Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Parish of the Holy Sacrifice

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Parish of the Holy Sacrifice

[edit]

1955 vldg, arch. leandro locsin (d. 1994). also note the sculptures and icons

no freedom of pano in the phils that allows all and free forms of reuse of photos of copyrighted bldgs and sculptures that doesnt compromise the rights of the architects, sculptors, designers, archi firms, or their heirs within the 50 yr copyright duration period. see https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Philippines#Freedom_of_panorama

a statement by one of the moderators or admins at Commons:Undeletion requests also says that bldgs from 1951 to 1972 can be NOT OK despite the guideline says "maybe ok" for 1951 to 1972 bldgs

Mrcl lxmna (talk) 15:51, 7 September 2020 (UTC) [reply]

Extended content 1

*  Keep all. As per my input at Commons:Undeletion requests/Current requests#Files in Category:Exterior of the Cathedral of the Holy Child (Aglipayan), Manila, although buildings from Aug. 1951 to Nov. 1972 are marked as "Maybe" at Commons:FOP Philippines, the "maybe" status is still listed as among the exceptions, which mean they should be OK. The lack of actual cases do not signify that people are faced with stringent restrictions in terms of photography and in manners of usage, at least to such buildings. AFAIK potential copyright issues may arise at contemporary-era buildings (most esp. buildings built after the post-EDSA People Power revolution of 1986) and also to sculptures that are truly considered special works of art, such as the recent deletions of photos of famous Lion's Head in Baguio and the photos of the noteworthy Sigaw sa Pugad Lawin in Quezon City that were removed in the early 2010s. But I always doubt that such copyright issues may arise even in the foreseeable future. IMO, the lack of actual case law only solidifies the de facto FOP situation in the Philippines. Any assumption of photos of such buildings as not OK are just guesses. And take note, FOP status in the Philippines is being dealt with at Commons talk:Copyright rules by territory/Philippines#New discussion on PHL FoP, so these DR's by a certain "mrcl lxmna" should be put on hold or better, snow close as keep all. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 15:43, 14 September 2020 (UTC) Withdrawing my vote keep. I concede that there is no Commons-acceptable FoP in the Philippines. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:20, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep all Our Catholic Parishes, Churches, Cathedrals and Basilicas buildings are built and solemnly consecrated from Donations of both the poorest and richest parishioners - physical or manual labor including the architect engineers designer's pen but all are part of the Bayanihan method; Canon and International Law vis-a-vis Copyright Law including Extinctive Prescription of 4 years from Common Uploading bars any deletion - architect engineers designer and all contributors transfer all their rights absolutely to the Titular Owner, the Bishop Archbishop of the Diocese or Archdiocese; No Parish or Basilica can be consecrated built or retrofitted renovated without the transfer of all accessory rights to the Titular Bishop; Ergo, No Copyright exists whatsoever
  • I sincerely hope that Editors will note my Underscoring of the 4 years Legal Bar on Deletion of FOP photos, I repeat from 2016, thus the tons of Mass Deletions tags by the Smart One on RamonFVelasquez should be stricken off the Talk Page as grave violations of Criminal Law ...
  •  Keep allKeep Because the Nominator has been blocked recently due to mass deletion nominations. It is fervently petitioned that - going to keep this for now until someone else can nominate if they see fit; Wherefore premises considered I humbly register my Strong Objection to this and the Mass Deletions Requests of this Single Editor, respectfully respectfully Judgefloro (talk) 08:30, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Additional input: donations do not transfer copyright (copyright ≠ physical ownership), unlike the claim of the uploader of some affected images. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 14:42, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: not free. Some of photos could be free as they don't have building on them, just some afishas, buildings and so on but they look to be out of scope anyway. --rubin16 (talk) 14:09, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Restored due to changes in Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Philippines#Public_domain_exceptions_for_artistic_works rubin16 (talk) 13:16, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
See [1]. Yann (talk) 13:32, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_in_Category:Parish_of_the_Holy_Sacrifice&oldid=588609643"