Commons:Deletion requests/mobile tracking/archive/2019-52

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused random photo with nonsense description, no context/location, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   18:47, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:43, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   19:38, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:54, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Extended content
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo(s), out of scope.

(Talk/留言) 04:08, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: F10. --1989 (talk) 06:59, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo(s), out of scope.

Minorax (talk) 13:51, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: F10. --1989 (talk) 02:37, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo(s), out of scope.

Minorax (talk) 12:25, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: F10. --1989 (talk) 23:19, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo(s), out of scope.

Minoraxtalk (formerly 大诺史) 17:07, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: F10. --1989 (talk) 17:12, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo(s), out of scope.

Minoraxtalk (formerly 大诺史) 15:51, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:45, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo(s), out of scope.

Minoraxtalk 03:41, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:44, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Official symbol. Proper license tag should be used if it's in public domain. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:27, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:10, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:28, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 14:04, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused blurry image of subject with unestablished notability. --Animalparty (talk) 17:11, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:06, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personality rights, need written permission from guardians of the kids Lucifer our Lord (Talk to satanist) 17:28, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Ianal — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lucifer our Lord (talk • contribs) 03:07, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Per Jmabel. --Storkk (talk) 09:58, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Extended content
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo(s), out of scope.

(Talk/留言) 04:08, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: F10. --1989 (talk) 06:59, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo(s), out of scope.

Minorax (talk) 13:51, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: F10. --1989 (talk) 02:37, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo(s), out of scope.

Minorax (talk) 12:25, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: F10. --1989 (talk) 23:19, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo(s), out of scope.

Minoraxtalk (formerly 大诺史) 17:07, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: F10. --1989 (talk) 17:12, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo(s), out of scope.

Minoraxtalk (formerly 大诺史) 15:51, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:45, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo(s), out of scope.

Minoraxtalk 03:41, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:44, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:40, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:32, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

False claim of ownership of picture and illegal use of image......... Copyright has been removed/cut out of actual image. Actual image belongs to Ingve/Wielheesen Sleddog Image Archives and no permission was asked nor given to use this image. 76.25.118.159 21:34, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment Proof of rightful ownership and copyright submitted to legal department of Wiki Foundation. This Togo photograph was cropped from an photograph that is NOT in public domain, but belongs to a private collection and was digitally restored and enhanced. Therefore, there is a legimate copyright holder. Not only was Togo image stolen from this copyrighted photograph, but also its ownership is falsely claimed by Wynland Morris, who posted it on WikiMedia Commons. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.25.118.159 (talk • contribs) 03:50, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • The information on the file description page is clearly wrong, I think we can all agree there. The only source I could find that provided more information than what's on the file description page is https://www.baltostruestory.net/togo.htm. That claims that the photo was taken in 1925, after the serum run. Assuming that is correct and that the photo was published in the US soon after it was taken, the original photo will enter the public domain on 1 January 2021. For that full length of protection, the copyright holder would have had to renew the copyright. While renewal is unlikely, US Copyright Office records for the time at hand are not digitized, so it is difficult to verify that protection has expired until next year. As far as any restorations go, I don't have access to the ticket at hand, so I can only speak generally. Restorations that don't involve colorization typically aren't original enough to recieve copyright protection. If there was detail added, that might qualify, if it makes the new image distinguishable from the [preexisting] work in some meaningful way.” Schrock v. Learning Curve International, Inc., 586 F.3d 513, 521 (7th Cir. 2009). The last person to look at it couldn't see a significant difference, but I'll leave it to those who can see both images to determine that.  Delete the image for now per COM:PCP (no author, copyright protection may not have expired), with a good possibility of being able to Undelete in 2021. I'd like to have a better original source before doing that though. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 02:33, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • I've now had a chance to review some of the additional information. The restored image does contain some new copyrightable elements, but none of them appear to have made it into the Commons image due to cropping. They date the image to 1926, which would put us to 2022 at the earliest. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 03:25, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment This photo is most likely from 1926-04-26, meaning the original might be protected by copyright until at least 2022-01-01, unless the author died prior to 1950 and it was unpublished prior to the archive's publication. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 03:12, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted per nom. False license, false source. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:06, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image was taken from this website and the image is downloaded and croup from this link [1] ~'Sourav 03:51, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion, the image was uploaded in here back in 2014 but the source you have provided was from 2018. ~ Nahid Talk 10:38, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Avdhesh paliwal (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Screenshots.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:30, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. --P 1 9 9   16:17, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused file. Photo of a stone with no meaningful explanation. No neducational use. Malcolma (talk) 13:26, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Done. Without a meaningful description and categories this falls out of scope. Thuresson (talk) 02:34, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused low-quality image of a sports jersey, no context, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   17:00, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 09:44, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Halmontaller (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of project scope

Didym (talk) 21:16, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of COM:SCOPE. - FitIndia Talk Mail 13:18, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Didym (talk) 21:17, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Done. Photo of unknown person. This is uploader's only contribution to any Wikimedia project. Thuresson (talk) 02:58, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]