Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by DiscoDanner

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by DiscoDanner (talk · contribs)

The license for these pages is "Except when specifically stated on a legislative page, anyone may view, copy, or distribute information found on a legislative website for personal or nonprofit use. A person or entity may not use any part of the information on a legislative website for commercial purposes or publish the information for commercial gain without proper attribution of source.". Does "without proper attribution of source" apply to both "the information on a legislative website for commercial purposes" and "publish the information for commercial gain", or only the latter? Is this acceptable for Commons?

• File:Jon Applebaum.jpg
• File:Patty Acomb.jpg
• File:Kurt Daudt5.jpg
• File:Melissa Hortman.jpg
• File:Bobby Joe Champion.jpg
• File:Kari Dziedzic.jpg
• File:Gen Olson.jpg
• File:David Osmek.jpg
• File:Connie Doepke.jpg
• File:Cindy Pugh.jpg
• File:Kelly Morrison 2023.jpg

—‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 13:25, 30 January 2023 (UTC)

•  Keep Yes, a requirement of attribution is perfectly in keeping with Creative Commons Copyleft. Such a license is fine. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:06, 30 January 2023 (UTC)

  @Ikan Kekek Agreed. I'm asking whether it's says "A person or entity may not use any part of the information on a legislative website (for commercial purposes) or (publish the information for commercial gain without proper attribution of source)" or "A person or entity may not use any part of the information on a legislative website ((for commercial purposes) or (publish the information for commercial gain)) without proper attribution of source". —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:24, 1 July 2023 (UTC)

•  Question Is publishing a photo on a legislative website for commercial purposes ever done? Requiring attribution for any kind of publication is perfectly fine. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:45, 1 July 2023 (UTC)

---

Kept: Statement is fine, merely a cringe worded demand for attribution, which is fine. --Natuur12 (talk) 19:09, 27 July 2023 (UTC)