Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Bosco Verticale
Files in Category:Bosco Verticale
[edit]These images depict a building in Milan (it:Bosco verticale) by architect it:Stefano Boeri who is still alive. In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in this case.
Stefan4 (talk) 15:43, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
- Delete--Dega180 (talk) 18:55, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Raoli ✉ (talk) 19:05, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:05, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
Files in Category:Bosco Verticale
[edit]There is no freedom of panorama in Italy. At least one architect of the Bosco Verticale, en:Stefano Boeri, is still living. Won't be PD in Italy for at least 70 years.
- File:Alloggiamento Piante Bosco Verticale II.jpg
- File:Balconi Bosco Verticale.jpg
- File:Bosco Verticale (17830612035).jpg
- File:Bosco verticale 2, milan, italy.jpg
- File:Bosco Verticale 2014 1.JPG
- File:Bosco Verticale Rendering.jpg
- File:Bosco verticale, Milan, Italy (9471373927).jpg
- File:Bosco verticale, milan, italy.jpg
- File:Bosco Verticale, Milano.jpg
- File:Bosco verticale.jpg
- File:Boscoverticale.JPG
- File:Boscoverticalemilan.JPG
- File:Boscoverticalemilano.JPG
- File:ProgettoPortaNuova-Milano-27giu2012-2.jpg
- File:ProgettoPortaNuova-Milano-27giu2012-20.jpg
- File:Vertical garden Milano1.jpg
- File:Vertical garden Milano2.jpg
- File:Vertical garden Milano3.jpg
- File:Vertical garden Milano4.jpg
- File:Vertical garden Milano5.jpg
- File:Vertical garden Milano6.jpg
- File:Vertical garden Milano7.jpg
- File:Verticalforest.JPG
- File:Verticalforestmilan.JPG
~ Rob13Talk 16:00, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:55, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
Files in Category:Bosco Verticale
[edit]The building was completed in 2014, by architect Stefano Boeri (1956–). Sadly, there is no freedom of panorama in Italy, therefore permission from him is required.
- File:Italy - Milan (17163817478).jpg
- File:Bosco Verticale (159667427).jpeg
- File:Bosco Verticale (2018) 01.jpg
- File:Bosco Verticale (2018) 02.jpg
- File:Bosco Verticale (2018) 03.jpg
- File:Bosco Verticale (2018) 04.jpg
- File:Bosco Verticale (2018) 05.jpg
- File:Bosco Verticale (2018) 06.jpg
- File:Bosco verticale 2.jpg
- File:Bosco Verticale Milano.jpg
- File:Bosco Verticale 米蘭樹塔 - panoramio.jpg
- File:Bosco Verticale.jpg
- File:Bosco verticale.jpg
- File:New building in Milan.jpg
- File:Vertical forest .jpg
A1Cafel (talk) 06:31, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 11:30, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Bosco Verticale
[edit]There is no complete freedom of panorama for free uses of architecture or public art in Italy. IMO the building is creative enough to be eligible for copyright. The author, w:en:Stefano Boeri, is still alive unfortunately.
- File:Bosco Verticale (205282347).jpeg
- File:Milan Duomo (Ank Kumar, Infosys) 03.jpg
- File:VERTICAL FOREST.jpg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:30, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 16:33, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Bosco Verticale
[edit]Unfortunately there's no FOP in Italy and the architect of this building, Stefano Boeri, seems to still be alive. So these images are copyrighted until an undernimmed date.
- File:Milano 11-2011 - panoramio.jpg
- File:9019 ITA Milan Bosco Verticale Torre unicredit seen from Via Gaetano de Castillo small planet.jpg
- File:Bosco verticale a distanza.jpg
- File:Bosco Verticale.jpg
- File:Garibaldi repubblica 01 (7211871980).jpg
- File:Irrigazione Bosco Verticale.jpg
- File:Milano 600 03.jpg
- File:Porta Nuova WIP.jpg
- File:Stefano Boeri Architetti - Bosco Verticale - Drawings 05.jpg
Adamant1 (talk) 16:45, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
- Keep File:Garibaldi repubblica 01 (7211871980).jpg per de minimis.--Friniate (talk) 13:55, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
- You think that's just an image of the trees and the buildings have nothing to do with it? Lol. --Adamant1 (talk) 14:29, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
- It's an image of the landscape, besides the trees there are other 2 skyscrapers clearly more visible than the copyrighted building. Friniate (talk) 18:05, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
- The building on the other side of the image is also copyrighted. If not also the building in the middle. So it's not like it matters since the image is a copyright violation either way. Or are you going to argue the only thing that matters are the dark, blurry trees in the foreground? Or maybe the photographer was just taking a photograph of the street lamp that's barely even part of it to begin with? --Adamant1 (talk) 18:34, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
- It's an image of the landscape, besides the trees there are other 2 skyscrapers clearly more visible than the copyrighted building. Friniate (talk) 18:05, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
- Delete All, including File:Garibaldi repubblica 01 (7211871980).jpg,which is not a trivial size, therefore not de minimis COM:DM. In addition, the other two buildings may also be copyrighted and should be deleted per COM:PCP Thanks, -- Ooligan (talk) 20:28, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
- Ok to delete others, but File:Milano 11-2011 - panoramio.jpg, File:Garibaldi repubblica 01 (7211871980).jpg, File:Porta Nuova WIP.jpg it's a panoramic photo who don't have the boeri's building or other building to exclusive and central subject. The precautionary principle is fine but it's a bit exaggerated; which it is a freedom paranorma of a street and a night-evening a public park, which are in the background in the background and also partially covered by plants and in a corner: it may be a "sly artifice" of the photographer, but according to Italian jurisprudence they are potentially acceptable. Therefore these could be there, or in any case they should be explored in depth with another discussion-procedure, because if for some they are not consistent with the guidelines it is a "photofinish" issue. 5.90.136.54 12:57, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:42, 25 January 2024 (UTC)