Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Interior of Bibliothek Witten
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Interior of Bibliothek Witten
[edit]copyright violation; book covers and mural are contemporary artworks; no freedom of panorama.
- File:Witten Zentralbibliothek Kinderbibliothek 1.jpg
- File:Witten Zentralbibliothek Kinderbibliothek 4.jpg
- File:Witten Zentralbibliothek Kinderbibliothek 5.jpg
- File:Witten Zentralbibliothek Kinderbibliothek 6.jpg
- File:Witten Zentralbibliothek Übersicht.jpg
Martin Sg. (talk) 13:11, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
- The photo quality is quite poor. So it shouldn’t be a copyright violation. Reclus (talk) 13:23, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
- First and last one might be borderline cases, but as for the rest, I'd say
Keep per de minimis. Nakonana (talk) 02:21, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- Keep de minimis cases. Herbert Ortner (talk) 19:12, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
- There's nothing copyrightable on the last one. Just a list without creativity. Herbert Ortner (talk) 18:38, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- The wall-painting! Martin Sg. (talk) 18:28, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
- File:Witten Zentralbibliothek Übersicht.jpg could be problematic because of the "Erased Wall Painting." File:Witten Zentralbibliothek Kinderbibliothek 5.jpg might contain violation of the copyrights of the stuffed animals. File:Witten Zentralbibliothek Kinderbibliothek 1.jpg might or might not be de minimis in regard to the book covers, though if so, that could be remedied by blurring them more. The other 2 are definitely de minimis views of rooms. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:57, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- I didn't recognise that there's an artsy wall painting (or what remains of it, whatever...). These stuffed animals should count as de minimis as per common sense – this photograph would "work" with any other stuffed animal there or even with no one. Herbert Ortner (talk) 17:50, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- You could be right. I am definitive only in regard to the 2 photos that are definitely de minimis. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:35, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- I didn't recognise that there's an artsy wall painting (or what remains of it, whatever...). These stuffed animals should count as de minimis as per common sense – this photograph would "work" with any other stuffed animal there or even with no one. Herbert Ortner (talk) 17:50, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted 2, kept 3, per discussion. --Krd 10:48, 22 November 2024 (UTC)