Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives August 22 2015

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Place du Trocadéro-et-du-11-Novembre à Paris le 23 avril 2015 - 18.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Place du Trocadéro-et-du-11-Novembre, Paris (by Lionel Allorge) --Paris 16 17:05, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 09:03, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I disagree: The blurred out faces are a no-go for QI. --Cccefalon 08:27, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose File name not accurate. Should be more descriptive. --Jebulon 14:40, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Hubertl 06:06, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

File:Pisciadoi_de_Murfrëit_Plans_de_Frea.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Waterfall Murfrëit in Sëlva, Gröden - South Tyrol --Moroder 09:02, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  SupportGood quality. --Berthold Werner 09:26, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose please, fix sharpening artefacts around sky-mountains edges --SkywalkerPL 22:01, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
    •  Comment I explained this several times on QIC. 1) The outline is not an artifact from sharpening since I rarely if ever sharpen my images. 2) The outline is of 2-3 pixels size which is less than 1/1000 of the whole picture width or length and it appears always between sorfaces of great difference of luminosity. 3) You don't see it at normal pixel size magnification. It disappears if you risize the image but resizing is discouraged by the Wikimedia guidelines. Thanks --Moroder 07:37, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
      • It really doesn't matter what's the original source of the bright artefact on a photograph. It's clearly there and it's a problem that can be - and should be - removed in post-processing, just like chromatic aberrations are. --SkywalkerPL 08:40, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
        • It is NOT clearly there if you look at normal pixel size, there is nothing to be removed or should I remove also the vertices of the pixels? --Moroder 12:46, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support This small line around the rocks in this big distance is negligible in my eyes. I think it comes with the natural light/shadow/temperature play. --Hockei 08:23, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support Yes it is a shot against the sun, and it has consequences. But I don't see "clear" artefacts between sky and mountains. It is a good composition and a QI for me.--Jebulon 22:48, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 06:04, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

File:Theseus_slaying_the_Minotaur.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Theseus slaying the Minotaur --Livioandronico2013 08:48, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:03, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Left line and bottom line is not straight. Distortion? --Dnalor 01 11:58, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
    ✓ Done It is a curved surface --Livioandronico2013 12:48, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support -- Spurzem 21:37, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support--Atamari 20:35, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Atamari 20:35, 21 August 2015 (UTC)