn't a nice sky. --XRay 14:11, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose Close call for me; the house seems OK, but the sky gives you problems. The chimney is distorted too, not sure if that can be rescued. I'd recommend reshooting on a day with better weather, and experimenting with distances to avoid the distortion.--Peulle 10:15, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination Conclusion: Not good enough. Thank you for your reviews. --XRay 09:59, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline? --W.carter 10:23, 25 February 2017 (UTC)