Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Lo sbadiglio.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Lo sbadiglio.jpg, featured
[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Oct 2020 at 11:46:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Family : Canidae (Canids)
Info created & uploaded by Alberto Peracchio - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 11:46, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 11:46, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
Oppose shame that so much is blown. That's the trouble with snow, but here the whole image is over-exposed. Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:59, 5 October 2020 (UTC)- Support IMHO, The snow does not have texture seems more the result of the good use of the depth, although ma vignetting bothers me a bit, I think it is enough to be FP --Wilfredor (talk) 12:17, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
Weak oppose The vignetting bothers me too much unfortunately. A lovely capture though, but it would be much better with it corrected. Cmao20 (talk) 06:53, 6 October 2020 (UTC)- Moderate Support Very good photo of the fox with its mouth open, decent composition. Some kind of detail in the upper right would have been nicer, but I'm not bothered by featureless snow in this context and nothing feels uncomfortably bright to look at. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:02, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
- Support as Ikan, the composition mitigates the overexposed snow --Muhammad (talk) 08:16, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
- Support per Wilfredor and Ikan. --Aristeas (talk) 10:31, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
- Support I agree with Wilfredor. Yes, there's some reduced detail in the foreground and background, but that is due to the good use of DoF rather than problems with the exposure. There are some areas in the center and foreground that are technically (close to) clipping, mostly in the blue channel. But that is not a problem as 1) transitions to non-clipped areas are smooth, 2) these areas are out of focus anyway, so there's no loss of detail. Of course, there's nothing wrong with even plain white #FFFFFF in an image per se if handled appropriately. The over-all impression of the image is actually more on the side of under-exposure for me. That may have to do with the vignetting, which looks a bit strong in the compressed tumbnails but gentle enough in the original full size version. --El Grafo (talk) 10:56, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
Weak support I’d have processed it differently, a bit more on the dark side *g*, but good enough IMHO. --Kreuzschnabel 16:35, 6 October 2020 (UTC)- Conditional oppose that I'll turn in support if the vignetting is fixed Poco a poco (talk) 18:53, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
Comment I had a look at the EXIF. This looks like it was converted from raw in Lightroom, and there is no evidence that software vignetting was added there. I suspect this is from the super-zoom lens being shot wide-open, and the vignetting from the zoom has unfortunately not been corrected by Lightroom. Perhaps it shows more on white than other images. Since it doesn't appear to be a creative-choice addition to the image, normally I'd support correcting a lens flaw directly in-place. But it won 3rd price in WLE Italy, so we shouldn't apply more than minor fixes per COM:OVERWRITE. I agree with others, there is no problem with the brightness of the snow, and I'd support an alt that had been carefully fixed. -- Colin (talk) 07:43, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
- For me it is clear that there is no problem with appearance of this snow since I live in it for 6 months and they are monochromatic colors that I'm used to seeing most of the year --Wilfredor (talk) 21:48, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
- Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 04:56, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
- Comment Maybe the issues with the perceived vignetting could be resolved by cropping in from the right (per note). Daniel Case (talk) 19:36, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 8 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 14:34, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Family : Canidae (Canids)
