Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Fireworks over Ponte Vecchio 2.JPG
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Fireworks over Ponte Vecchio 2.JPG, featured
[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Aug 2013 at 09:29:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- all by Martin Falbisoner (talk) 09:29, 30 July 2013 (UTC). A few weeks ago, I already successfully nominated another image of fireworks over Ponte Vecchio. Still, imo the current photo deserves a FP nomination in its own right too. The type of explosion and its color are significantly different, creating a distinct atmosphere.
Support -- Martin Falbisoner (talk) 09:29, 30 July 2013 (UTC)- Support -- Felix König ✉ 10:58, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
Comment Not that different but noticeably worse in quality, so I don't see why it should also be FP (waiting with my vote until I've heard some comments, not sure what the policy is on very similar shots). --Julian H.✈ (talk/files) 14:22, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
- Comment Why is it worse in quality in your eyes? The WB is different and it's somewhat darker in appearance, but this doesn't make it necessarily worse as a whole. As far as the policy concerning similar motifs is concerned, I'm still wondering myself... Best, Martin Falbisoner (talk) 15:02, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
- Because the smaller aperture creates stronger star artifacts around light sources and also led to more brightening in post (I assume), which boosted the noise level and killed a few details. It's not horrible but, as I said, noticeable. --Julian H.✈ (talk/files) 15:15, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
- Support --Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 15:45, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
- Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:16, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
- Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:04, 4 August 2013 (UTC)
- Support --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:09, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
- Support --Claus (talk) 07:31, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture
