Commons:Oversighters/Requests/Kadı

 Withdrawn (non-bureaucrat closure) —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:50, 16 December 2023 (UTC)

Kadı

Related requests:

• Administrators/Requests/Kadı

• Oversighters/Requests/Kadı
• Oversighters/Requests/Kadı 2

Vote

Kadı (talk · contributions · deleted user contributions · recent activity · logs · block log · global contribs · CentralAuth)

Scheduled to end: 10:15, 22 December 2023 (UTC)

Hello, I am Kadı. I serve as an administrator on Commons, also I am a global renamer and VRT agent. I am requesting oversight access in order to work on this area. Sincerely, --Kadı Message 10:15, 8 December 2023 (UTC)

Thank you all for the feedback, I will apply again once I have proven through my contributions to the community that I am competent in the field of OS. I withdraw my request. Thanks everyone, best regards. Kadı Message 07:26, 15 December 2023 (UTC)

Votes

•  Oppose, I am not satisfied by your responses to Krd. ─ The Aafī (^talk) 18:27, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
•  Support. We currently have four oversighters. They are all trustworthy, and they do the job well, but they aren't always awake. Oversight can be a very time-sensitive task; two days ago, a Steward had to take an emergency action, self-assigning oversight rights on Commons in order to deal with an oversight request in a timely manner. Having more competent hands willing to do the work will improve our oversight response time and will thereby improve Commons. I trust Kadı with the tools, and I thank them for volunteering. Let's not look a gift horse in the mouth here. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 23:55, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
•  Oppose No experience shown at all, no need or occasion shown at all, plus strikingly wrong answer to simply policy question. --Krd 09:16, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Krd. Abzeronow (talk) 17:13, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
•  Oppose I suggest you file first some more (maybe 100?) successful requests to an oversighter in order for you to know what an oversighter actually needs the tools for.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 22:36, 14 December 2023 (UTC)

Comments

• IMO not sufficient explanation why you need the flag. Did I miss something, was there any discussion that more oversighters were needed? Thanks, --A.Savin 11:36, 8 December 2023 (UTC)

  @A.Savin, thanks for the question. You didn't miss something because there was not a discussion about more oversighters were needed. I am requesting this flag, because I am working on renaming and VRT area. In this area, in some cases oversight access is needed for suppressing personal info, private location coordinates etc. I am an active user, so if I get this flag, I will have a chance to evaluate the requests and do whatever needed. Regards, Kadı Message 14:25, 8 December 2023 (UTC)

  I think for suppressing private coordinates usually admin's revdel is enough, but I may be wrong wrt some cases. --A.Savin 18:00, 8 December 2023 (UTC)

  @A.Savin, I requested suppression for this file's coordinates because the coordinates was private, that's an example. Kadı Message 18:04, 8 December 2023 (UTC)

  The mentioned example appears to be your own upload. Are you planning to oversight own edits? Are there other cases where you have requested oversight? Krd 20:45, 8 December 2023 (UTC)

  @Krd, no that's an example. I am not planning to oversight my edits, I am requesting this flag for contributing to Commons in that area. For example, if someone mails to VRT about oversighting, I can evaluate the issue. Best, Kadı Message 21:46, 8 December 2023 (UTC)

  Excluding the example given above, how many times did you request oversight in the last 12 months? Krd 07:54, 9 December 2023 (UTC)

  I do not remember. But, I remember a suppress request in global rename queue. If I get this flag, I will have a chance to evaluate. Kadı Message 08:45, 9 December 2023 (UTC)

  what's the point, to suppress that photo's coords. it can be easily geotagged with the aid of satellite images. (it's already categorised to the village.) removing its coords only makes it a tiny bit more difficult to pinpoint the location of that photo.

  and like others have said, in that case isnt a revdel enough? what is the chance that out of the several hundred sysops someone might abuse that little piece of not-so-secret info? RZuo (talk) 12:09, 9 December 2023 (UTC)

  Agreed. Just for something like complete private data including street address, an oversighter is definitely needed. --A.Savin 19:21, 9 December 2023 (UTC)

  What's the harm in suppressing the coordinates if an uploader asks for them to be suppressed? I'd hate to think I'd be totally screwed if I accidently included the coordinates in an image of something in my backyard that I uploaded Commons. Sure, someone could technically find out where it was taken using satellite images, but so what? The same goes for any other private information. At that point why not leave addresses and phone numbers in file descriptions because both can easily be found using a Google Search? --Adamant1 (talk) 21:17, 9 December 2023 (UTC)

  I agree with A. Savin. A revdel of coordinates is sufficient. Abzeronow (talk) 23:18, 9 December 2023 (UTC)

• What is the appropriate situation to use OS versus using only revdel? GMG^talk 15:31, 13 December 2023 (UTC)

  @GreenMeansGo, Oversight is the term used to describe the removal of certain information from public view, including hiding it from administrators who are not oversighters. Such information includes, but is not limited to, non-public personal information, potentially libellous information, blatant attack names, and copyright violations. Kadı Message 07:36, 14 December 2023 (UTC)

  Maybe a bit late, but thanks anyway for volunteering. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 07:58, 15 December 2023 (UTC)