Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Col Rodella Val Jumela.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Col Rodella Val Jumela.jpg, featured
[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Apr 2019 at 08:01:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places
Info all by Moroder -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 08:01, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
Support -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 08:01, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
Oppose the view in the background and the image quality is stunning, but the foreground with the two buildings doesn't work for me. The hut on the left kind of disappears into the background, is partly covered by the small shed in front and the right building has an interesting shape, but we only see its (presumably) boring backside where I'm left wondering what the front has to offer. Kind of the same situation with the left building. There are stitching errors on the cables on the extreme right. – Lucas 08:23, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
- Info @Moroder: , there's posterization all over the sky as was the case with an earlier nomination of yours. Please check your post-processing. – Lucas 15:15, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
- Support This quirky and unusual compo actually works for me in a surreal way. That big "thing" up right looks like an Imperial shuttle just landed on this wintery "forest moon". It's like a real life version of one of Simon Stålenhag's paintings. There is a nice diagonal line from upper right to down left. This one stands out from other alp photos. Stitching errors should be fixed though. --Cart (talk) 08:53, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
Comment - Do fix the stitching errors. Also, I'm assuming where there are dark circles, none of them are dust spots, but if they are (such as all the way to the left a bit of the way down the mountain in the snow), correct those, too. I'll be happy to support when you make the fixes, as the composition is good and the resolution is amazing. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:57, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
Done @Ikan Kekek: I fixed the stitching errors. I don't see/understand which circles, could you please put a note. Thanks for your comment --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 12:58, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
- @Moroder: please clone out all of the wire, there are multiple faint ghosts of it left. – Lucas 13:29, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
- @Lucasbosch: I think that's already done. In case please live a note. Thanks --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 13:58, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
- @Moroder: I added two notes, there is one well visible ghost and another very faint one below that. – Lucas 14:01, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
- Done Thanks --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 15:00, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
- Support Another good one. I agree with Cart, the composition is really interesting here. Cmao20 (talk) 15:02, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
- Support --Cayambe (talk) 21:42, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
- Support - I marked one possible dust spot. Also, the sky is subtly blotchy and posterized in places. But overall, this photo is a great achievement, IMO. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:31, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
- Done Thanks --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 09:44, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
- Support--BoothSift 03:57, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
- Support I can't get Cart's interpretation out of my mind. Daniel Case (talk) 18:37, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
- I'm doing the Jedi mind-trick.
--Cart (talk) 19:36, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
- Can't you do it on Lucas? ;-) --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 07:21, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
- I'm doing the Jedi mind-trick.
- Oppose It's rare for backlit midday lighting to produce a compelling atmosphere, and this is no exception. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:49, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 05:03, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose poor light Charles (talk) 09:10, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
- Support -- EATCHA (talk) 04:46, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
- Support Wow! 😄 ArionEstar 😜 01:08, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose per Lucas. -- Karelj (talk) 07:58, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places
