Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Hronov - morový sloup 2010 (part).JPG

File:Hronov - morový sloup 2010 (part).JPG, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Oct 2010 at 17:32:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Hronov - morový sloup 2010 (part).JPG Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Hronov - morový sloup 2010 (part).JPG

•  Info all by Pudelek -- Pudelek (talk) 17:32, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
•  Support -- Pudelek (talk) 17:32, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
•  Support --The High Fin Sperm Whale 18:00, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose Athyllis (talk) 18:15, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
  • Any reason why? --The High Fin Sperm Whale 20:39, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
•  Support --McIntosh Natura (talk) 19:03, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose Insufficient technical quality. bamse (talk) 19:08, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose Blurry and, to me, tilted--Miguel Bugallo 20:43, 14 October 2010 (UTC)

bamse and Bugallo: I think that's just the reflection of the sun in the gold structure which gives it a special glare; I don't think that's tilted or blurry, it's just matt paint. --McIntosh Natura (talk) 21:39, 14 October 2010 (UTC)

Maybe it should be photographed on a not-sunny day in this case!? To me it appears as if focus is not on the main subject but on the small head at Maria's feet. bamse (talk) 00:25, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

Sorry, the dark zones (and the illuminated zones) are out of focus: it's not the sun: to me, blurry--Miguel Bugallo 21:26, 17 October 2010 (UTC)

•  Oppose average quality--MASHAUNIX 19:53, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose --Brackenheim (talk) 20:06, 17 October 2010 (UTC)

•  Comment please state reason for opposition as a courtesy to the author/uploader. Lycaon (talk) 13:19, 19 October 2010 (UTC)

•  Support -- Albertus teolog (talk) 20:54, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
•  Neutral Nice statue, but visible pixels. --IdLoveOne (talk) 19:15, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose although playing with light and shadow could work out, this image does not benefit from doing so. trying different light situations on the scene could improve the image's quality. regards, PETER WEIS TALK 07:28, 19 October 2010 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 6 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /kaʁstn Disk/Cat 10:10, 24 October 2010 (UTC)