Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Pont de Chancia02 2015-05-10.jpg

File:Pont de Chancia02 2015-05-10.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Jul 2015 at 09:43:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Pont de Chancia02 2015-05-10.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Pont de Chancia02 2015-05-10.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Panoramas
•  Info created, uploaded and nominated by KlausFoehl -- KlausFoehl (talk) 09:43, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Support as nominator -- KlausFoehl (talk) 09:43, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose 180° panos look so strange. Clouds are forming bands around the mountain. Definately unnatrual looking. I would try just one half. --Mile (talk) 09:55, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Support It's an exciting projection this way or the other. And let the clouds form bands if they like, this is surely due to the kind of projection and does not really disturb me. :) --Tremonist (talk) 12:23, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Question Are there CAs along the shadow of the right balustrade? The same problem also in the alternative. --Llez (talk) 10:13, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

 Info Yes there are. For panoramic images I usually use only image information from near the centre, but each balustrade comes from one photo (to avoid parallax errors) and hence the stronger CA from the image corner shows. -- KlausFoehl (talk) 13:20, 5 July 2015 (UTC)

•  Support unusual and interesting angles. Technical quality is decent. --Pine^✉ 02:01, 3 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Poco² 17:23, 3 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Totally per Pine. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 11:52, 4 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Support -- Pofka (talk) 19:22, 4 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Comment Color space tagged as sRGB, without an embedded color profile: Windows and Mac browsers and apps treat the colors randomly (even with a properly calibrated monitor). -- Slaunger (talk) 20:17, 5 July 2015 (UTC)

 Info Probably hugin cannot add a colour profile where files from camera (see File:Chancia02 2015-05-10.jpg) come without. I thought that for cameras gamma=2.2 has been the de facto standard for quite a while. The Canon G12 does gamma=2.2 as I have checked, how to add this best to the file? -- KlausFoehl (talk) 08:26, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

 Info Generic sRGB_IEC61966-2-1_black_scaled.icc colour profile now added. -- KlausFoehl (talk) 12:59, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

Verified! Metadata color space data looks good now. -- Slaunger (talk) 15:28, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

•  Support Great composition. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 22:08, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose Agree with Mile.--Jebulon (talk) 09:37, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

Alternative

 Comment The alternative doesn't provide this great panoramic view what is regrettable. --Tremonist (talk) 12:25, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

•  Oppose I like the wide angle variant much more. -- Pofka (talk) 19:22, 4 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose No color-space metadata and no embedded color profile. -- Slaunger (talk) 20:18, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose Bad crop. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 22:08, 5 July 2015 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 14:48, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Panoramas

The chosen alternative is: File:Pont de Chancia02 2015-05-10.jpg