Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Kleiber - Sitta europaea.jpg

File:Kleiber - Sitta europaea.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Sep 2015 at 19:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Kleiber - Sitta europaea.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Kleiber - Sitta europaea.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals
•  Info A young nuthatch ( Sitta europaea ): A short break before the second flight test; created by OlgaUnger - uploaded by OlgaUnger - nominated by Nightflyer -- Nightflyer (talk) 19:09, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Support -- Nightflyer (talk) 19:09, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose Nice but nothing more for me (and what's happened above???) --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 19:56, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Livio. The bokeh in this one is actually too distracting. Daniel Case (talk) 20:39, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Support See this and shame on you for oppose. --Jean11 (talk) 21:28, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

In that one the bokeh is beautiful, harmonious and abstract. Here it isn't. Daniel Case (talk) 21:45, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

What is more important the subject or background? --Jean11 (talk) 22:05, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

The whole picture. If the background distracts us from the subject it does not matter how well the subject was photographed. Daniel Case (talk) 02:56, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

•  Support --Ralf Roleček 21:33, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 21:44, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Support. I don't find the bokeh distracting. —Bruce1ee^talk 05:06, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Nice. --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 05:18, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Support per supporters above --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:28, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose because of the distracting bokeh. Otherwise very interesting, good and sharp. --Cayambe (talk) 06:34, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose I agree with the other opposers. --El Grafo (talk) 08:11, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Weak oppose The moment and the quality of the shot under the circumstances is astonishing good. The WB looks to me a bit off (I'd expect that the white plumage is white) but the bokeh and especially the human finger is a minus to me. I enjoy pictures of animals if I see them in their habitat. I also wonder what is that behind the bird's head (looks like hair!) Poco² 09:29, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Support It's nice enough for me. --Tremonist (talk) 12:11, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose For poco --Σπάρτακος (talk) 13:02, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Question Is really the voting period over ? I don't understand.--Jebulon (talk) 23:53, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 21:43, 30 August 2015 (UTC)