Commons:Deletion requests/mobile tracking/archive/2016-13

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope (no educational use), unclear copyright situation ireas (talk) 17:36, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:47, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Wisneyo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unclear copyright status, out of COM:SCOPE.

Steinsplitter (talk) 19:33, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 13:16, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 07:35, 3 April 2016 (UTC) Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.[reply]

Ies (talk) 07:38, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 07:59, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 08:01, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 11:04, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Wisneyo (talk · contribs) (2)

[edit]

Pokéfan95's request

[edit]

Out of project scope, Commons is not a private photo album. Also a Wikipedia Zero upload.

Poké95 09:42, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Gunnex's request

[edit]

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used (Wikipedia Zero upload). Uploader blocked on testwiki.

Gunnex (talk) 06:57, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Also:

and all further uploads by this user. See also logs. Block already requested. Gunnex (talk) 08:43, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jim. Poké95 06:07, 20 April 2016 (UTC) (non-admin close)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Wisneyo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope

Davey2010Talk 03:21, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: speedy. ~riley (talk) 03:33, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-notable artwork, see COM:SCOPE. Riley Huntley (talk) 05:04, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 04:59, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE, unused personal image of non-notable person(s). Note: Commons is not Facebook. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:23, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted by Krd: copyright violation and/or obviously out of project scope

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Wisneyo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unclear copyright status, out of COM:SCOPE.

Steinsplitter (talk) 19:33, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 13:16, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 07:35, 3 April 2016 (UTC) Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.[reply]

Ies (talk) 07:38, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 07:59, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 08:01, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 11:04, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Wisneyo (talk · contribs) (2)

[edit]

Pokéfan95's request

[edit]

Out of project scope, Commons is not a private photo album. Also a Wikipedia Zero upload.

Poké95 09:42, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Gunnex's request

[edit]

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used (Wikipedia Zero upload). Uploader blocked on testwiki.

Gunnex (talk) 06:57, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Also:

and all further uploads by this user. See also logs. Block already requested. Gunnex (talk) 08:43, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jim. Poké95 06:07, 20 April 2016 (UTC) (non-admin close)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Wisneyo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope

Davey2010Talk 03:21, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: speedy. ~riley (talk) 03:33, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

These seem to be out of scope.

Stefan2 (talk) 01:33, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 13:40, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, missing permission Jcb (talk) 14:21, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: it's most likely one of those option, going for out of scope. --Basvb (talk) 19:09, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW issues Steinsplitter (talk) 17:42, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:01, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Krd 07:02, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:28, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no description, so no educational purpose Avron (talk) 17:12, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:22, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

it's dublicate Visem (talk) 19:28, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:02, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unidentified road, low quality. Stefan2 (talk) 13:09, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, even if identified, the file has still low quality. Taivo (talk) 09:19, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 20:12, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:42, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Эта работа не может быть собственной работой User:Tttttttdjhgh, так как маленькое изображение значка увеличивала и корректировала я для своего сайта, использована картинка с сайта http://chernobylpeople.ucoz.ua/publ/chernobyl/o_gorode/o_gorode/15-1-0-10 Natis (talk) 22:03, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:26, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 04:32, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:25, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]