Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/June 2005

This is an archive for Commons:Featured picture candidates page debates and voting.
The debates are closed and should not be edited.

Image:WaterLily-BlackPrincess.JPG, not featured

self-nomination --Yongxinge 08:45, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support Greudin
Oppose Very nice, but low resolution. --Mateusza 12:29, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Shizhao 03:28, 18 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Very nice, low resolution. David.Monniaux 06:36, 18 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Low resolution Yann 13:22, 18 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Peregrine981 08:08, 19 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose too low resolution --Malene Thyssen 19:50, 21 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Uploaded the origin version of photo. --Yongxinge 03:28, 24 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support now it's better! thanks! --Mateusza 22:44, 24 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support :-) --Malene Thyssen 06:48, 25 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Result: 4 Support, 3 Oppose => Not featured Peregrine981 04:10, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Image:MontreGousset001.jpg, Not featured

Nominate and Support --ZA 17 May 2005
Oppose shadow norro 13:01, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose (shadow/resolution) --Avatar 16:36, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Nice -- Fabien1309 22:47, 18 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose WεFt 15:45, 21 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Malene Thyssen 19:49, 21 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - nice watch, but photo not optimal (resolution, contrast) - Rex 00:42, 26 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Already was featured on 2005-05-25 Helix84 01:10, 26 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I think you're getting confused between featured pictures and picture of the day -- Joolz 07:45, 26 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Oh... so it seems. correct me please. Helix84 11:04, 26 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Support. I'd like to have a wallpaper like this but always showing the real time...Pabix &; 12:28, 26 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Result: 4 Support, 4 Oppose => Not featured Peregrine981 04:11, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Image:Iris germanica 001.jpg, not featured

Nominate and Support -- Za 11:25, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose --Avatar 16:36, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose too dark; can't really identify the shape of the object norro 18:38, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose bad perspective --Yongxinge 02:46, 18 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose dark, bad perspective; can't really see shape David.Monniaux 06:35, 18 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - Too dark -- Fabien1309 22:33, 18 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose --Malene Thyssen 19:49, 21 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - way out of focus - Arpingstone 09:03, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Result: 1 Support, 7 Oppose => Not featured Peregrine981 04:12, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Image:Iris germanica 002.jpg, not featured

Nominate and Support -- Za 11:27, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose --Avatar 16:35, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose too dark; bad perspective norro 18:39, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose bad perspective --Yongxinge 02:46, 18 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose David.Monniaux 06:37, 18 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - Bad view (angle) --Fabien1309 22:33, 18 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

angle at purpose to see the inside part of the Iris -- Za 25 May 2005

Oppose --Malene Thyssen 19:50, 21 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - focus is poor - Arpingstone 09:03, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Result: 1 Support, 7 Oppose => Not featured Peregrine981 04:13, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Image:Beihai-flower.JPG, not featured

Nominate and Support --Shizhao 14:17, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yongxinge 14:55, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose --Avatar 16:35, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Oppose - Nice but not FP for me -- Fabien1309 22:34, 18 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Malene Thyssen 19:50, 21 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - composition not optimal - Rex 00:44, 26 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Result: 3 Support, 3 Oppose => Not featured Peregrine981 04:14, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Image:Tomato je.jpg, featured

Nominate and Support --Quasipalm 17:00, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Shizhao 18:52, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Avatar 21:02, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Pensiero 00:37, 18 May 2005 (CEST)
Support Yongxinge 02:42, 18 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support David.Monniaux 06:34, 18 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support but I wouldn't eat those ones, I think they don't taste.Pabix &; 05:55, 19 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support very cute --Ananda 15:47, 20 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support Aoineko
Support --Malene Thyssen 19:51, 21 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Atamari 23:28, 28 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Result: 11 Support, 0 Oppose => featured Peregrine981 04:14, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Image:Plasma-lamp.jpg, featured

Nominate and Support --Quasipalm 17:00, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support norro 17:13, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Avatar 21:02, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support Perfect! Pensiero 00:37, 18 May 2005 (CEST)
Support. James F. (talk) 22:50, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support Yongxinge 02:42, 18 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support Yann 13:08, 18 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Note that I cropped the black border down just now. Dbenbenn 22:04, 18 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you do that? There were only supports for the original version. norro 23:05, 18 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I was being bold. Do you think one should refrain from improving a picture when it is a featured picture candidate? How about once it becomes a featured picture? Dbenbenn 13:42, 19 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I strongly prefer the original version (which I voted for). --Avatar 00:38, 21 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I think, it's better to upload a second version, if the picture is a candidate. Improving is always a matter of taste. Kind regards, norro 09:42, 21 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted the cropping. Yann 11:38, 21 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Do you think the use in w:Plasma lamp was improved by having a wide black border? Oh well; I uploaded the cropped version as Image:Plasma-lamp 2.jpg Dbenbenn 15:32, 21 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I think, that's the better way. Kind regards, norro 16:09, 21 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Support Pabix &; 05:56, 19 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Malene Thyssen 19:53, 21 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Result: 9 Support, 0 Oppose => Featured Peregrine981 04:16, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Image:Kaloe.jpg, featured

Photo of Kalø Castle in Denmark, build in 1313

Nominate and Support Peregrine981
Oppose LoopZilla 22:07, 18 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose--Shizhao 19:28, 18 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Resolution is too low, and the author put his name in the lower right corner. Dbenbenn 21:46, 18 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose -- Nice but the name at the bottom-right is annoying ... Support for the new one -- Fabien1309 12:05, 20 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cool, the signature can be ignored --Yongxinge 01:29, 19 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. I would support with a better resolution, Support, it's really nice -- FoeNyx 10:46, 19 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
After request from FoeNyx I have uploadet a new version of this photo with better resolution and without the signature. (Be the way - author is female ;-) Regards Malene Thyssen 19:29, 19 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support Luc Viatour 07:34, 21 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mateusza 08:35, 21 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support Aoineko
Support. villy ♦ ✎ 18:34, 21 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support (my own photo :-) --Malene Thyssen 19:53, 21 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Avatar 11:24, 24 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Result: 10 Support, 2 Oppose => featured Peregrine981 04:18, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Image:Stadtbahn Nancy.jpg, not featured

Nominate and Support -- Fabien1309 22:28, 18 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose --Quasipalm 02:59, 19 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose It's okay, but not featured--Jcornelius 08:37, 19 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose not bad but nothing special David.Monniaux 05:07, 21 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose --Malene Thyssen 19:54, 21 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose --Avatar 11:24, 24 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose--Urban 06:03, 29 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Result: 1 Support, 6 Oppose => Not featured Peregrine981 04:19, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Image:Vadso Norwegen Februar 2004.jpg, not featured

Nominate and Support -- Fabien1309 22:28, 18 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tbc 23:44, 18 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose not as good as some other sunsets that are FP 1 2 3 4 --Quasipalm 02:58, 19 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose--Shizhao 07:06, 19 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Always had a thing for snow. James F. (talk) 17:46, 19 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support. villy ♦ ✎ 18:31, 21 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose --Malene Thyssen 19:54, 21 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose --Avatar 11:24, 24 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - not my favorite composition - Rex 00:45, 26 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Result: 4 Support, 5 Oppose => Not featured Peregrine981 04:20, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Image:Countryandcitydaegu.jpg, featured

Nominate and Support LoopZilla 16:17, 19 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support I'm a sucker for panoramas :-P --Quasipalm 03:42, 20 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. The background is smoky. villy ♦ ✎ 18:31, 21 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Malene Thyssen 19:56, 21 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Too much contrast between foreground and background (like Villy)Pabix &; 10:55, 22 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support norro 12:30, 22 May 2005 (UTC) (please don't modify my vote)[reply]
Support --Avatar 11:26, 24 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
-. --Hautala 13:58, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Support -- ADSR6581 17:22, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Result: 6 support, 3 oppose => featured norro 10:40, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Image:Lady of the Lightbulbs.jpg, not featured

Nominate and Support -- Quistnix 19:55, 20 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mateusza 08:34, 21 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support Yann 11:35, 21 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Malene Thyssen 19:56, 21 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose --Shizhao 08:06, 23 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Avatar 11:27, 24 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - should be cropped a little bit - Rex 00:47, 26 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cropped or uncropped, I like the lady --wpopp 10:08, 28 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose --Atamari 23:30, 28 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support -Didactohedron 19:56, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
-. --Hautala 13:59, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Result: 7 support, 4 oppose => not featured (result by norro, corrected by: Joolz 22:30, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC))

Image:Lens_Nikkor_50mm.jpg, featured

Nominate norro 12:27, 22 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support norro 12:27, 22 May 2005 (UTC) (please don't modify my vote)[reply]
Pro --Malene Thyssen 19:44, 22 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Pro --Heidas 19:46, 22 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Pro --David.Monniaux 05:49, 23 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Pro -- Luc Viatour 06:46, 23 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Pro --Shizhao 08:07, 23 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Pro James F. (talk) 13:06, 23 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Pro --Avatar 11:27, 24 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support - good - Rex 00:48, 26 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
+. --Hautala 17:04, 27 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Fabien1309 23:52, 27 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Atamari 23:31, 28 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Kyllä --Janne Karaste 18:37, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Suport. Good picture. Good lens, too. --MarkSweep 08:29, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Result: 14 support, 0 oppose => featured norro 10:23, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Image:Empirestate.jpg, not featured

"Empire State VI", training vessel of the State University of New York Maritime College

Nominate and Support LoopZilla 08:14, 23 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose --Malene Thyssen 09:46, 23 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Shizhao 07:43, 24 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose --Avatar 11:30, 24 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - Rex 00:49, 26 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Urban 06:04, 29 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, cluttered with ships, don't like the bridge --Janne Karaste 18:39, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Oppose --Quasipalm 16:00, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
-. --Hautala 14:00, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Oppose --Atamari 21:32, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Result: 3 support, 7 oppose => not featured norro 10:25, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Image:Rooster04.jpg, (newer version) featured

Support. Self Nom --fir0002 08:46, 23 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. There is something blurry in front of the roosters eye. If you can remove that I'll support.
Support norro 09:30, 23 May 2005 (UTC) (please don't modify my vote)[reply]
Support LoopZilla 12:37, 23 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose.--Shizhao 07:42, 24 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Avatar 11:29, 24 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - Agree with Malene. Basic flaw takes away from otherwise great picture. Peregrine981 03:05, 25 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - I also agree - Rex 00:50, 26 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Result: 4 support, 3 oppose => not featured norro 18:42, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)

I have removed the blur as best I could:

Naturally, I Support this version. Should I submit it at the bottom of the page? -Didactohedron 23:40, 29 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
I Support the new version - a great picture :-) --Malene Thyssen 09:23, 23 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support norro 15:48, 30 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support Congratulations on the new image, you did a great job. I had a shot but I couldn't get the detail in the face to stay - maybe I was using too soft a brush. --fir0002 22:13, 30 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - Rex 00:33, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Support Peregrine981 11:09, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Support --Quasipalm 16:00, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Result: 6 support, 1 oppose => featured norro 18:42, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Image:Westminster_from_London_Eye_night.jpg, not featured

Nominate and Support LoopZilla 07:40, 24 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Malene Thyssen 08:39, 24 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose --Avatar 11:30, 24 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support Yann 11:52, 24 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
tak (yes) - tsca ✉ 15:13, 24 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - Rex 00:51, 26 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support Luc Viatour 10:11, 26 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support James F. (talk) 11:42, 26 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support - but what a pity you didn't pull the tower of Big Ben upright, it only takes a few seconds in Photoshop - Arpingstone 09:08, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Oppose --Quasipalm 16:01, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
-. You can't see the time on Big Ben. --Hautala 14:02, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- -- Too much colour noise for my liking ADSR6581 07:24, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Result: 7 support, 5 oppose => not featured norro 18:43, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Image:Vagur, Faroe Islands, in the winter, sunlight on slope.JPG, not featured

Nominate

Peregrine981 14:29, 24 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Support Peregrine981 14:29, 24 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mateusza 22:47, 24 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose resolution --Avatar 05:07, 25 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Malene Thyssen 07:00, 25 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Quasipalm 23:02, 25 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - Rex 00:52, 26 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Why should every featured picture have a wallpaper minimum size ?Pabix &; 12:33, 26 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- "Wallpaper size" - Where is it defined? Hm, I reduced the photo, when I got it. A mistake? Try to find the original one between all that 1000's of photos here. For me, it was "Wiki size" after all experiences in the real thing :-( Arne List 15:47, 28 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose norro 11:41, 27 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The pole in the middle is disturbing. Yann 10:29, 31 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose --Janne Karaste 18:41, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
-. --Hautala 14:04, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Result: 5 support, 6 oppose => not featured norro 18:45, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Image:ArcticFoxSummer.jpg, featured

Selfnomination Andreas Tille 20:55, 24 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I just adjusted the darkness in the direction suggested by Quasipalm. My version is not as bright as the suggestion and I also did not cropped the image because I wanted to leave some space to look at for the fox. Please tell me whether you like this change or if I should change more in the "Quasipalm"-direction. Andreas Tille 20:16, 26 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

One more change: On a secon thought I agree with Quasipalm about the cropping. I now cropped the original PNG at the exact same place as Quasipalm and left my imporeesion of the lightning (it was a cloudy day and thus I regard this version as realistic). Please update your browser cache. Andreas Tille 13:55, 27 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

tak (yes) / tsca ✉ 21:20, 24 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
support, but fox is too dark --Mateusza 22:46, 24 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Avatar 05:07, 25 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Malene Thyssen 06:59, 25 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose good, but too dark for me --Quasipalm 22:37, 25 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I support this updated image. --Quasipalm 19:26, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Oppose - Peregrine981 07:58, 26 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Result: 5 support, 1 oppose => featured norro 18:53, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Image:ArcticFoxSummer Adjusted.jpg, not featured

I edited the levels and framing a little bit. I support this version:

300px|Arctic Fox in Summer

Support --Quasipalm 22:44, 25 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your engagement. I'm sitting now behind my laptop which has a more flat display and I see what you mean. The colors seemed natural to me on my CRT desktop screen. I think I should try to adjust the colors from the original PNG file to reduce compression loss. I'll do this today evening. Andreas Tille 09:24, 26 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
The CRT can not handle fine vertical lines like the hairs on the fox. Try this test image on your monitors.

AlbertCahalan 00:46, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)

I'm moving my support back to the first image -- now updated. I used auto-levels in PS for this one, and now I believe that the contrast was too high. I hope other voters can take in to account that the first image was updated and they should move their vote their if they wish. --Quasipalm 19:38, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Support James F. (talk) 11:42, 26 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support Helix84 13:47, 26 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Avatar 12:49, 29 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Chun-hian 16:55, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Oppose - Rex 15:12, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Oppose norro 18:51, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Result: 4 support, 2 oppose => not featured norro 18:51, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Image:Sunset - Ponzalla, Italia - 2004.jpg, not featured

Self-Nomination and Support -- Joolz 00:16, 26 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Shizhao 06:58, 26 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Rex 23:24, 26 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
oppose - beautiful sunset but too banal for an encyclopaedia Luc Viatour 20:56, 27 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, this is not an enzyclopaedia. These are the commons norro

Support - Very nice sunset -- Fabien1309 23:43, 27 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral --Avatar 12:49, 29 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support. James F. (talk) 12:52, 29 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose How many sunsets do we want to make featured? The foto is good but not brilliant as it would have to be to become a featured sunset image. Andreas Tille 05:58, 30 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- We have 3 at the moment -- Joolz 23:32, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Oppose, agree with Andreas Tille. --Janne Karaste 18:43, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Oppose --Quasipalm 16:02, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
-. --Hautala 14:05, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Result: 5 support, 5 oppose, 1 neutral => not featured

Image:Ambersweet oranges.jpg, featured

Nominate

and  Support --Quasipalm 20:11, 26 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Support - Rex 23:24, 26 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support norro 15:00, 27 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Good colors and composition -- Fabien1309 23:43, 27 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Joolz 11:11, 28 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Get_It • 22:29, 28 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Atamari 23:34, 28 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Avatar 12:49, 29 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Chun-hian 16:59, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Support --Janne Karaste 18:44, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
+. --Hautala 12:42, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Neutral - Don't feel anything special-- Deep750 13:53, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral >= featured norro 18:55, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Image:FrigateBird nuke.pg.jpg, not featured

Nominate

and  Support ... for historical content as much as composition; i think a historical section of FPs would be great --Quasipalm 20:17, 26 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose - Rex 23:26, 26 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support - But if we're talking about historical sections, a date would be appreciated. --wpopp 10:12, 28 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I added more info on the page. "May 1962. Even now, the Frigate Bird test remains the only end-to-end system test of a strategic nuclear missile – from launch to detonation – ever carried out by either side during the Cold War." --71.35.103.4 18:24, 28 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- LoopZilla 21:16, 28 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Get_It • 22:28, 28 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Urban 06:06, 29 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral --Avatar 12:49, 29 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Shizhao 15:55, 31 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
-. --Hautala 12:43, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Oppose - Urban 18:29, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Result: 6 support, 3 oppose, 1 neutral => not featured James F. (talk) 11:21, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Image:Green parrot feather.jpg, not featured

300px|Green parrot feather

Nominate

and  Support --Quasipalm 20:17, 26 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral - Rex 23:25, 26 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose not sharp norro 11:51, 27 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose the lower part (fluffy stuff near stem) is not sharp, or is it me? David.Monniaux 06:40, 28 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose --Avatar 12:48, 29 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
+. --Hautala 12:50, 31 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Shizhao 15:55, 31 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- white part is out of focus --Smartneddy 06:50, 2005 Jun 13 (UTC)

Result: 3 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured James F. (talk) 11:21, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Image:Monumentvalley.jpg, featured

Info created by Moritz Zimmermann - uploaded by Moritz Zimmermann - nominated by Caaz 19:15, 17 June 2006 (UTC)]][reply]
Support --Caaz 19:15, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Luc Viatour 19:44, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It would still be necessary to improve superposition assembly

Support --> Snowwayout 20:31, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Cary "Bastique" Bass ^parler _voir 02:46, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Golbez 05:06, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support nice -- Gorgo 12:49, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support. El ComandanteHasta ∞ 18:08, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support -Quasipalm 21:24, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I nominated this image about a year ago this month. If you'd like to see the comments on why it didn't make it, look here. -Quasipalm 21:24, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting, I voted differently this time, I less better looked at! --Luc Viatour 04:28, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Ggonnell 10:51, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support --FoeNyx 13:59, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Overlord 14:15, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Urban 15:24, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support --New Painter 15:43, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support --DTA 15:59, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support -Artist 16:16, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support City Slicker 16:25, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Quickstep 18:35, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support if this aint FP then nothing could be --Go West 19:35, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support -nice... but where is John Wayne? --DiTaeg 09:33, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support --- gildemax 21:13, 24 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Agree Perfect. --Lmbuga ^{gl, pt, es: contacta comigo} 11:31, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uwe Hermann 16:58, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ceridwen 00:50, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral - nice when downscaled, less in full res. Stitching problems, looks artificially sharpened by a „cheap sharpen filter“ --Wikimol 15:37, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Voting ended on 19:15, 2 July 2006 (UTC) votes after this time are invalid

Oppose agree with wikimol about sharpening and stitching Coldfingers 00:45, 3 July 2006 (UTC) Lycaon 06:24, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Doruk Salancı 12:17, 4 July 2006 (UTC) Lycaon 06:24, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Result: 23  Support, 0  Oppose and 1  Neutral => featured. -- Lycaon 21:28, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Lorenz system r28 s10 b2-6666.png, not featured

Nominate

and  Support a nice one for the Science category of FP, imo --Quasipalm 20:13, 26 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Support - Rex 23:26, 26 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Luc Viatour 05:28, 27 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support - LoopZilla 09:05, 27 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Marshaü 09:15, 27 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I don't think, that's the most excellent way to illustrate this. But i like it norro 11:54, 27 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose --Avatar 12:47, 29 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose--Shizhao 15:54, 31 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Andreas Tille 08:34, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Oppose --Atamari 16:37, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
-. --Hautala 10:23, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Result: 6 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured James F. (talk) 11:23, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Image:Araneus diadematus (aka).jpg, featured

Nominate and Support -- Fabien1309 10:52, 27 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Luc Viatour 20:47, 27 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose --Avatar 12:47, 29 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support Yann 10:20, 31 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Shizhao 15:55, 31 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - Rex 00:22, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)
+ / tsca ✉ 12:35, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
+. --Hautala 16:26, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)
+. --Deep750 13:56, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Result: 7 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral => featured James F. (talk) 11:24, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Image:Contrail with jet (aka).jpg, not featured

Nominate and Support -- Fabien1309 10:52, 27 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose not sharp norro 11:54, 27 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - Peregrine981 02:03, 29 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose --Avatar 12:46, 29 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - Rex 00:23, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Oppose --Janne Karaste 18:46, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
-. --Hautala 10:24, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured James F. (talk) 11:26, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Image:Uno-karten.jpg, not featured

Nominate, no vote Pabix &; 20:39, 27 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose bad light, bad composition norro 23:15, 27 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose bad angle David.Monniaux 06:38, 28 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose --Avatar 12:46, 29 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - Rex 00:23, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Oppose, agree with norro. --Janne Karaste 18:47, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
-. --Hautala 10:24, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Oppose --Atamari 21:33, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Result: 0 support, 7 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured James F. (talk) 11:27, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Image:Helsingborg_port.jpg, not featured

Nominate

, no vote Michal.pise 21:09, 27 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose --Quasipalm 00:32, 29 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Peregrine981 02:01, 29 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose --Avatar 12:46, 29 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - Rex 00:24, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Oppose --Janne Karaste 18:48, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
-. --Hautala 16:26, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Result: 0 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured James F. (talk) 11:27, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Image:Jakarta old football.jpg, not featured

Info created by Jonathan McIntosh - uploaded by Jonathan McIntosh - nominated by AngMoKio --AngMoKio 21:36, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment This picture was nominated in 2005 by norro but didn't get promoted. I really can't understand why - that's why i try it again now. This picture says more than thousand words. Great composition and quality. In my opinion it is really about time to get it into the FPs. --AngMoKio 21:36, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support --AngMoKio 21:36, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose If it were more crisp, I'd be OK with the cut off head, but as it is it's more distracting. Also, I don't like the way the sun is falling on his face. Dori - Talk 02:26, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose it is too cropped for my taste Tbc 16:06, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I agree with the previous opposers. /Daniel78 23:38, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Unfortunate crop, overexpose sky. Lycaon 04:29, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Agree with AngMoKio. I think the crop is very appropriate here and does focus our attention to the ball. Benh 06:36, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I also agree with you :) A cropped upper part of a head is nothing unusual...a often used composition element. Normally I don't like centered main objects but here it really fits. It somehow represents to me "Look! This is how it is here." --AngMoKio 20:46, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Support The theme is captured in an impressive way, while not being depicted as a cliché. I don't mind the cropped head, the focus is on the ball. --Tsui 19:44, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The ball is cropped too. Tbc 14:15, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Crop and use of horizontal rather than vertical format. --MichaelMaggs 21:32, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support A very good portrait - a boy and a football Gordo 09:53, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Cut off head. --Egg 11:34, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose --Dezidor 12:55, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

reason? --AngMoKio 15:02, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Support - Alvesgaspar 19:08, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Mbz1 17:11, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support --norro 22:25, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're entitled to your opinion (and I opposed this picture as well), but Commons is not Wikipedia's slave. It stands on its own merits. Dori - Talk 01:51, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Very true, Dori. If a picture is suitable for wikipedia article shouldn't be a reason here. Harris Morgan: Please read General Rules before voting: "This is not simply a repository for Wikipedia images, so images should not be judged here on their suitability for that project.". Furthermore if you check the usage of this picture you will see that it is used in wikipedias. --AngMoKio 08:14, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

result: 7 support, 7 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Simonizer 11:45, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry: I have confused [1] Wikipedia's FP criteria with these. Apologies! I shall withdraw my vote. Harris Morgan 22:28, 6 October 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Image:Flusslandschaft_sense_kantonbern_schweiz.jpg, not featured

Nominate and Support -- --BenHur 21:28, 28 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose --Quasipalm 00:32, 29 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Peregrine981 01:55, 29 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose not very special --Avatar 12:45, 29 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
-. --Hautala 16:28, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)
+ --Smartneddy 06:47, 2005 Jun 13 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured James F. (talk) 11:28, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Image:Hazelnuts.jpg, featured

Nominate

and  Support -Didactohedron 08:37, 29 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Support. James F. (talk) 11:03, 29 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Avatar 12:44, 29 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Apoio -- Get_It • 22:29, 30 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Rex 00:25, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Support --Chun-hian 17:06, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Support nice --Janne Karaste 18:50, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Support squirrels' paradise! -- Quistnix 18:19, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Support-- Tbc 18:20, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Support --Atamari 21:34, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
-. --Hautala 16:33, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Support — FoeNyx 09:07, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Result: 11 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral => featured James F. (talk) 11:29, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Image:Fractal Broccoli.jpg, featured

Nominate

and  Support -Didactohedron 08:37, 29 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Support. James F. (talk) 11:03, 29 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Avatar 12:43, 29 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - Rex 00:38, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Support --Chun-hian 17:15, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Support. Jvillafruela 21:29, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Support Greudin
+. --Hautala 13:41, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Support -- ADSR6581 14:12, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Support — FoeNyx 09:07, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Result: 9 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral => featured James F. (talk) 11:31, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Image:Bodie ghost town.jpg, featured

Nominate

and  Support -Didactohedron 08:37, 29 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Support. James F. (talk) 11:03, 29 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like it norro 11:12, 29 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- higher resolution would be nice --Avatar 12:43, 29 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- LoopZilla 18:57, 29 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support --fir0002 22:21, 30 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Apoio -- Get_It • 22:30, 30 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Rex 00:27, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Support --Chun-hian 17:18, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Support --Urban 18:59, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Support. Already an FP on en:, btw. --MarkSweep 08:30, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)
-. --Hautala 16:34, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Result: 11 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral => featured James F. (talk) 11:31, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Image:Adams The Tetons and the Snake River.jpg, featured

Nominate

and  Support -Didactohedron 08:37, 29 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Support. James F. (talk) 11:03, 29 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like the mood norro 11:17, 29 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support dito --Avatar 12:44, 29 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support same -- Joolz 13:48, 29 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- LoopZilla 18:59, 29 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Quasipalm 20:23, 29 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support --fir0002 22:21, 30 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Apoio -- Get_It • 22:31, 30 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support - moody - Rex 00:28, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Support --Malene Thyssen 11:37, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Support. Jvillafruela 21:17, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Support --Urban 18:59, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Support. Already an FP on en:, btw. --MarkSweep 08:30, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Oppose --Atamari 21:36, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
~~- --Smartneddy 06:47, 2005 Jun 13 (UTC)~~ voting closed -- Colin (talk) 21:36, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Result: 14 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral => featured James F. (talk) 11:31, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Image:Alphonse Mucha Dancel lithographie.jpg, not featured

Nominate

and  Support -Didactohedron 08:38, 29 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose fail to see any beauty --fir0002 22:22, 30 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Nice, but better resolution needed. Yann 10:23, 31 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral I can't name why, but this is not perfect to me... --Avatar 19:06, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Oppose --Quasipalm 15:51, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 2 neutral => not featured James F. (talk) 11:35, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Image:StrokkurBubble3.jpg, not featured

Selfnomination Andreas Tille 06:04, 30 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose -- LoopZilla 19:41, 30 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose nothing special --fir0002 22:21, 30 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Well, whether it is special in general I can not say, but while looking at Category:Geysers I would say it is the only one showing the bubble before the fountain erupts which makes it at least special in the set of WikiMedia. Andreas Tille 05:14, 31 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
I meant in terms of image quality. The actual subject may be good, but it's slightly out of focus, and not what you might call aestheticly pleasing --fir0002 06:25, 31 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Are you sure that it is out of focus? IMHO foregrund and background are sharp. The unsharpness is caused by the motion of the buble which was intended. For the aesthetic I can not comment because it is personal taste. The only thing I can say that I uploaded the image to WikiMedia because I've got a request from people who wanted to publish it in a newspaper. Andreas Tille 09:29, 31 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support Yann 10:18, 31 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose--Shizhao 15:53, 31 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support. James F. (talk) 00:04, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Oppose - Rex 00:30, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Neutral --Avatar 19:07, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Oppose it's neat, but not particularly illustrative of anything --Quasipalm 15:52, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Support / tsca ✉ 12:32, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Support --Smartneddy 06:45, 2005 Jun 13 (UTC)

Result: 4 support, 5 oppose, 1 neutral => not featured James F. (talk) 11:35, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Image:Chamomile@original size.jpg, featured

Support. Self Nom. --fir0002 22:14, 30 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support norro 16:24, 31 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support Peregrine981 04:06, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Support --Avatar 19:07, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Support -Didactohedron 21:27, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Support --Atamari 21:37, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Support — FoeNyx 09:07, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Result: 7 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral => featured James F. (talk) 11:36, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Image:Terragen render.jpg, not featured

Support. Self Nom. --fir0002 22:16, 30 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral - bottom part of image is too dark --Mateusza 09:13, 31 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support Yann 10:18, 31 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Shizhao 15:54, 31 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Clouds in the background of bad quality norro 20:48, 31 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- LoopZilla 22:24, 31 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Agree with norro; background clouds look fake. Dbenbenn 23:01, 31 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Um, that's probably because they are fake. Unfortunately the caption of the thumbnail doesn't appear anymore, but it tells you that this image has been render with the 3d landscaping program, Terragen. --fir0002 09:11, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Yes, I understand it's synthetic. But it's supposed to look realistic. The foreground clouds look real; the background clouds don't. Dbenbenn 07:39, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Oppose - Rex 00:32, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Oppose nice, but not excellent. --Avatar 19:09, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Oppose this is cool, but looking at the Terragen site, it's possible to do even cooler stuff --Quasipalm 15:52, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Result: 4 support, 5 oppose, 1 neutral => not featured James F. (talk) 11:37, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Image:Closeup of a strawberry.jpg, not featured

Nominate and support. A closeup of a strawberry, showing the pips. Dbenbenn 22:57, 31 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Are those colors authentic? The red looks overdriven. norro 17:18, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Oppose nice, but not excellent. --Avatar 19:10, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Oppose --Quasipalm 15:53, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Support It could benefit from some minor tweaking, but it's quite striking as it is. --MarkSweep 08:36, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured James F. (talk) 11:37, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Image:Ross Fountain in Edinburgh.jpg, not featured

Self- Nominate

, so neutral vote James F. (talk) 08:11, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Oppose Fountain is cut norro 17:22, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Oppose - Rex 22:58, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Oppose --Avatar 19:12, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Support. ed g2s • talk 11:39, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 1 neutral => not featured Li-sung 16:03, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Image:Elizabeth I of England - coronation portrait.jpg, not featured

Nominate

and  Support (disclaimer: I uploaded it) James F. (talk) 08:11, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Oppose - not special enough to be featured - Rex 22:57, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Oppose resolution. --Avatar 19:12, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Oppose I would support w/ better resolution --Quasipalm 15:54, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured Li-sung 16:01, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Image:Klaus Doldinger mit Saxophon.jpg, not featured

Self- Nominate

--Raymond de 07:42, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Oppose I like the saxophonist in the foreground very much, but the left side of this image/the background is a little bit too disturbing. The face of the left drummer is covered. norro 17:20, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Support -- LoopZilla 18:52, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Oppose - Rex 22:57, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Neutral I also criticise the bg. --Avatar 19:10, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
+ / tsca ✉ 12:31, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Oppose --Quasipalm 17:02, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 3 oppose, 1 neutral => not featured Li-sung 15:59, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Image:Panthera tigris tigris.jpg, not featured

Nominate

norro 15:01, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Support norro 15:01, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Oppose, cut tail, resolution, plants in front of tiger seem weird. --Janne Karaste 18:59, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Oppose resolution and cutting. --Avatar 19:18, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Oppose - tiger not in the center; very high (computer) contrast - Rex 23:09, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Support higher resolution would be good, but it's ok for me --Quasipalm 15:57, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
-. --Hautala 13:39, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
+ nice face of big cat--Smartneddy 06:42, 2005 Jun 13 (UTC)

Result: 3 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured Li-sung 16:15, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Image:Byrcecanyon.jpg, featured

Nominate

norro 15:00, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Support The depth ist just great norro 15:00, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Support --Avatar 19:18, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Support brilliant --Quasipalm 15:56, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Support --Urban 19:00, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Support --Malene Thyssen 22:50, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Support Resolution is a bit low, though. After all, there now are gigapixel panoramas of Bryce Canyon. ;-) --MarkSweep 08:39, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Support -- Tbc 18:20, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Support -- Wiki-observer 17:02, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Result: 8 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral => featured Li-sung 16:16, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Image:Jakarta_slumlife8.JPG, not featured

Nominate

and  Support LoopZilla 14:07, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Oppose bad composition, uninteresting object norro 14:51, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Oppose --Avatar 19:15, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Oppose - Rex 23:07, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Oppose not really any story or information in this pic --Quasipalm 15:55, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Oppose --Atamari 21:39, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured Li-sung 16:14, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Image:Danish_Foreign_Ministry_6.jpg, not featured

Nominate

and  Support LoopZilla 09:58, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Oppose - unsharp - Rex 10:22, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Oppose norro 14:52, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Oppose --Avatar 19:14, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured Li-sung 16:12, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Image:Shanghai_-_Nanjing_Road.jpeg, not featured

Nominate

and  Support. --P.B. 23:13, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Support - Peregrine981 04:08, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Oppose norro 14:52, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Oppose --Avatar 19:14, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Oppose - not special enough - Rex 23:05, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Oppose - buildings leaning badly, it only takes two minutes to correct this sort of thing in a photo editor - Arpingstone 12:10, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Out of curiosity, why shouldn't the buildings lean? Peregrine981 12:56, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  - It's a pretty standard convention in architectural photography that vertical lines should be vertical (or, rarely though, deliberately far from vertical). --MarkSweep 08:34, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)
    - Because they DON'T lean!! - Arpingstone 12:51, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- I uploaded a new, edited version of this photo. I hope you like it better. --P.B. 22:15, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
+ --Smartneddy 06:29, 2005 Jun 13 (UTC)

Result: 3 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured Li-sung 16:11, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Image:Lappeenranta fortification.jpg, not featured

Picture by me, Nominate

and neutral vote. --Rdnk 14:44, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Support -- LoopZilla 18:53, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Oppose - nice, but some things out of proportion, like the tree on the right. In the center, there is a twig which is not connected to the tree. - Rex 23:00, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Oppose Peregrine981 04:07, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Oppose the twig just below the ship, where should it go? Otherwise very good. --Janne Karaste 18:56, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Oppose nice, but not perfect. --Avatar 19:13, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Oppose --Atamari 21:38, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
+ --Smartneddy 06:27, 2005 Jun 13 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 5 oppose, 1 neutral => not featured Li-sung 16:09, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Image:Montinari Milano.jpg, featured

Nominate

norro 15:01, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Support norro 15:01, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Oppose resolution --Avatar 19:19, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Support - very nice 10 seconds exposure - Rex 23:11, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Support again, close to having a too small resolution, but big and good enough for me --Quasipalm 15:58, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Support -Didactohedron 19:58, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)~
Support --Malene Thyssen 23:15, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
-. Otherwise splendid, but too low a resolution. --Hautala 13:39, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Oppose -- Great picture, but the resolution is too low. ADSR6581
Support. Very nice. --CSamulili 18:56, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Result: 6 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral => featured Li-sung 17:58, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Image:Larus argentatus by Malene Thyssen.jpg, not featured

Nominate

(self nomination - no vote) --Malene Thyssen 23:01, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Oppose norro 14:14, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Oppose - good sharp photo, but not a very special setting - Rex 22:54, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Next time I'll catch the bird reading a news paper ;-) Malene Thyssen 21:52, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)
+. --Hautala 13:36, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
+ -- LoopZilla 22:13, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Oppose Avatar 21:26, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
+ clear picture,full body of the gull--Smartneddy 06:41, 2005 Jun 13 (UTC)
Support — FoeNyx 09:08, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Oppose --Quasipalm 22:53, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Result: 4 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured Li-sung 13:07, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Image:September 14 2001.jpg, featured

Nominate

and  Support (I uploaded, but did not take this image) --Quasipalm 04:11, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Support - Rex 14:46, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
-. --Hautala 13:37, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Support James F. (talk) 22:15, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Support Avatar 21:26, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Support -- Wiki-observer 17:06, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Result: 5 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral => featured Li-sung 13:00, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Image:September 14 2001 Ground Zero 03.jpg, not featured

Nominate

and  Support (I uploaded, but did not take this image) --Quasipalm 04:12, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Oppose - not centered - Rex 14:45, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Support -Didactohedron 20:15, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Support WεFt 20:27, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Support -- LoopZilla 21:58, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Support --Malene Thyssen 23:14, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
-. Headroom. --Hautala 14:07, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Oppose The story behind this picture/this face is momentous. But in my opinion, this photo is not. norro 18:58, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Support Avatar 21:26, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Oppose. What norro said. --CSamulili 18:55, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Result: 6 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured Li-sung 12:56, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Image:VeronaSanZenoMaggioreCloister.jpg, not featured

Selfnomination Andreas Tille 16:24, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Oppose -- LoopZilla 19:19, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Oppose - nice, but shadow too dominant - Rex 22:47, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Support, lovely use of shadow. James F. (talk) 23:50, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Support --MarkSweep 08:41, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Oppose it's almost there, but not quite for me --Quasipalm 20:46, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Oppose --Hautala 13:33, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Oppose Avatar 21:25, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured Li-sung 16:28, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Initiation Ritual in Malawi, featured

Nominate

and  Support --Atamari 12:08, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)

is my monitor a 3D-monitor? :-)

Support - interesting - Rex 22:46, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Support Mmm ... babastevig -guety 01:16, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)
-. Non-existent description. What is going on in here? --Hautala 13:35, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Support --Malene Thyssen 07:08, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Oppose Avatar 21:26, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Support. "countering system bias". --CSamulili 18:54, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Support — FoeNyx 09:01, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Result: 6 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral => featured Li-sung 16:22, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Image:View from the Window at Le Gras, Joseph Nicéphore Niépce, uncompressed UMN source.png, Featured

Nominate

and  Support LoopZilla 11:51, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Support --Quasipalm 20:42, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Support James F. (talk) 00:09, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Support --MarkSweep 01:39, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
+. --Hautala 13:32, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Support --Malene Thyssen 07:10, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Support Avatar 21:25, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Support Greudin
Support Nuno Sequeira André 13:49, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Oppose -- WB 23:47, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Support --Janne Karaste 09:11, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Result: 10 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral => featured ADSR6581 11:58, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Image:Tour eiffel at sunrise from the trocadero.jpg, Featured

Nominate

&  Support ed g2s • talk 11:47, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Support -- LoopZilla 11:53, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)
I would be oppose to this picture's being featured for two reasons :
- I don't think the logo of « Paris 2012 » (application for the olympic games) is the purpose of the photograph, and I'd prefer a pic when nothing is hung to the tower
- I don't like the contrast ; however the composition is great ; seeing completely the Invalides under the first floor can be very difficult.Pabix &; 18:31, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Support --Quasipalm 20:40, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Support James F. (talk) 00:08, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
+ villy ♦ ✎ 12:13, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
+. --Hautala 13:31, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Support - Rex 21:51, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Support Avatar 21:23, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Support --Atamari 21:42, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Support -- ADSR6581 17:27, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
support --CSamulili 18:53, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Support — FoeNyx 08:59, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Support -- WB 23:45, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Support --Janne Karaste 09:12, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Result: 14 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral => featured ADSR6581 12:18, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Image:LabourCampaignPoster20050115 CopyrightKaihsuTai.jpg, not featured

UK Labour Party campaign poster aimed at the general election, taken months before the announcement of the date

Nominate

and  Support LoopZilla 19:28, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Oppose a bit mundane for me --Quasipalm 20:43, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Support James F. (talk) 00:08, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- villy ♦ ✎ 12:11, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
-. --Hautala 13:29, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Oppose - Rex 21:51, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Oppose Avatar 21:23, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Oppose -- ADSR6581 17:28, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Oppose --Janne Karaste 09:14, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 7 oppose => not featured norro 20:24, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Image:Ducks Winter.jpg, not featured

Nominate

&  Support David.Monniaux 07:59, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)

+ -- LoopZilla 08:28, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- villy ♦ ✎ 12:10, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
-. The description "Ducks" is too brief. Which ducks? --Hautala 13:28, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Oppose there is some color strangeness (bluring?) between the duck's black head and the water --Quasipalm 17:00, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Oppose -- Tbc 18:21, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Oppose - Rex 21:52, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Oppose Avatar 21:23, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Oppose --Janne Karaste 09:15, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 7 oppose => not featured norro 20:26, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Image:Notre_dame-paris-view.jpg, Not Featured

Nominate

and  Support LoopZilla 12:46, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Oppose. Too small a resolution for my taste. --Hautala 13:26, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
+ / tsca ✉ 14:44, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Oppose resolution --Quasipalm 16:59, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose, due to this wonderful image's terrible resolution. --Zantastik 08:09, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
+ Pabix &; 11:07, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Oppose - resolution - Rex 21:52, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Oppose Avatar 21:23, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
+ good picture--Smartneddy 06:24, 2005 Jun 13 (UTC)
+ Excellent! I think the dimension of this picture is enough for any use (except printing). El Comandante 21:22, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Oppose resolution Greudin
Oppose resolution (700x525) --Janne Karaste 09:16, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Result: 5 Support, 7 Oppose => Not featured ADSR6581 13:04, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Image:Jawor3.jpg, Not Featured

Nominate

and  Support LoopZilla 13:14, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Oppose. The coloured glass isn't visible on the lower windows. --Hautala 13:21, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Oppose composition and color --Quasipalm 16:58, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Oppose Avatar 21:22, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Pabix &; 11:07, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Oppose --Janne Karaste 09:16, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral => Not featured ADSR6581 15:37, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Image:OspreyNASA.jpg , Featured

Nominate

and  Support --Quasipalm 19:42, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Support --Malene Thyssen 07:14, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
+. Support. This is a great photo, well composed, visually interesting and with high-res. --Zantastik 08:10, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Support David.Monniaux 18:51, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Support - Rex 21:53, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
+ LoopZilla 09:16, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Support --Atamari 21:42, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Support --Chun-hian 08:05, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
+Pabix &; 11:08, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Support — FoeNyx 08:57, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Support. --Hautala 12:49, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Support --Janne Karaste 09:17, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Support -PedroPVZ 20:41, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral => Featured ADSR6581 15:51, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Image:Canyon de Chelly, Navajo.jpg, Featured

Nominate

and  Support --Quasipalm 19:49, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC) (I uploaded, but did not take this image)

Support James F. (talk) 22:15, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Support Avatar 21:16, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Support --Chun-hian 08:11, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Support -- Urban 13:32, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
+ LoopZilla 07:45, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Support — FoeNyx 08:58, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Support GurraJG 19:06, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Oppose. --Hautala 12:52, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Oppose jpeg-sky --Janne Karaste 09:19, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Support -- Get_It • 15:54, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Result: 9 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral => Featured ADSR6581 16:03, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Info I uploaded in June 2017 a new post-processed version of the image. Sting (talk) 17:24, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Olive tree Karystos.jpg, not featured

Nominate and Support Tbc 12:53, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Oppose cool subject, but the photo doesn't sit right with me --Quasipalm 18:17, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Oppose most of the tree is cut off David.Monniaux 18:52, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Oppose - Rex 21:54, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Oppose Avatar 21:16, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- see David's comment Pabix &; 11:08, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Oppose. --Hautala 12:53, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Oppose --Janne Karaste 09:19, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Neutral -- Get_It • 16:08, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Support artistical. The tree being cut make the photo more special. -PedroPVZ 20:38, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Oppose. I don't like the background. Would prefer a tree with leaves and olives on it. --Erin (talk) 13:22, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 8 oppose, 1 neutral => not featured

Image:Commodore64.jpg, not featured

Nominate

LoopZilla 10:47, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Support LoopZilla 10:47, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Support funky! --Quasipalm 15:57, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Support! Avatar 21:17, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Support. --Hautala 16:37, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Support -- Pabix &; 11:11, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Oppose - Rex 23:52, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Oppose lighting norro 15:30, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Oppose I dont like the white background. --Malene Thyssen 12:55, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- You don't like the white background, but its good enough for the credit card photo media:Credit-cards.jpg you supported? ADSR6581 13:56, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  - I know I'm not beeing very consistant :-( Commenting photos I guess is very subjective and english is not my first language so I apologize if my comments sometimes sounds a bit rough. In this case its hard to explain why I opposed this pic and supported the pic of the creditcards - I think it has something to do with mixing styles. The old keyboard looks a bit funny in my eyes with the shining white modern looking background. I hope this explanation makes just a little sense - I'm not commenting the photos with the goal to annoy anyone or hurt anyones feelings. Regards Malene Thyssen 19:05, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
    - I understand what you are saying, but opposing just because of a white background is tenuous at best. What colour should it be? All the pictures of objects (old computers mainly) I take have white backgrounds. This is so it can be used without a thumbnail box around it. For example: [2] I also do it because it makes the picture look more professional. If I had left the original background, it wouldn't have even got nominated... If you had a technical problem with the picture, then fair enough, but because it has a white background... Seems a little unreasonable to me. ADSR6581 20:07, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
      - I understand that taking photos of computerparts must be a challenge - I know I wouldn't be as succesfull as you in that matter! And in most cases I agree with you about the white backgound. This photo is not bad, it's just not exceptionally good in my eyes (and I think features pictures should be that). But maybee I have misunderstood the requirements to featured pictures candidates and judge too hard? Regards Malene Thyssen 20:50, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
I think the parameters of what is a good picture needs to be discussed in some depth, but that should be saved for the discussion page. In relation to my picture, I know it isn't the best. It was the best I could do without a digital SLR camera. Personally, I feel you have a been a bit hard, but I'm sure people have thought that about some of my votes too. :-) ADSR6581 21:08, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)

I guess it's always difficult to accept when other people judge ones artistic work - especially when the judgement is a bit harsh (I know that from own experience ;-). I'll try to be not quite so meticulous in the future :-) Regards Malene Thyssen 22:09, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)

- I also become pretty stressed when I cant fully express myself in English. So I understand Malene. --PedroPVZ 20:41, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Support Andreas Tille 06:13, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Support --Janne Karaste 09:19, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Support -PedroPVZ 20:40, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Support -- Get_It • 15:55, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Oppose. Too dull. --Erin (talk) 13:23, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Okay... May I ask as to why it is "too dull"? ADSR6581 17:46, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)

If you want detail, fine. It's a very boring, uninteresting subject. The focus is out, the lighting isn't strong enough, and whilest I appreciate it is a difficult thing to take a good picture of, it is just not FP worthy as is. I also think for something of this colour, a plain background possibly isn't the best option. --Erin (talk) 18:05, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)

"very boring and uninteresting subject." Ouch!!! In your ever so "humble" opinion of course... ADSR6581 20:51, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Isn't that what this whole voting business is all about? Our opinions? I was just being honest about mine. --Erin (talk) 21:58, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Yes of course, but what are we all voting for? Is right that we should vote positively about things we are interested in, and negatively if the subject is of no interest to the voter? I think this place is more featured *content* cadidates, rather featured *pictures* sometimes... <steps off soapbox> ;-) ADSR6581 22:19, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Oppose bad lighting and boring. --David Gaya 10:40, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Result: 9 support, 5 oppose => not featured norro 13:31, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Image:VernClark.jpg, not featured

Nominate and Support Avatar 21:20, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Oppose --Quasipalm 22:51, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Oppose nothin special David.Monniaux 22:33, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Oppose norro 16:09, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Oppose. --Hautala 12:53, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Oppose --Janne Karaste 09:20, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Oppose definitely not art. -PedroPVZ 20:40, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Oppose -- Get_It • 15:54, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Oppose. --Erin (talk) 13:23, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 8 oppose => not featured norro 13:30, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Image:Mercedes-SLK.jpg, not featured

A mercedes SLK

Nominate and Support Avatar 21:20, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Oppose --Atamari 21:30, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Support --Quasipalm 22:50, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Oppose: Looks like a really cool car but two major problems. 1) I dont think thats the best angle to take the picture of this car, should be taken from either front or with a little bit of top(camera above the car), cant see any part of the convertible interior. 2) The white background makes it look surreal, but not in a good way, somehow the back ground is not working for me. My $0.02 --Spundun 15:46, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Oppose norro 16:08, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Oppose (agree with Spundun's 2nd reason). --CSamulili 18:51, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Oppose --Malene Thyssen 12:53, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Oppose --Janne Karaste 09:20, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Oppose bad angle. --PedroPVZ 17:35, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Oppose. --Hautala 11:51, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Oppose -- Get_It • 15:51, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Oppose. Don't like it being B&W. Angle isn't the best. --Erin (talk) 13:23, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 10 oppose => not featured norro 13:32, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Image:Iraq-patrol.jpg, not featured

Nominate and Support Avatar 21:19, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Oppose nothing special --Quasipalm 22:50, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Oppose -- Urban 13:31, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Oppose - Rex 23:52, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Oppose It isnt art --PedroPVZ 17:36, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Oppose. --Hautala 11:51, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Oppose -- Get_It • 15:51, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Oppose. Would like to see a more unique moment in time. --Erin (talk) 13:24, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 7 oppose => not featured norro 13:33, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Image:Credit-cards.jpg, featured

Nominate and Support Avatar 21:18, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Support nice --Quasipalm 22:50, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Support -- ADSR6581 17:10, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Support: Nice pic, but the cards are fake! :(......... ;) --Spundun 15:42, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
+ LoopZilla 19:10, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Support. James F. (talk) 21:35, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Support - Rex 23:53, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Support --Malene Thyssen 12:52, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Support --Janne Karaste 09:20, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Support. --Hautala 11:52, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)

* Support. --Erin (talk) 13:24, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Oppose. I'd supported because it is a good picture of credit cards, but I don't believe it's FP worthy. --Erin (talk) 18:26, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Support --Pjotr 17:54, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Oppose nothing special. It isn't art. --PedroPVZ 18:41, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Oppose Skilled but not artful. --Tysto 21:40, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- This is featured *pictures*, not featured *art*. It will be a real shame if this picture doesn't get through. ADSR6581 13:50, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  - A featured picture is an artful picture. I'm not talking about Da Vinci art... -PedroPVZ 22:59, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Neutral -- Get_It • 22:13, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Oppose -- Get_It • 23:20, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Support Cool. Chamaeleon 17:51, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Support I agree with the remark of ADSR6581 - a few voters should think twice before voting here. -- aka 20:28, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- The people that should think twice before voting are the people who oppose saying nothing. Art means everything: composition, colours, placement of the object, etc. It is a very valid argument that you should respect. Plus, artful is a picture that you want to look twice, and get to see more, this you see once, and you don't want to see it again, because it is nothing special, that is, it isn't art. -PedroPVZ 01:13, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  - I don't agree with your last statement, but I respect it, because this page exists to find out what most of the voters think about an image. -- aka 26 June 2005 08:59 (UTC)

Result: 13 support, 4 oppose => featured norro 26 June 2005 11:55 (UTC)

Image:A single white feather closeup.jpg, featured

Nominate

I think people might like this better than the last feather image i nominated :) --Quasipalm 22:53, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Support --Quasipalm 22:53, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Support --Spundun 15:40, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Support. James F. (talk) 21:34, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Support — FoeNyx 08:56, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Oppose - Rex 23:53, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Support Yann 09:30, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Oppose --Malene Thyssen 12:51, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Support --fir0002 11:30, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Support --Janne Karaste 09:22, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Oppose. --Hautala 11:53, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Oppose not sharp at top and bottom norro 21:39, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Neutral I don't like it much, maybe because of the black background... -PedroPVZ 01:19, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Support. Love it. --Erin (talk) 13:25, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Support great--Pjotr 17:54, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Oppose Nice, but nothing special. --Tysto 21:41, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Support Pretty. Chamaeleon 17:53, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Support a picture should not be forced to be "something special" to become a featured one .. -- aka 20:29, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Result: 11 support, 5 oppose, 1 neutral => featured norro 26 June 2005 11:57 (UTC)

Image:Capela dos ossos pormenor.jpg, not featured

Nominate

-- Bones in the wall of the Bone Chapel in Évora, Portugal. The Bone Chapel is a chapel that is completely covered in bones and skulls, more than 5000.Nuno Sequeira André 13:41, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Support -- Nuno Sequeira André 13:41, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)
+. --Hautala 16:39, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)
+ LoopZilla 07:01, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
+ Deep750 13:35, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Support - Rex 23:54, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Oppose very flat + lighting norro 19:49, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Oppose Agree with norro. I don't like the composition. --Malene Thyssen 12:49, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Support - ~~82.154.209.120 13:27, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)~~ Sorry wasn't logged in, my vote is below
Support - Ee97056 13:28, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Support although creepy. I wouldnt visit this place. :S -PedroPVZ 20:39, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Oppose -- Get_It • 15:53, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Oppose, agree with norro. -Didactohedron 04:22, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Oppose. It's a wall. If the skull faces were showing, that would be different. --Erin (talk) 13:26, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Oppose --Pjotr 17:53, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Oppose Fascinating subject, but not a fascinating image. --Tysto 21:42, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Result: 8 support, 7 oppose => not featured norro 26 June 2005 11:58 (UTC)