Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Rizal Park
Files in Category:Rizal Park
[edit]Redundant photos, some cannot be meaningfully used even outside Wikimedia scope. Per precedent with Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Judgefloro#Files uploaded by Judgefloro (talk · contribs) 3, to quote P199's verdict: "As per COM:PS: Examples of files that are not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Files that add nothing educationally distinct to the collection of images we already hold covering the same subject. = meaning we don't need a massive collection of nearly duplicate images. We have told Judgefloro/Ramon FVelasquez many times in the past to be more selective when uploading. And no need to give a long sermon on the notability, that is irrelevant to the number of needless images." However, unlike two "massive" deletion attempts to Judgefloro files, this DR is meticulous and carefully-made so that not less than 95% of the subject collection on Commons is still intact.
- File:09836jfSouth Road Rizal Park Ermita Manilafvf 03.jpg
- File:09836jfSouth Road Rizal Park Ermita Manilafvf 11.jpg
- File:09836jfSouth Road Rizal Park Ermita Manilafvf 13.jpg
- File:09915jfDancing Rings Rizal Park Manilafvf 08.jpg
- File:09930jfSouth Gate Rizal Park Manilafvf 02.jpg
- File:09930jfSouth Gate Rizal Park Manilafvf 07.jpg
- File:242Rizal Park landmarks attractions historical memorials 13.jpg
- File:809Rizal Park Landmarks Tourist Attractions 30.jpg
- File:Lapu-LapuRizalParkjf8063 09.JPG
- File:RizalParkjf8109 09.JPG
- File:RizalParkjf8110 13.JPG
- File:RizalParkjf8173 16.JPG
- File:RizalParkjf8173 36.JPG
- File:RizalParkjf8225 24.JPG
- File:RizalParkjf8225 27.JPG
- File:RizalParkjf8267 16.JPG
- File:RizalParkjf8388 34.JPG
- File:RizalParkjf8388 37.JPG
- File:RizalParkjf8422 12.JPG
- File:RizalParkjf8422 13.JPG
- File:RizalParkjf8422 15.JPG
- File:RizalParkjf8607 04.JPG
- File:RizaolParkjf7961 05.JPG
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:42, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks for your messages and good afternoon hereat Bulacan, Philippines; It is respectfully submitted that the purpose of taking 2019 version of Rizal Park is to update on the Tourist aspect of remarkably different spots for Rizal Park was renovated and well cleaned unlike before at any rate I respectfully submit to the sound discretion of Commons sincerely yours Judgefloro (talk) 06:48, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination. I was not in good mood at that time. These pictures are educational in scope, since they depict important scenes of the park. So I hereby withdraw. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 15:56, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
- Hi and the Bulacan lockdown pandemic prevents me from taking photos of La Union and Pangasinan and Benguet; but my depression is cured by daily waking up at 5:30 am racing to buy the fresh fish from Pamarawan Island of Malolos City, then a cup of choco or coffee and at Jollibee, then taking photos of the fish, fruits, vegies and Kakanin; I bought the Globe Home Wifi and this is my daily dose against unhappiness of being humbled by Pandemic; I wish you the best, for the Pandemic is a great blessing since I savour fresh fish, fresh home cooking and Food photography; for I discovered that I was able to take precious valued photos of Fishes never ever seen in the internet, yes very rare, and I have them due to good luck and early rising from bed, cheers sincerelyJudgefloro (talk) 13:42, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
Kept, the nomination is withdrawn, the photos are well in scope. Two files are deleted as derivative works of copyrighted objects (sculpture and information board). Taivo (talk) 11:01, 18 April 2021 (UTC)