Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by EnergyAnalyst1

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by EnergyAnalyst1 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused charts and diagrams. Should be in tabular data, MediaWiki graph or SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:48, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Eugene Zelenko, We've identified these International Energy Agency resources as material that we think would add value to energy security and clean energy topics on Wikipedia. For those graphics that haven't yet been used on a specific article, we intend to use them soon. These uploads are part of a special effort by the IEA to provide selected content under a CC BY 4.0 license. We have noticed a lack of up-to-date data and graphics in a lot of related pages, and part of our goal is to make these resources available to any editors who are contributing in the energy/transition space. --EnergyAnalyst1 (talk) 09:24, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep This is very well in scope. Sure, they would be better as SVG, but who would create these? Yann (talk) 11:19, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Indeed in scope. Agree with Yann that there could be more optimal versions (like svg) but it is still very useful. //Tanzania (talk) 14:42, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep a clear educational benefit and use case for these images, some images are already being used. John Cummings (talk) 14:47, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep clearly in scope, like any other materials produced by high-reputation institutions, of high educational use, Sadads (talk) 15:10, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Very useful images, clearly within the definition of scope and much potential for benefit EriedgenArc (talk) 15:25, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep in scope and only recently uploaded, need to give editors more time to incorporate them into articles. Zeromonk (talk) 16:26, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Very useful. Could have a better quality, but no reason to delete those. Nadzik (talk) 18:35, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Jumping in to say I'm also working on getting higher quality versions of these up. Thanks all. EnergyAnalyst1 (talk) 08:40, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Within scope. Lirazelf (talk) 15:28, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 16:23, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]