Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by NuManDavid
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by NuManDavid (talk · contribs)
[edit]Commons is not an amateur porn site
- File:Husband and Wife, Doggy-style, Vaginal and Anal.png
- File:Wife Sucks Husband.png
- File:During Rear-entery Sex, Woman Is Anally Fingered.png
- File:Anal Masturbation During Intercourse.png
- File:Couple having anal sex in the forest.png
- File:Male standing left nude in locker-room.png
- File:Male in briefs in locker-room.png
- File:Male standing right nude in locker-room.png
Dronebogus (talk) 04:54, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- == I do not believe these are porn because of intention ==
- Not all the pictures are the same:
- Husband and wife, Wife sucks, During rear-entery, Anal masturbation, Couple having are photos of sex or sex acts; however, they're shared images of heterosexual acts involving a husband and wife for visual documentation/learning. Webster defines pornography as, depiction of erotic behavior (as in pictures or writing) intended to cause sexual excitement. It is not my intention to cause sexual excitement. It is my intention to document sexual acts for visual learning/education.
- Male standing left, Male standing in briefs, Male standing right are photos of an overweight, adult, Caucasian, male in an American Locker-room changing. These are visual representations of an event in the normal American routine.
- Not unlike Forward and Right View of Foreskin Restoration which depicts a male penis for documentation/learning purposes. NuManDavid (talk) 18:39, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Moreover look at this porn and at this porn. If one called that porn, I would agree and yet they're on here. NuManDavid (talk) 21:09, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Your nominated images represent common subjects we already have lots of images of. I did not nominate those that actually show useful information, like the ones on foreskin restoration. I don’t know why you’re citing the only two quality videos of gay anal sex on Commons in contrast to your low-quality heterosexual pics, unless it’s to come across as homophobic. Dronebogus (talk) 00:55, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- How do I report you for name calling and bad faith comments? NuManDavid (talk) 02:54, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Your nominated images represent common subjects we already have lots of images of. I did not nominate those that actually show useful information, like the ones on foreskin restoration. I don’t know why you’re citing the only two quality videos of gay anal sex on Commons in contrast to your low-quality heterosexual pics, unless it’s to come across as homophobic. Dronebogus (talk) 00:55, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Moreover look at this porn and at this porn. If one called that porn, I would agree and yet they're on here. NuManDavid (talk) 21:09, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 07:38, 14 May 2024 (UTC)