Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives February 21 2014

• 
  • Nomination Dortmund, Germany: Zeche Zollern, gate to the former machine hall --Cccefalon 23:23, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 23:29, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lake Windermere. Mattbuck 19:22, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion QI for me. --Lewis Hulbert 19:32, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 185117 at Scarborough. Mattbuck 19:22, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline Poor composition: the bridge dominates the picture. --DAJF 03:10, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Clock tower of the church and neighbouring turrets, Civray, Vienne, France. --JLPC 18:17, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 18:29, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The nave of Salisbury Cathedral. By User:Rafesmar --Lewis Hulbert 17:33, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support : very nice imo.. --JLPC 18:06, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Alpine guesthouse Enzian, Mönichkirchner Schwaig, Lower Austria --P e z i 16:10, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --JLPC 18:06, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sculpture on the gate of Swaminarayan Temple, Ahmedabad --Bgag 15:48, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --JLPC 18:06, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View on Ai-Petri mountain in Crimea, Ukraine. --Kulmalukko 15:22, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 23:29, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Hillside of Ai-Petri mountain in Crimea, Ukraine. --Kulmalukko 15:22, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 23:29, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View on Ai-Petri mountain in Crimean peninsula, Ukraine. --Kulmalukko 15:22, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Bgag 15:52, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Kranensee, a ballet performed by construction cranes at Seestadt Aspern. Vienna --P e z i 13:55, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. Wow, this colors! --Ralf Roletschek 14:25, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Hut of the Austrian alpine rescue service, Lower Austria --P e z i 13:31, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Bgag 15:52, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination ticket automat in Strasbourg Train Station --Ralf Roletschek 13:00, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support QI --Rjcastillo 13:19, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination french Train SNCF Z 5300 --Ralf Roletschek 13:00, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --P e z i 21:19, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination german Locomotive Typ E 310 in Straßburg, France --Ralf Roletschek 13:00, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support QI --Rjcastillo 13:19, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Auxiliary stage of the SNCF --Ralf Roletschek 13:00, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --P e z i 21:16, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Horse near the hills in Koktebel. --Kulmalukko 12:41, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality imo. --JLPC 18:10, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mourèze, Hérault, France. --Christian Ferrer 12:12, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support QI --Rjcastillo 13:17, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mourèze, Hérault, France. --Christian Ferrer 12:12, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 23:00, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Straßburg, center of town --Ralf Roletschek 10:59, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --P e z i 13:36, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination public bicycle "Velhop" in Straßburg, France --Ralf Roletschek 10:59, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality image --DAJF 11:55, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Pitrus (Juncus effusus) in Lytse Mâr. De Alde Feanen.--
    Famberhorst 06:24, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 11:43, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Oedemera nobilis --Archaeodontosaurus 06:23, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Cayambe 14:55, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Shell of a Gibbose Conch, Gibberulus gibbosus --Llez 05:50, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good good quality, but see notes--Lmbuga 14:42, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
     Done Thanks. Corrections done --Llez 20:09, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Insect hotel at the "Hochzeitsallee" in Hausdülmen, Germany --XRay 04:36, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Very good IMO--Lmbuga 14:35, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Weil am Rhein: Water tower Friedlingen (detail) --Taxiarchos228 21:49, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 11:45, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Tower of the church of El Salvador, Teruel, Teruel, España --Poco a poco 20:19, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality image. --DAJF 03:04, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lycée int pontonniers, Straßburg, France --Ralf Roletschek 17:28, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality image. --DAJF 03:04, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Balaruc-le-Vieux, Hérault, France. --Christian Ferrer 14:51, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 07:34, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Fallow deer female --Hydro 13:05, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 11:45, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Capri, Certosa di San Giacomo, plaque at the entrance --Berthold Werner 07:32, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --P e z i 23:28, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 170s at Proof House Jct. Mattbuck 07:08, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline The train is not in focus. Poor composition. --DAJF 03:01, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Jesuit college in Kłodzko --Jacek Halicki 22:19, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 11:46, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Jesuit college in Kłodzko --Jacek Halicki 22:19, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 11:46, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Jesuit college in Kłodzko --Jacek Halicki 22:19, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 11:46, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 221122 at Stapleton Road. Mattbuck 07:55, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline Excessive shadow in the foreground and what looks like motion blur in the background. --DAJF 02:42, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination SK St. Monica in Sandakan, a primary school --Cccefalon 21:29, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Quality image. --DAJF 02:39, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Front of station Cologne. By User:Raymond --EveryPicture 14:53, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
    Uncorrected CAs problematic --DXR 13:16, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
    @DXR CA fixed. Raymond 21:00, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
    Sorry, but it really is very unsharp in the borders. Is the original upload the one you have been working with? --DXR 20:05, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
    @DXR Sorry, no chance to get it better with the existing original images. This (stitched) image is nearly 8 years old, taken in my pre-RAW time with an Olympus E20. Raymond 16:48, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline I understand and I'm sorry, but based on the current standard I must decline it. However you can of course put it to discussion, if you want. --DXR 17:18, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Jeseníky by night - view from Lázně Jeseník (Bad Gräfenberg), Czech Republic --Pudelek 13:35, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Moroder 07:43, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Smudge the cat. Mattbuck 07:49, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline The main subject (the cat) is in almost total shadow. --DAJF 02:35, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Earl's Court tube station. Mattbuck 07:49, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline Too noisy. --DAJF 02:37, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Clapton in Gordano. Mattbuck 08:04, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion I like it. --Pleclown 12:44, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Racing at Castle Combe. Mattbuck 08:07, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Pleclown 12:38, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 43017 at Cardiff Central. Mattbuck 08:07, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Pleclown 12:38, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Scarborough station. Mattbuck 08:07, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Christian Ferrer 08:44, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Entry to the Royal Saltworks at Arc-et-Senans in France --Moroder 15:23, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Perspective not done. IMO large sky area too dominant. --Cccefalon 11:16, 17 February 2014 (UTC) Done Thanks --Moroder 13:38, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
    Lots of sky, I suggest a crop. Mattbuck 22:10, 17 February 2014 (UTC) Done New crop, thanks --Moroder 07:35, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
    OK. Mattbuck 21:16, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Managers house, overlooking the Oil Palm Plantation of SAWIT Kinabalu --Cccefalon 09:46, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
    I'm not quite convinced by the focus,  Weak support but I'd like other opinions. Mattbuck 22:10, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Looks fine to me. Good quality image. --DAJF 04:32, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Castle Combe circuit. Mattbuck 15:52, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Need a little sharpening IMO --Christian Ferrer 15:39, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
     Done Mattbuck 21:58, 17 February 2014 (UTC) Support --Christian Ferrer 08:33, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Mine, Daroca, Zaragoza, Spain --Poco a poco 22:50, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
    The contrast in the foreground seems rather low. Mattbuck 21:22, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
    You're right,  new version Poco a poco 20:52, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination 2013 Longines Global Champions - Lausanne - 14-09-2013 - Janika Sprunger et Electra van't Roosakker --Pleclown 12:34, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
    Remarkably good detail for the night, but a fair amount of chromatic noise. Mattbuck 23:07, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
    I've tried something Pleclown 19:53, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
    I'm not sure, I ask for more comments. Mattbuck 21:11, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Looks fine to me. --DAJF 04:28, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

Consensual review

File:Melaka_Malaysia_Cheng_Hoon_Teng_Temple-01.jpg

• Nomination Memory plates to the deceased in Cheng Hoon Teng Temple, Melaka, Malaysia --Cccefalon 19:02, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
   Comment Take this photograph is not easy, but I don't like the DOF. F/4 is not appropriate IMO in this kind of pictures to be QI--Lmbuga 21:25, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
   Question Dear Lmbuga, what do you want to tell with the comment? That the photo is of bad photographic quality? The camera was mounted directly to the window glass and I intentionally choosed the small DoF. The memory plates are stacked row by row so it is an obvious choice to focus one row. It is a pretty common setting for that kind of picture and IMO a "like" or "don't like" in this matter is not the appropriate assessment here, so please specify issues. Cheers, --Cccefalon 06:08, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
   Comment Sorry, with this kind of picture, such small DoF may be appropriate (IMO) for a photograph in a newspaper, but not to a QI picture IMO. It's a good image, but I think that it's not QI, I'm not sure--Lmbuga 19:32, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
• Withdrawn
•  Oppose Agree that the tight depth of focus doesn't really work here. --DAJF 06:19, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
• I withdraw it. --Cccefalon 09:06, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

File:Maua_Bahnübergang.jpg

• Nomination Railroad crossing in Maua. --Indeedous 19:26, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
• Decline  OpposeStrong CA (red and magenta). Needs perspective correction. I'm not really convinced with the crop at the top. --Cccefalon 08:58, 3 February 2014 (UTC)  Support --Sebastian Wallroth 14:38, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
   OpposeBad M/C CA. --Mattbuck 22:38, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Cccefalon 06:34, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

File:Ling yang.jpg

• Nomination Chinese herbs including shaved antelope horn. Soup boiled from these ingredients is used to treat fever --ProjectManhattan 18:39, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
• Decline  Support --Sebastian Wallroth 14:38, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
   OpposeExtreme noise, JPEG artifacts. --Mattbuck 22:38, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
   Oppose as per Matt and too much Whites (see histo) --Cccefalon 06:31, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 06:32, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

File:13-06-09_RaR_Clutch_Neil_Fallon_11.jpg

• Nomination Neil Fallon of US stoner rock band Clutch at Rock am Ring 2013 --Achim Raschka 08:17, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
• Decline  Support Good quality. --Sebastian Wallroth 14:38, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
   OpposeUnsharp IMO. --Mattbuck 22:38, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
   Oppose not sharp enough --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Cccefalon 13:18, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

File:Hibiscus_red_2.jpg

• Nomination Hibiscus --The Photographer 14:22, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
• Decline I do like this, and I support its promotion, but I am not quite sure about the composition - I wonder if it would be better with less on the right, the subject is rather in a corner. Mattbuck 22:11, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
  Background is not sufficiently separated from the flower and not good composition. --PetrVod 20:15, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
•  Comment WTH, this is not Featured Pictures Candidates, please forget composition and see the image quality --The Photographer 23:53, 9 February 2014 (UTC)

  Composition is an aspect of image quality. We don't let a too tight crop pass just because the other technical elements are ok. Mattbuck 19:23, 13 February 2014 (UTC)

 Oppose Good lighting, sharpness acceptable, and main subject does not always need to be in the center of the image. But very desturbing background, sorry. -- Smial 13:56, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Declined   --Cccefalon 09:03, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

File:Börsenburg.jpg

• Nomination Hamburg, office building Börsenburg --Dirtsc 22:45, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
• Decline  Oppose Insufficient quality. Sorry. It looks very gray and it look titled. (Please look at the edge of the house.) --XRay 07:33, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
  More perspective correction. By the way: the building is gray. --Dirtsc 18:45, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
  
•  Support It's OK now. (And a gray building should be gray, you're right.)--XRay 17:56, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sorry, IMO detail is not acceptable given the low resolution --DXR 20:26, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose Denoising- and sharpening artifacts, CA, barrel distortion. Considering the rather low resolution all in all not QI. -- Smial 14:08, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Cccefalon 09:00, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

File:Eucalyptus_plantation_in_final_stages.JPG

• Nomination: A eucalyptus plantation - cum - research trial in its final stages at Arimalam --Balablitz 05:23, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
• Review
•  Comment Sorry, it's tilted. And for the images needs another crop.--XRay 07:52, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
  • I think its not tilted, may be if so it could be the effect of ploughed land. --Balablitz 07:10, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
    •  Comment Let's ask for another opinion.--XRay 08:38, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Can't see any tilt; only point to rely on for verticals are the people (centre of mass over their feet). QI IMO --P e z i 19:21, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sorry, Blurry and -IMO- unnatural colors, oversaturated--Lmbuga 21:53, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose - I agree with Lmbuga. Mattbuck 17:33, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

 Comment It seems tilted or distorted, and it's improvable--Lmbuga 21:54, 31 January 2014 (UTC) Sorry, this comment is not for this image--Lmbuga 21:49, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

•  Support Certainly not a tilt. Good line and depth IMO. --Gauri Wur Sem 13:20, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
  •  Comment Not blurred or oversaturated. --Balablitz 22:08, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
  •  Comment Excellent picture, but need white balance. Well done --The Photographer 02:39, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --Cccefalon 09:02, 20 February 2014 (UTC)