Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives February 22 2014
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
-
- Nomination Pilot boat at Landsort. --ArildV 00:25, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 01:45, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Landsort lighthouse at Öja Island, Stockholm Archipelago. --ArildV 00:25, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 01:45, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Wells Cathedral, Somerset. --Saffron Blaze 22:02, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality and high EV.--ArildV 23:31, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The protected area Vils-Engtal in Lower Bavaria. --High Contrast 20:58, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
- Decline Unsharp, not a QI to me, sorry --Poco a poco 21:14, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View from Black Sea to Kara-Dag, Crimean peninsula, Ukraine. --Kulmalukko 19:55, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
- Decline Left crop not convincing and lack of sharpness, sorry --Poco a poco 21:01, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The main harbour at Öja Island, Stockholm Archipelago. --ArildV 19:23, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality with bright colors. --Kulmalukko 19:57, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Landscape at Öja Island, Stockholm Archipelago. --ArildV 19:23, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:04, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Dortmund, Germany: Mine timber lorry at "Zeche Zollern", a former coal mine. --Cccefalon 19:04, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:04, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination St Michael church, Engolasters, Andorra --Poco a poco 15:21, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Nice.--ArildV 19:28, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Dust spot in the sky (see annotation), please fix it. Otherwise nice. -- Felix Koenig 21:37, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Thank you! -- Felix Koenig 21:56, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Teotihuacán, Mexico --Poco a poco 15:21, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --XRay 16:49, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Archaeological area of Cantona, Puebla, Mexico --Poco a poco 15:21, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Cayambe 19:57, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Albarracín, Teruel, Spain --Poco a poco 15:21, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --JLPC 18:30, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Villafeliche, Zaragoza, Spain --Poco a poco 15:21, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality--Lmbuga 18:42, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Albarracín Cathedral, Teruel, Spain --Poco a poco 15:21, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Cccefalon 17:54, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View of Albarracín from the city walls, Teruel, Spain --Poco a poco 15:21, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Nice and very sharp, but tilted IMO, see notes--Lmbuga 18:40, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Done Poco a poco 20:56, 19 February 2014 (UTC) - Promotion Support Nice and good quality--Lmbuga 23:30, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
- Nomination View of Albarracín from the city walls, Teruel, Spain --Poco a poco 15:21, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Detail of the Jama Masjid over the main entrance, Ahmedabad --Bgag 14:58, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:14, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bicycles in Palma de Mallorca --Ralf Roletschek 14:05, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose Sorry, cyan CAs (see notes), artifacts, bad background (too blurry and dirty IMO). Perhaps the picture is too processed--Lmbuga 18:27, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Palma de Mallorca --Ralf Roletschek 14:05, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
- Decline CA, strong pixelation, perspective distortion, definitively not a QI --Poco a poco 21:15, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The monument of Ladislaus I in Győr. --MrPanyGoff 08:48, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Bgag 15:03, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Queen's Medical Centre. Mattbuck 08:04, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Ok --Poco a poco 21:15, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Old industrial area Katrinedal, Hedemora, Sweden.--V-wolf 07:19, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
- Decline CA, in general too much magenta in the photo. Too tight crop on top and unfortunate cut at the bottom. A disturbing grass in the foreground. Too much issues, sorry. --Cccefalon 11:19, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The Iron Log House museum in Győr. --MrPanyGoff 07:07, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality IMO--Lmbuga 18:12, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Plateau d'emparis, (2250 m.) cairn.--
Famberhorst 05:40, 19 February 2014 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality. --JLPC 18:30, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
- Nomination Plateau d'emparis, (2250 m.) cairn.--
-
- Nomination Information board at the "Hochzeitsallee" in Hausdülmen, Germany --XRay 04:37, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Could you set the magenta fringe level to "2" to get rid of the magenta around the metal reflections? And brighten up the darks and shadows a little bit; the background is too dark. --Cccefalon 06:47, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Fixed Thanks! It's all fixed.--XRay 16:32, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
ah, that's good! Support --Cccefalon 21:11, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A Tobu Railway 6050 series EMU train (by Omcrayon) --DAJF 04:18, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Again good photographic quality, but some things to do: Reduce magenta in the wires, remove dust spot and clone out the disturbing lamp upper right side. I made annotations. --Cccefalon 06:18, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Done --DAJF 06:45, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Well done! --Cccefalon 06:49, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Hidden Falls, Nerstrand Big Woods State Park, Minnesota (by McGhiever) --Jonathunder 00:43, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
- Decline Below 2 MP; not eligible for nomination. --Cccefalon 06:42, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Latsch State Park, Minnesota (by McGhiever) --Jonathunder 00:43, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
- Decline Below 2 MP; not eligible for nomination. --Cccefalon 06:41, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Wood Lake Battlefield, Minnesota (by McGhiever) --Jonathunder 00:43, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
- Decline Below 2 MP; not eligible for nomination. --Cccefalon 06:42, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mailbox in Liège, Belgium --Ralf Roletschek 23:21, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
- Withdrawn Sharpness fading in the Dernièr levée sign; borderline, but can be acceptable. But: Perspective correction not done and the tiny part of the sign at the upper right side is unfortunate. --Cccefalon 11:24, 19 February 2014 (UTC) ich verzerre nicht jedes Bild. Das ist schräg fotografiert, also ist es auch schräg .--~~~~
-
- Nomination Train in Station Liège, Belgium --Ralf Roletschek 23:21, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --JLPC 18:27, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Church of Our Lady of Peace, Newbridge --Lewis Hulbert 18:37, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
Perspective correction is borderline, but Qi for me. --JLPC 09:07, 19 February 2014 (UTC) - Promotion
- Nomination Church of Our Lady of Peace, Newbridge --Lewis Hulbert 18:37, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Train in Station Liège-Guillemins (Belgium) --Ralf Roletschek 13:41, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Ok for QI imo.--ArildV 23:57, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Rain in Straßburg, France --Ralf Roletschek 13:37, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality and atmospheric photo. Some non-rectilinear verticals of the old buildings acceptable as the new houses verticals are ok.. --Cccefalon 06:33, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Juvenile sooty gulls, Oman. --Baresi franco 12:48, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion I saw the note but QI imo.--ArildV 23:51, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Straßburg, ponts couverts --Ralf Roletschek 10:59, 18 February 2014 (UTC) Comment Sky in the upper right is overexposed. Additionally a perspective correction is needed. --P e z i 13:49, 18 February 2014 (UTC)Perspektive ist korrigiert. Aber die Ecke... es ist gegen die Sonne. --Ralf Roletschek 16:39, 18 February 2014 (UTC) Comment I've uploaded a new version. Please could someone else make a review; I'm biased ... --P e z i 21:06, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Honestly, I liked the previous version much more, because the WB looks more natural. Anyway, both versions are qualified for QI IMO. --Cccefalon 17:58, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Pass from the quarter back of the giants --PierreSelim 07:37, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Very good.--ArildV 00:06, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Wide reciever of the Giants (Saint-Etienne) is running toward the goal area in order to gain yards for his team --PierreSelim 07:28, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Very good.--ArildV 00:06, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Building at Pfarrplatz 6 in Baden. --MrPanyGoff 07:05, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Cccefalon 09:55, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination All Saints Church, Fleet. --Lewis Hulbert 22:19, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Felix Koenig 21:39, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A JR East Keiyo Line E233-5000 series EMU train (by Toshinori baba) --DAJF 10:57, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion In general good quality, but please remove the CA which occurs clearly visible on the right side. --Cccefalon 11:41, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
Done I learned up on how to remove magenta fringes in Photoshop. --DAJF 06:59, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Considerably better! Good work and congratulations to your new knowledge. --Cccefalon 13:13, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Chapel of San Roque, Ribeira, Galicia -R27 --Lmbuga 11:38, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
The left side is leaning out, is it for real? Poco a poco 13:37, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
Done Tienes razón, pero no soy capaz de dejarla mejor. A ver que te parece?--Lmbuga 21:03, 16 February 2014 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:34, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
- Nomination Chapel of San Roque, Ribeira, Galicia -R27 --Lmbuga 11:38, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Diego Costa performing a bicycle kick while Ángel Trujillo is defending at the game Atlético de Madrid-Ud Almería. --Kadellar 19:58, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --PierreSelim 07:48, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Information at the nature trail in Hausdülmen, Germany --XRay 04:38, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
The WB is an issue here, it has a purple cast, an increase of temperature would help Poco a poco 07:38, 15 February 2014 (UTC) Comment I check the WB. But the colors on the figure are actually very pale, because they are relatively old.--XRay 07:57, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
Fixed You're right. It's better with another WB.--XRay 08:15, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
I prefer the last version but the change was too radical, it went from greenish to purpleish, try to reduce the purple cast and incrase the temperature a bit. I can try it if you want Poco a poco 13:12, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
Fixed It's now a new mixture and not CW tilted. Thanks for your advice.--XRay 16:47, 19 February 2014 (UTC) - Promotion Not a great quality (there is also some overexposure) but just ok for QI to me --Poco a poco 21:19, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
- Nomination Information at the nature trail in Hausdülmen, Germany --XRay 04:38, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Open-pit lignite mines in the Rhenish area. By User:Thoroe --EveryPicture 14:53, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Teotihuacán, Mexico --Poco a poco 20:17, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Pleclown 12:54, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Great Pyramid of Cholula, Puebla, Mexico --Poco a poco 20:17, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Pleclown 12:54, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Statue to Saint Joseph and Jesus teenager, Pantheon, Rome, Italy.--Jebulon 15:33, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
If you just had the bottom part this would be QI, but I'm not convinced by the detail in the top half. Mattbuck 22:19, 17 February 2014 (UTC) - Decline Bad light conditions--Moroder 23:26, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
- Nomination Statue to Saint Joseph and Jesus teenager, Pantheon, Rome, Italy.--Jebulon 15:33, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 222016 at Kettering. Mattbuck 09:44, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Frankly spoken: I like the colours but not the composition. Too much shadow in the foreground and the sharpness is faded away already at the letters of the service door. What about the blue front - is it dirt or noise? I am not sure for now, but perhaps a square crop could be a possibility (I made an annotation). --Cccefalon 11:01, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
Cropped. Mattbuck 22:35, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
better. --Cccefalon 18:06, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Consensual review
[edit]File:Roaring_Creek_(Pennsylvania)_Edit1.JPG
[edit]- Nomination Roaring Creek in wintertime. Jakec 15:56, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose Insufficient quality: The branches do not show fine details, it is lacking sharpness. --Cccefalon 20:51, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
*The trees aren't the point of the image, oftentimes even in FPs the background is not sharp. I can even remove most of the trees entirely if it is so desired. Jakec 22:22, 14 February 2014 (UTC) - Oppose Unsharp Christian Ferrer 05:10, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
File:Cerkiew_na_Ćipurze_w_Cetinje_02.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Court Church. Cetinje, Montenegro. --Halavar 14:00, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
Bad CA. Mattbuck 23:07, 10 February 2014 (UTC) - Decline No veo mala calidad, al contrario, esta toma tiene una composicion bien lograda en mi modesta opinion. --Ivan2010 08:29, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose sorry, mattbuck is right --A.Savin 17:21, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose Excessively distracting chromatic aberration. --DAJF 03:17, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline? --DAJF 03:07, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
File:UBC_Haida_House_01.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Haida House UBC --Xicotencatl 07:51, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Oppose Too much fog for me , sorry Pleclown 12:37, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
SupportIt's maybe a bit dark, but I think it's ok. Mattbuck 21:22, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
- I lightened a bit this picture and the one below. The fog is actually the main areason I went there to take these pictures. --Xicotencatl 06:08, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
Support --JLPC 08:25, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote? --JLPC 08:41, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
File:UBC_museum_of_anthropology_01.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Museum of anthropology UBC --Xicotencatl 07:51, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Oppose Too much fog for me , sorry Pleclown 12:37, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
SupportIt's maybe a bit dark, but I think it's ok. Mattbuck 21:22, 11 February 2014 (UTC) - Support Nice view. Quality OK. I like the foggy mood, it's something new here. --Dirtsc (talk) 07:41, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
- Support --JLPC 08:26, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
- Support Looks good quality to me, and the mist adds rather than detracts. --DAJF 06:16, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote? --DAJF 06:16, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
File:Kościół_Najświętszego_Serca_Pana_Jezusa_w_Czeskim_Cieszynie_1.JPG
[edit]- Nomination The Parish Church of the Sacred Heart of Jesus in Český Těšín, Czech Republic --Halavar 17:54, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
Several issues: Noisy and blurred in full resolution; dust spots; tilted. --NorbertNagel 20:45, 2 February 2014 (UTC) - Decline Good quality. --Sebastian Wallroth 14:38, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose as per Norbert plus CA --Cccefalon 07:34, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose In full size have problems like others --The Photographer 20:17, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose As already mentioned above, the image is tilted, noisy, and dust spots are visible in the sky. --DAJF 06:14, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Decline? --DAJF 02:57, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
File:Jama Masjid, Uperkot - Mihrab 03.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Detail of a mihrab in Jama Masjid, Uperkot Fort, India --Bgag 15:09, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support --Sebastian Wallroth 14:38, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
OpposeBottom seems unsharp to me. --Mattbuck 22:38, 10 February 2014 (UTC)- Support --Better now imo. --JLPC 09:39, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote? --JLPC 08:27, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
File:Tank locomotive 2023.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Tank locomotive 2023 --Vitold Muratov 15:59, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support Good quality. --Pleclown 12:34, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose overexposed on the right; chromatic aberrations --A.Savin 21:35, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
- Comment Not too bad but a bit too bright, and CA on window frames – fixable? --Kreuzschnabel 15:25, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
- Done Problems fixed imo. Feel free to reverse. --JLPC 09:34, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
- Sorry, still no QI to me. Overall too soft and there is kinda colour banding in the sky at the right. --A.Savin 20:19, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
- Support Looks OK to me. --DAJF 03:12, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote? --JLPC (talk) 08:17, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
File:Gran_Pirámide_de_Cholula,_Puebla,_México,_2013-10-12,_DD_17.JPG
[edit]- Nomination Shadow of myself at the Great Pyramid of Cholula, Puebla, Mexico --Poco a poco 17:01, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Oppose Shooting a stair from above is always a difficult situation. But the disturbing shadow and the lack of interesting compositional elements push me to decline the photo, sorry. --Cccefalon 13:52, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
- Well, fine, but obviously the shadow was the central element of the picture rather than a disturbing and not desired factor Poco a poco 16:52, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
- Actually, if you don't mind I'd like to discuss it, the quality is IMHO acceptable --Poco a poco 17:28, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
- Support If the shadow is the main subject. We need more pictures of your shadow --The Photographer 21:40, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
- Support --Gauri Wur Sem 11:49, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose Agree with Cccefalon --PetrVod 21:12, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
- Support --Ralf Roletschek 11:53, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promote? --A.Savin 23:42, 28 January 2014 (UTC)