Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Донор

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.


Files uploaded by Донор (talk · contribs)

[edit]

In exif as author set www.donor-tiras-biz.livejournal.com and www.donor.tiras.biz. Donor.tiras.biz also set on file names. No permission on these sites.

Before deletion, wait for OTRS. --Wuyouyuan (talk) 08:35, 18 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Art-top (talk) 19:52, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Question Did anything arrive at the OTRS-team? --High Contrast (talk) 09:30, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 01:02, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Донор (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No evidence that the uploader is the copyright owner of the image on the package(s).
(Derivative work of copyrighted image/artwork.)
If the images on the package is PD for any reason (like age or shape), that should be specified by using {{Licensed-PD}}.

(tJosve05a (c) 15:02, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep. As specified at the page of the uploaded User:Донор, one should read this post in the blog from which the images stem from. This post specifies that all images are released under Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license. It is also obvious from this post and from the userpage that the uploaded Донор and the "donor_tiras_biz" blog owner is the same person. Many images uploaded by this user were already deleted once and then restored, as the status was clarified. --Off-shell (talk) 22:17, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    • No, that is about the copyright of 'the photos', not the artwork on the packages (which is a separate copyright) from what I can tell. (tJosve05a (c)
@Josve05a: please read this: {{PD-PMR-exempt}}
And also you may read this: {{FoP-Moldova}}
This information about licensing can be applicable to food produced in Transnistria and in Moldova. That is applies to the following photographs:
Transnistria:
File:Мука высшего сорта Бендерского КХП - Донор.JPG
File:Горошек зелёный - Донор.JPG
File:Зелёный горошек фирмы Рустас - Донор.JPG
File:Горошек зелёный - Завод консервов детского питания - Донор.JPG
File:Сок Яблочный осветлённый - Донор.JPG
File:Икра из кабачков - Донор.JPG
File:Масло Крестьянское - Донор.JPG
File:Масло Столичное - Донор.JPG
Moldova:
File:Масло Unt - Донор.JPG
File:Соки Молдавии - Донор.JPG
File:Повидло яблочное и яблочно-сливовое - Донор.JPG
With best regards, Донор () 16:53, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
FoP only applies for permanently placed artworks and/or buildings, not food packages. PD-PMR-exempt does not appliy either, since it is not unknown who is the copyright owners (the companies selling the product), nor part of a law or ruling, nor an official symbols (flags, coats of arms, etc.) (tJosve05a (c) 19:35, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete. OK, I agree, the images on the packages belong to the copyright owners. --Off-shell (talk) 20:48, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:43, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]