Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:RAI GT26 Simin Dasht.jpg

File:RAI GT26 Simin Dasht.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Jun 2022 at 13:47:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:RAI GT26 Simin Dasht.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:RAI GT26 Simin Dasht.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Iran
•  Info created & uploaded by David Gubler – nominated b Ivar (talk) 13:47, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
•  Support – Ivar (talk) 13:47, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
•  Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 14:33, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
•  Support Wonderful landscape composition. I know the point of it is to photograph a train in the landscape, but this would be just as much an FP without the train, too. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:39, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
•  Oppose wowing landscape and composition, but tenchnically not a FP in my eyes because there are too much artefacts in the sky. --Milseburg (talk) 21:07, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
•  Support While technical quality at the pixel level could be better, this is a 75 MP image and it doesn't make sense to judge it according to the same standards as a 20 MP image. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:36, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
•  Support - Impressive landscape. —Bruce1ee^talk 07:08, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
•  Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 07:09, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
•  Support Exceptional view enhanced with this train -- Basile Morin (talk) 08:00, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
•  Support -- IamMM (talk) 09:54, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
•  Support per King of Hearts. -- Radomianin (talk) 10:01, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
• I think it's worth pinging David Gubler and check if he could share a less compressed version of the photo? - Benh (talk) 11:41, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
  • Hi Benh, sadly I don't have anything with less compression I could upload. I still have the original RAWs and could re-stitch them but that's not a quick or easy process, and is not exactly high on my priority list at the moment... --Kabelleger (talk) 21:02, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

    • @Kabelleger: Just in case you trust me enough to share 16-bit TIFF versions of the source images, I'm confident I can do that very quickly. It's already good (as always with u), but the compression is noticeable. - Benh (talk) 08:41, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

    • • @Benh: Thanks, but even that isn't so simple. Never mind, I've re-done the photo, do you think it's better now? --Kabelleger (talk) 20:34, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

        • It looks marginally better (but that's because it wasn't that bad to begin with). So fine with me :) Thanks a lot for acting so fast. - Benh (talk) 09:43, 15 June 2022 (UTC)

          • I'm just finding out the filesize has largely increased. From my experience, there may be a better tradeoff (like 90/100 if you use Lightroom). - Benh (talk) 09:50, 15 June 2022 (UTC)

•  Comment Train is too insignificant in the image. Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:36, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
•  Support--Ermell (talk) 20:06, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:19, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
•  Support per Ikan. I don't see this as a train picture at all. Daniel Case (talk) 01:35, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
•  Support --Yann (talk) 09:43, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
•  Support I've taken the liberty to change the gallery though, --A.Savin 11:20, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
•  Support Poco a poco (talk) 13:39, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
•  Support It looks like the shape of the clouds is reflected on the ground. -- Wolf im Wald 04:29, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
•  Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 06:26, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
•  Support --Llez (talk) 10:36, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:58, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
•  Support Impressive landscape panorama. (Thanks to A.Savin for changing the gallery link!) --Aristeas (talk) 05:53, 20 June 2022 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 20 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 21:14, 21 June 2022 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural#Iran