Commons:Deletion requests/New York City Subway bullets
This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
New York City Subway bullets
[edit]- File:NYCS-bull-trans-A.svg
- File:NYCS-bull-trans-B.svg
- File:NYCS-bull-trans-C.svg
- File:NYCS-bull-trans-D.svg
- File:NYCS-bull-trans-E.svg
- File:NYCS-bull-trans-F.svg
- File:NYCS-bull-trans-G.svg
- File:NYCS-bull-trans-J.svg
- File:NYCS-bull-trans-L.svg
- File:NYCS-bull-trans-M.svg
- File:NYCS-bull-trans-M-orange.svg
- File:NYCS-bull-trans-N.svg
- File:NYCS-bull-trans-Q.svg
- File:NYCS-bull-trans-R.svg
- File:NYCS-bull-trans-S.svg
- File:NYCS-bull-trans-T.svg
- File:NYCS-bull-trans-V.svg
- File:NYCS-bull-trans-W.svg
- File:NYCS-bull-trans-Z.svg
- File:NYCS-bull-trans-1.svg
- File:NYCS-bull-trans-2.svg
- File:NYCS-bull-trans-3.svg
- File:NYCS-bull-trans-4.svg
- File:NYCS-bull-trans-5.svg
- File:NYCS-bull-trans-6.svg
- File:NYCS-bull-trans-6d.svg
- File:NYCS-bull-trans-7.svg
- File:NYCS-bull-trans-7d.svg
- File:NYCS-bull-trans-9.svg
The New York MTA claims that it owns the licenses to its logos and symbols, of which the subway bullets are a part of. Regardless of whether they are correct or not, the MTA has been vigorously defending their intellectual property,[1][2] and to see the bullets on non-New York City Subway pages is alarming.[3][4] I am nominating the bullets that are currently in use, have been used in the past 10 years (the 9) or about to or proposed to be used (the orange M and the T). (There are other variations in Category:New York City Subway bullets that I am not nominating at this time.) The images should be fine under fair use. --TLK in 3 (talk) 05:21, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
- Keep I would say that they can all be keept becaue of simple design. See also here. Amada44 (talk) 07:34, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
- Keep As per above, far to simple for copyright.--Svgalbertian (talk) 15:35, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
- Keep Quite clearly too simple for copyright eligibility. MTA's claims of copyright are frankly... sad. Jujutacular T · C 15:52, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
- Keep They're letters or numbers in the middle of a simple geometric shape. No copyrightable claim.--Prosfilaes (talk) 17:29, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
- Keep Seems to me that that {{PD-ineligible}} would apply. --ChrisRuvolo (t) 17:40, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
- Comment would it help to make our case and increase their usefulness by moving them to generic names, like Bullet_W_Yellow_circle.svg? On the other hand, moving them would be non-trivial.--Prosfilaes (talk) 17:47, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
- Keep. The bullets are so simple that they are public domain. Putting a letter or number in a circle or diamond is not enough to declare authorship. —Imdanumber1 ( local | logs | global ) 18:51, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
- Keep per so many reasons already listed, especially the one given by Prosfilaes. What's next? Is P. C. Richard & Son going to sue the Famous Tate appliance & bedding chain in the Tampa Bay area because they both use the same typeface? ----69.117.255.50 21:32, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
- Sorry, I got logged off my PC. I reiterate; KEEP.----DanTD (talk) 21:35, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
- Comment After absorbing everything that was said here, I agree the combination of shape, color and text is simple enough to not allow a claim of copyright, one of the simplest combos there is. I would suggest the tags be changed from the current {{PD-text}} to {{PD-ineligible}} because the color is also an important element. I also suggest adding the tag {{Trademarked}}, if the MTA's trademark claim is valid. (Full disclosure: I am planning to write a mobile app regarding NYC public transportation
and I will ask the MTA for the rights to use its bullets, among other images.At one point I plan to integrate Wikipedia text into the app, and in doing so, I want to be sure that Wikipedia will have no liability from using the bullet images. For example, if I incorporate the article en:34th Street – Penn Station (IND Eighth Avenue Line) into the mobile app, I want Wikipedia to be free of trademarking liabilities due to the bullets in the infobox. Plus, I am also a significant editor of the infobox!) This should be enough to close the debate and keep the images, but the tags should be edited. --TLK in 3 (talk) 21:41, 21 June 2010 (UTC)- I still support closure as directed above. (I would do it myself as a non-admin but I'm busy at the moment.) I'm just adding a comment that I will not seek to use the MTA's intellectual property because the rights are too expensive. But I strongly suggest adding the trademark tag as it's appropriate here. TLK in 3 (talk) 07:57, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
- Keep This file can be useful in a userbox. Please, do not delete it. Luispihormiguero (talk) 21:34, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
- Can't you create and use another similar file that will not infringe on the MTA's trademark? Like, the letter "G" in a red circle for the gaming infobox above (if that in itself is not trademarked)? TLK in 3 (talk) 07:57, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
- No use in a Gaming Userbox could possibly infringe on the MTA's trademark. Trademarks are limited by field. The MTA does have a trademark (76534147) on the G in white on a green circle (check out http://www.uspto.gov/index.jsp for details) and presumably others, but that's only in their field.--Prosfilaes (talk) 12:21, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
- Can't you create and use another similar file that will not infringe on the MTA's trademark? Like, the letter "G" in a red circle for the gaming infobox above (if that in itself is not trademarked)? TLK in 3 (talk) 07:57, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
- Keep {{PD-ineligible}} or {{PD-geometry}} Kyro (talk) 14:28, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
Kept. TLK (or anyone) is welcome to improve the tags on the images. 99of9 (talk) 04:59, 27 June 2010 (UTC)