Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Farul vechi din Sulina.jpg

File:Farul vechi din Sulina.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Jun 2019 at 04:33:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Farul vechi din Sulina.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Farul vechi din Sulina.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Towers
•  Info created by ValentinManus - uploaded by ValentinManus - nominated by Gbawden -- Gbawden (talk) 10:12, 18 June 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- Gbawden (talk) 10:12, 18 June 2019 (UTC)
• Why FPD ? I see only one active nomination, one is FPXed ? -- Eatcha (talk) 20:56, 18 June 2019 (UTC)

• I agree. Once a day has passed after the other one was FPXed, this nomination should be reactivated. And this photo is interesting and IMO deserves consideration. I'd prefer if it were de-noised just a bit, but it's a good photo. I would contest the FPD, but I'm not sure how to do that. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:13, 18 June 2019 (UTC)

• Eatcha, per the rules, a FPX is still considered active as I can be contested anytime during 24 hours. A denied nom can also be removed from the list after 24 h, but as there is interest to continue voting I will remove my FPD after the deadline of the FPX has passed and I closed that other nom for good. – Lucas 07:24, 19 June 2019 (UTC)

• Lucas, please remove it before 13:00UTC otherwise the bot will close it. (24 hours limit at 08:28, 19 June 2019 (UTC)) -- Eatcha (talk) 07:33, 19 June 2019 (UTC)

• Eatcha, Ikan Kekek:  Done – Lucas 07:41, 19 June 2019 (UTC)

•  Oppose The colors seem overcooked and there are halos around the tower due to oversharpening. Coordinates would be nice. – Lucas 07:44, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
•  Weak Support Street view here -- Eatcha (talk) 09:03, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose The technical quality should be better. -XRay ^talk 10:56, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Lucas.--Vulphere 08:44, 20 June 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 19:09, 20 June 2019 (UTC)
•  Weak support Normally I'd agree that it's a little overdone, and it does look like some filter was applied, but in this case it offsets the effects of the cloudy sky and dull light. Daniel Case (talk) 22:20, 20 June 2019 (UTC)
•  Comment - I'm seeing the halos on the upper reaches of the lighthouse. User:ValentinManus, if you would eliminate the halos effectively, I would support this nomination because the form works for me and the low angle is interesting, making me feel like I'm on the water. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:17, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per above--Boothsift 21:54, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
•  Support I think this is actually quite good, and certainly rather beautiful, despite the slight halos. I don’t see any great issue with over processed colours. Cmao20 (talk) 22:35, 21 June 2019 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Boothsift 05:29, 27 June 2019 (UTC)