Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Årstaberg September 2014.jpg

File:Årstaberg September 2014.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Dec 2014 at 07:25:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Årstaberg September 2014.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Årstaberg September 2014.jpg

•  Info Two X60 commuter train (pendeltåg) at Årstaberg commuer train station, Stockholm. Created, uploaded and nominated by -- Arild Vågen (talk) 07:25, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
•  Support -- ArildV (talk) 07:25, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Trains are blurred :-)) --P e z i (talk) 14:19, 3 December 2014 (UTC) confirmed vote after new upload. --P e z i (talk) 15:46, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Its nine watch! Such watch! --Hubertl (talk) 22:54, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
•  Comment Concept is brilliant, but there are some oddities for me. The crop does not maximize the use of leading lines. I can't wrap my head around the differences in height of the trains as well as the apparent asymmetry on the ground. Saffron Blaze (talk) 23:37, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Saffron Blaze Thanks for your comment and appreciation of the concept. I think the problem is that it is a curved platform (and hence the difference in height). So it does not help that the camera is centered (relative to the platform). I dont know if there's any better solution?--ArildV (talk) 23:45, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
    •  Comment First of all: I like it like it is! Just try to cut 400px from left and have a look at the result ... --P e z i (talk) 10:14, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
      •  Done--ArildV (talk) 15:24, 4 December 2014 (UTC) @P e z i, Hubertl, Saffron Blaze, ProfesorFavalli, and King of Hearts: @Martin Falbisoner and Christian Ferrer:

•  Support How strange. I could see what was wrong, but couldn't see the edit. The suggestion by Pezi did the trick. Saffron Blaze (talk) 23:39, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

•  Support · Favalli ⟡ 03:33, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
•  Support A rare catch: two trains at once! --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:32, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
•  Support -- ChristianFerrer 06:24, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
• strong  Support I like the picture very much - wow! --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 08:22, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
• strong  Oppose Two trains passing a trainstation isn't that spectacular. Kleuske (talk) 14:34, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Thats true. But, if you look closer, they are passing the station at the same time! ;-) --Hubertl (talk) 15:47, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
•  Enthusiastic support I love the way that, at theumbnail, it looks so clean and elegant and modern, but then when you look at in full resolution you see all the graffitti. Daniel Case (talk) 18:58, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Yann (talk) 09:59, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
•  Support --JLPC (talk) 15:36, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose Nothing extraordinary here for me. There is a dead pixel at left. The blue flares are a problem, and I don't find the picture really sharp.--Jebulon (talk) 20:03, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
  •  Comment The "dead pixel" is at least 5×4 pixels in size on my monitor, and it’s not really rectangular. I suspect there really was something bright. 2 seconds is long enough to capture bright stars, looking north-east it could be Capella. --Kreuzschnabel 20:51, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
•  Question Are the lights green? I would expect the whole scene to be less green... but then I saw that the clock is correctly white. Why do they have green lights? --99of9 (talk) 03:32, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
  • To be honest I'm not sure regarding green light (maybe grey-green lampshades?). Regarding the dead pixel, I think Kreuz is right. I have been using this camera body for over 2 year and never had problems with dead pixels.--ArildV (talk) 14:13, 12 December 2014 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Poco² 10:15, 14 December 2014 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors