Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Newark Penn Station June 2015 002.jpg

File:Newark Penn Station June 2015 002.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Sep 2017 at 20:46:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Newark Penn Station June 2015 002.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Newark Penn Station June 2015 002.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
•  Info created by King of Hearts - uploaded by King of Hearts - nominated by King of Hearts -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 20:46, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
•  Info Note that the walkway is inherently not completely centered; the reasonable thing to do was to prioritize symmetry around the overhang and the main doors.
•  Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 20:46, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
•  Question Why are the plants and the guy standing on the right blurry? PumpkinSky talk 22:20, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

  Long exposure, 1s. In that time there can be a bit of wind and people moving about... -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 22:42, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

•  Support very nice, looks better IMHO if you crop out the plant containers at the extreme ends.--Nikhil B (talk) 02:45, 28 August 2017 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:10, 28 August 2017 (UTC)
• Some of the ghosts are strange, but so be it.  Support - Very good, IMO. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:29, 28 August 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --cart-Talk 12:13, 28 August 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Interesting --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 22:03, 28 August 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose sorry, maybe I just don't get it, but there's nothing particularly wow-y about this for me. --El Grafo (talk) 13:56, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose Same as El Grafo.--Jebulon (talk) 15:19, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Nice to see a picture of a place I've been through more than a few times here ... Daniel Case (talk) 21:33, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Strange argument...--Jebulon (talk) 16:03, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

@Jebulon: That was a comment, not an argument. Daniel Case (talk) 19:31, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

• • • of course. No offense I hope.--Jebulon (talk) 20:45, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Albertus teolog (talk) 19:49, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
•  Support I really like that... --Basotxerri (talk) 19:58, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per El Grafo. --Karelj (talk) 20:24, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose Agree with El Grafo. Plus the three blurry people are odd; and the guy in front of the plant is just freaky. HalfGig talk 11:52, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose per others. --Milseburg (talk) 18:06, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /PumpkinSky talk 21:19, 5 September 2017 (UTC)