Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Eruedin

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Eruedin (talk · contribs)

[edit]

copyright violation; neither the photos nor the texts are public domain.

Martin Sg. (talk) 17:17, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have compared the three front pages of three daily newspapers that have been discontinued for decades with other published front pages of newspapers (Brüsseler Zeitung, Sport, Rhein-Ems-Zeitung, Aargauer Volksblatt). For the time being, this raises a few questions for me. With the help of the answers, I then hope to put the situation in order so that the pictures do not have to be deleted. Thi pictures are not about texts or photographs, but about newspapers.
- Does a newspaper page that has been compiled daily according to criteria such as existing articles, available space by the editors and the printers reach the level of creation (Schöpfungshöhe) under Swiss law (since the newspapers were produced in Switzerland)? In the case of various similar images, it is explicitly stated that they are "Zeitungsausschnitt, keine Schöpfungshöhe". "(Newspaper clipping, no creative merit. )
- would the pictures be unproblematic if they were cut off at the bottom - as in certain other cases - and did not show the whole page?
- In my opinion, the articles can at most be guessed at, rather than really read, which is why I don't see any copyright infringement there - if it is nevertheless an infringement, would it be unproblematic if, of the four formats, the largest one was removed and only the smaller ones were left, in which, even with a good will, nothing more of the text can be guessed at apart from the titles?
- In the case of the Italian-language newspaper, the rights holder still exists. I can ask for permission there. Is there a standardised procedure?
- In the case of the two German-language pictures, the rights holder has expired. According to the oral statements of a shareholder of the newspaper, the situation was so desolate when it ceased publication in 1991 that not even the subscriber base could be sold - let alone any copyrights to newspaper articles that had already appeared. The liquidator himself died two years ago and can no longer give any information. How should one proceed with expired rights?
- Or are these candidates that are problematic on Commons but could exist on de:? Since they illustrate articles on de: could they then be moved to de:? — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2A02:200:2E00:B400:4BCD:EA4F:EE26:8544 (talk) 23:07, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Eruedin (talk) 23:08, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:43, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]