Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Parviz Tanavoli

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Parviz Tanavoli

[edit]

Artwork by living artist, needs permission from artist via COM:VRT.

P 1 9 9  ✉ 23:35, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 KeepThe deletion reason is totally nonsense. If that's the case, all pictures of works of living artists should get deleted!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Also, it seems photos with "Nothing by parviz tanavoli photo by pouria afkhami" name are taken in a public place and they are public art and don't need a permission.
Specifically, Parviz Tanavoli.jpg has a confirmation email from the creator of the work. But P 1 9 9 has nominated it for deletion.
Do you think when an artist sits next to his work and takes a photo, he doesn't know and doesn't give a permission for his work to be published? Shkuru Afshar (talk) 10:30, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep all, though not for reasons given above (works of art by living artists are copyright and therefore not generally eligible for Commons, even if publicly accessible). However these are all 3D works in Canada and the UK, where FOP applies for 3D works (COM:FOP Canada and COM:FOP UK), and as far as I can see the photographer of these works has released the image as cc-by-sa. Voice of Clam 11:52, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Uploader has been WMF global banned. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 09:59, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Liuxinyu970226: There are multiple uploaders of images in this category. Which one are you referring to? Voice of Clam 22:45, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Voice of Clam The Mardetanha Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 23:15, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not aware of any Commons policy that states that images uploaded by users who are subsequently blocked/banned should be deleted, with the possible exception of block evasion (I can't immediately see why this user was globally banned). In any case that's not a reason for deleting all the other images in this category. Voice of Clam 06:53, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That is completely a false accusation and total hostility. That banning is for over 8 years ago and expired within 3 months. Shkuru Afshar (talk) 08:37, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Shkuru Afshar 8 years ago and expired within 3 months? Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 23:39, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry. I thought you mention me. Apologies. Shkuru Afshar (talk) 01:22, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete per nom.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 13:48, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Jeff G.: As I stated above, I believe the nom is incorrect. FOP applies in all these cases. Voice of Clam 14:44, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Works covered by FOP. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:42, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_in_Category:Parviz_Tanavoli&oldid=884725512"