Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Râşnov Citadel (Rosenauer Burg) 01.jpg

File:Râşnov Citadel (Rosenauer Burg) 01.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Mar 2017 at 18:59:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Râşnov Citadel (Rosenauer Burg) 01.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Râşnov Citadel (Rosenauer Burg) 01.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications
•  Info all by Pudelek -- Pudelek (talk) 18:59, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Support -- Pudelek (talk) 18:59, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Comment shame about the people. Charles (talk) 23:00, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
• Weak  Oppose. Generally well-done, but as a slightly unsharp (especially the left edge) 7 MP image with no mitigating factors or the feeling of "wow, we have to promote this even if the quality is a bit lower than usual." -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:17, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per KoH. lNeverCry 02:49, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per KoH --PtrQs (talk) 09:36, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per King. Seems to me that the image might have had some serious overexposure on the building which was brought under control at the cost of looking overprocessed (something about the blue in the sky doesn't strike me the right way). Daniel Case (talk) 21:44, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Support I like it; the composition is good and the path with people walking up and down reminds me of a picture book -- Thennicke (talk) 01:45, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Support no pseudo sharpness visible. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 09:28, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Support — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 10:43, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Comment - Pudelek, could you possibly sharpen the citadel a bit? I find absolutely nothing wrong with the composition. The only thing that makes me unlikely to vote for a feature is the noted slight unsharpness. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:39, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

  Ikan Kekek - mayby now?? --Pudelek (talk) 11:14, 27 February 2017 (UTC)

• Thanks, Pudelek. It's definitely better. I'm deliberating about whether to weakly support a feature now or to remain neutral. I don't have any questions about whether it's a featurable composition and a very good picture, and you improved it noticeably. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:05, 27 February 2017 (UTC)

•  Support Albertus teolog (talk) 23:26, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Weak support I like the composition, but the technical part could be better. Overall nice work! -- Wolf im Wald 18:24, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
• Weak  Support per Wolf im Wald. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:19, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --Ralf Roleček 16:54, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Support as Thennicke --Berthold Werner (talk) 07:37, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
•  Support--M★Zaplotnik ^(edits) 19:00, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 09:27, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications