Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Poppy closeup of a single blossom outside.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Image:Poppy closeup of a single blossom outside.jpg, not featured
[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Jan 2011 at 20:07:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by MatthiasKabel - uploaded by MatthiasKabel - nominated by MatthiasKabel -- MatthiasKabel (talk) 20:07, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
Oppose Focus is a bit unfortunate. The subject is several flowers of the same type, and it would be better if the focus was on all of them. Also, the composition is tight at the bottom, as one of the flowers are cut out.--Snaevar (talk) 22:17, 3 January 2011 (UTC)- Oppose (formerly FPX) Image does not fall within the guidelines, the composition is confusing and the subject is not focused -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 23:42, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
- the focus is on the blossom, ok it's a very narrow DOF, but this is needed to guide the viewer to the single blossom. Otherwise it would be very confusing with many blossoms. Would you prefer File:Poppy closeup of a single blossom.jpg? MatthiasKabel (talk) 06:47, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
Comment -- Please take a look at Commons:Featured pictures/Plants/Flowers and also at Commons:Quality images/Subject/Plant life, to see the kind of quality we expect here. Quality images candidates would have been a better place to start. Please correct the category to "Papaver rhoeas" -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 08:50, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
Support I don't think it's so bad, I like the colors and quality. It's an unusual choice, but not necessarily a terrible one... --IdLoveOne (talk) 05:33, 4 January 2011 (UTC)- Oppose I would like blurry flowers as a background, but here, some are right behind the main subject, so it is hard to tell where one starts and another begins. Worse, a blurry pedal is in front of the main subject. However, I think another shot here could produce a FP. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 17:19, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 20:08, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
