Commons:Deletion requests/Template:PolishSenateCopyright

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Template:PolishSenateCopyright

[edit]

In fact, I could not find a permission at all on this web site. Moreover, I advise that Commons should accept only pictures for which the source web site displays a clear CC license tag (or has an equivalent release boilerplate for a standard, non-home-brew license). --Rtc 07:03, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • they have changed Senate website in February 2007. Keep, with stipulation as in Commons:Deletion requests/Template:SejmCopyright. Rules in both chambers of Polish Parliament are similiar. Julo 12:14, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    • The license was clarified, not changed. The current terms have always been in effect and had merely been described in a less explicit way before. --Rtc 12:43, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • This situation is different from Sejm. We haven't actually got any permission text! Where it can be found and verified? Delete because it's unverifyable. A.J. 05:29, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    • No, it is not different. The law regarding both chambers of Polish Parliament is equivalent. In fact, webmaster of Senate website forgot to put informations about terms of use. Keep this template and add there "obsolete", as in Sejm-template. Julo 19:24, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
      • Rtc says otherwise, that on Sejm's site they forgot to put "non-derivative" or "non-commercial" phrase... So let's do not talk about what should be written, but what IS written. Another curious thing: Polish version of this template [1] mentions GFDL license! I'm going to have serius conversation with Ausir about that... A.J. 20:39, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
        • I think I e-mailed them and asked about GFDL and they were OK with licensing all Senate images under GFDL, but sadly it was a long time ago, and I can't find the e-mail. Ausir 21:06, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Update: I actually did find it. Here's the entire correspondence:

Witam,
Jestem jednym z redaktorów Wikipedii, wolnej encyklopedii internetowej ( http://pl.wikipedia.org ). Piszę z pytaniem, czy możliwe byłoby wykorzystanie zdjęć senatorów ze strony Senatu w naszej encyklopedii? Wymagałoby to udostępnienia ich na licencji GNU FDL, która pozwala na ich dowolne użycie i rozpowszechnianie pod warunkiem podania ich autora/źródła (w tym wypadku byłby to link do strony Senatu).
Z góry dziękuję za odpowiedź.
Pozdrawiam,
Paweł Dembowski
Szanowny Panie,
Kancelaria Senatu jest wlascicielem praw autorskich fotografii senatorow zamieszczanych na stronach www.senat.gov.pl. Nie zglaszamy zadnego sprzeciwu jesli ktos wykorzystuje nasze zdjecia czy informacje na swoich stronach (bardzo milo jest jesli zgodnie z dobrym obyczajem i prawem podaje zrodlo). Encyklopedie sa waznym i potrzebnym zrodlem informacji - tym bardziej wyrazamy zgode na publikowanie i udostepnianie zdjec senatorow ze strony Senatu.
Serdecznie pozdrawiam
Andrzej Andruszkiewicz
Dzial Internetu
Witam,
Dziekuje bardzo za pozwolenie na uzycie zdjec w naszej encyklopedii. Zeby jednak sprawa byla calkiem jasna, musze dodac, ze cala tresc Wikipedii (w tym zdjecia) udostepniona musi byc na Licencji Wolnej Dokumentacji GNU ( http://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/GFDL ) lub kompatybilnej z nia licencji, ktora pozwala na uzycie objetych nia tresci nie tylko w Wikipedii, ale takze na dowolne uzycie i rozpowszechnianie (rowniez komercyjne), pod warunkiem podania informacji o wlascicielach praw autorskich do danego zdjecia oraz pod warunkiem udostepnienia dziela, w ktorym objete ta licencja dziela bylyby uzyte rowniez na tej samej licencji. Dlatego tez nasza encyklopedia jest nie tylko darmowa, ale rowniez wolna. Czy zgadzacie sie wiec Panstwo rowniez na udostepnienie zdjec na licencji GNU, czy tylko na umieszczenie ich w Wikipedii? Jesli to drugie, to niestety nie bedziemy mogli ich uzyc.
Z gory dziekuje za odpowiedz.
Pozdrawiam,
Pawel Dembowski
Szanowny Panie,
Udzielajac Panstwu zgode na uzycie fotografii bralismy pod uwage filozofie licencji GNU. Na wszelki wypadek, po Pana e-liscie, jeszcze raz skonsultowalem z prawnikiem te kwestie. Nie mamy zastrzezen by zdjecia byly udostepniane na licencji GNU.
Pozdrawiam
Andrzej Andruszkiewicz
DI

In summary, I first asked if it would be OK for us to put the images from Senate website on Wikipedia under GFDL, the guy said that they are copyrighted by the Senate and that they do not object for them to be used by anyone anywhere as long as they are attributed to them, and especially in encyclopedia, I asked once again about GFDL, explaining the terms of the license and the possible commercial use of the photos, he answered that yes, they are aware of the GNU philosophy and that he consulted with a lawyer about it, and confirmed that they do release them under GFDL. When creating this template I mistakenly copied the Sejm one instead of putting GFDL in this one and didn't remember about it until now. Ausir 21:06, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

withdrawn. --Rtc 21:27, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Template:PolishSenateCopyright replacing

[edit]

As I know, there is a cooperation project of Senate of the Republic of Poland with Wikimedia Polska and template {{Polish Senate partnership}}. Therefore, in Commons is parallelly deprecated template {{PolishSenateCopyright}}, which should be deleted and repladced by {{Polish Senate partnership}}. Category:PolishSenateCopyright will be deleted with this template. 87.205.196.227 17:25, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The template is a valid license tag and is being used. We can not replace it with {{Polish Senate partnership}}, they serve different purposes. --Jarekt (talk) 17:36, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Deletion_requests/Template:PolishSenateCopyright&oldid=123485040"