Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Michelangelo's Pietà Saint Peter's Basilica Vatican City.jpg/2
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Mar 2014 at 18:28:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by Michelangelo - Photographied, uploaded and nominated by me--Jebulon (talk) 18:28, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
Support Renomination after rework of this Michelangelo's Pietà, one of the marvels on the human genius IMO, and one of the great masterpieces of all times. This work has his own article in many wikipedias.I know that we already have a FP of the same subject, but it is now a bit old (2008), and a bit small. The nominated version has double size. It seems to have a sufficient quality (better than the already feaured version IMO - chromatic noise etc-). Those who know the place know also how it is difficult to take such a photograph, without tripod nor flash, and through a glass...-- Jebulon (talk) 18:28, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
Comment Not really easy for me right now. I have never witnessed a delist and replace during my short time here, but wouldn't that be the right place for doing one with the FP you have mentioned? Both images show the same subject with approx. 30° difference in viewing angle while having a very comparable crop. That seems pretty similar to me. --DXR (talk) 19:08, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
- I asked myself the same question, but 1)We already have at least 3 FP of the Neuschwanstein castle taken from the same place (the bridge), 2) I'm not a fan of delisting old FP, and 3) as you noticed, my candidate is different, because not taken from the front. And there is no way to have another crop, due to the nature of the composition of the sculpture. Thoughts ? Supports ?
--Jebulon (talk) 21:06, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
- I asked myself the same question, but 1)We already have at least 3 FP of the Neuschwanstein castle taken from the same place (the bridge), 2) I'm not a fan of delisting old FP, and 3) as you noticed, my candidate is different, because not taken from the front. And there is no way to have another crop, due to the nature of the composition of the sculpture. Thoughts ? Supports ?
- Support Michael Barera (talk) 21:13, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
- Support D&Rs make more sense on en:WP. I think it is wrong to force a contributor to make D&Rs when offering candidates to this project. BTW, a well executed image. Saffron Blaze (talk) 21:47, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
- Support Okay, given that two FPs of one subject appears to be accepted, I can well support as the quality is certainly good. However, may I suggest cropping a tiny bit to remove the right yellow part of the wall? Not a big deal, but I find it a bit distracting. --DXR (talk) 22:27, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
- Support tbh I didn't actually see the sliver of yellow wall until DXR pointed it out but it is actually annoying. But not really at all a dealbreakerr—Love, Kelvinsong talk 03:58, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
- Support — Julian H.✈ (talk/files) 13:35, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
- Support --JLPC (talk) 17:32, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
- Support I personally prefer the viewing angle of the current fp, but with it´s better quality this one is still fp-worthy. --mathias K 05:23, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
- Support --Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 11:48, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
- Support Classic, but very good:) Halavar (talk) 00:34, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
- Support —Blurred Lines 13:29, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
- Support Food for the mind in the lent. Jee 06:20, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /A.Savin 22:27, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects
