Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by MB298

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by MB298 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

For the Princess Kathleen images, born1945 specifically states it was his father that took them. MB298 (talk) 23:41, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: , but I think it is safe to assume that the Flickr user is his or her father's heir. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:20, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by MB298 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Protest signs, paper mache and metal cut out statues, containing either original artwork or derivative works. These were uploaded from Flickr as part of a group, and do not appear to able to be retained by Commons due to COM:DW and COM:FOP.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:04, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Looking at those protest signs. They do not seem, kind of creations one would claim copyrights for, that was not the intend. They were indented to be copied, shared and spread. Many would be {{PD-rext}} and most would fall under case #1 of Commons:De_minimis#United_States. To me the main copyright is the photographers copyright and that one is clearly OK. --Jarekt (talk) 17:25, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: File:March For Our Lives 2018 - San Francisco (3687).jpg was not uploaded by User:MB298 from a Flickr set. It was uploaded by me from a set of photos I took at that event. --Varnent (talk)(COI) 19:39, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I, as uploader, support the deletion, but not for the reasons said – I transferred all Boston images before realizing they had been transferred already, so they are duplicates. MB298 (talk) 19:44, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
MB298, I do not see any duplicated Boston images. But I see duplicates in San Francisco data set. How did that happen? I thought the software prevented us from uploading duplicates. --Jarekt (talk) 12:35, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Jarekt: for example File:March for Our Lives Boston 2018 (26136333017).jpg is a duplicate of File:March for Our Lives Boston 2018 - 201.jpg. MB298 (talk) 22:12, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I disagree that the photographer has copyright to hand made signs by a multitude of people, and particularly not to the signs which incorporate images derived from other sources. I do not think that the intent of the COM:DW is to permit anyone to go outside in the US and take photos of personal artworks on temporary display, or being held on temporary display. I am pointing out the display factor as some of these signs were placed against a fence prior to being photographed. This is no different than an art show by students (which we've deleted), or other groups of artwork photographed without permission by photographers who happened to be there. Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:46, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep we are responsible administrators thus I want to believe that we are able to distinguish between 'aim of a protest' and 'copyright issue'. It's a demonstration, not an art vernissage, and historically demonstrations have been held just because press and public talked about them and spread them: the demonstration is a fact and a piece of news itself (meaning that it's held just because it becomes a piece of news, if there were no press and cameras to portrait it there wouldn't be any demonstration). On the (questionable, in these cases) ground of copyright issues almost every demonstration photograph should be banned here. -- SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 14:37, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Remind everyone that copyright has nothing to do with protest, its validity or lack there of. The problem here is images copied from other places and messages to which the photographer does not hold copyright. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:41, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: All of the photos were clearly focussed on the protest signs. Most of those signs had either photos or drawings on them that exceed the threshold of originality. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 10:02, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_uploaded_by_MB298&oldid=680007816"