Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:France Prešeren statue, Ljubljana

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:France Prešeren statue, Ljubljana

The author of the sculpture of France Prešeren and the reliefs at it (sl:Ivan Zajec) died in 1952, which is less than 70 years ago. This makes these images non-free for commercial use (see COM:FOP#Slovenia), which means they're ineligible for Commons.

Eleassar ^(t/p) 09:17, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

As the pedestal was designed by Max Fabiani (died in 1962), the images should be undeleted in 2033. The two images depicting the reliefs by Ivan Zajec (died in 1952) should be undeleted in 2023. Perhaps also some with the pedestal visible (I'm leaving this to the administrator). --Eleassar ^(t/p) 11:03, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 02:16, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:France Prešeren statue, Ljubljana

Per COM:Anonymous works, "reliable sources must be found that prove it [the image] was originally published anonymously." They're missing.

File:1912 Ljubljana postcard - the Stritar Street.jpg
File:Gradnja Tromostovja 1931-32.jpg
File:Slavnost pred odkritjem Prešernovega spomenika na Marijinem trgu leta 1905.jpg - with this image, I doubt that the photographer was indeed Ivan Kotar, because per this article (pg. 78), he died in 1903, and the celebration took place in September 1905. It would not be the first time that I've spotted a mistake in dLib.

Eleassar ^(t/p) 15:31, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, same as here --Sporti (talk) 11:19, 9 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

What exactly from this text makes you think these three images are free? For the first one, Flickr is no source; for the second one, some images from this collection were published anonymously, others were not. One cannot be certain that this one was published anonymously; and for the last one, the author is evidently incorrect (or what?). --Eleassar ^(t/p) 11:39, 9 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I

I withdraw my nomination the deletion proposal for the second image. --Eleassar ^(t/p) 16:35, 9 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Regarding the first image (1910s postcard); no author credit on the cards was very common (though there were some exceptions). Probably correct to call it anon work, though what was on the back of the card would have to be seen to be certain. -- Infrogmation (talk) 15:11, 10 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]