Commons:Deletion requests/Images of Pirat

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Images of Pirat

[edit]
[edit]

Low quality images

[edit]

I believe that User:Pirat's images are likely copyright violations. The image quality is too high for just any old user. They are either a really good amateur photographer with attractive friends who run around in the nude, or copyright violations. There are other images that are low resolution that look like they were created in microsoft paint.-Optigan13 02:17, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • These four Low quality images - self-made drawings - are typical Original Research and should be Delete d. Julo 06:55, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Please Keep Me! Is it all deletion? No kidding! Besides, there are two reasons.Because one of reasons is good.Because another reason is too clumsy.Though is interesting; the all deletion a little.I do not see the Internet, each other's faces here.More at first than doubting a person I will believe each other.--Pirat 16:23, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Is there a chance, that you will meet one of your friends again, for example reading a newspaper of next week. She must not show her breasts ;.) Mutter Erde 19:01, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Perfect idea! It would be proof and test of veracity. Julo 20:22, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DeleteLooks like copyvio to me.--Lamilli 18:09, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Some images may be things which himself really made. Low quality images....It be assumed that this does not matter.

Copyright violations. Some images may not need to delete it. For example that Breasts001en.jpg,Breasts003.jpg,Breasts002.jpg,Breasts001.jpg,Trip Season.jpg,Breast Lang Ja.jpg,Breach0401.jpg.These images resemble closely I do not understand whether an image without a face which photographed whom. Such a photograph is common.But had better others Delete.

Keep Breasts001en.jpg,Breasts003.jpg,Breasts002.jpg,Breasts001.jpg,Trip Season.jpg,Breast Lang Ja.jpg,Breach0401.jpg.AB Members in Prisons of States US MAP.jpg--El torero 04:31, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment I think this was quite a bad idea to start a mass deletion for all of those pictures. Some are clearly connected (the nude that might be copyvios) but some other files are concerned by different cases (maps, drawings...). I think we can delete all the nudes (some details of Image:Circle and an Lady.jpg are quite strange...) but we have to treat the rest separately. For instance there's no reason to delete the page nudity since it could become an interesting gallery. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 12:35, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
     CommentThe connection was the uploader, all of the images were tagged as self-made, which I don't think is legitimate, especially with the image you noticed(Circle and an Lady) which appears to have a website name/watermark blurred out around the bottom. The drawings are legitimately self-made, but are derivative of copyrighted work(simpsons) and I doubt will ever be of any use on any wikimedia projects. Also I don't see what the Nudity page adds that Category:Nudity doesn't already sort out. The nudity page only appears to be a collection of female nudes based on personal preference. Especially since the intial header was "Hot Gallery"[1], and was moved to the main space under this user's name as Pirat's favorite pictures[2]. -Optigan13 00:45, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete I agree with the suggestion that most, if not all of these images are copyright violations and so, since we should err on the side of caution, all should be deleted unless the situation is clarified. Adambro 19:28, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep with caution I'm having a hard time believing that all of these are copyvio, but some of them probably are. throw the copyvio ones away and keep the rest.72.81.226.247 02:08, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete EXCEPT for Nudity which is valid (even if it must be changed)--and I if it is to be deleted should have its own deleition request since it's vastly different than the other requests and should not have been lumped in. Also, the 4 "Low quality images" should be deleted as out of scope original research rather than copyright violations. If Pirat can come up with some plausible explanation about why they are all different cops sizes and have no EXIF data then maybe this can be reversed. gren 11:23, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. except image:AB Members in Prisons of States US MAP.jpg and Nudity. Please file separate deletion requests for those if you think they should have been deleted to. Finn Rindahl 11:29, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]